Polyamine dependence of normal cell-cycle progression

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 366-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Oredsson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Enzyme Activities ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Polyamine Biosynthesis ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Elongation Step ◽  
Key Steps

The driving force of the cell cycle is the activities of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Key steps in the regulation of the cell cycle therefore must impinge upon the activities of the CDKs. CDKs exert their functions when bound to cyclins that are expressed cyclically during the cell cycle. Polyamine biosynthesis varies bicyclically during the cell cycle with peaks in enzyme activities at the G1/S and S/G2 transitions. The enzyme activities are regulated at transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels. When cells are seeded in the presence of drugs that interfere with polyamine biosynthesis, cell cycle progression is affected within one cell cycle after seeding. The cell cycle phase that is most sensitive to polyamine biosynthesis inhibition is the S phase, while effects on the G1 and G2/M phases occur at later time points. The elongation step of DNA replication is negatively affected when polyamine pools are not allowed to increase normally during cell proliferation. Cyclin A is expressed during the S phase and cyclin A/CDK2 is important for a normal rate of DNA elongation. Cyclin A expression is lowered in cells treated with polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors. Thus, polyamines may affect S phase progression by participating in the regulation of cyclin A expression.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Dysregulation by Human Cytomegalovirus: Influence of the Cell Cycle Phase at the Time of Infection and Effects on Cyclin Transcription

1998 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 3729-3741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan S. Salvant ◽  
Elizabeth A. Fortunato ◽  
Deborah H. Spector
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Hcmv Infection ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Time Of Infection

ABSTRACT Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection inhibits cell cycle progression and alters the expression of cyclins E, A, and B (F. M. Jault, J.-M. Jault, F. Ruchti, E. A. Fortunato, C. Clark, J. Corbeil, D. D. Richman, and D. H. Spector, J. Virol. 69:6697–6704, 1995). In this study, we examined cell cycle progression, cyclin gene expression, and early viral events when the infection was initiated at different points in the cell cycle (G0, G1, and S). In all cases, infection led to cell cycle arrest. Cells infected in G0 or G1phase also showed a complete or partial absence, respectively, of cellular DNA synthesis at a time when DNA synthesis occurred in the corresponding mock-infected cells. In contrast, when cells were infected near or during S phase, many cells were able to pass through S phase and undergo mitosis prior to cell cycle arrest. S-phase infection also produced a delay in the appearance of the viral cytopathic effect and in the synthesis of immediate-early and early proteins. Labeling of cells with bromodeoxyuridine immediately prior to HCMV infection in S phase revealed that viral protein expression occurred primarily in cells which were not engaged in DNA synthesis at the time of infection. The viral-mediated induction of cyclin E, maintenance of cyclin-B protein levels, and inhibitory effects on the accumulation of cyclin A were not significantly affected when infection occurred during different phases of the cell cycle (G0, G1, and S). However, there was a delay in the observed inhibition of cyclin A in cells infected during S phase. This finding was in accord with the pattern of cell cycle progression and delay in viral gene expression associated with S-phase infection. Analysis of the mRNA revealed that the effects of the virus on cyclin E and cyclin A, but not on cyclin B, were primarily at the transcriptional level.

scholarly journals DNA damage checkpoint dynamics drive cell cycle phase transitions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Xiao Chao ◽  
Cere E. Poovey ◽  
Ashley A. Privette ◽  
Gavin D. Grant ◽  
Hui Yan Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints

ABSTRACTDNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed “commitment point” within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases. In contrast to G1 and G2, cell cycle progression in S phase is significantly less sensitive to DNA damage. Instead of exhibiting a complete halt, we find that increasing DNA damage doses leads to decreased rates of S-phase progression followed by arrest in the subsequent G2. Moreover, these phase-specific differences in DNA damage checkpoint dynamics are associated with corresponding differences in the proportions of irreversibly arrested cells. Thus, the precise timing of DNA damage determines the sensitivity, rate of cell cycle progression, and functional outcomes for damaged cells. These findings should inform our understanding of cell fate decisions after treatment with common cancer therapeutics such as genotoxins or spindle poisons, which often target cells in a specific cell cycle phase.

scholarly journals Intrinsic S phase checkpoint enforced by an antiproliferative oncosuppressor cytokine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livio Mallucci ◽  
Valerie Wells
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Normal Cells ◽  
Orderly Transition

AbstractThe cell cycle is strictly programmed with control mechanisms that dictate order in cell cycle progression to ensure faithful DNA replication, whose deviance may lead to cancer. Checkpoint control at the G1/S, S/G2 and G2/M portals have been defined but no statutory time-programmed control for securing orderly transition through S phase has so far been identified. Here we report that in normal cells DNA synthesis is controlled by a checkpoint sited within the early part of S phase, enforced by the βGBP cytokine an antiproliferative molecule otherwise known for its oncosuppressor properties that normal cells constitutively produce for self-regulation. Suppression of active Ras and active MAPK, block of cyclin A gene expression and suppression of CDK2-cyclin A activity are events which while specific to the control of a cell cycle phase in normal cells are part of the apoptotic network in cancer cells.

scholarly journals A Protein Encoded by the Latency-Related Gene of Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Is Expressed in Trigeminal Ganglionic Neurons of Latently Infected Cattle and Interacts with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 during Productive Infection

1998 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 8133-8142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunquan Jiang ◽  
Ashfaque Hossain ◽  
Maria Teresa Winkler ◽  
Todd Holt ◽  
Alan Doster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Bovine Herpesvirus 1 ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Latently Infected ◽  
Herpesvirus 1

ABSTRACT Despite productive viral gene expression in the peripheral nervous system during acute infection, the bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) infection cycle is blocked in sensory ganglionic neurons and consequently latency is established. The only abundant viral transcript expressed during latency is the latency-related (LR) RNA. LR gene products inhibit S-phase entry, and binding of the LR protein (LRP) to cyclin A was hypothesized to block cell cycle progression. This study demonstrates LRP is a nuclear protein which is expressed in neurons of latently infected cattle. Affinity chromatography indicated that LRP interacts with cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2)-cyclin complexes or cdc2-cyclin complexes in transfected human cells or infected bovine cells. After partial purification using three different columns (DEAE-Sepharose, Econo S, and heparin-agarose), LRP was primarily associated with cdk2-cyclin E complexes, an enzyme which is necessary for G1-to-S-phase cell cycle progression. During acute infection of trigeminal ganglia or following dexamethasone-induced reactivation, BHV-1 induces expression of cyclin A in neurons (L. M. Schang, A. Hossain, and C. Jones, J. Virol. 70:3807–3814, 1996). Expression of S-phase regulatory proteins (cyclin A, for example) leads to neuronal apoptosis. Consequently, we hypothesize that interactions between LRP and cell cycle regulatory proteins promote survival of postmitotic neurons during acute infection and/or reactivation.

scholarly journals Multiple Functions of Fubp1 in Cell Cycle Progression and Cell Survival

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyu Kang ◽  
Hyeon Ji Kim ◽  
Tae-Jun Kim ◽  
Jin-Seok Byun ◽  
Jae-Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Metabolic Stress ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Double Agent

The discovery of novel and critical genes implicated in malignant development is a topic of high interest in cancer research. Intriguingly, a group of genes named “double-agent” genes were reported to have both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions. To date, less than 100 “double-agent” genes have been documented. Fubp1 is a master transcriptional regulator of a subset of genes by interacting with a far upstream element (FUSE). Mounting evidence has collectively demonstrated both the oncogenic and tumor suppressive roles of Fubp1 and the debate regarding its roles in tumorigenesis has been around for several years. Therefore, the detailed molecular mechanisms of Fubp1 need to be determined in each context. In the present study, we showed that the Fubp1 protein level was enriched in the S phase and we identified that Fubp1 deficiency altered cell cycle progression, especially in the S phase, by downregulating the mRNA expression levels of Ccna genes encoding cyclin A. Although this Fubp1-cyclin A axis appears to exist in several types of tumors, Fubp1 showed heterogeneous expression patterns among various cancer tissues, suggesting it exhibits multiple and complicated functions in cancer development. In addition, we showed that Fubp1 deficiency confers survival advantages to cells against metabolic stress and anti-cancer drugs, suggesting that Fubp1 may play both positive and negative roles in malignant development.

Cells and polyamines do it cyclically

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 63-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kersti Alm ◽  
Stina Oredsson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Biosynthetic Activity ◽  
Polyamine Biosynthesis ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
G0 Phase ◽  
Proliferating Cell

Cell-cycle progression is a one-way journey where the cell grows in size to be able to divide into two equally sized daughter cells. The cell cycle is divided into distinct consecutive phases defined as G1 (first gap), S (synthesis), G2 (second gap) and M (mitosis). A non-proliferating cell, which has retained the ability to enter the cell cycle when it receives appropriate signals, is in G0 phase, and cycling cells that do not receive proper signals leave the cell cycle from G1 into G0. One of the major events of the cell cycle is the duplication of DNA during S-phase. A group of molecules that are important for proper cell-cycle progression is the polyamines. Polyamine biosynthesis occurs cyclically during the cell cycle with peaks in activity in conjunction with the G1/S transition and at the end of S-phase and during G2-phase. The negative regulator of polyamine biosynthesis, antizyme, shows an inverse activity compared with the polyamine biosynthetic activity. The levels of the polyamines, putrescine, spermidine and spermine, double during the cell cycle and show a certain degree of cyclic variation in accordance with the biosynthetic activity. When cells in G0/G1-phase are seeded in the presence of compounds that prevent the cell-cycle-related increases in the polyamine pools, the S-phase of the first cell cycle is prolonged, whereas the other phases are initially unaffected. The results point to an important role for polyamines with regard to the ability of the cell to attain optimal rates of DNA replication.

scholarly journals Regulation of Late G1/S Phase Transition and APCCdh1 by Reactive Oxygen Species

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 4701-4711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney G. Havens ◽  
Alan Ho ◽  
Naohisa Yoshioka ◽  
Steven F. Dowdy
Keyword(s):  
Reactive Oxygen Species ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Reactive Oxygen ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Oxygen Species ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitochondrial Mass

ABSTRACT Proliferating cells have a higher metabolic rate than quiescent cells. To investigate the role of metabolism in cell cycle progression, we examined cell size, mitochondrial mass, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in highly synchronized cell populations progressing from early G1 to S phase. We found that ROS steadily increased, compared to cell size and mitochondrial mass, through the cell cycle. Since ROS has been shown to influence cell proliferation and transformation, we hypothesized that ROS could contribute to cell cycle progression. Antioxidant treatment of cells induced a late-G1-phase cell cycle arrest characterized by continued cellular growth, active cyclin D-Cdk4/6 and active cyclin E-Cdk2 kinases, and inactive hyperphosphorylated pRb. However, antioxidant-treated cells failed to accumulate cyclin A protein, a requisite step for initiation of DNA synthesis. Further examination revealed that cyclin A continued to be ubiquitinated by the anaphase promoting complex (APC) and to be degraded by the proteasome. This antioxidant arrest could be rescued by overexpression of Emi1, an APC inhibitor. These observations reveal an intrinsic late-G1-phase checkpoint, after transition across the growth factor-dependent G1 restriction point, that links increased steady-state levels of endogenous ROS and cell cycle progression through continued activity of APC in association with Cdh1.

Manipulation of the expression of regulatory genes of polyamine metabolism results in specific alterations of the cell-cycle progression

2001 ◽  
Vol 354 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca SCORCIONI ◽  
Arnaldo CORTI ◽  
Pierpaola DAVALLI ◽  
Serenella ASTANCOLLE ◽  
Saverio BETTUZZI
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Ornithine Decarboxylase ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Transient Transfection ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Polyamine Metabolism ◽  
Direct Link ◽  
Polyamine Biosynthesis ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Polyamine Uptake

We have previously reported that cyclical phases of accumulation and depletion of polyamines occur during cell-cycle progression. Regulatory ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) catalyses the first step of polyamine biosynthesis. Ornithine decarboxylase antizyme (OAZ), induced by high polyamine levels, inhibits ODC activity and prevents extracellular polyamine uptake. Spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT) regulates the polyamine degradation/excretion pathway. Here we show that 24h transient transfection of immortalized human prostatic epithelial cells (PNT1A and PNT2) with antisense ODC RNA or OAZ cDNA, or both, while effectively causing marked decreases of ODC activity and polyamine (especially putrescine) concentrations, resulted in accumulation of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle. Transfection with SSAT cDNA led to more pronounced decreases in spermidine and spermine levels and resulted in accumulation of cells in the G2/M phases. Transfection with all three constructs together produced maximal depletion of all polyamines, accompanied by accumulation of PNT1A cells in the S phase and PNT2 cells in the G0/G1 and G2/M phases. Accumulation of PNT1A cells in the S phase progressively increased at 15, 18 and 24h of transfection with antisense ODC and/or OAZ cDNA. At 24h, the DNA content was always reduced, as a possible outcome of altered chromosome condensation. A direct link between polyamine metabolism, cell proliferation and chromatin structure is thus proposed.

scholarly journals The S-phase-induced lncRNA SUNO1 promotes cell proliferation by controlling YAP1/Hippo signaling pathway

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinyu Hao ◽  
Xinying Zong ◽  
Qinyu Sun ◽  
Yo-Chuen Lin ◽  
You Jin Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Hippo Signaling ◽  
Cycle Progression

Cell cycle is a cellular process that is subject to stringent control. In contrast to the wealth of knowledge of proteins controlling the cell cycle, very little is known about the molecular role of lncRNAs (long noncoding RNAs) in cell-cycle progression. By performing genome-wide transcriptome analyses in cell-cycle-synchronized cells, we observed cell-cycle phase-specific induction of >2000 lncRNAs. Further, we demonstrate that an S-phase-upregulated lncRNA, SUNO1, facilitates cell-cycle progression by promoting YAP1-mediated gene expression. SUNO1 facilitates the cell-cycle-specific transcription of WTIP, a positive regulator of YAP1, by promoting the co-activator, DDX5-mediated stabilization of RNA polymerase II on chromatin. Finally, elevated SUNO1 levels are associated with poor cancer prognosis and tumorigenicity, implying its pro-survival role. Thus, we demonstrate the role of a S-phase up-regulated lncRNA in cell-cycle progression via modulating the expression of genes controlling cell proliferation.

scholarly journals Histone Deacetylase 3 Regulates Cyclin A Stability

2013 ◽  
Vol 288 (29) ◽  
pp. 21096-21104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Vidal-Laliena ◽  
Edurne Gallastegui ◽  
Francesca Mateo ◽  
Marian Martínez-Balbás ◽  
Maria Jesús Pujol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 3 ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Phase Progression

PCAF and GCN5 acetylate cyclin A at specific lysine residues targeting it for degradation at mitosis. We report here that histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) directly interacts with and deacetylates cyclin A. HDAC3 interacts with a domain included in the first 171 aa of cyclin A, a region involved in the regulation of its stability. In cells, overexpression of HDAC3 reduced cyclin A acetylation whereas the knocking down of HDAC3 increased its acetylation. Moreover, reduction of HDAC3 levels induced a decrease of cyclin A that can be reversed by proteasome inhibitors. These results indicate that HDAC3 is able to regulate cyclin A degradation during mitosis via proteasome. Interestingly, HDAC3 is abruptly degraded at mitosis also via proteasome thus facilitating cyclin A acetylation by PCAF/GCN5, which will target cyclin A for degradation. Because cyclin A is crucial for S phase progression and mitosis entry, the knock down of HDAC3 affects cell cycle progression specifically at both, S phase and G2/M transition. In summary we propose here that HDAC3 regulates cyclin A stability by counteracting the action of the acetylases PCAF/GCN5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document