scholarly journals An actin-dependent spindle position checkpoint ensures the asymmetric division in mouse oocytes

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aïcha Metchat ◽  
Manuel Eguren ◽  
Julius M. Hossain ◽  
Antonio Z. Politi ◽  
Sébastien Huet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Cell Periphery ◽  
Actin Network ◽  
Metaphase Arrest ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Spindle Position ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Abstract Faithful chromosome segregation, during meiosis, is of critical importance to prevent aneuploidy in the resulting embryo. In mammalian oocytes, the segregation of homologous chromosomes takes place with the spindle located at the cell’s periphery. The spindle is often assembled close to the centre of the cell, which necessitates the actin network for spindle transport to the cell cortex. In this study, we investigate how the segregation of chromosomes is coordinated with the positioning of the metaphase I spindle. We develop different assays to perturb the spindle’s position and to delay its relocation to the cell periphery. We find that anaphase is delayed until the spindle is positioned in close proximity with the oocyte cortex. We further show that the metaphase arrest is dependent on a functional actin network, in addition to the spindle assembly checkpoint. Our work provides the first evidence for the existence of a functional spindle position checkpoint.

scholarly journals Centromere-localized Aurora B kinase is required for the fidelity of chromosome segregation

2019 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Liang ◽  
Zhenlei Zhang ◽  
Qinfu Chen ◽  
Haiyan Yan ◽  
Miao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora B Kinase ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Proper Timing ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Aurora B kinase plays an essential role in chromosome bi-orientation, which is a prerequisite for equal segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. However, it remains largely unclear whether centromere-localized Aurora B is required for faithful chromosome segregation. Here we show that histone H3 Thr-3 phosphorylation (H3pT3) and H2A Thr-120 phosphorylation (H2ApT120) can independently recruit Aurora B. Disrupting H3pT3-mediated localization of Aurora B at the inner centromere impedes the decline in H2ApT120 during metaphase and causes H2ApT120-dependent accumulation of Aurora B at the kinetochore-proximal centromere. Consequently, silencing of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is delayed, whereas the fidelity of chromosome segregation is negligibly affected. Further eliminating an H2ApT120-dependent pool of Aurora B restores proper timing for SAC silencing but increases chromosome missegregation. Our data indicate that H2ApT120-mediated localization of Aurora B compensates for the loss of an H3pT3-dependent pool of Aurora B to correct improper kinetochore–microtubule attachments. This study provides important insights into how centromeric Aurora B regulates SAC and kinetochore attachment to microtubules to ensure error-free chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals ConnectingGCN5’s centromeric SAGA to the mitotic tension-sensing checkpoint

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2201-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Petty ◽  
Masha Evpak ◽  
Lorraine Pillus
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Binding Function ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Histone H3 Variant ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Centromere Histone H3 ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Multiple interdependent mechanisms ensure faithful segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Among these, the spindle assembly checkpoint monitors attachment of spindle microtubules to the centromere of each chromosome, whereas the tension-sensing checkpoint monitors the opposing forces between sister chromatid centromeres for proper biorientation. We report here a new function for the deeply conserved Gcn5 acetyltransferase in the centromeric localization of Rts1, a key player in the tension-sensing checkpoint. Rts1 is a regulatory component of protein phopshatase 2A, a near universal phosphatase complex, which is recruited to centromeres by the Shugoshin (Sgo) checkpoint component under low-tension conditions to maintain sister chromatid cohesion. We report that loss of Gcn5 disrupts centromeric localization of Rts1. Increased RTS1 dosage robustly suppresses gcn5∆ cell cycle and chromosome segregation defects, including restoration of Rts1 to centromeres. Sgo1’s Rts1-binding function also plays a key role in RTS1 dosage suppression of gcn5∆ phenotypes. Notably, we have identified residues of the centromere histone H3 variant Cse4 that function in these chromosome segregation-related roles of RTS1. Together, these findings expand the understanding of the mechanistic roles of Gcn5 and Cse4 in chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals Cell shape impacts on the positioning of the mitotic spindle with respect to the substratum

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1286-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Lázaro-Diéguez ◽  
Iaroslav Ispolatov ◽  
Anne Müsch
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Shape ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mdck Cells ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Spindle Position

All known mechanisms of mitotic spindle orientation rely on astral microtubules. We report that even in the absence of astral microtubules, metaphase spindles in MDCK and HeLa cells are not randomly positioned along their x-z dimension, but preferentially adopt shallow β angles between spindle pole axis and substratum. The nonrandom spindle positioning is due to constraints imposed by the cell cortex in flat cells that drive spindles that are longer and/or wider than the cell's height into a tilted, quasidiagonal x-z position. In rounder cells, which are taller, fewer cortical constraints make the x-z spindle position more random. Reestablishment of astral microtubule–mediated forces align the spindle poles with cortical cues parallel to the substratum in all cells. However, in flat cells, they frequently cause spindle deformations. Similar deformations are apparent when confined spindles rotate from tilted to parallel positions while MDCK cells progress from prometaphase to metaphase. The spindle disruptions cause the engagement of the spindle assembly checkpoint. We propose that cell rounding serves to maintain spindle integrity during its positioning.

scholarly journals Aurora B Tension Sensing Mechanisms in the Kinetochore Ensure Accurate Chromosome Segregation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 8818
Author(s):  
Shelby L. McVey ◽  
Jenna K. Cosby ◽  
Natalie J. Nannas
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Congenital Birth Defects ◽  
Biochemical Signals ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

The accurate segregation of chromosomes is essential for the survival of organisms and cells. Mistakes can lead to aneuploidy, tumorigenesis and congenital birth defects. The spindle assembly checkpoint ensures that chromosomes properly align on the spindle, with sister chromatids attached to microtubules from opposite poles. Here, we review how tension is used to identify and selectively destabilize incorrect attachments, and thus serves as a trigger of the spindle assembly checkpoint to ensure fidelity in chromosome segregation. Tension is generated on properly attached chromosomes as sister chromatids are pulled in opposing directions but resisted by centromeric cohesin. We discuss the role of the Aurora B kinase in tension-sensing and explore the current models for translating mechanical force into Aurora B-mediated biochemical signals that regulate correction of chromosome attachments to the spindle.

scholarly journals TRF1 Depletion Reveals Mutual Regulation Between Telomeres, Kinetochores, and Inner Centromeres in Mouse Oocytes

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuk-Joon Jeon ◽  
Jeong Su Oh
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Telomere Shortening ◽  
Mouse Oocytes ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Telomere Protection ◽  
Telocentric Chromosomes ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Mutual Regulation ◽  
Kinetochore Function

In eukaryotic chromosomes, the centromere and telomere are two specialized structures that are essential for chromosome stability and segregation. Although centromeres and telomeres often are located in close proximity to form telocentric chromosomes in mice, it remained unclear whether these two structures influence each other. Here we show that TRF1 is required for inner centromere and kinetochore assembly in addition to its role in telomere protection in mouse oocytes. TRF1 depletion caused premature chromosome segregation by abrogating the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and impairing kinetochore-microtubule (kMT) attachment, which increased the incidence of aneuploidy. Notably, TRF1 depletion disturbed the localization of Survivin and Ndc80/Hec1 at inner centromeres and kinetochores, respectively. Moreover, SMC3 and SMC4 levels significantly decreased after TRF1 depletion, suggesting that TRF1 is involved in chromosome cohesion and condensation. Importantly, inhibition of inner centromere or kinetochore function led to a significant decrease in TRF1 level and telomere shortening. Therefore, our results suggest that telomere integrity is required to preserve inner centromere and kinetochore architectures, and vice versa, suggesting mutual regulation between telomeres and centromeres.

scholarly journals Deregulation of Chromosome Segregation and Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie L. Curtis ◽  
Gian Filippo Ruda ◽  
Paul Brennan ◽  
Victor M. Bolanos-Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Drug Targets ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Assembly ◽  
Protein Components ◽  
Stable Genome ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

The mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is an intricate cell signaling system that ensures the high fidelity and timely segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Mistakes in this process can lead to the loss, gain, or rearrangement of the genetic material. Gross chromosomal aberrations are usually lethal but can cause birth and development defects as well as cancer. Despite advances in the identification of SAC protein components, important details of the interactions underpinning chromosome segregation regulation remain to be established. This review discusses the current understanding of the function, structure, mode of regulation, and dynamics of the assembly and disassembly of SAC subcomplexes, which ultimately safeguard the accurate transmission of a stable genome to descendants. We also discuss how diverse oncoviruses take control of human cell division by exploiting the SAC and the potential of this signaling circuitry as a pool of drug targets to develop effective cancer therapies.

scholarly journals Synchronizing chromosome segregation by flux-dependent force equalization at kinetochores

2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Matos ◽  
António J. Pereira ◽  
Mariana Lince-Faria ◽  
Lisa A. Cameron ◽  
Edward D. Salmon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mechanical Model ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
S2 Cells ◽  
Spindle Microtubule ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Drosophila S2 Cells ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

The synchronous movement of chromosomes during anaphase ensures their correct inheritance in every cell division. This reflects the uniformity of spindle forces acting on chromosomes and their simultaneous entry into anaphase. Although anaphase onset is controlled by the spindle assembly checkpoint, it remains unknown how spindle forces are uniformly distributed among different chromosomes. In this paper, we show that tension uniformity at metaphase kinetochores and subsequent anaphase synchrony in Drosophila S2 cells are promoted by spindle microtubule flux. These results can be explained by a mechanical model of the spindle where microtubule poleward translocation events associated with flux reflect relaxation of the kinetochore–microtubule interface, which accounts for the redistribution and convergence of kinetochore tensions in a timescale comparable to typical metaphase duration. As predicted by the model, experimental acceleration of mitosis precludes tension equalization and anaphase synchrony. We propose that flux-dependent equalization of kinetochore tensions ensures a timely and uniform maturation of kinetochore–microtubule interfaces necessary for error-free and coordinated segregation of chromosomes in anaphase.

scholarly journals Crossover recombination and synapsis are linked by adjacent regions within the N terminus of the Zip1 synaptonemal complex protein

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Voelkel-Meiman ◽  
Shun-Yun Cheng ◽  
Melanie Parziale ◽  
Savannah J. Morehouse ◽  
Arden Feil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Central Element ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Sumo Ligase ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Complex Protein ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex Protein

AbstractAccurate chromosome segregation during meiosis relies on the prior establishment of at least one crossover recombination event between homologous chromosomes, which is often associated with the meiosis-specific MutSγ complex. The recombination intermediates that give rise to MutSγ interhomolog crossovers are embedded within a hallmark meiotic prophase structure called the synaptonemal complex (SC), but the mechanisms that coordinate the processes of SC assembly (synapsis) and crossover recombination remain poorly understood. Among known central region building blocks of the budding yeast SC, the Zip1 protein is unique for its SC-independent role in promoting MutSγ crossovers. Here we report that adjacent regions within Zip1’s unstructured N terminus encompass its crossover and SC assembly functions. We previously showed that deletion of Zip1 residues 21-163 abolishes tripartite SC assembly and prevents the robust SUMOylation of the SC central element component, Ecm11, but allows excess MutSγ crossover recombination. We find the reciprocal phenotype when Zip1 residues 2-9 or 10-14 are deleted; in these mutants SC assembles and Ecm11 is hyperSUMOylated, but MutSγ crossovers are strongly diminished. Interestingly, Zip1 residues 2-9 or 2-14 are required for the normal localization of Zip3, a putative E3 SUMO ligase and pro-MutSγ crossover factor, to Zip1 polycomplex structures and to recombination initiation sites. By contrast, deletion of Zip1 residues 15-20 does not detectably prevent Zip3’s localization at Zip1 polycomplex and supports some MutSγ crossing over but prevents normal SC assembly and robust Ecm11 SUMOylation. These results highlight distinct N terminal regions that are differentially critical for Zip1’s roles in crossover recombination and SC assembly; we speculate that the adjacency of these regions enables Zip1 to serve as a liaison, facilitating crosstalk between the two processes by bringing crossover recombination and synapsis factors in close proximity to one another.

scholarly journals Aneuploid abortion correlates positively with MAD1 overexpression and miR-125b down-regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhao ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Guangxin Chen ◽  
Lijun Du ◽  
Peiyan Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Embryo Abortion ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

Abstract Background Aneuploidy is the most frequent cause of early-embryo abortion. Any defect in chromosome segregation would fail to satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) during mitosis, halting metaphase and causing aneuploidy. The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), comprising MAD1, MAD2, Cdc20, BUBR1 and BUB3, plays a vital role in SAC activation. Studies have confirmed that overexpression of MAD2 and BUBR1 can facilitate correct chromosome segregation and embryo stability. Research also proves that miR-125b negatively regulates MAD1 expression by binding to its 3′UTR. However, miR-125b, Mad1 and Bub3 gene expression in aneuploid embryos of spontaneous abortion has not been reported to date. Methods In this study, embryonic villi from miscarried pregnancies were collected and divided into two groups (aneuploidy and euploidy) based on High-throughput ligation-dependent probe amplification (HLPA) and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. RNA levels of miR-125b, MAD1 and BUB3 were detected by Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR); protein levels of MAD1 and BUB3 were analysed by Western blotting. Results statistical analysis (p < 0.05) showed that miR-125b and BUB3 were significantly down-regulated in the aneuploidy group compared to the control group and that MAD1 was significantly up-regulated. Additionally, the MAD1 protein level was significantly higher in aneuploidy abortion villus, but BUB3 protein was only mildly increased. Correlation analysis revealed that expression of MAD1 correlated negatively with miR-125b. Conclusion These results suggest that aneuploid abortion correlates positively with MAD1 overexpression, which might be caused by insufficient levels of miR-125b. Taken together, our findings first confirmed the negative regulatory mode between MAD1 and miR-125b, providing a basis for further mechanism researches in aneuploid abortion.

scholarly journals The Role of Cdh1p in Maintaining Genomic Stability in Budding Yeast

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 165 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E Ross ◽  
Orna Cohen-Fix
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Growth Defects ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Specificity Factor

Abstract Cdh1p, a substrate specificity factor for the cell cycle-regulated ubiquitin ligase, the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), promotes exit from mitosis by directing the degradation of a number of proteins, including the mitotic cyclins. Here we present evidence that Cdh1p activity at the M/G1 transition is important not only for mitotic exit but also for high-fidelity chromosome segregation in the subsequent cell cycle. CDH1 showed genetic interactions with MAD2 and PDS1, genes encoding components of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint that acts at metaphase to prevent premature chromosome segregation. Unlike cdh1Δ and mad2Δ single mutants, the mad2Δ cdh1Δ double mutant grew slowly and exhibited high rates of chromosome and plasmid loss. Simultaneous deletion of PDS1 and CDH1 caused extensive chromosome missegregation and cell death. Our data suggest that at least part of the chromosome loss can be attributed to kinetochore/spindle problems. Our data further suggest that Cdh1p and Sic1p, a Cdc28p/Clb inhibitor, have overlapping as well as nonoverlapping roles in ensuring proper chromosome segregation. The severe growth defects of both mad2Δ cdh1Δ and pds1Δ cdh1Δ strains were rescued by overexpressing Swe1p, a G2/M inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinase, Cdc28p/Clb. We propose that the failure to degrade cyclins at the end of mitosis leaves cdh1Δ mutant strains with abnormal Cdc28p/Clb activity that interferes with proper chromosome segregation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document