scholarly journals Sex-related impacts on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Park ◽  
Seungbong Han ◽  
Gyung-Min Park ◽  
Soe Hee Ann ◽  
Jon Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Abstract The aim of this study is to investigate sex-related impacts on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyzed 90,305 patients (29.0% of women) with the first episode of coronary artery disease who underwent PCI from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database between July 2013 and June 2017. Women were significantly older than men (71.5 ± 10.5 vs. 61.8 ± 11.7 years, p < 0.001). The study population had a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.2–3.3). In the propensity-score matched angina population (15,104 pairs), the in-hospital mortality of women was not different from men (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.71–1.08, p = 0.202). However, the post-discharge mortality of women was significantly lower (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.69–0.80, p < 0.001) than that of men. In the propensity-score matched acute myocardial infarction (AMI) population (8,775 pairs), the in-hospital mortality of women was significantly higher than that of men (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.34, p = 0.006). Meanwhile, there was no difference in mortality after discharge (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.91–1.06, p = 0.605). The post-discharge mortality of women was not higher than men under the contemporary PCI treatment. Altered sex-related impacts on clinical outcomes might be attributed to improved medical and procedural strategies.

scholarly journals Association of the Hemoglobin to Serum Creatinine Ratio with In-Hospital Adverse Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention among Non-Dialysis Patients: Insights from a Japanese Nationwide Registry (J-PCI Registry)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3612
Author(s):  
Yohei Numasawa ◽  
Taku Inohara ◽  
Hideki Ishii ◽  
Kyohei Yamaji ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Nationwide Registry ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Although baseline hemoglobin and renal function are both important predictors of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), scarce data exist regarding the combined impact of these factors on outcomes. We sought to investigate the impact and threshold value of the hemoglobin to creatinine (Hgb/Cr) ratio, on in-hospital adverse outcomes among non-dialysis patients in a Japanese nationwide registry. We analyzed 157,978 non-dialysis patients who underwent PCI in 884 Japanese medical institutions in 2017. We studied differences in baseline characteristics and in-hospital clinical outcomes among four groups according to their quartiles of the Hgb/Cr ratios. Compared with patients with higher Hgb/Cr ratios, patients with lower ratios were older and had more comorbidities and complex coronary artery disease. Patients with lower hemoglobin and higher creatinine levels had a higher rate of in-hospital adverse outcomes including in-hospital mortality and procedural complications (defined as occurrence of cardiac tamponade, cardiogenic shock after PCI, emergency operation, or bleeding complications that required blood transfusion). On multivariate analyses, Hgb/Cr ratio was inversely associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.89–0.92; p < 0.001) and bleeding complications (odds ratio: 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.90–0.94; p < 0.001). Spline curve analysis demonstrated that these risks started to increase when the Hgb/Cr ratio was <15, and elevated exponentially when the ratio was <10. Hgb/Cr ratio is a simple index among non-dialysis patients and is inversely associated with in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications after PCI.

scholarly journals Variation in in-hospital mortality and its association with percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding complications: A report from nationwide registry in Japan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261371
Author(s):  
Yuichi Sawayama ◽  
Kyohei Yamaji ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Takashi Yamamoto ◽  
Yosuke Higo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
High Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Institutional Variation ◽  
Very High

Large-scale registries have demonstrated that in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) varies widely across institutions. However, whether this variation is related to major procedural complications (e.g., bleeding) is unclear. In this study, institutional variation in in-hospital mortality and its association with PCI-related bleeding complications were investigated. We analyzed 388,866 procedures at 718 hospitals performed from 2017 to 2018, using data from a nationwide PCI registry in Japan. Hospitals were stratified into quintiles according to risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (very low, low, medium, high, and very high). Incidence of bleeding complications, defined as procedure-related bleeding events that required a blood transfusion, and in-hospital mortality in patients who developed bleeding complications were calculated for each quintile. Overall, 4,048 (1.04%) in-hospital deaths and 1,535 (0.39%) bleeding complications occurred. Among patients with bleeding complications, 270 (17.6%) died during hospitalization. In-hospital mortality ranged from 0.22% to 2.46% in very low to very high mortality hospitals. The rate of bleeding complications varied modestly from 0.27% to 0.57% (odds ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.58–2.39). However, mortality after bleeding complications markedly increased by quintile and was 6-fold higher in very high mortality hospitals than very low mortality hospitals (29.0% vs. 4.8%; odds ratio, 12.2; 95% confidence interval, 6.90–21.7). In conclusion, institutional variation in in-hospital mortality after PCI was associated with procedure-related bleeding complications, and this variation was largely driven by differences in mortality after bleeding complications rather than difference in their incidence. These findings underscore the importance of efforts toward reducing not only bleeding complications but also, even more importantly, subsequent mortality once they have occurred.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes From Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Last Remaining Coronary Artery

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Shoaib ◽  
Muhammad Rashid ◽  
Evangelos Kontopantelis ◽  
Andrew Sharp ◽  
Eoin F. Fahy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Background: Patients with complex high-risk coronary anatomy, such as those with a last remaining patent vessel (LRPV), are increasingly revascularized with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary practice. There are limited data on the outcomes of these high-risk procedures. Methods: We analyzed a large longitudinal PCI cohort (2007–2014, n=501 841) from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database. Clinical, demographic, procedural, and outcome data were analyzed by dividing patients into 2 groups; LRPV group (n=2432) and all other PCI groups (n=506 691). Results: Patients in the LRPV PCI group were older, had more comorbidities, and higher prevalence of moderate-severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Mortality was higher in the LRPV PCI group during hospital admission (12 % versus 1.5 %, P <0.001), at 30 days (15% versus 2%, P <0.001), and at one-year (24% versus 5%, P <0.001). In a propensity score matching analysis the adjusted risk of mortality during index admission (odds ratio, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.65–2.44], P <0.001), at 30 days (odds ratio, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.78–2.5], P <0.001), at 1 year (odds ratio, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.59–2.03], P <0.001), and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.42–2.19], P <0.001) were higher in LRPV PCI group as compared to control group. In sensitivity analyses, similar clinical outcomes were observed irrespective of which major epicardial coronary artery was treated. Conclusions: In this contemporary cohort, patients who had PCI to their LRPV had a higher-risk profile and more adverse clinical outcomes, irrespective of the vessel treated.

P960Association of peri-procedural intravenous morphine use on clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Batchelor ◽  
D Liu ◽  
J Bloom ◽  
S Noaman ◽  
W Chan
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background Morphine analgesia may affect absorption of co-prescribed P2Y12 antagonists attenuating platelet inhibition. The impact of peri-procedural intravenous (IV) morphine administration on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not well defined. Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring clinical outcomes with peri-procedural IV morphine in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI. Methods Analysis of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov for association of peri-PCI IV morphine use with myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality. Primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital or 30-day MI and all-cause mortality respectively. Results Eleven studies (1 randomised controlled trial; 10 cohort studies) were included for systematic review. Five studies, including 3,748 patients were included in meta-analysis of the primary outcome. Of 3,748 patients, 2,239 were treated concurrently with ticagrelor, 1,256 treated with clopidogrel and 253 with prasugrel. As shown in the Figure, there was a trend towards increased risk of myocardial infarction with IV morphine (odds ratio 1.88; 95% CI 0.87–4.09, I2 0%). Across seven studies and 6585 patients, no increased risk of mortality at the same composite time endpoint was evident (odds ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.40–1.23, I2 19%). Figure 1. MI in hospital or at 30 days Conclusion Based on current literature, evidence of an association between IV morphine and myocardial infarction in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI is limited by observational methodology and conflicting results. There is no evidence of an association between intravenous peri-procedural morphine and mortality. Clinical trial evidence with strong documentation of adverse events data is required to demonstrate association or causality. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a nationwide survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siv JS Olsen ◽  
Henrik Schirmer ◽  
Kaare H Bønaa ◽  
Tove A Hanssen
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Participation Rate ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Aim: The purpose of this study was to estimate the proportion of Norwegian coronary heart disease patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes after percutaneous coronary intervention, and to determine predictors of cardiac rehabilitation participation. Methods: Participants were patients enrolled in the Norwegian Coronary Stent Trial. We assessed cardiac rehabilitation participation in 9013 of these patients who had undergone their first percutaneous coronary intervention during 2008–2011. Of these, 7068 patients (82%) completed a self-administered questionnaire on cardiac rehabilitation participation within three years after their percutaneous coronary intervention. Results: Twenty-eight per cent of the participants reported engaging in cardiac rehabilitation. Participation rate differed among the four regional health authorities in Norway, varying from 20%–31%. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for an acute coronary syndrome were more likely to participate in cardiac rehabilitation than patients with stable angina (odds ratio 3.2; 95% confidence interval 2.74–3.76). A multivariate statistical model revealed that men had a 28% lower probability ( p<0.001) of participating in cardiac rehabilitation, and the odds of attending cardiac rehabilitation decreased with increasing age ( p<0.001). Contributors to higher odds of cardiac rehabilitation participation were educational level >12 years (odds ratio 1.50; 95% confidence interval 1.32–1.71) and body mass index>25 (odds ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.36). Prior coronary artery bypass graft was associated with lower odds of cardiac rehabilitation participation (odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.32–0.70) Conclusion: The estimated cardiac rehabilitation participation rate among patients undergoing first-time percutaneous coronary intervention is low in Norway. The typical participant is young, overweight, well-educated, and had an acute coronary event. These results varied by geographical region.

scholarly journals The Clinical Prediction Factors for Non-Culprit Lesion Progression in Patients with Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
jian wang ◽  
Cheng-ying Yan
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background To investigate the relationship between the clinical features and progression of non-culprit lesions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods A total of 480 patients (57.1 ± 9.2 y) with STEMI who underwent PPCI between January 2016 and December 2017 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent PPCI as a treatment for culprit lesions. Clinical and angiographic follow-up were performed for 12 months. All patients were divided into a non-culprit lesions (NCL) progression group (205 cases) and a control group (275 cases) based on angiographic follow-up outcomes at 12 months. The clinical and angiographic features were analyzed. Results Body mass index (BMI), serum creatinine (Scr), fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated serum albumin, glycated hemoglobin and homocysteine levels in the NCL progression group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). A logistic regression analysis showed that FBG (odds ratio = 1.274, 95% confidence interval: 1.077–1.505, P = 0.005) and Scr (odds ratio = 1.020, 95% confidence interval: 1.002–1.038, P = 0.027) were independent predictors of NCL progression. A partial correlation analysis showed that FBG was positively correlated with NCL progression (r = 0.231, P = 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the boundary point of FBG to predict NCL progression was 5.715 mmol/L, and the sensitivity was 74.4% and the specificity was 46.4%. Conclusions FBG is a valuable predictor for NCL progression in patients with STEMI after PPCI.

Symptom experience as a predictor of cardiac rehabilitation education programme attendance after percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective questionnaire survey

2020 ◽  
pp. 147451512094053
Author(s):  
Ji-Su Kim ◽  
Gwang S Kim ◽  
Seok-Min Kang ◽  
Sang H Chu
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Health Behaviour ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Education Programme ◽  
Symptom Experience ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Background: Despite evidence that participation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with better clinical outcomes, many patients with coronary artery disease do not participate in such programmes. A traditional educational approach is recommended to provide patients with information regarding the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in relation to their underlying coronary artery disease and modification of risk factors. Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine the role of patient factors (symptom experience and health belief) on cardiac rehabilitation education programme attendance among Korean patients subjected to percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: A prospective survey was conducted enrolling 173 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Information on symptom experience, health belief (perceived susceptibility/severity/benefits/ barriers) and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was collected at baseline (after percutaneous coronary intervention). Three to four weeks later, information on disease-related knowledge and health behaviour was compared between cardiac rehabilitation education programme attendees and non-attendees. Results: Eighty of 173 (46.2%) patients surveyed attended the cardiac rehabilitation education programme. Symptom experience before percutaneous coronary intervention was the most significant predictor of programme attendance (odds ratio=3.46; 95% confidence interval 1.45–8.27), followed by higher perceived socioeconomic status (odds ratio=2.90; 95% confidence interval 1.28–6.58), perceived susceptibility (odds ratio=1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.08–1.39), perceived benefits (odds ratio=1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.17) and perceived severity (odds ratio=1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.08). Better disease-related knowledge and health behaviour were significantly associated with cardiac rehabilitation education programme attendance. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that educational programmes to help improve patients’ perceptions of their disease susceptibility and severity, especially health behaviour benefits in patients without symptom experience before percutaneous coronary intervention, are necessary.

scholarly journals Prognostic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: A report from SWEDEHEART

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Völz ◽  
Petur Petursson ◽  
Oskar Angerås ◽  
Jacob Odenstedt ◽  
Dan Ioanes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
One Year

Aims: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACSs). Octogenarians, however, were underrepresented in the pivotal trials. This study aimed to assess the effect of PCI in patients ≥80 years old. Methods and results: We used data from the SWEDEHEART registry for all hospital admissions at eight cardiac care centres within Västra Götaland County. Consecutive patients ≥80 years old admitted for NSTE-ACS between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. We performed instrumental variable analysis with propensity score. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days and one year after index hospitalization. During the study period 5200 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In total, 586 (11.2%) patients underwent PCI, the remaining 4613 patients were treated conservatively. Total mortality at 30 days was 19.4% (1007 events) and 39.4% (1876 events) at one year. Thirty-day mortality was 20.7% in conservatively treated patients and 8.5% in the PCI group (adjusted odds ratio 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.12–0.97, p = 0.044). One-year mortality was 42.1% in the conservatively treated group and 16.3% in the PCI group (adjusted odds ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.36–2.51, p = 0.847). Conclusions: PCI in octogenarians with NSTE-ACS was associated with a lower risk of mortality at 30 days. However, this survival benefit was not sustained during the entire study-period of one-year.

scholarly journals Multicentre cohort study of the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with concurrent cancer and ischaemic heart disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Nishikawa ◽  
Toshitaka Morishima ◽  
Sumiyo Okawa ◽  
Yuki Fujii ◽  
Tomoyuki Otsuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Long Term Prognosis ◽  
Concurrent Cancer

Abstract Background The incidence of concurrent cancer and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is increasing; however, the long-term patient prognoses remain unclear. Methods Five-year all-cause mortality data pertaining to patients in the Osaka Cancer Registry, who were diagnosed with colorectal, lung, prostate, and gastric cancers between 2010 and 2015, were retrieved and analysed together with linked patient administrative data. Patient characteristics (cancer type, stage, and treatment; coronary risk factors; medications; and time from cancer diagnosis to index admission for percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or IHD diagnosis) were adjusted for propensity score matching. Three groups were identified: patients who underwent PCI within 3 years of cancer diagnosis (n = 564, PCI + group), patients diagnosed with IHD within 3 years of cancer diagnosis who did not undergo PCI (n = 3058, PCI-/IHD + group), and patients without IHD (n = 27,392, PCI-/IHD- group). Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for comparisons. Results After propensity score matching, the PCI + group had better prognosis (n = 489 in both groups, hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.51–0.81, P < 0.001) than the PCI-/IHD + group. PCI + patients (n = 282) had significantly higher mortality than those without IHD (n = 280 in each group, hazard ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.90–4.38, P < 0.001). Conclusions PCI might improve the long-term prognosis in cancer patients with IHD. However, these patients could have significantly worse long-term prognosis than cancer patients without IHD. Since the present study has some limitations, further research will be needed on this important topic in cardio-oncology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document