The REIm-13

Abstract. The Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory (REIm) is a recent tool showing promise in the measurement of self-reported thinking style – preference for rational or experiential processing – and offers three-faceted measurement of the latter. We present the first short form of the measure, the REIm-13, and test its factor structure, reliability, and validity in a large community sample. Participants were N = 920 Australian adults (502 females) who completed an online survey ( N = 510 of whom participated in a follow-up survey). In addition to the REIm, participants completed a Big Five personality measure. The internal consistency of the REIm-13 was acceptable given the limited number of items (.52–.68). Furthermore, test-retest reliability was high (ρ = .64–.74) for the theorized four-factor and two-factor solutions. Construct validity was established by examining the relationship between short-form and full REIm factors (ρ = .65–.71), and the validity of composite scoring was confirmed against factor scoring. Relationship with age (a slight negative relationship to both main scales), gender (females reporting higher Experientiality, males higher Rationality), and Big Five variables largely followed previous findings, demonstrating concurrent validity. The study demonstrates that the REIm-13 provides sound measurement of thinking style.

Download Full-text

Further Validity of the Japanese Version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)

Journal of Individual Differences ◽

10.1027/1614-0001/a000145 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 35 (4) ◽

pp. 236-244 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Atsushi Oshio ◽

Shingo Abe ◽

Pino Cutrone ◽

Samuel D. Gosling

Keyword(s):

Big Five ◽

Content Validity ◽

Structural Equation ◽

English Language ◽

Full Range ◽

Reliability And Validity ◽

Japanese Version ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Equation Modeling ◽

Big Five Personality

The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003 ) is a widely used very brief measure of the Big Five personality dimensions. Oshio, Abe, and Cutrone (2012) have developed a Japanese version of the TIPI (TIPI-J), which demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Until now, all studies examining the validity of the TIPI-J have been conducted in the Japanese language; this reliance on a single language raises concerns about the instrument’s content validity because the instrument could demonstrate reliability (e.g., retest) and some forms of validity (e.g., convergent) but still not capture the full range of the dimensions as originally conceptualized in English. Therefore, to test the content validity of the Japanese TIPI with respect to the original Big Five formulation, we examine the convergence between scores on the TIPI-J and scores on the English-language Big Five Inventory (i.e., the BFI-E), an instrument specifically designed to optimize Big Five content coverage. Two-hundred and twenty-eight Japanese undergraduate students, who were all learning English, completed the two instruments. The results of correlation analyses and structural equation modeling demonstrate the theorized congruence between the TIPI-J and the BFI-E, supporting the content validity of the TIPI-J.

Download Full-text

Using Principal Component Scores to Enhance the Validity and Reliability of Big Five Personality Measures

Journal of Individual Differences ◽

10.1027/1614-0001/a000225 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 38 (2) ◽

pp. 83-93

Author(s):

Jeffrey M. Cucina ◽

Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos ◽

Arwen H. DeCostanza

Keyword(s):

Big Five ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Reliability And Validity ◽

Principal Component ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Scoring Method ◽

Five Factors ◽

Big Five Factors ◽

Component Scores

Abstract. Varimax rotated principal component scores (VRPCS) have previously been offered as a possible solution to the non-orthogonality of scores for the Big Five factors. However, few researchers have examined the reliability and validity of VRPCS. To address this gap, we use a lab study and a field study to investigate whether using VRPCS increase orthogonality, reliability, and criterion-related validity. Compared to the traditional unit-weighting scoring method, the use of VRPCS enhanced the reliability and discriminant validity of the Big Five factors, although there was little improvement in criterion-related validity. Results are discussed in terms of the benefit of using VRPCS instead of traditional unit-weighted sum scores.

Download Full-text

Gender Differences in Relationship Between Resilience and Big Five Personality Traits in Japanese Adolescents

Psychological Reports ◽

10.1177/0033294117741654 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 121 (5) ◽

pp. 920-931 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Shuhei Iimura ◽

Kanako Taku

Keyword(s):

Gender Differences ◽

Personality Traits ◽

Big Five ◽

Online Survey ◽

Big Five Personality Traits ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

School Students ◽

Five Dimensions ◽

Japanese Adolescents ◽

Age Range

Prior work has indicated that female adolescents mature more quickly than males with regard to the various personality dimensions. From the developmental perspectives, this study aimed to explore gender differences in the relationships between resilience and the Big Five personality traits in Japanese adolescents. Middle school students ( N = 310, 155 females, age range = 14–15 years) participated in an online survey. The results demonstrated that females had higher Conscientiousness than males. Stepwise regression analyses indicated that Neuroticism was the most influential predictor of resilience in females, whereas Extraversion was the most important predictor in males. Multigroup path analysis demonstrated that the effect of Neuroticism on resilience was greater for females; however, the effects of all other variables did not differ across genders. Considering gender differences is important to understand the relationship between resilience and the Big Five dimensions among adolescents.

Download Full-text

Exploring Valued Personality Traits in Practicing Veterinarians

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education ◽

10.3138/jvme-2021-0051 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. e20210051

Author(s):

Andrea J. Kunze ◽

Christopher Seals

Keyword(s):

Veterinary Medicine ◽

Personality Traits ◽

Big Five ◽

Online Survey ◽

Age Groups ◽

Small Animal ◽

Emotional Stability ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Pet Owners ◽

Medicine Community

We examined differences in valued Big Five personality traits of small animal veterinarians between members and nonmembers of the veterinary medicine community. Between fall 2019 and spring 2020, data were collected from an online survey sent to eligible persons across a US midwestern state. Eligible persons included veterinary office clients (i.e., pet owners) and persons practicing/training in veterinary medicine. Participants completed demographic questions and 10 Likert scale items about which Big Five personality characteristics they prefer in a veterinarian. Descriptive data were determined and checked for assumptions of linearity and normality. Data for the primary analyses were analyzed using Spearman’s correlations and Kruskal–Wallis H tests. Participants who were members of the veterinary community of practice valued the characteristic openness more than clients but valued emotional stability less than clients. Moreover, tests revealed that young adults (aged 18–24) valued extraversion more than all other age groups but least valued agreeableness. Last, participants aged 55 and older valued agreeableness and emotional stability more than the 18–44 age groups. Findings indicate individuals from different membership and age groups have varying preferences in what personality traits they expect in a veterinarian. Clients care more about their veterinarian being able to handle adversity. Older adults want their veterinarian to be trusting and creative. These findings encourage veterinary medical education to spotlight the development of skills congruent with these desired personality traits. Gaining such skills will be useful for veterinarians who seek to grow or build lasting relationships with clientele and colleagues.

Download Full-text

Moderation effect of pleasure seeking and loss aversion in the relationship between personality traits and risky investment intention

Kybernetes ◽

10.1108/k-05-2020-0278 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽

Author(s):

Selim Aren ◽

Hatice Nayman Hamamci ◽

Safvan Özcan

Keyword(s):

Personality Traits ◽

Big Five ◽

Loss Aversion ◽

Online Survey ◽

Big Five Personality Traits ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Moderator Effect ◽

Content Type ◽

Risky Investment ◽

Investment Intentions

Purpose The aim of this study, the moderating effect of pleasure-seeking and loss aversion, was investigated in relation to the big five personality traits with regard to risky investment intentions. Design/methodology/approach In the study, the data was obtained between January and November 2019 via an online survey with convenience sampling. The total number of subjects is 886. The authors used IBM SPSS Statistics for analysis. Exploratory factor analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis and discriminant analysis were performed. Findings Significant relationships were found between five personality traits and risky investment intentions. In these relationships, the moderator effect of pleasure-seeking for extraversion, conscientiousness and neuroticism personality traits was also determined. Besides, investment preferences for choosing “unknown and new investment” against “known and experienced investment”, which is a typical feature of the balloon periods, were modeled with big five personality traits and motivation variables (pleasure-seeking and loss aversion) and the equation was formed. As a result, high accuracy classification success was obtained. Originality/value The study is unique owing to its findings. In addition, general risk aversion and risky investment intention were investigated simultaneously to explain the different findings in the literature regarding the attitude of big five personality traits to risk and personality traits that show consistent approach were identified.

Download Full-text

Personality and Ideology

The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Political Science ◽

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634131.013.35 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Danny Osborne ◽

Nicole Satherley ◽

Chris G. Sibley

Keyword(s):

Personality Traits ◽

Big Five ◽

Personality Trait ◽

Negative Relationship ◽

Big Five Personality Traits ◽

Openness To Experience ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Vast Literature ◽

Political Conservatism ◽

The Relationship

Research since the 1990s reveals that openness to experience—a personality trait that captures interest in novelty, creativity, unconventionalism, and open-mindedness—correlates negatively with political conservatism. This chapter summarizes this vast literature by meta-analyzing 232 unique samples (N = 575,691) that examine the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and conservatism. The results reveal that the negative relationship between openness to experience and conservatism (r = −.145) is nearly twice as big as the next strongest correlation between personality and ideology (namely, conscientiousness and conservatism; r = .076). The associations between personality traits and conservatism were, however, substantively larger in Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) countries than in non-WEIRD countries. The chapter concludes by reviewing recent longitudinal work demonstrating that openness to experience and conservatism are non-causally related. Collectively, the chapter shows that openness to experience is by far the strongest (negative) correlate of conservatism but that there is little evidence that this association is causal.

Download Full-text

Psychometric properties of the International Personality Item Pool Big-Five personality questionnaire for the Greek population

Health Psychology Research ◽

10.4081/hpr.2015.2206 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Maria Ypofanti ◽

Vasiliki Zisi ◽

Nikolaos Zourbanos ◽

Barbara Mouchtouri ◽

Pothiti Tzanne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Age Differences ◽

Big Five ◽

Short Form ◽

Personality Factor ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Item Pool ◽

Total N ◽

Personality Item ◽

Good Internal Consistency ◽

Highly Correlated

Goldberg’s International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) big-five personality factor markers currently lack validating evidence. The structure of the 50-item IPIP was examined in two different adult samples (total N=811), in each case justifying a 5-factor solution, with only minor discrepancies. Age differences were comparable to previous findings using other inventories. One sample (N=193) also completed additionally another personality measure (the TIPI Short Form). Conscientiousness, extraversion and emotional stability/ neuroticism scales of the IPIP were highly correlated with those of the TIPI (r=0.62 to 0.65, P=0.01). Agreeableness and Intellect/Openness scales correlated less strongly (r=0.54 and 0.58 respectively, P=0.01). The IPIP scales have good internal consistency (a=0.88) and relate strongly to major dimensions of personality assessed by the two questionnaires.

Download Full-text

Negative feedback and employee job performance: Moderating role of the Big Five

Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal ◽

10.2224/sbp.6478 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 45 (10) ◽

pp. 1735-1744 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yun Guo ◽

Yanhong Zhang ◽

Jianqiao Liao ◽

Xinwei Guo ◽

Jintao Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Job Performance ◽

Personality Traits ◽

Big Five ◽

Negative Feedback ◽

Linear Regression Analysis ◽

Negative Relationship ◽

Big Five Personality Traits ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Moderating Role

We used hierarchical linear regression analysis to test the relationship between negative feedback and employee job performance, and explored the moderating role of the Big Five personality traits in this relationship. Participants were 357 supervisor–subordinate dyads in China; subordinates responded to negative feedback and Big Five personality traits measures, and direct supervisors rated their employees' job performance. Results showed that negative feedback was negatively related to employee job performance, and that the Big Five personality traits moderated this relationship. Specifically, the strength of the negative relationship between negative feedback and job performance was reduced as extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, emotional stability, and conscientiousness increased. Implications for management and theory are discussed.

Download Full-text