scholarly journals Atomic Resolution Microscopy

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
John Silcox

Although it has been possible for many years to determine the average position of atoms by using diffraction techniques, finding the positions of specific atoms has been an elusive target. This latter goal is now in sight. Individual atoms on surfaces were first seen in the seventies by the Chicago Group using the then newly invented Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM). More recently atoms on surfaces have also been seen by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) and associated variants (e.g. Atomic Force Microscopy). Atomic structures in the interior of a material have been imaged in recent years through atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy of thin film specimens. Progress in these developments is following an acceleration path and the Materials Research Division of the NSF recently commissioned a panel to review the area and provide advice on an appropriate response.

1992 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Chason ◽  
Charles M. Falco ◽  
A. Ourmazd ◽  
E. F. Schubert ◽  
J. M. Slaughter ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTA panel discussion on interface roughness was held at the Fall 1992 Materials Research Society meeting. We present a summary of the results presented by the invited speakers on the application and interpretation of X-ray reflectivity, atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), photoluminescence and transmission electron microscopy. A transcript of the moderated discussion is provided in the final section.


Author(s):  
CE Bracker ◽  
P. K. Hansma

A new family of scanning probe microscopes has emerged that is opening new horizons for investigating the fine structure of matter. The earliest and best known of these instruments is the scanning tunneling microscope (STM). First published in 1982, the STM earned the 1986 Nobel Prize in Physics for two of its inventors, G. Binnig and H. Rohrer. They shared the prize with E. Ruska for his work that had led to the development of the transmission electron microscope half a century earlier. It seems appropriate that the award embodied this particular blend of the old and the new because it demonstrated to the world a long overdue respect for the enormous contributions electron microscopy has made to the understanding of matter, and at the same time it signalled the dawn of a new age in microscopy. What we are seeing is a revolution in microscopy and a redefinition of the concept of a microscope.Several kinds of scanning probe microscopes now exist, and the number is increasing. What they share in common is a small probe that is scanned over the surface of a specimen and measures a physical property on a very small scale, at or near the surface. Scanning probes can measure temperature, magnetic fields, tunneling currents, voltage, force, and ion currents, among others.


1989 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Shin ◽  
J. Silcox ◽  
S. E. Russek ◽  
D. K. Lathrop ◽  
R. A. Buhrman

AbstractGrain boundaries in thin films of high Tc YBa2Cu3O7-x superconductors have been investigated with high resolution scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) imaging and nanoprobe energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) analysis. Atomic resolution images indicate that the grain boundaries are mostly clean, i.e., free of a boundary layer of different phase or of segregation, and are often coherent. EDX microanalysis with a 10 Å spatial resolution also indicates no composition deviation at the grain boundaries.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (S2) ◽  
pp. 974-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Watanabe ◽  
A. Yasuhara ◽  
E. Okunishi

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2012 in Phoenix, Arizona, USA, July 29 – August 2, 2012.


1995 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Stephen W. Carmichael

For biologic studies, atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been prevailing over scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) because it has the capability of imaging non-conducting biologic specimens. However, STM generally gives better resolution than AFM, and we're talking about resolution on the atomic scale. In a recent article, Franz Giessibl (Atomic resolution of the silicon (111)- (7X7) surface by atomic force microscopy, Science 267:68-71, 1995) has demonstrated that atoms can be imaged by AFM.


Author(s):  
Oliver C. Wells ◽  
P.C. Cheng

In this discussion the words “high resolution imaging” of a solid sample in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) mean that details can be resolved that are considerably smaller than the penetration depth of the incident electron beam (EB) into the specimen. “Atomic resolution” in either the transmission electron microscope (TEM) or scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) means that columns of atoms are resolved.Image contrasts in the backscattered electron (BSE) image are strongly affected by the specimen tilt and by the position and energy sensitivity of the BSE detector. The expression “BSE image” generally implies that the specimen is normal to the beam and the detector is above it. This shows compositional variations in the specimen with a spatial resolution limited by the spreading of the EB during the initial stages of penetration. This is similar in basic principle to the Z-Contrast method in the STEM that shows atomic resolution from a thinned single crystal mounted in the magnetic field of the focusing lens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document