Adaptation, Validation and Preliminary Standardisation of the Frontal Systems Behaviour Scale – Apathy Subscale and the Dimensional Apathy Scale in Vietnamese Healthy Samples

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Halle Quang ◽  
Khanh Sin ◽  
Fiona Kumfor ◽  
Skye McDonald
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Disorders ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Behavioural Syndrome ◽  
Divergent Validity ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Frontal Systems

Abstract Objective: Apathy, the reduction of motivation and goal-directed behaviour, is a ubiquitous behavioural syndrome in many neurological disorders. However, apathy measures are limited in non-English speaking countries. The present study aimed to develop a culturally appropriate version of the Vietnamese Frontal Systems Behavioural Scale-Apathy subscale (V-FrSBe-A) and Dimensional Apathy Scale (V-DAS), examine their internal reliability and construct validity (i.e., factor structure, convergent and divergent validity) in a Vietnamese healthy sample and establish preliminary normative cut-offs for clinical and research applications. Method: In total, 112 healthy subjects and 64 informants completed the self-report and informant report V-FrSBe-A and V-DAS, developed using a translation, back-translation and cultural adaptation procedure. McDonald’s omega was applied to examine internal reliability. The internal structure of the V-DAS was evaluated using exploratory structural equation model. For both apathy scales, convergent validity was determined by correlations between scales and between informant and self-report versions. Regarding divergent validity, participants completed the Vietnamese Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 and V-FrSBe-Disinhibition for depression and disinhibition assessment. Results: Both the V-FrSBe-A and V-DAS were reliable (ω t ≥ .74). Dimensional manifestations of apathy in executive, emotional and initiation domains were confirmed on the V-DAS. Both scales were also valid, convergent with each other and divergent from depression and disinhibition symptoms. Cut-off scores for both scales were higher than their English versions. Conclusion: The adapted V-FrSBe-A and V-DAS have good reliability and validity for the potential application in clinical groups to advance current knowledge about apathy transculturally and direct more effective clinical care for Vietnamese individuals with neurological disorders.

Development and initial validation of the Subjective Academic Wellbeing Measure: A new tool of youth wellbeing in school

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Gökmen Arslan ◽  
Murat Yıldırım ◽  
Silvia Majercakova Albertova
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
School Context ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Academic Functioning ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Gender Groups

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the preliminary development and validation of the Subjective Academic Wellbeing Measure (SAWM), which is a six-item self-report rating measure intended for use as a screening tool to assess the positive academic functioning of young people within the elementary and high school context. Exploratory factor analysis was performed with Sample 1 (N= 161), indicating that the SAWM was characterized by a unidimensional measurement model and had strong factor loadings. Results from confirmatory factor analysis, which was carried out with Sample 2 (N= 199), confirmed the measurement model by yielding good data-model fit statistics that were characterized by strong latent construct and internal reliability estimates. Further analyses showed that the scale had good convergent validity considering scores from several self-reported scales of student mental health problems and positive school functioning. Further analyses also showed that configural, metric, and scalar measurement invariance were observed across gender groups. These results provide initial evidence suggesting that the SAWM is a reliable and valid measure that can be used to assess the positive academic functioning of students within the school context. Implications are discussed, and some suggestions are provided for future research and practice

Validity of the Perceived Criticism Measure in an Undergraduate Sample

1998 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. White ◽  
Joanna E. Strong ◽  
Dianne L. Chambless
Keyword(s):  
Negative Affect ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Divergent Validity ◽  
Perceived Criticism ◽  
Report Measure

The concurrent and predictive validity of the Perceived Criticism Measure's Criticism and Upset subscales was assessed for undergraduates, 21 men and 98 women. Participants were asked to identify five people important to them at present (typically these were parents as well as peers) and, for each, to rate how critical that person was as well as how upsetting they found that criticism to be. Scores on Upset exhibited convergent validity with another self-report measure of general sensitivity to criticism, whereas those on Criticism did not. Neither measure predicted higher ratings of criticism in a specific interaction with a mildly critical peer. Divergent validity with scores on a measure of depression was supported for Upset but was less clear for Criticism. Strong evidence of predictive validity for Criticism and Upset was obtained. Ratings for both Peer scales predicted increased negative affect after mild criticism from a peer, although this interaction took place 4 to 10 weeks after administration of the Perceived Criticism Measure.

scholarly journals Individual differences in avoiding feelings of disgust: Development and construct validity of the disgust avoidance questionnaire

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248219
Author(s):  
Paula von Spreckelsen ◽  
Nienke C. Jonker ◽  
Jorien Vugteveen ◽  
Ineke Wessel ◽  
Klaske A. Glashouwer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Cognitive Avoidance ◽  
Behavioral Avoidance

We developed and examined the construct validity of the Disgust Avoidance Questionnaire (DAQ) as a measure of people’s inclination to prevent experiencing disgust (disgust prevention) and to escape from the experience of disgust (disgust escape). In a stepwise item-reduction (Study 1; N = 417) using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) based on a 4-subscale distinction (behavioral prevention, cognitive prevention, behavioral escape, cognitive escape), we selected 17 items from a pool of potential items. In order to incorporate the conceptual overlap between dimensions of disgust avoidance, focus (prevention vs. escape), and strategy (behavioral avoidance vs. cognitive avoidance), we specified an adapted model. In this model, we allowed each item to load on one type of dimension and one type of strategy, resulting in four overlapping factors (prevention, escape, behavioral avoidance, cognitive avoidance). Evaluation of this overlapping 4-factor model (Study 2; N = 513) using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed promising model fit indices, factor loadings, factor correlations, and reliability estimates for three of the four factors (prevention, behavioral avoidance, cognitive avoidance). Those three subscales also showed good convergent validity. In contrast, the results related to the escape factor may call the suitability of self-report to assess disgust escape into question. In light of the exploratory nature of the project, future examinations of the DAQ’s validity and applicability to more diverse samples are essential. A critical next step for future research would be to examine the DAQ’s criterion validity and the distinctive roles of the DAQ subscales in (clinical) psychological constructs and processes.

scholarly journals The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faika Sanal Karahan ◽  
Erdal Hamarta ◽  
Ali Yavuz Karahan
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Anxiety Scale ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Internal Reliability

The purpose of the present study is to translate and adapt the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS), a 30-item self-report measure of anxiety among older adults, into Turkish and examine its basic psychometric properties. We tested the translated GAS in a sample of community-dwelling older adults in Konya, Turkey (N=100; Mage=71.4 years, SD=6.5; range=65-88) without a history of mental disorder and sufficient cognitive abilities. To assess the convergent validity, Turkish versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were administered. The mean GAS total score was 13.33 (SD=11.86). Due to low item-total correlations (<0.30), two items (items 2 and 3) were removed from the Turkish version of the GAS. The internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) was excellent for the total score (0.91) and acceptable for the subscales (somatic = 0.71; cognitive = 0.85; affective = 0.84). Regarding the convergent validity, the GAS total score was significantly and positively correlated with the total scores of the BAI (r=0.87, P<0.05) and GDS (r=0.57, P<0.05), with large effect sizes. Implications: The newly translated Turkish version of the GAS has promising utility in an older adult Turkish sample. Future studies of this measure are warranted.

Evaluation of an In Vivo Measure of Thought–Action Fusion

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah C. Berman ◽  
Jonathan S. Abramowitz ◽  
Michael G. Wheaton ◽  
Caleb Pardue ◽  
Laura Fabricant
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Negative Events ◽  
Maladaptive Beliefs ◽  
Mental Events ◽  
Car Accident ◽  
Thought Action Fusion

Thought–action fusion (TAF) refers to maladaptive beliefs about the relationship between mental events and behaviors, and is associated with obsessional problems. Currently, the self-report Thought–Action Fusion Scale (TAFS) is the most widely used measure of TAF, but a single assessment modality limits research that can be conducted on this phenomenon. This study evaluated the validity of an in vivo paradigm that assesses both Moral TAF (the belief that thoughts are the moral equivalent of actions) and Likelihood TAF (the belief that thinking about a negative event increases the probability of the event itself). In this paradigm, participants were asked to contemplate two negative events involving a beloved relative: (a) I hope (relative) is in a car accident today and (b) I hope I have sex with (relative). Participants then provided in vivo ratings of anxiety, estimates of likelihood, and moral wrongness related to the negative thoughts. Results provided evidence for the convergent validity of the in vivo ratings for both sentences. These findings are discussed in terms of clinical care, the assessment of TAF, and the implications for future research on this theoretically important construct.

scholarly journals Standardization of the Persian Version of the Self-Report Personality Questionnaire (SCID-5-SPQ) in a Clinical Sample of Iranian Population

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banafsheh Gharraee ◽  
◽  
Samira Masoumian ◽  
Somayeh Zamirinejad ◽  
Hooman Yaghmaeezadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Psychiatric Institute ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Persian Version ◽  
Section Type

Background and Aim: This study was conducted to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the Persian version of the self-report personality questionnaire (SCID-5-SPQ) in the clinical sample in Tehran. Method: The present study is descriptive cross section type. The present study population includes outpatients and inpatients referred to three centers in Tehran, including Iran Psychiatric Medical Center, Hazrat Rasool Akram Educational and Medical Complex and the Clinic of the Faculty of Behavioral Sciences andMental Health (Tehran Psychiatric Institute). .The criteria for entering the study were the ages between of 18 and 65, conscious consent to enter the study and the ability to understand and speak Persian and no specific physical problems. Sampling in this study was performed in Convenience Sampling manner. In this study, in addition to the demographic questionnaire, the Persian version of the Structured clinical interview for the DSM-5 (SCID-5) and the self-report personality questionnaire (SCID-5-SPQ) were used. Finally, in order to evaluate the information, formal and convergent validity methods, internal reliability and comparative tests were used. Results: Based on the results, the SCID-5-SPQ has a good formal narrative. A study of the convergent validity of this questionnaire with SCID interview showed that all subscales had a significant positive correlation (P≥0.001). Also, the reliability of the questionnaire was 0.93, and therefore the Persian version of this questionnaire is considered a stable tool. Conclusion: According to the findings of the present study, SCID-5-SPQ is a more stable tool and can be used in psychiatric clinics and hospitals as a screening tool for personality disorders alone or in addition to interviews.

scholarly journals Associations Between Psychopathy and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale in Incarcerated Males: A Combined Latent Variable- and Person-Centered Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Garofalo ◽  
Craig S. Neumann ◽  
Daniel Mark
Keyword(s):  
Latent Variable ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Interpersonal Traits ◽  
Mood Scale

The present study sought to replicate and extend current knowledge on the relevance of emotion regulation (ER) for psychopathy. In a large sample of incarcerated adult males ( N = 578), latent profile analysis (LPA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed to examine person- and variable-centered associations between self-reported ER and both self-report and clinical ratings of psychopathy. With LPA, participants were classified into three profiles corresponding to low, medium, and high ER. The low-ER profile displayed higher affective traits across psychopathy assessments compared with the other profiles. The same pattern of findings was evident for overt behavioral features of psychopathy, but not for interpersonal traits. SEM results were consistent with LPA findings: interpersonal (positively), affective, and lifestyle (negatively) facets had unique associations with a superordinate ER latent variable. Findings replicate and extend prior associations between psychopathy and ER and suggest differential links between ER and affective and interpersonal traits of psychopathy.

scholarly journals Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) for Dutch Adolescents

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3276-3286
Author(s):  
Anne Kennes ◽  
Sanne Peeters ◽  
Mayke Janssens ◽  
Jennifer Reijnders ◽  
Johan Lataster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
School Environment ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Positive Emotions ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Internal Reliability

Abstract This study examined the structure, reliability, and convergent validity of the adolescent version of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (Dutch MHC-SF-A), a self-report questionnaire for positive mental health assessment. This questionnaire was completed by 459 Dutch adolescents (178 boys and 281 girls) between the ages of 11 and 18 years at baseline and at a 4-week follow-up. Results revealed the 3-factor structure in emotional, psychological, and social well-being, a high internal reliability and a moderate test–retest reliability. Findings suggest that mental illness and well-being represent two related but distinct continua of mental health. Fostering adolescents’ well-being is important. Promoting positive emotions, creating a supportive and loving parent–adolescent relationship, and a supportive school environment will contribute to this.

scholarly journals Testing the Validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale Using an Australian Sample

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy McNaught ◽  
Peter Caputi ◽  
Lindsay G. Oades ◽  
Frank P. Deane
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Health Measures ◽  
Recovery Assessment ◽  
Recovery Assessment Scale

Objective: Mental health services in Australia are increasingly becoming recovery orientated. However, there are varying meanings for recovery and few measures that specifically target recovery outcomes. The current study aimed to assess the construct and concurrent validity of a patient self-report measure, the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). Method: Participants were 168 individuals with severe and persistent psychiatric disability who were participants in the Australian Integrated Mental Health Initiative (AIMhi) project. They completed self-report recovery and other mental health measures and their case workers completed the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine the factor structure of the RAS. Results: Exploratory factor analysis of the RAS produced five factors that were replicated using confirmatory techniques. Each factor has satisfactory internal reliability (Cronbach α range = 0.73–0.91). The factors displayed convergent validity with positive and significant correlations with other recovery measures. Concurrent validity was demonstrated with significant but lower correlations with symptoms and clinician-rated measures of psychiatric functioning. Conclusion: The factors of the RAS are consistent with the consumer literature on recovery. Correlations with other variable suggest that the RAS is measuring something different from traditional symptom or functional mental health measures. Further research is needed to clarify the extent to which the RAS is able to capture the range of recovery experiences that have been described by patients.

scholarly journals Sexual Orientation Self-Concept Ambiguity: Scale Adaptation and Validation

Assessment ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 632-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia E. Talley ◽  
Jordan E. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Orientation ◽  
Sexual Identity ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Identity Status ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional

The current article describes the adaptation of a measure of sexual orientation self-concept ambiguity (SSA) from an existing measure of general self-concept clarity. Latent “trait” scores of SSA reflect the extent to which a person’s beliefs about their own sexual orientation are perceived as inconsistent, unreliable, or incongruent. Sexual minority and heterosexual women ( n = 348), ages 18 to 30, completed a cross-sectional survey. Categorical confirmatory factor analysis guided the selection of items to form a 10-item, self-report measure of SSA. In the current report, we also examine (a) reliability of the 10-item scale score, (b) measurement invariance based on respondents’ sexual identity status and age group, and (c) correlations with preexisting surveys that purport to measure similar constructs and theoretical correlates. Evidence for internal reliability, measurement invariance (based on respondent sex), and convergent validity was also investigated in an independent, validation sample. The lowest SSA scores were reported by women who self-ascribed an exclusively heterosexual or exclusively lesbian/gay sexual identity, whereas those who reported a bisexual, mostly lesbian/gay, or mostly heterosexual identity, reported relatively higher SSA scores.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document