scholarly journals Development of the Digital Economy in the Context of Improving the Methodological Support for the Formation and Assessment of Institutional Mechanisms of Innovation Activity

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 01022
Author(s):  
Denis Mironov ◽  
Viktor Blaginin ◽  
Lyudmila Shaybakova

The practice of reforming macrosystems and attempts to transition from resource and industrial to digital economy showed that the lack of an institutional component increases information uncertainty, prevents the development of various forms of cooperation, increases the degree of risk in the implementation of exchange and contracting, causing an increase in economic, social and transactional costs, as well as higher prices for goods and services. The formation of institutional mechanisms of innovative development of the Russian Federation requires the development of appropriate scientific-methodological, regulatory and legal and information-analytical framework for effective regulation of the formation processes of high-tech economy, which is a pressing problem for our country. The paper identifies institutional factors, as well as areas to enhance and improve the effectiveness of innovation activities; established economic risks in an imperfect institutional environment; identified institutional components of the integration mechanism to ensure innovative economic development; proposed a methodological approach to assessing the quality of the institutional environment, as well as a diagnostic mechanism of its state.

2021 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
Martabo Makhmudovna Dadajonova ◽  

Realizing the high importance of digital technologies, Uzbekistan, along with many countries, creates conditions for the transition to a digital economy. The task of the new economic model is to improve the lives of citizens by improving the quality of goods and services produced using modern digital technologies and to bring small businesses to the level of innovative entrepreneurship.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 05021
Author(s):  
Elena Andreeva ◽  
Alla Golovina

The relevance of the article is due to the importance of the development of export of high-processing industries. Objective: to develop methodological support for assessing the neo-industrial export specialization of regions and its determining factors. The research methods included identifying potential assessment parameters and testing their applicability based on the analysis of economic development statistics of the region selected as an example. The proposed methodological support for the assessment of neo-industrial export specialization includes its integral assessment, assessment of goods and services, assessment of the contribution of the high-tech component to the change in exports, ranking of regions by absolute values of high-tech exports. The method of assessing the factors of neo-industrial export specialization involves the assessment of indicators that identify these factors of exo-and endogenous order – the development of manufacturing production, innovation potential, transport potential, the development of the export support system, and the international demand for the region's products. The practical significance of the proposed methodological support lies in the fact that it makes it possible to analyze the neo-industrial export specialization of Russian regions and the factors of its development, and to identify and analyze possible directions of development in this area.


2018 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 01048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Meshcheryakova

The innovative development of individual enterprises and industries determines the competitiveness of the regional and national economies through modern business technologies for sustainable urban development. The article presents the analysis of categories "science intensive", "high technology", "innovative". The analysis of official data of the Federal Statistical Agency on key indicators of the effectiveness of innovation activities of enterprises is given and their aggregated estimate is given. The dynamics of such indicators as: innovative activity of organizations (specific weight of organizations that carried out technological, organizational, marketing innovations in the reporting year) was revealed; the share of innovative goods, works, services in the total volume of goods shipped, works performed, services; costs for technological innovation; specific weight of expenses for technological innovations in the total volume of shipped goods, works performed, services, etc. In the course of the research, recommendations were developed to increase the efficiency of innovation activities of enterprises based on assessing innovation activity and identifying innovative capacity, as well as applying the necessary economic and mathematical tools for the assessment and modelling of innovative projects and enterprise programs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. N. Ustinova

Today in Russia there is a definite situation in the field of innovative development, characterized by a number of distinctive features. In a dynamic environment of industrial production and entrepreneurship, the need for the formation and development of non-proprietary resources is beyond doubt. The dynamics of productivity growth, the development of new high-tech production systems, the growth of the patent base in enterprises, trends in innovative development in general in the sector of the economy and large-scale production.The state of development of the economic system, depending on the structure of the innovation development of the subjects. At the same time, the innovative development of companies is manifested both in investments in advanced production technologies and in the production of high-tech products. The purpose of the scientific article is to analyze the innovative development in the Russian Federation.The goal necessitated the following tasks:1. To analyze the indirect indicator of innovation development – the volume of domestic expenditures on research and development in the context of country adaptability;2. To analyze the innovation activity of organizations by districts of the Russian Federation;3. To produce a factor analysis of indicators on the innovative development of the Russian Federation;4. Formulate recommendations for improving innovation activities in Russia.The article used modern methods and tools for integrated analysis based on the systematization and structuring of thematic material. So, in the article in which you will find information about what is happening in Russia.The above studies have become conclusions and recommendations regarding the features of the innovative development of the Russian Federation, recommendations for improving innovation activities in the Russian Federation.Significance is expressed in the practical possibility of using the results of research results. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 04014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inessa Lukmanova ◽  
Evgeniya Sizova ◽  
Evgeniya Zhutaeva ◽  
Olga Mironova

The paper presents the problematic area of the formation of the parties of innovation activities in holdings and its methodological justification. The objective preconditions for differentiating intersubject interactions as a part of innovation activity with the participation of holdings are considered. Features of the formation of innovation strategies and goal-setting mechanisms are structured; their features in large enterprises are emphasized. The importance of determining the optimal parties of the innovation network as a factor of increasing the efficiency of implementation of innovation activity is substantiated. The external and internal environments of the holding are considered as sources of attracting participants of innovation activity. Features of the procedure for selecting the structure of innovation activity, complicated by the conditions of multi- project environment, are presented. Positive effects from the introduction of the scientific approach to the determination of the parties of innovation activity were revealed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arch G. Woodside ◽  
Carol M. Megehee ◽  
Lars Isaksson ◽  
Graham Ferguson

Purpose This paper aims to apply complexity theory tenets to deepen understanding, explanation and prediction of how configurations of national cultures and need motivations influence national entrepreneurial and innovation behavior and nations’ quality-of-life (QOL). Also, the study examines whether or not high national ethical behavior is sufficient for indicating nations high in quality-of-life. Design/methodology/approach Applying core tenets of complexity theory, the study constructs asymmetric, case-based (nations), explanations and predictive models of cultures’ consequences (via Schwartz’s seven value dimensions) and implicit need motivations (via McClelland’s three need motivations) indicating national entrepreneur and innovation activities and subsequent national quality-of-life and ethical behavior. The study includes testing configurational models empirically for predictive accuracy. The empirical examination is for a set of data for 24 nations in Asia, Europe, North and South America and the South Pacific. Findings The findings confirm the usefulness of applying complexity theory to learn how culture and motivation configurations support versus have negative consequences on nations’ entrepreneurship, innovation and human well-being. Nurturing of entrepreneur activities supports the nurturing of enterprise innovation activity and their joint occurrence indicates nations achieving high quality-of-life. The findings advance the perspective that different sets of cultural value configurations indicate nations high versus low in entrepreneur and innovation activities. Practical implications High entrepreneur activities without high innovation activity are insufficient for achieving high national quality-of-life. Achieving high ethical behavior supports high quality-of-life. Originality/value This study is one of the first to apply complexity theory tenets in the field of entrepreneurship research. The study here advances the perspective that case-based asymmetric modeling of recipes is necessary to explain and predict entrepreneur activities and outcomes rather than examining whether variable relationships are statistically significant from zero.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-143
Author(s):  
Anastasia V. Karavay ◽  
◽  

The factors that currently determine Russian professionals' quality of human capital is analised in the article. Authors use the multinomial logistic regression and methods of content analysis based on the data of the RLMS HSE in 2019 and the FCTAS RAS in 2021. It is shown that the main role in the processes of accumulation and renewal of their human capital is played by factors related to the specific of socio-economic institutions in Russia. Employment in the main sectors of the Russian economy – industry, trade and services – does not require professionals to further increase their human capital. The concentration of enterprises from industries where highly qualified specialists are usually in demand in the most urbanized regions causes an unequal distribution of high-quality human capital between large cities and other localities. It is also shown that the influence of age on the processes of accumulation of human capital is nonlinear. The possibility to get into the group with the highest quality of human capital for professionals are drained even before the age of 40. At the same time, from the age of 45, the chances for them to have human capital with its typical quality for highly-skilled professionals begin to decrease, which is associated with discrimination in the Russian labor market of older workers and the inexpediency for them to invest in their human capital in these conditions. The results show how difficult it will be in the current conditions and considering the inevitable aging of the population to implement the plans of the country's leadership to increase the share of high-tech enterprises and increase labor productivity without changing the institutional environment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 00041
Author(s):  
Vladislav Anichin ◽  
Dmitry Chugay ◽  
Galina Khudobina ◽  
Natalia Yakovenko

The economic aspects of innovation activity are determined by the fact that innovations serve to achieve the economic goals of the enterprise, act as a means of competition and require the use of economic resources. When organizing innovation activities, it is important to take into account macroeconomic factors and intra-company conditions. The authors identify three large-scale macroeconomic factors that have a significant impact on the chain of interrelated innovations in the activities of modern Russian agro-industrial enterprises. At present, the factor of creating institutions of the digital economy is beginning to take effect, in connection with which the third wave of organizational, technological and marketing innovations and the next growth of agro-industrial production in Russia are expected. Due to the different rates of economic concentration in the three areas of the agro-industrial complex, historically, unfair vertical competition has been and remains one of the limitations for innovation at agro-industrial enterprises. In the digital economy, information about the essential conditions of concluded transactions becomes available to antimonopoly authorities in real time, which allows them to quickly develop and apply regulatory actions in cases of violations of antimonopoly legislation or in cases of “failures” of the market. It is also possible to create institutions that support fair competition in the vertical and horizontal dimensions. The opportunities that open up actualize the improvement of the conditions for innovation activity at the intra-company level.


Author(s):  
Nataliia Reznikova ◽  
Maryna Rubtsova ◽  
Olha Yatsenko

Innovation clusters are analyzed in the article from the perspective of cross-border cooperation of regions. Types of clusters are highlighted, capable of adapting to cross -border cooperation, which enables to identify and outline the instruments of economic policy, capable to stimulate deepening of innovation processes in cross -border regions. Specialization and specifics of gaining competitiveness through promoting new comparative advantages are defined as the determining criteria for distinguishing the notions of “cross-border cluster in the conditions of cross -border cooperation” and “cross -border innovative cluster”. The innovative cluster’s role is analyzed in terms of its being a promoter of creating the innovation ecosystem as a highly coordinated system of dynamics interlinks between economic agents and institutes, resulting in the innovation activity, commercial success of projects and technological modernization of the structure of national economies, which effectiveness is conditional on the conformity of the institutional environment with the needs of R&D, education and business, and with the latter’s capability to build the closed loop innovation cycle. The determinants of gravity of regional entities, the dominant principles of cross -border cooperation, the determinants of effectiveness and ineffectiveness of cross -border cooperation of border regions are defined; the multi-category approach to assessment of the cross -border potential is given. The potential of customs tariff and fiscal regulation in stimulating the innovation activity in the conditions of cross -border cooperation is highlighted. The controversial character of “border” is identified from the perspective of opportunities and threats for innovation activities, generated by it. Cross-border cooperation is identified as a trigger for implementation of technological projects and innovationdriven productions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-274
Author(s):  
Коломин ◽  
Roman Kolomin ◽  
Лапшин ◽  
Vyacheslav Lapshin

Increasing importance of innovative development has resulted in the need for more in-depth study of its nature, content and forms of interaction between the participants of this process, find ways to improve its effectiveness. It becomes obvious that the formation of the country on the path of high-quality development is impossible without a systematic and well-calibrated state support of innovation activity of enterprises. With the development of the domestic economy enterprise is faced with a vast array of problems to solve on their own that it can not. That is why you need a balanced and effective innovation infrastructure aimed at supporting, encouraging and developing entrepreneurship. Innovative firms are actively conducting research and development, making a significant contribution to the process of innovation, technological renewal of production. Orientation government policy to improve the status of science and education, encouraging companies involved in knowledge-intensive production, export promotion of high-tech products, will create the foundations of a fundamentally new model of economic growth for Russia. Enhancing the development dimension of innovation activity of enterprises in the short to medium term posluzhitbazisom for laying the foundation of an efficient economy. The article analyzed the micro-level innovation system, the basic ways of organizing innovation activities of enterprises, analyzed the organizational structure of the organizations associated with the development and implementation of innovations, the main problems faced by the enterprises of this sector, due to the need for state support of innovative activity at the micro level, by creating market-oriented innovation infrastructure, determined the nature, objectives and components of the innovation infrastructure, considered aspects needed to build an effective infrastructure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document