A communication training perspective on AND versus DNR directives

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomer T. Levin ◽  
Nessa Coyle
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Communication Training ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Natural Death ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Unnatural Death ◽  
End Of Life Communication

AbstractBackground:From a communication perspective, the term “do not resuscitate” (DNR) is challenging to use in end-of-life discussions because it omits the goals of care. An alternative, “Allow Natural Death” (AND), has been proposed as a better way of framing this palliative care discussion.Case:We present a case where a nurse unsuccessfully discusses end-of-life goals of care using the term DNR. Subsequently, with the aid of a communication trainer, he is coached to successfully use the term “AND” to facilitate this discussion and advance his goal of palliative care communication and planning.Discussion:We contrast the advantages and disadvantages of the term AND from the communication training perspective and suggest that AND-framing language replace DNR as a better way to facilitate meaningful end-of-life communication. One well-designed, randomized, controlled simulation study supports this practice. We also consider the communication implications of “natural” versus “unnatural” death.

Much Ado About Fried Chicken: Abetting Aspiration or Respecting Autonomy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1356-1362
Author(s):  
Laurence Tan Lean Chin ◽  
Yu Jun Lim ◽  
Wan Ling Choo
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Biopsychosocial Model ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Clinical Decisions ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Complex Needs ◽  
Aspiration Risk ◽  
Patient Centric

Purpose Palliative care is a philosophy of care that encompasses holistic, patient-centric care involving patients and their family members and loved ones. Palliative care patients often have complex needs. A common challenge in managing patients near their end of life is the complexity of navigating clinical decisions and finding achievable and realistic goals of care that are in line with the values and wishes of patients. This often results in differing opinions and conflicts within the multidisciplinary team. Conclusion This article describes a tool derived from the biopsychosocial model and the 4-quadrant ethical model. The authors describe the use of this tool in managing a patient who wishes to have fried chicken despite aspiration risk and how this tool was used to encourage discussions and reduce conflict and distress within the multidisciplinary team.

Quality Improvement Initiatives to Reduce Mortality: An Opportunity to Engage Palliative Care and Improve Advance Care Planning

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Signe Peterson Flieger ◽  
Erica Spatz ◽  
Emily J. Cherlin ◽  
Leslie A. Curry
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Despite substantial efforts to integrate palliative care and improve advance care planning, both are underutilized. Quality improvement initiatives focused on reducing mortality may offer an opportunity for facilitating engagement with palliative care and advance care planning. Objective: In the context of an initiative to reduce acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality, we examined challenges and opportunities for engaging palliative care and improving advance care planning. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected through the Leadership Saves Lives initiative between 2014 and 2016. Data included in-depth interviews with hospital executives, clinicians, administrators, and quality improvement staff (n = 28) from 5 hospitals participating in the Mayo Clinic Care Network. Focused analysis examined emergent themes related to end-of-life experiences, including palliative care and advance care planning. Results: Participants described challenges related to palliative care and advance care planning in the AMI context, including intervention decisions during an acute event, delivering care aligned with patient and family preferences, and the culture around palliative care and hospice. Participants proposed strategies for addressing such challenges in the context of improving AMI quality outcomes. Conclusions: Clinicians who participated in an initiative to reduce AMI mortality highlighted the challenges associated with decision-making regarding interventions, systems for documenting patient goals of care, and broader engagement with palliative care. Quality improvement initiatives focused on mortality may offer a meaningful and feasible opportunity for engaging palliative care. Primary palliative care training is needed to improve discussions about patient and family goals of care near the end of life.

OP456 Encouraging Shared Decision-Making Of Goals Of Care Discussions In Lung Cancer Patients Using A Smartphone Application

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Amanda Lovato ◽  
Nisha Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients

IntroductionAn important reason for receiving non-beneficial treatment at end-of life is the lack of timely discussions on goals of care and end-of-life preferences. A recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients primed with a questionnaire on their end-of-life preferences were more likely to initiate such conversations with their doctors. Our objective is to integrate the questionnaire into a smartphone application to facilitate early goals of care discussions. To achieve this goal, we first plan to undertake a feasibility study to understand stakeholder preferences.MethodsAs part of a quality improvement initiative at our Canadian quaternary-care hospital, we conducted focus groups with oncology and palliative care physicians and patients to understand barriers to early conversations on end-of-life preferences, and to assess feasibility of using smartphone technology in facilitating these conversations. The app would integrate a questionnaire to patients and send prompts to physicians on patient readiness and timing of conversations.ResultsWe conducted separate focus groups with lung cancer patients (n = 6) and clinicians in oncology (n = 6) and palliative care (n = 6). Clinical teams expressed enthusiasm about early conversations but raised several barriers including system (lack of electronic documentation and access to data; multiple physicians), clinician (lack of time) and patient (stigma associated with end-of-life) barriers. Clinicians agreed that an app could overcome some of these barriers such as access to patient and electronic data by making patients the repository of all their data and empowering them to initiate discussions. However, they raised concerns about universal accessibility of such technology, especially among the elderly. Patient focus groups will take place in March 2021 and inform us on feasibility in this population.ConclusionsThere is a consensus among physicians at our hospital that early end-of-life conversations have the potential to mitigate adverse events and that use of a smart phone app could facilitate such conversations.

scholarly journals Managing uncertainty and references to time in prognostic conversations with family members at the end of life: A conversation analytic study

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 896-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J Anderson ◽  
Patrick C Stone ◽  
Joseph T S Low ◽  
Steven Bloch
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Conversation Analysis ◽  
Communication Training ◽  
Analytic Method ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Reference Time ◽  
The Family ◽  
End Of Life Communication ◽  
Precise Time ◽  
Prognostic Uncertainty

Background: When patients are likely to die in the coming hours or days, families often want prognostic information. Prognostic uncertainty and a lack of end-of-life communication training make these conversations challenging. Aim: The objective of this study is to understand how clinicians and the relatives/friends of patients at the very end of life manage uncertainty and reference time in prognostic conversations. Design: Conversation analysis of audio-recorded conversations between clinicians and the relatives/friends of hospice inpatients. Setting/participants: Experienced palliative care clinicians and relatives/friends of imminently dying hospice inpatients. Twenty-three recorded conversations involved prognostic talk and were included in the analysis. Results: Requests for prognostic information were initiated by families in the majority of conversations. Clinicians responded using categorical time references such as ‘days’, allowing the provision of prognostic estimates without giving a precise time. Explicit terms such as ‘dying’ were rare during prognostic discussions. Instead, references to time were understood as relating to prognosis. Relatives displayed their awareness of prognostic uncertainty when requesting prognostic information, providing clinicians with ‘permission’ to be uncertain. In response, clinicians often stated their uncertainty explicitly, but presented evidence for their prognostic estimates, based on changes to the patient’s function previously discussed with the family. Conclusion: Prognostic uncertainty was managed collaboratively by clinicians and families. Clinicians were able to provide prognostic estimates while being honest about the related uncertainty, in part because relatives displayed their awareness of uncertainty within their requests. The conversation analytic method identified contributions of both clinicians and families, and identified strategies based on real interactions, which could inform communication training.

scholarly journals Illness Understanding, Prognostic Awareness, and End-of-Life Care in Patients With GI Cancer and Malignant Bowel Obstruction With Drainage Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00035
Author(s):  
Jessica I. Goldberg ◽  
Debra A. Goldman ◽  
Sarah McCaskey ◽  
Douglas J. Koo ◽  
Andrew S. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Malignant Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Future Expectations ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Gi Cancer ◽  
Additional Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is common in advanced GI cancer, and MBO management, including drainage percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG), is palliative. How patients understand the goals of dPEG and its impact on disease is inadequately understood in the literature. Therefore, we analyzed these issues in patients with GI cancer. METHODS: Demographics, clinical variables, and patient outcomes were abstracted from the medical record. Illness understanding and future expectations were retrieved from palliative care notes. We described additional treatment and outcomes after dPEG and estimated overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From January 2015 to June 2017, 125 admitted patients with metastatic GI cancer underwent dPEG for MBO. Cancers were most commonly colorectal (34%) and pancreatic/ampullary (25%). During the dPEG admission, 32% (40 of 125) of patients had a palliative care consultation, and 22% (28 of 125) were asked about illness understanding and future expectations. All (28 of 28) reported good understanding of the advanced nature of their disease, but few were accurate about prognosis given their stage IV disease (10 of 28). Of the 117 (94%) discharged, 13% (15 of 117) received additional chemotherapy, which rarely prevented progression; half (63 of 117) had a do-not-resuscitate order; and most (101 of 117) were enrolled in hospice at death. Median time to death was 37 days (95% CI, 29 to 45 days); 6-month OS was 3.7% (95% CI, 1.2% to 8.4%). CONCLUSION: dPEGs are placed close to end of life in patients with advanced GI cancer. A minority of patients receive additional chemotherapy post-dPEG. Many have adequate disease understanding, but chemotherapy benefit is low, and future expectations vary. This may be an opportunity for improved communication regarding palliative procedures in advanced cancer.

Easing of Suffering in Children With Cancer at the End of Life: Is Care Changing?

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1717-1723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Wolfe ◽  
Jim F. Hammel ◽  
Kelly E. Edwards ◽  
Janet Duncan ◽  
Michael Comeau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Children With Cancer ◽  
Adjusted Risk

Purpose In the past decade studies have documented substantial suffering among children dying of cancer, prompting national attention on the quality of end-of-life care and the development of a palliative care service in our institutions. We sought to determine whether national and local efforts have led to changes in patterns of care, advanced care planning, and symptom control among children with cancer at the end of life. Methods Retrospective cohort study from a US tertiary level pediatric institution. Parent survey and chart review data from 119 children who died between 1997 and 2004 (follow-up cohort) were compared with 102 children who died between 1990 and 1997 (baseline cohort). Results In the follow-up cohort, hospice discussions occurred more often (76% v 54%; adjusted risk difference [RD], 22%; P < .001) and earlier (adjusted geometric mean 52 days v 28 days before death; P = .002) compared with the baseline cohort. Do-not-resuscitate orders were also documented earlier (18 v 12 days; P = .031). Deaths in the intensive care unit or other hospitals decreased significantly (RD, 16%; P = .024). Parents reported less child suffering from pain (RD, 19%; P = .018) and dyspnea (RD, 21%; P = .020). A larger proportion of parents felt more prepared during the child's last month of life (RD, 29%; P < .001) and at the time of death (RD, 24%; P = .002). Conclusion Children dying of cancer are currently receiving care that is more consistent with optimal palliative care and according to parents, are experiencing less suffering. With ongoing growth of the field of hospice and palliative medicine, further advancements are likely.

Measuring the impact of integrating palliative care into a multidisciplinary brain and spine oncology clinic.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 163-163
Author(s):  
Matthew Manning ◽  
Mary Larach ◽  
Susan Boyles ◽  
Abigail Stern
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Metastatic Lung ◽  
The Impact

163 Background: Recent literature indicates that palliative care (PC) improves the outcomes of patients with cancer. Integration of PC providers into cancer centers is increasingly recognized to enhance symptom management with a beneficial effect on patient survival. In order to predict the impact of widespread PC integration, we hypothesized that a small pilot program may provide evidence supporting broader implementation. The current study endeavors to measure the result of adding a dedicated PC provider to a multidisciplinary brain and spine oncology program. Methods: Over the six month study period, a PC nurse practitioner was integrated into an existing weekly multidisciplinary brain and spine oncology conference and clinic. The provider participated in the multidisciplinary conference reviewing recent MRIs and discussing current disease status and treatment options. Following conference, the PC provider would consult on up to four of the clinic patients. Data were recorded regarding patient characteristics, goals of care, and changes in therapy. Results: The PC provider participated in 14 multidisciplinary clinics with a total of 180 subjects. Of those, 24 subjects met with the PC provider in formal consultation. The most common diagnoses were 41.6% with metastatic lung cancer and 25% with glioblastoma. For goals of care, an Advanced Directive discussion was documented in 100%. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were activated in 37.5% and documented in 54%. Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) forms were introduced in 87.5% and completed in 25%. For changes in therapy, enrollment in hospice occurred in 33.3%. Pain medication was changed in 33.3%. Other symptoms including fatigue, weakness, anorexia, constipation, anxiety, lymphedema, dysphagia, depression, insomnia, and alopecia were managed in 87.5%. Conclusions: This study suggests that the integration of a PC provider into an existing multidisciplinary cancer program can produce a high rate of establishing goals of care and result in changes in treatment in a significant number of cases. Further study on the impact of integrating PC in cancer centers seems to be warranted.

Structured outpatient palliative care family conferences to enhance early integration of palliative care in advanced cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
Cheruppolil R. Santhosh-Kumar ◽  
Deborah Gray ◽  
Stephanie Struve ◽  
Carol Huibregtse
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Advanced Directives ◽  
Early Integration ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Family Conference ◽  
Nurse Navigator ◽  
Care Family

36 Background: Integrating early palliative care with cancer treatment improves quality of life and survival. Effective communication among physicians, patients and their loved ones is crucial to end-of-life, hospice and palliative care discussions. To address the inherent challenges in these discussions, we implemented a structured outpatient palliative care family conference (OFC) program at our community cancer clinic. Methods: A team comprising a hematologist/oncologist, cancer nurse navigator and social worker developed a toolkit for conducting an OFC, recognizing that each family conference is a unique adaptive challenge. New patients with advanced malignancies and limited life expectancy (<12 months) were offered a 90-minute structured OFC attended by the care team, patient and family members and or friends. Pre and post-conference patient satisfaction surveys and other data were collected prospectively. Results: From March 2014 through May 2015, fortyOFC were conducted (16 female and 24 male patients, median age: 67 years). Diagnoses were advanced gastrointestinal (14), lung (12), hematologic (6) and other (8) malignancies. As a direct result of the OFC program, 18 patients ordered do-not-resuscitate bracelets, 15 completed advanced directives, 7 submitted paperwork for disabled parking permits, 7 were referred to hospice and 4 for rehabilitation therapy. Further results are shown in the table. Conclusions: Structured outpatient palliative care family conferences improve satisfaction of end-of-life discussions and facilitate integration of palliative care options. Enhanced communication between providers, patients and loved ones eases the challenges of such discussions. The OFC approach could be a model for integrating palliative care in community cancer clinics. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document