scholarly journals Boundary sequences flanking the mouse tyrosinase locus ensure faithful pattern of gene expression

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Seruggia ◽  
Almudena Fernández ◽  
Marta Cantero ◽  
Ana Fernández-Miñán ◽  
José Luis Gomez-Skarmeta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Abstract Control of gene expression is dictated by cell-type specific regulatory sequences that physically organize the structure of chromatin, including promoters, enhancers and insulators. While promoters and enhancers convey cell-type specific activating signals, insulators prevent the cross-talk of regulatory elements within adjacent loci and safeguard the specificity of action of promoters and enhancers towards their targets in a tissue specific manner. Using the mouse tyrosinase (Tyr) locus as an experimental model, a gene whose mutations are associated with albinism, we described the chromatin structure in cells at two distinct transcriptional states. Guided by chromatin structure, through the use of Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C), we identified sequences at the 5′ and 3′ boundaries of this mammalian gene that function as enhancers and insulators. By CRISPR/Cas9-mediated chromosomal deletion, we dissected the functions of these two regulatory elements in vivo in the mouse, at the endogenous chromosomal context, and proved their mechanistic role as genomic insulators, shielding the Tyr locus from the expression patterns of adjacent genes.

scholarly journals Boundary sequences flanking the mouse tyrosinase locus ensure faithful pattern of gene expression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Seruggia ◽  
Almudena Fernández ◽  
Marta Cantero ◽  
Ana Fernández-Miñán ◽  
José Luis Gomez-Skarmeta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

ABSTRACTControl of gene expression is dictated by cell-type specific regulatory sequences that physically organize the structure of chromatin, including promoters, enhancers and insulators. While promoters and enhancers convey cell-type specific activating signals, insulators prevent the cross-talk of regulatory elements within adjacent loci and safeguard the specificity of action of promoters and enhancers towards their targets in a tissue specific manner. Using the mouse tyrosinase (Tyr) locus as an experimental model, a gene whose mutations are associated with albinism, we described the chromatin structure in cells at two distinct transcriptional states. Guided by chromatin structure, through the use of Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C), we identified sequences at the 5’ and 3’ boundaries of this mammalian gene that function as enhancers and insulators. By CRISPR/Cas9-mediated chromosomal deletion, we dissected the functions of these two regulatory elements in vivo in the mouse, at the endogenous chromosomal context, and proved their role as genomic insulators, shielding the Tyr locus from the expression patterns of adjacent genes.

scholarly journals Enhancers and Transcriptional Regulation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. SCI-14-SCI-14
Author(s):  
Joanna Wysocka
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Regulatory Sequence ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Abstract Interactions between the genome and its cellular and signaling environments, which ultimately occur at the level of chromatin, are the key to comprehending how cell-type-specific gene expression patterns arise and are maintained during development or are misregulated in disease. Central to the cell type-specific transcriptional regulation are distal cis-regulatory elements called enhancers, which function in a modular way to provide exquisite spatiotemporal control of gene expression during development. We are using a combination of genomic, genetic, biochemical, and single-cell approaches to investigate how enhancers are activated in response to developmental stimuli, how they communicate with target promoters over large genomic distances to regulate transcriptional outputs, what is the role of chromatin modification and remodeling in facilitating or restricting enhancer activity and how regulatory sequence change leads to the phenotypic divergence in humans. I will discuss our latest results on the mechanisms underlying enhancer function and gene regulation in development and disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals A human cell atlas of fetal chromatin accessibility

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 370 (6518) ◽  
pp. eaba7612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Domcke ◽  
Andrew J. Hill ◽  
Riza M. Daza ◽  
Junyue Cao ◽  
Diana R. O’Day ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Human Cell ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Complex Trait ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Type Specific

The chromatin landscape underlying the specification of human cell types is of fundamental interest. We generated human cell atlases of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in fetal tissues. For chromatin accessibility, we devised a three-level combinatorial indexing assay and applied it to 53 samples representing 15 organs, profiling ~800,000 single cells. We leveraged cell types defined by gene expression to annotate these data and cataloged hundreds of thousands of candidate regulatory elements that exhibit cell type–specific chromatin accessibility. We investigated the properties of lineage-specific transcription factors (such as POU2F1 in neurons), organ-specific specializations of broadly distributed cell types (such as blood and endothelial), and cell type–specific enrichments of complex trait heritability. These data represent a rich resource for the exploration of in vivo human gene regulation in diverse tissues and cell types.

Analysis of Gene Expression Directed by a Thymic Locus Control in Transgenic Mice: Mechanisms and Application to Vectors for Gene Therapy

1996 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
BJ Aronow ◽  
CA Ley ◽  
KC Ess ◽  
DP Witte
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Therapy ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Transgenic Mice ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Base Pair ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gene Copy ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Type Specific

The formation of peripheral T cells from thymocyte progenitors is an intricate developmental process that requires the organized and coordinate expression of multiple genes. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is an example of a gene that is subject to strong developmental regulation in T-cell precursors and is essential for the subsequent formation of T-cells in humans. We have sought to understand the mechanisms of ADA gene regulation from a basic point of view as well as to employ this to potential vectors for gene therapy.Using transgenic mice have shown that the first intron of the ADA gene contains a powerful locus control region that directs high level gene expression within cortical thymocytes. Based on extensive mutational analysis of the regulatory region and analyses of gene expression that include quantitative gene expression, in situ hybridization, and biochemical characterizations of chromatin structure, we have demonstrated that the intronic locus control region (LCR) consists of a hierarchically structured 2300 base pairs of DNA sequence (Figure 1). The LCR is composed of a series of regulatory elements that include a centrally positioned 300 base pair classical enhancer domain within which there is a critical 30 base pair enhancer core. Within this core, there is a single binding site for the transcription factor c-Myb that is required for activity of the enhancer core, the enhancer, and the intact LCR. Beyond the 300 bp enhancer core on either side the LCR contains novel and puzzling 1 kb non-enhancer sequences that we have termed facilitators. These sequences enable gene copy proportional expression by facilitating the ability of the enhancer to function in chromatin. The effects of the facilitators are evidenced by their ability to allow for insertion-site-independent and gene-copy-proportional expression and they prevent variegated expression among similarly differentiated cell types (Figure 2). Thus, total gene expression does not indicate proper cell type specific expression. The facilitators also allow for the formation of a strong tissue and cell type specific DNAse I hypersensitive site at the enhancer. This suggests that the formation of a discrete organized chromatin structure as a function of developmental differentiation requires extensive DNA sequences, only some of which are of the enhancer type. The capabilities of the facilitators to activate a chromatin domain may also suggest their potential usefulness in vectors for gene therapy of both ADA deficiency and possibly other human genetic diseases. However, the distance and non-enhancer nature of the facilitators suggest that they may act differently than conventional regulatory elements. In support of this, the facilitators obey a strict position and orientation rules with respect to the enhancer.

scholarly journals Dynamics of the 4D genome during lineage specification, differentiation and maturation in vivo

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Marieke Oudelaar ◽  
Robert A. Beagrie ◽  
Matthew Gosden ◽  
Sara de Ornellas ◽  
Emily Georgiades ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Erythroid Differentiation ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
High Resolution Data ◽  
Chromatin Architecture

AbstractMammalian gene expression patterns are controlled by regulatory elements, which interact within Topologically Associating Domains (TADs). The relationship between activation of regulatory elements, formation of structural chromatin interactions and gene expression during development is unclear. We developed Tiled-C, a low-input Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) approach, to study chromatin architecture at high spatial and temporal resolution through in vivo mouse erythroid differentiation. Integrated analysis of matched chromatin accessibility and single-cell expression data shows that regulatory elements gradually become accessible within pre-existing TADs during early differentiation. This is followed by structural re-organization within the TAD and formation of specific contacts between enhancers and promoters. In contrast to previous reports, our high-resolution data show that these enhancer-promoter interactions are not established prior to gene expression, but formed gradually during differentiation, concomitant with progressive upregulation of gene activity. Together, these results provide new insight into the close, interdependent relationship between chromatin architecture and gene regulation during development.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals Histone modifications form a cell-type-specific chromosomal bar code that persists through the cell cycle

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Halsall ◽  
Simon Andrews ◽  
Felix Krueger ◽  
Charlotte E. Rutledge ◽  
Gabriella Ficz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Histone Modifications ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Bar Code ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Rolling Windows

AbstractChromatin configuration influences gene expression in eukaryotes at multiple levels, from individual nucleosomes to chromatin domains several Mb long. Post-translational modifications (PTM) of core histones seem to be involved in chromatin structural transitions, but how remains unclear. To explore this, we used ChIP-seq and two cell types, HeLa and lymphoblastoid (LCL), to define how changes in chromatin packaging through the cell cycle influence the distributions of three transcription-associated histone modifications, H3K9ac, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. We show that chromosome regions (bands) of 10–50 Mb, detectable by immunofluorescence microscopy of metaphase (M) chromosomes, are also present in G1 and G2. They comprise 1–5 Mb sub-bands that differ between HeLa and LCL but remain consistent through the cell cycle. The same sub-bands are defined by H3K9ac and H3K4me3, while H3K27me3 spreads more widely. We found little change between cell cycle phases, whether compared by 5 Kb rolling windows or when analysis was restricted to functional elements such as transcription start sites and topologically associating domains. Only a small number of genes showed cell-cycle related changes: at genes encoding proteins involved in mitosis, H3K9 became highly acetylated in G2M, possibly because of ongoing transcription. In conclusion, modified histone isoforms H3K9ac, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 exhibit a characteristic genomic distribution at resolutions of 1 Mb and below that differs between HeLa and lymphoblastoid cells but remains remarkably consistent through the cell cycle. We suggest that this cell-type-specific chromosomal bar-code is part of a homeostatic mechanism by which cells retain their characteristic gene expression patterns, and hence their identity, through multiple mitoses.

scholarly journals Comprehensive analysis of single cell ATAC-seq data with SnapATAC

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongxin Fang ◽  
Sebastian Preissl ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Xiaomeng Hou ◽  
Jacinta Lucero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Single Cell Analysis ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cellular Heterogeneity ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractIdentification of the cis-regulatory elements controlling cell-type specific gene expression patterns is essential for understanding the origin of cellular diversity. Conventional assays to map regulatory elements via open chromatin analysis of primary tissues is hindered by sample heterogeneity. Single cell analysis of accessible chromatin (scATAC-seq) can overcome this limitation. However, the high-level noise of each single cell profile and the large volume of data pose unique computational challenges. Here, we introduce SnapATAC, a software package for analyzing scATAC-seq datasets. SnapATAC dissects cellular heterogeneity in an unbiased manner and map the trajectories of cellular states. Using the Nyström method, SnapATAC can process data from up to a million cells. Furthermore, SnapATAC incorporates existing tools into a comprehensive package for analyzing single cell ATAC-seq dataset. As demonstration of its utility, SnapATAC is applied to 55,592 single-nucleus ATAC-seq profiles from the mouse secondary motor cortex. The analysis reveals ~370,000 candidate regulatory elements in 31 distinct cell populations in this brain region and inferred candidate cell-type specific transcriptional regulators.

scholarly journals A scalable platform for the development of cell-type-specific viral drivers

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinisa Hrvatin ◽  
Christopher P Tzeng ◽  
M Aurel Nagy ◽  
Hume Stroud ◽  
Charalampia Koutsioumpa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Heterologous Gene Expression ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Type Specificity ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
The Many ◽  
Dna Regulatory Elements

Enhancers are the primary DNA regulatory elements that confer cell type specificity of gene expression. Recent studies characterizing individual enhancers have revealed their potential to direct heterologous gene expression in a highly cell-type-specific manner. However, it has not yet been possible to systematically identify and test the function of enhancers for each of the many cell types in an organism. We have developed PESCA, a scalable and generalizable method that leverages ATAC- and single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols, to characterize cell-type-specific enhancers that should enable genetic access and perturbation of gene function across mammalian cell types. Focusing on the highly heterogeneous mammalian cerebral cortex, we apply PESCA to find enhancers and generate viral reagents capable of accessing and manipulating a subset of somatostatin-expressing cortical interneurons with high specificity. This study demonstrates the utility of this platform for developing new cell-type-specific viral reagents, with significant implications for both basic and translational research.

scholarly journals Genetic influences on cell type specific gene expression and splicing during neurogenesis elucidate regulatory mechanisms of brain traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nil Aygün ◽  
Angela L. Elwell ◽  
Dan Liang ◽  
Michael J. Lafferty ◽  
Kerry E. Cheek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Allele Specific ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Regulatory Effects

SummaryInterpretation of the function of non-coding risk loci for neuropsychiatric disorders and brain-relevant traits via gene expression and alternative splicing is mainly performed in bulk post-mortem adult tissue. However, genetic risk loci are enriched in regulatory elements of cells present during neocortical differentiation, and regulatory effects of risk variants may be masked by heterogeneity in bulk tissue. Here, we map e/sQTLs and allele specific expression in primary human neural progenitors (n=85) and their sorted neuronal progeny (n=74). Using colocalization and TWAS, we uncover cell-type specific regulatory mechanisms underlying risk for these traits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document