The muscarinic M3 acetylcholine receptor exists as two differently sized complexes at the plasma membrane

2013 ◽  
Vol 452 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suparna Patowary ◽  
Elisa Alvarez-Curto ◽  
Tian-Rui Xu ◽  
Jessica D. Holz ◽  
Julie A. Oliver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Acetylcholine Receptors ◽  
Quaternary Structure ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Dimeric Complexes ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Quaternary Structures ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The literature on GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptor) homo-oligomerization encompasses conflicting views that range from interpretations that GPCRs must be monomeric, through comparatively newer proposals that they exist as dimers or higher-order oligomers, to suggestions that such quaternary structures are rather ephemeral or merely accidental and may serve no functional purpose. In the present study we use a novel method of FRET (Förster resonance energy transfer) spectrometry and controlled expression of energy donor-tagged species to show that M3Rs (muscarinic M3 acetylcholine receptors) at the plasma membrane exist as stable dimeric complexes, a large fraction of which interact dynamically to form tetramers without the presence of trimers, pentamers, hexamers etc. That M3R dimeric units interact dynamically was also supported by co-immunoprecipitation of receptors synthesized at distinct times. On the basis of all these findings, we propose a conceptual framework that may reconcile the conflicting views on the quaternary structure of GPCRs.

scholarly journals In-cell detection of conformational sub-states of a GPCR quaternary structure: Modulation of sub-state probability by cognate ligand binding

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Paprocki ◽  
Gabriel Biener ◽  
Michael Stoneman ◽  
Valerica Raicu
Keyword(s):  
Quaternary Structure ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Cell Detection ◽  
Conformational Substates ◽  
Class D ◽  
Spectrometry Technique ◽  
Quaternary Structures ◽  
Functional Relevance ◽  
Fluorescent Tags

ABSTRACTWhile the notion that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) associate into homo- and hetero-oligomers has gained more recognition in recent years, a lack of consensus remains among researchers regarding the functional relevance of GPCR oligomerization. A relatively recent technique, Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) spectrometry, allows for the determination of the oligomeric (or quaternary) structure of proteins in living cells via analysis of efficiency distributions of energy transferred from optically excited fluorescent tags acting as donors of energy to fluorescent tags acting as acceptors of energy and residing within the same oligomer. In this study, we significantly improved the resolution of the FRET-spectrometry approach to detect small differences between the interprotomeric distances among GPCR oligomers with subtle differences in quaternary structures. We then used this approach to study the conformational substates of oligomers of sterile 2 α-factor receptor (Ste2), a class D GPCR found in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae of mating type a. Ste2 has previously been shown to form tetrameric oligomers at relatively low expression levels (between 11 and 140 molecules/μm2) in the absence of its cognate ligand, the α-factor pheromone. The significantly improved FRET spectrometry technique allowed us to detect multiple distinct quaternary conformational substates of Ste2 oligomers, and to assess how the α-factor ligand altered the proportion of such substates. The ability to determine quaternary structure substates of GPCRs provides exquisite means to elucidate functional relevance of GPCR oligomerization.

scholarly journals Molecular basis of signaling specificity between GIRK channels and GPCRs

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouki K Touhara ◽  
Roderick MacKinnon
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Acetylcholine Receptors ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors ◽  
K Channel ◽  
Girk Channels ◽  
Signaling Specificity ◽  
Slow Heart Rate ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Stimulated muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M2Rs) release Gβγ subunits, which slow heart rate by activating a G protein-gated K+ channel (GIRK). Stimulated β2 adrenergic receptors (β2ARs) also release Gβγ subunits, but GIRK is not activated. This study addresses the mechanism underlying this specificity of GIRK activation by M2Rs. K+ currents and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer between labelled G proteins and GIRK show that M2Rs catalyze Gβγ subunit release at higher rates than β2ARs, generating higher Gβγ concentrations that activate GIRK and regulate other targets of Gβγ. The higher rate of Gβγ release is attributable to a faster G protein coupled receptor – G protein trimer association rate in M2R compared to β2AR. Thus, a rate difference in a single kinetic step accounts for specificity.

scholarly journals Regulation of voltage-gated potassium channels by PI(4,5)P2

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kruse ◽  
Gerald R.V. Hammond ◽  
Bertil Hille
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Muscarinic Agonists ◽  
Voltage Gated ◽  
Channel Current ◽  
Kv Channels ◽  
Regulation Of Activity ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Ph Probes

Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) regulates activities of numerous ion channels including inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels, KCNQ, TRP, and voltage-gated calcium channels. Several studies suggest that voltage-gated potassium (KV) channels might be regulated by PI(4,5)P2. Wide expression of KV channels in different cells suggests that such regulation could have broad physiological consequences. To study regulation of KV channels by PI(4,5)P2, we have coexpressed several of them in tsA-201 cells with a G protein–coupled receptor (M1R), a voltage-sensitive lipid 5-phosphatase (Dr-VSP), or an engineered fusion protein carrying both lipid 4-phosphatase and 5-phosphatase activity (pseudojanin). These tools deplete PI(4,5)P2 with application of muscarinic agonists, depolarization, or rapamycin, respectively. PI(4,5)P2 at the plasma membrane was monitored by Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) from PH probes of PLCδ1 simultaneously with whole-cell recordings. Activation of Dr-VSP or recruitment of pseudojanin inhibited KV7.1, KV7.2/7.3, and Kir2.1 channel current by 90–95%. Activation of M1R inhibited KV7.2/7.3 current similarly. With these tools, we tested for potential PI(4,5)P2 regulation of activity of KV1.1/KVβ1.1, KV1.3, KV1.4, and KV1.5/KVβ1.3, KV2.1, KV3.4, KV4.2, KV4.3 (with different KChIPs and DPP6-s), and hERG/KCNE2. Interestingly, we found a substantial removal of inactivation for KV1.1/KVβ1.1 and KV3.4, resulting in up-regulation of current density upon activation of M1R but no changes in activity upon activating only VSP or pseudojanin. The other channels tested except possibly hERG showed no alteration in activity in any of the assays we used. In conclusion, a depletion of PI(4,5)P2 at the plasma membrane by enzymes does not seem to influence activity of most tested KV channels, whereas it does strongly inhibit members of the KV7 and Kir families.

scholarly journals Heterodimerization Between the Lutropin and Follitropin Receptors is Associated With an Attenuation of Hormone-Dependent Signaling

Endocrinology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (10) ◽  
pp. 3925-3930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuyan Feng ◽  
Meilin Zhang ◽  
Rongbin Guan ◽  
Deborah L. Segaloff
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Fsh Receptor ◽  
Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Lh Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Stimulation Of

The LH receptor (LHR) and FSH receptor (FSHR) are each G protein-coupled receptors that play critical roles in reproductive endocrinology. Each of these receptors has previously been shown to self-associate into homodimers and oligomers shortly after their biosynthesis. As shown herein using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to detect protein-protein interactions, our data show that the LHR and FSHR, when coexpressed in the same cells, specifically heterodimerize with each other. Further experiments confirm that at least a portion of the cellular LHR/FSHR heterodimers are present on the cell surface and are functional. We then sought to ascertain what effects, if any, heterodimerization between the LHR and FSHR might have on signaling. It was observed that when the LHR was expressed under conditions promoting the heterodimerization with FSHR, LH or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation of Gs was attenuated. Conversely, when the FSHR was expressed under conditions promoting heterodimerization with the LHR, FSH-stimulated Gs activation was attenuated. These results demonstrate that the coexpression of the LHR and FSHR enables heterodimerizaton between the 2 gonadotropin receptors and results in an attenuation of signaling through each receptor.

scholarly journals Minireview: GPCR and G Proteins: Drug Efficacy and Activation in Live Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Vilardaga ◽  
Moritz Bünemann ◽  
Timothy N. Feinstein ◽  
Nevin Lambert ◽  
Viacheslav O. Nikolaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Live Cells ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract Many biochemical pathways are driven by G protein-coupled receptors, cell surface proteins that convert the binding of extracellular chemical, sensory, and mechanical stimuli into cellular signals. Their interaction with various ligands triggers receptor activation that typically couples to and activates heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn control the propagation of secondary messenger molecules (e.g. cAMP) involved in critically important physiological processes (e.g. heart beat). Successful transfer of information from ligand binding events to intracellular signaling cascades involves a dynamic interplay between ligands, receptors, and G proteins. The development of Förster resonance energy transfer and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based methods has now permitted the kinetic analysis of initial steps involved in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling in live cells and in systems as diverse as neurotransmitter and hormone signaling. The direct measurement of ligand efficacy at the level of the receptor by Förster resonance energy transfer is also now possible and allows intrinsic efficacies of clinical drugs to be linked with the effect of receptor polymorphisms.

scholarly journals The luminescent HiBiT peptide enables selective quantitation of G protein–coupled receptor ligand engagement and internalization in living cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (15) ◽  
pp. 5124-5135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle E. Boursier ◽  
Sergiy Levin ◽  
Kris Zimmerman ◽  
Thomas Machleidt ◽  
Robin Hurst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Cell Surface Receptor ◽  
Cellular Interactions ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are prominent targets to new therapeutics for a range of diseases. Comprehensive assessments of their cellular interactions with bioactive compounds, particularly in a kinetic format, are imperative to the development of drugs with improved efficacy. Hence, we developed complementary cellular assays that enable equilibrium and real-time analyses of GPCR ligand engagement and consequent activation, measured as receptor internalization. These assays utilize GPCRs genetically fused to an N-terminal HiBiT peptide (1.3 kDa), which produces bright luminescence upon high-affinity complementation with LgBiT, an 18-kDa subunit derived from NanoLuc. The cell impermeability of LgBiT limits signal detection to the cell surface and enables measurements of ligand-induced internalization through changes in cell-surface receptor density. In addition, bioluminescent resonance energy transfer is used to quantify dynamic interactions between ligands and their cognate HiBiT-tagged GPCRs through competitive binding with fluorescent tracers. The sensitivity and dynamic range of these assays benefit from the specificity of bioluminescent resonance energy transfer and the high signal intensity of HiBiT/LgBiT without background luminescence from receptors present in intracellular compartments. These features allow analyses of challenging interactions having low selectivity or affinity and enable studies using endogenously tagged receptors. Using the β-adrenergic receptor family as a model, we demonstrate the versatility of these assays by utilizing the same HiBiT construct in analyses of multiple aspects of GPCR pharmacology. We anticipate that this combination of target engagement and proximal functional readout will prove useful to the study of other GPCR families and the development of new therapeutics.

scholarly journals Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer Based G Protein-Activation Assay to Probe Duration of Antagonism at the Histamine H3 Receptor

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 3724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara A. M. Mocking ◽  
Maurice C. M. L. Buzink ◽  
Rob Leurs ◽  
Henry F. Vischer
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Short Residence Time ◽  
Protein Activation ◽  
G Protein Activation ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Histamine H3

Duration of receptor antagonism, measured as the recovery of agonist responsiveness, is gaining attention as a method to evaluate the ‘effective’ target-residence for antagonists. These functional assays might be a good alternative for kinetic binding assays in competition with radiolabeled or fluorescent ligands, as they are performed on intact cells and better reflect consequences of dynamic cellular processes on duration of receptor antagonism. Here, we used a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based assay that monitors heterotrimeric G protein activation via scavenging of released Venus-Gβ1γ2 by NanoLuc (Nluc)-tagged membrane-associated-C-terminal fragment of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 (masGRK3ct-Nluc) as a tool to probe duration of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) antagonism. The Gαi-coupled histamine H3 receptor (H3R) was used in this study as prolonged antagonism is associated with adverse events (e.g., insomnia) and consequently, short-residence time ligands might be preferred. Due to its fast and prolonged response, this assay can be used to determine the duration of functional antagonism by measuring the recovery of agonist responsiveness upon washout of pre-bound antagonist, and to assess antagonist re-equilibration time via Schild-plot analysis. Re-equilibration of pre-incubated antagonist with agonist and receptor could be followed in time to monitor the transition from insurmountable to surmountable antagonism. The BRET-based G protein activation assay can detect differences in the recovery of H3R responsiveness and re-equilibration of pre-bound antagonists between the tested H3R antagonists. Fast dissociation kinetics were observed for marketed drug pitolisant (Wakix®) in this assay, which suggests that short residence time might be beneficial for therapeutic targeting of the H3R.

Dynamic receptor superstructures at the plasma membrane

1997 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. DAMJANOVICH ◽  
R. GÁSPÁR, Jr. ◽  
C. PIERI
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Scanning Force Microscopy ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Conformational States ◽  
Lipid Domain ◽  
Receptor Clusters

1. INTRODUCTION 681.1 Receptor patterns in the plasma membrane 681.2 Different types of receptor patterns 712. METHODS TO INVESTIGATE NON-RANDOM RECEPTOR CLUSTERING 732.1 Fluorescence resonance energy transfer 732.2 Flow cytometric energy transfer measurement 782.3 Fluorescence anisotropy and energy transfer 792.4 Photobleaching energy transfer on single cells 812.5 Two-dimensional mapping of receptor superstructures 822.6 Detecting single receptor molecules 852.7 Chemical identification of receptor clusters 862.8 Electron microscopy 872.9 Scanning force microscopy 883. CONFORMATIONAL STATES OF RECEPTORS 903.1 Multi-subunit receptor structures 903.2 Physical parameters influencing conformational states 913.3 Chemical interactions and receptor conformations 924. ON THE ORIGIN OF NATURALLY OCCURRING RECEPTOR CLUSTERS 934.1 Synthesis of receptors and their localization in the plasma membrane 934.2 Lipid domain structure of the plasma membrane 944.3 The validity of the Singer–Nicolson model 945. CONCLUSIONS 966. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 967. REFERENCES 97

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document