Rezidivtherapie des Multiplen Myeloms – Individualisierte Konzepte aus dem Arsenal vielfältiger Optionen

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (12) ◽  
pp. 820-827
Author(s):  
Charlotte Weyermann ◽  
Christian Straka ◽  
Hermann Einsele

AbstractThe prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma has improved significantly over the past 20 years. However, the patient population in the relapse situation is very heterogeneous due to increasing age and the previous course of the disease and therapy. In particular, the approval of new targeted substances offers numerous treatment options that can be adapted to the individual situation.In relapsed multiple myeloma, disease- and patient-specific factors must be considered for an individually adapted therapy. Suitable patients can also receive an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or, in the case of early relapse after ASCT, an allogenic stem cell transplant, if possible as part clinical studies. Proteasome or immunomodulator-based triple combinations are the standard in recurrence. In frail patients, a combination of two can also be used. The new substances also offer very good therapeutic options for high-risk cytogenetics or renal insufficiency. The monoclonal antibodies Daratumumab and Elotuzumab are well tolerated except for infusion reactions and are highly effective in various combinations, even in high-risk cytogenetics.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1170-1170
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Olin ◽  
David L. Porter ◽  
Selina M. Luger ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
Donald Tsai ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as part of initial therapy has been shown to prolong survival of patients with multiple myeloma, with some achieving durable complete remission. However, the majority of patients ultimately relapse after ASCT and require salvage treatment. Options for the treatment of such patients have increased significantly over recent years, including not only novel chemotherapeutic and biological agents but also additional ASCTs. We performed a retrospective analysis of our experience with salvage ASCT for multiple myeloma to determine which clinical variables influence outcome. Methods: Between October 1992 and February 2005, we performed 342 ASCTs for multiple myeloma. Twenty-six of these were salvage transplants for relapsed disease after prior ASCT, and all were included in the analysis. Patients who received two planned (tandem) ASCTs were not included. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 47 (range 25–66), and median ISS and DS stages at diagnosis were 1 and 2, respectively. The initial ASCT was melphalan-based in 21/26; six (23%) achieved a complete response (CR) to the initial transplant, and fifteen (58%) achieved a partial response (PR). The median event-free survival (EFS) after the initial transplant was 19.5 months (range 2–60). The median time between initial and salvage ASCT was 2.6 years (range 0.3–7.6). Twenty-two patients (85%) received non-transplant therapy between ASCTs, and the median number of lines of therapy prior to salvage ASCT was 3. At the time of salvage ASCT, the median age was 52.5 (range 28–69). Fourteen patients received melphalan alone, eight received melphalan/TBI, and four received other regimens. Eleven patients (42%) achieved a response to therapy (1 CR, 10 PR). One patient (4%) died of transplant-related toxicity. The median follow-up after salvage ASCT is 12 months (range 0.2–58). Median EFS is 9 months, and median overall survival (OS) is 36 months. The 2-year EFS is 14%, and 2-year OS is 52%. On univariate analysis, both response to and EFS after initial transplant significantly predict improved EFS after salvage transplant (p=0.0008 and p=0.0065 respectively). Both also predict improved OS (p=0.03 and 0.0005 respectively). A greater than 12 month interval between first and second transplant also correlated with OS (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in EFS or OS by preparative regimen. Interestingly, type of response to the salvage transplant (CR/PR or less than PR) did not predict improved EFS or OS. Conclusion: This study suggests that salvage ASCT after relapse from initial ASCT is a feasible therapy for patients with heavily treated multiple myeloma, particularly those with a prolonged response to the first transplant.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lapo Alinari ◽  
Kristie A. Blum

AbstractDespite the success of standard front-line chemotherapy for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), a subset of these patients, particularly those with poor prognostic factors at diagnosis (including the presence of B symptoms, bulky disease, advanced stage, or extranodal disease), relapse. For those patients who relapse following autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), multiple treatment options are available, including single-agent chemotherapy, combination chemotherapy strategies, radiotherapy, the immunoconjugate brentuximab, checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, lenalidomide, everolimus, or observation in selected patients. In patients with an available donor, allogeneic SCT may also be considered. With numerous treatment options available, we advocate for a tailored therapeutic approach for patients with relapsed cHL guided by patient-specific characteristics including age, comorbidities, sites of disease (nodal or organ), previous chemosensitivity, and goals of treatment (long-term disease control vs allogeneic SCT).


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 845-845
Author(s):  
Aaron P. Rapoport ◽  
Edward A Stadtmauer ◽  
Karen Chagin ◽  
Thomas Faitg ◽  
Malini Iyengar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a are cancer-testis antigens that are overexpressed in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and the incidence of these antigens correlates with tumor proliferation and other high-risk features. Genetically engineered NY-ESO-1 SPEAR (specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor) T-cells (NY-ESO-1c259T cells) recognize the peptide sequence SLLMWITQC expressed by NY-ESO-1 or LAGE-1a in the context of HLA-A*02 presentation. This study evaluated treatment with NY-ESO-1SPEAR T-cells post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with advanced MM. Methods: Eligible patients were HLA-A*02:01, 02:05 or 02:06 positive, with refractory, relapsed or high risk MM associated with one or more adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. Eligible patients' tumors also expressed NY-ESO-1 and/or LAGE-1a by qPCR. The primary study endpoint was safety. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) (sCR+CR+VGPR+PR) evaluated with the International Myeloma Working Group Criteria (Rajkumar S.V. et al., Blood 2011), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), best overall response (BOR), duration of response (DOR), as well as gene-marked cell persistence. Lymphocytes were obtained by leukapheresis, isolated, activated, transduced to express NY-ESO-1c259T cell receptor, and expanded using anti-CD3/anti-CD28 immunomagnetic beads. While the SPEAR T-cells were being manufactured, stem cell mobilization was conducted using 1.5 g/m2 of cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, and stem cells were collected (minimum: 2 × 106 CD34+ progenitors/kg). Once the manufactured product was ready, high-dose melphalan (140-200 mg/m2) was given 2 days before stem cell infusion. Two days after the stem cell infusion, the SPEAR T-cells were infused (median dose 3.1 × 109 of transduced T-cells, range 0.5-5.1 × 109). Disease was assessed at days 42, 100, 180, 270 and 360 post-T-cell infusion, and then every 3 months. Patients meeting the criteria for lenalidomide maintenance therapy received 10 mg/day starting around day 100 post-ASCT. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, and all have been treated. Median age at enrollment was 61 yr (range 45 - 72); 60% were male. Based on analyses through July 2017, ORR at day 100 was 76% (1 sCR; 12 VGPR; 6PR), and at year 1, 13 patients were progression free (52%) of which 11 were responders (1 sCR; 1 CR; 8 VGPR; 1 PR). Three patients remain disease progression-free at 39, 56 and 61 months post T-cell infusion. Median PFS was ~13 months (range 3-61 months). Eleven of 25 patients (44%) are alive, and median survival was ~35 months (range 6-68 months). The most common adverse events (experienced by >70%) were diarrhea (100%), nausea (100%), anemia (96%), decreased appetite (92%), thrombocytopenia (92%), fatigue (88%), pyrexia (84%), rash (84%), hypokalemia (76%), febrile neutropenia (72%) and vomiting (72%). Autologous GVHD (24%) was reported in 6 patients (3 G3, 3 ≤G2); all resolved with corticosteroids and supportive therapy. No fatal adverse events have been reported. Conclusions: NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cell therapy in the setting of autologous stem cell transplant has promising efficacy and acceptable safety. GVHD, which manifests in a similar way as reported in prior transplant studies and is more frequent with adoptive T cell transfer (engineered or not engineered), appears manageable with appropriate supportive care. Analyses of transduced cell persistence, T-cell clonality, and minimal residual disease (MRD) genetic studies are ongoing and will be presented along with the efficacy and safety data for all 25 patients. Disclosures Chagin: Adaptimmune: Employment. Faitg: Adaptimmune: Employment. Iyengar: Adaptimmune: Employment. Trivedi: Adaptimmune: Employment. Norry: Adaptimmune: Employment. Holdich: Adaptimmune: Employment. Binder-Scholl: Adaptimmune: Employment. Amado: Adaptimmune: Employment. Fang: Adaptimmune: Employment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeina Al-Mansour ◽  
Muthalagu Ramanathan

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care in transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients and is associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), complete remission rates (CR), and overall survival (OS). However, majority of patients eventually relapse, with a median PFS of around 36 months. Relapses are harder to treat and prognosis declines with each relapse. Achieving and maintaining “best response” to initial therapy is the ultimate goal of first-line treatment and sustained CR is a powerful surrogate for extended survival especially in high-risk multiple myeloma. ASCT is often followed by consolidation/maintenance phase to deepen and/or maintain the response achieved by induction and ASCT. Novel agents like thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have been used as single agents or in combination. Thalidomide use has been associated with a meaningful improvement in PFS and EFS, however, with substantial side effects. Data with lenalidomide maintenance after-ASCT is favorable, but the optimal duration of lenalidomide maintenance is still unclear. Bortezomib use has been associated with superior outcomes, predominantly in high-risk myeloma patients. Combination regimens utilizing a proteasome inhibitor (i.e., bortezomib) with an immunomodulatory drug (thalidomide or lenalidomide) have provided the best outcomes. This review article serves as a review of the best available evidence in post-ASCT approaches in multiple myeloma.


eJHaem ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Biran ◽  
Wanting Zhai ◽  
Roxanne E. Jensen ◽  
Jeanne Mandelblatt ◽  
Susan Kumka ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S254
Author(s):  
Felipe Peña-Muñoz ◽  
Luz Román-Molano ◽  
Danylo Palomino-Mendoza ◽  
Alberto Hernández-Sánchez ◽  
Borja Puertas-Martínez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document