REDUCING THE RISKS OF A VACUUM DELIVERY

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALDO VACCA
Keyword(s):  
Genital Tract ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Teaching Resources ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Vacuum Extractor ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Assisted Delivery ◽  
Vacuum Delivery

Evidence-based reviews and practice guidelines have identified a number of risk factors associated with vacuum assisted delivery (VAD) that may result in adverse effects on the newborn infant, injuries to the mother's genital tract, and difficulty or failure of the procedure. In addition, clinical circumstances that predispose to increased risk, such as the use of the vacuum extractor for rotational and mid-cavity procedures, have been highlighted as possible avoidable factors. Although there is general agreement that success of vacuum delivery depends on the knowledge, experience and skill of the operator, system analyses of adverse outcomes often reveal inadequate training as a major contributing factor. It is beyond the scope of this review to present the detailed knowledge and technical skills required for correct use of the vacuum extractor. A variety of teaching resources is available for this purpose and practitioners who wish to obtain more information are referred to them.

scholarly journals Evidence-based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed-methods study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chisato Masuda ◽  
Shirley Kristine Ferolin ◽  
Ken Masuda ◽  
Chris Smith ◽  
Mitsuaki Matsui
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Assisted Delivery ◽  
Fundal Pressure

Abstract Background Evidenced-based practice is a key component of quality care. However, studies in the Philippines have identified gaps between evidence and actual maternity practices. This study aims to describe the practice of evidence-based intrapartum care and its associated factors, as well as exploring the perceptions of healthcare providers in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted, which consisted of direct observation of intrapartum practices during the second and third stages, as well as semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with care providers to determine their perceptions and reasoning behind decisions to perform episiotomy or fundal pressure. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyse the relationship between observed practices and maternal, neonatal, and environmental factors. Qualitative data were parsed and categorised to identify themes related to the decision-making process. Results A total of 170 deliveries were included. Recommended care, such as prophylactic use of oxytocin and controlled cord traction in the third stage, were applied in almost all the cases. However, harmful practices were also observed, such as intramuscular or intravenous oxytocin use in the second stage (14%) and lack of foetal heart rate monitoring (57%). Of primiparae, 92% received episiotomy and 31% of all deliveries received fundal pressure. Factors associated with the implementation of episiotomy included primipara (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 62.3), duration of the second stage of more than 30 minutes (aOR 4.6), and assisted vaginal delivery (aOR 15.0). Factors associated with fundal pressure were primipara (aOR 3.0), augmentation with oxytocin (aOR 3.3), and assisted delivery (aOR 4.8). Healthcare providers believe that these practices can prevent laceration. The rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) was 17%. Associated with OASIS were assisted delivery (aOR 6.0), baby weights of more than 3.5 kg (aOR 7.8), episiotomy (aOR 26.4), and fundal pressure (aOR 6.2). Conclusions Our study found that potentially harmful practices are still conducted that contribute to the occurrence of OASIS. The perception of these practices is divergent with current evidence, and empirical knowledge has more influence. To improve practices the scientific evidence and its underlying basis should be understood among providers.

scholarly journals Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibition

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001931
Author(s):  
Aljosja Rogiers ◽  
Ines Pires da Silva ◽  
Chiara Tentori ◽  
Carlo Alberto Tondini ◽  
Joseph M Grimes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundPatients with cancer who are infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are more likely to develop severe illness and die compared with those without cancer. The impact of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) on the severity of COVID-19 illness is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ICI confers an additional risk for severe COVID-19 in patients with cancer.MethodsWe analyzed data from 110 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 while on treatment with ICI without chemotherapy in 19 hospitals in North America, Europe and Australia. The primary objective was to describe the clinical course and to identify factors associated with hospital and intensive care (ICU) admission and mortality.FindingsThirty-five (32%) patients were admitted to hospital and 18 (16%) died. All patients who died had advanced cancer, and only four were admitted to ICU. COVID-19 was the primary cause of death in 8 (7%) patients. Factors independently associated with an increased risk for hospital admission were ECOG ≥2 (OR 39.25, 95% CI 4.17 to 369.2, p=0.0013), treatment with combination ICI (OR 5.68, 95% CI 1.58 to 20.36, p=0.0273) and presence of COVID-19 symptoms (OR 5.30, 95% CI 1.57 to 17.89, p=0.0073). Seventy-six (73%) patients interrupted ICI due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, 43 (57%) of whom had resumed at data cut-off.InterpretationCOVID-19–related mortality in the ICI-treated population does not appear to be higher than previously published mortality rates for patients with cancer. Inpatient mortality of patients with cancer treated with ICI was high in comparison with previously reported rates for hospitalized patients with cancer and was due to COVID-19 in almost half of the cases. We identified factors associated with adverse outcomes in ICI-treated patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Evidence-based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed-methods study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chisato Masuda ◽  
Shirley Kristine Ferolin ◽  
Ken Masuda ◽  
Chris Smith ◽  
Mitsuaki Matsui
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Assisted Delivery ◽  
Fundal Pressure

Abstract Background Evidenced-based practice is a key component of quality care. However, studies in the Philippines have identified gaps between evidence and actual maternity practices. This study aims to describe the practice of evidence-based intrapartum care and its associated factors, as well as exploring the perceptions of healthcare providers in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted, which consisted of direct observation of intrapartum practices during the second and third stages, as well as semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with care providers to determine their perceptions and reasoning behind decisions to perform episiotomy or fundal pressure. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyse the relationship between observed practices and maternal, neonatal, and environmental factors. Qualitative data were parsed and categorised to identify themes related to the decision-making process. Results A total of 170 deliveries were included. Recommended care, such as prophylactic use of oxytocin and controlled cord traction in the third stage, were applied in almost all the cases. However, harmful practices were also observed, such as intramuscular or intravenous oxytocin use in the second stage (14%) and lack of foetal heart rate monitoring (57%). Of primiparae, 92% received episiotomy and 31% of all deliveries received fundal pressure. Factors associated with the implementation of episiotomy included primipara (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 62.3), duration of the second stage of more than 30 minutes (aOR 4.6), and assisted vaginal delivery (aOR 15.0). Factors associated with fundal pressure were primipara (aOR 3.0), augmentation with oxytocin (aOR 3.3), and assisted delivery (aOR 4.8). Healthcare providers believe that these practices can prevent laceration. The rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) was 17%. Associated with OASIS were assisted delivery (aOR 6.0), baby weights of more than 3.5 kg (aOR 7.8), episiotomy (aOR 26.4), and fundal pressure (aOR 6.2). Conclusions Our study found that potentially harmful practices are still conducted that contribute to the occurrence of OASIS. The perception of these practices is divergent with current evidence, and empirical knowledge has more influence. To improve practices the scientific evidence and its underlying basis should be understood among providers.

Geriatric depression and cognitive impairment

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Steffens ◽  
G. G. Potter
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cognitive Outcomes ◽  
Geriatric Depression ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Psychotherapeutic Interventions ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prevalence Of Depression ◽  
Assessment And Treatment

Cognitive impairment is common in geriatric depression, and depressed individuals with co-morbid cognitive impairment are at increased risk for a number of adverse medical, psychiatric and cognitive outcomes. This review focuses on clinical issues surrounding the co-occurrence of these two conditions within the context of current research. We (1) review the clinical criteria and prevalence of depression, as well as co-morbid cognitive impairment, (2) discuss factors associated with persistent cognitive impairment in depression, including dementia, and (3) review research relevant to the assessment and treatment of cognitive impairment and dementia in the context of depression. We conclude that current research on depression and cognition can inform clinical decisions that reduce the occurrence of adverse outcomes. Clinicians are encouraged to develop proactive approaches for treatment, which may include combinations of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions.

scholarly journals Novel evidence depicting adverse long-term outcomes linked to tonsillectomy: a spotlight on overtreatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
Nikhil Nair Hariharan ◽  
Kashyap Patel
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Prophylactic Measure ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Increased Risk

Tonsillectomies (TEs) are the first line of treatment when patients present with recurrent tonsillitis, peritonsillar abscesses or obstructive sleep apnea. Though TEs have modest efficacy, they remain a common pediatric surgery in Canada. TEs are now viewed as a prophylactic measure used to prevent tonsil-related diseases. Simultaneously, there is a lack of evidence-based decision-making when recommending TEs, leading to overtreatment. Novel findings indicate that pediatric TE patients have an increased risk of complications and poor long-term outcomes including respiratory, infectious, and allergic disorders. A need for alternatives to TEs is evident; less invasive interventions with fewer perioperative complications and lifelong morbidities warrant further research. To prevent unnecessary adverse outcomes, healthcare providers should opt for more selective and evidence-based TE recommendations. Meanwhile, it is also imperative that physicians clearly communicate the potential quality of life implications associated with TEs. Healthcare and social mores surrounding TEs need to change towards a more evidence-based practice that focuses on improving patients’ quality of life. This commentary examines the current role of TEs, their long-term outcomes, and the implications of overtreatment.

Research Consumerism 101: Evaluating External Evidence of Treatment Effectiveness

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
James L. Coyle
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Professional Services ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Professional Judgment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Intervention Selection ◽  
Published Research

Abstract The modern clinician is a research consumer. Rehabilitation of oropharyngeal impairments, and prevention of the adverse outcomes of dysphagia, requires the clinician to select interventions for which evidence of a reasonable likelihood of a successful, important outcome exists. The purpose of this paper is to provide strategies for evaluation of published research regarding treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. This article utilizes tutorial and examples to inform and educate practitioners in methods of appraising published research. It provides and encourages the use of methods of efficiently evaluating the validity and clinical importance of published research. Additionally, it discusses the importance of the ethical obligation we, as practitioners, have to use evidence-based treatment selection methods and measurement of patient performance during therapy. The reader is provided with tactics for evaluating treatment studies to establish a study's validity and, thereby, objectively select interventions. The importance of avoiding subjective or unsubstantiated claims and using objective methods of generating empirical clinical evidence is emphasized. The ability to evaluate the quality of research provides clinicians with objective intervention selection as an important, essential component of evidence-based clinical practice. ASHA Code of Ethics (2003): Principle I, Rule F: “Individuals shall fully inform the persons they serve of the nature and possible effects of services rendered and products dispensed…” (p. 2) Principle I, Rule G: “Individuals shall evaluate the effectiveness of services rendered and of products dispensed and shall provide services or dispense products only when benefit can reasonably be expected.” (p. 2) Principle IV, Rule G: “Individuals shall not provide professional services without exercising independent professional judgment, regardless of referral source or prescription.” (p. 4)

Factors Associated With Evidence-Based Care in Community-Based Child Psychotherapy

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Brookman-Frazee ◽  
Rachel A. Haine ◽  
Mary J. Baker-Ericzen ◽  
Ann F. Garland
Keyword(s):  
Child Psychotherapy ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Evidence Based Care

Living with HIV in the Time of COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Muhammad Naveed Noor
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Developing Country ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Comorbid Conditions ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Associated Conditions ◽  
Living With Hiv

This commentary foregrounds the need to examine how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and associated conditions may be affecting the lives of people living with HIV (PLWH) in a developing country context like Pakistan. It raises some important questions on medical care and updated information regarding PLWH in the time of COVID-19. Since PLWH are at an increased risk of developing comorbid conditions – something that makes them more vulnerable to COVID-19 – it is critical that timely research and evidence-based actions are undertaken to protect their health.

Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Evident Cardiovascular Disease: An Investigation Using the SPRINT Study Data

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charalambos Vlachopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios ◽  
Konstantinos Aznaouridis ◽  
Nikolaos Ioakeimidis ◽  
Panagiotis Xaplanteris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Beneficial Effect ◽  
Harmful Effect ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Intensive Treatment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Stroke Incidence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background: Recent data advocate adoption of a more intensive treatment strategy for management of blood pressure (BP). </P><P> Objective: We investigated whether the overall effects of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) are applicable to cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients. </P><P> Methods: In a post hoc analysis we analyzed data from SPRINT that randomly assigned 9361 individuals to a systolic BP (SBP) target of <120 mmHg (intensive treatment) or <140 mmHg (standard treatment). 1562 patients had clinically evident CVD (age=70.3±9.3 years, 24% females) at study entry and were followed for 3.1 years. Further, we assessed the effect of low (<150 mmHg) baseline SBP on outcome. </P><P> Results: In CVD patients, there was no benefit from the intensive treatment regarding all endpoints, except for a marginally significant benefit on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 1.00; p=0.0509). Further, while there was no increase in serious adverse events (SAE) in the intensive group, there was increased risk for study-related SAE, acute renal failure and electrolyte abnormalities. In patients with low baseline SBP there was a beneficial effect on allcause mortality (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.96; p=0.033), but with greater stroke incidence (HR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.04 to 8.29; p=0.042). </P><P> Conclusion: We confirm the beneficial effect of the intensive strategy in SPRINT study on all-cause mortality and the harmful effect on specific adverse outcomes in patients with CVD. However, in patients with low baseline SBP stroke may increase.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document