scholarly journals Coexistent adenoma and serrated polyps on index colonoscopy and the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (12) ◽  
pp. E1748-E1754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Kyung Park ◽  
Hak-Soo Kim ◽  
Hyo-Joon Yang ◽  
Yoon Suk Jung ◽  
Jung Ho Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims The family of serrated polyps (SP) includes hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, and traditional serrated adenoma. We investigated whether SP synchronous with adenoma at index colonoscopy is associated with metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (CRN). Methods Patients with ≥ 1 adenoma on index colonoscopy and who had undergone a follow-up colonoscopy were included. The patients were divided into four groups according to the presence of SP and advanced adenoma (AA) on index colonoscopy (non-AA, non-AA + SP, AA, AA + SP). The cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced CRN at surveillance colonoscopy was compared between groups. Results Among a total of 2209 patients, the numbers of patients in the non-AA, non-AA + SP, AA, and AA + SP groups were 922, 441, 625, and 221, respectively. The cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced CRN was higher in patients in the AA + SP group than that in the AA group (P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between the non-AA + SP group and the non-AA group (P = 0.06). The cumulative incidence of metachronous advanced CRN at 3 years was 17.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 8.0–27.6], 10.7 % [95 %CI 7.7–3.6], 3.5 % [95 %CI 1.3–5.6], and 3.4 % [95 %CI 2.0–4.7] in the AA + SP, AA, non-AA + SP, and non-AA group, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, overall SP [hazard ratio (HR) 2.24; 95 %CI 1.38–3.64, P = 0.001], proximal SP (HR 2.31; 95 %CI 1.32–4.08), and HP (HR 2.19; 95 %CI 1.35–3.57) were risk factors for metachronous advanced CRN in patients with AA on index colonoscopy. Conclusions Coexistent AA and SP on index colonoscopy significantly increased the risk of metachronous advanced CRN compared with AA alone. Further large prospective studies are needed to confirm whether more intensive follow-up improves outcomes in these high risk patients.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1066
Author(s):  
Daniel Rodríguez-Alcalde ◽  
Guillermo Castillo-López ◽  
Jorge López-Vicente ◽  
Luis Hernández ◽  
Mercedes Lumbreras-Cabrera ◽  
...  

Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) implies a slightly elevated risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) during endoscopic follow-up, but its natural course is still not well known. The main objective of this study was to describe the long-term risk of developing advanced neoplasia (AN) in these patients. Until October 2020, individuals who fulfilled 2010 WHO criteria I and/or III for SPS were retrospectively recruited. We selected those under endoscopic surveillance after resection of all lesions >3 mm in a high-quality colonoscopy. We excluded patients with total colectomy at diagnosis and those with any interval between colonoscopies >3.5 years. We defined AN as advanced serrated polyp (≥10 mm and/or with dysplasia), advanced adenoma, or CRC. In 109 patients, 342 colonoscopies were performed (median = 3, median interval = 1.8 years) during a median follow-up after colonic clearance of 5.0 years. Five-year cumulative incidences of AN were 21.6% globally, and 5.6%, 10.8%, and 50.8% in patients who fulfilled criterion I, III, and both, respectively (p < 0.001). No CRC was diagnosed and only 1 (0.9%) patient underwent surgery. In conclusion, cumulative incidences of AN could be lower than previously described, at least in patients who fulfil the 2010 WHO criterion III alone. Therefore, low-risk individuals might benefit from less stringent surveillance.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah B Kosyakovsky ◽  
Federico Angriman ◽  
Emma Katz ◽  
Neill Adhikari ◽  
Lucas C Godoy ◽  
...  

Introduction: Sepsis results in dysregulated inflammation, coagulation, and metabolism, which may contribute to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between sepsis and subsequent long-term CVD events. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception to May 2020 to identify observational studies of adult sepsis survivors (defined by diagnostic codes or consensus definitions) measuring long-term CV outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, CV death, and stroke. Random-effects models estimated the pooled cumulative incidence and adjusted hazard ratios of CV events relative to hospital or population controls. Odds ratios were included as risk ratios assuming <10% incidence in non-septic controls, and risk ratios were taken as hazard ratios (HR) assuming no censoring. Outcomes were analyzed at maximum follow-up (primary analysis) and stratified by time (<1 year, 1-2 years, and >2 years) since sepsis. Results: Of 11,235 abstracts screened, 25 studies (22 cohort studies, 2 case-crossover studies, and 1 case-control) involving 1,949,793 sepsis survivors were included. The pooled cumulative incidence of CVD events was 9% (95% CI; 5-14%). Sepsis was associated with an increased risk (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.37-1.86) of CVD events at maximum follow-up ( Figure ); between-study heterogeneity was substantial (I 2 =97.3%). There was no significant difference when comparing studies using population and hospital controls. Significantly elevated risk was observed up to 5 years following sepsis. Conclusions: Sepsis survivors experience an approximately 50% increased risk of CVD events, which may persist for years following the index episode. These results highlight a potential unmet need for early cardiac risk stratification and optimization in sepsis survivors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 631-640
Author(s):  
Xinwei Hua ◽  
Polly A. Newcomb ◽  
Jessica Chubak ◽  
Rachel C. Malen ◽  
Rebecca Ziebell ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joren R ten Hove ◽  
Shailja C Shah ◽  
Seth R Shaffer ◽  
Charles N Bernstein ◽  
Daniel Castaneda ◽  
...  

ObjectivesSurveillance colonoscopy is thought to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with long-standing colonic IBD, but data regarding the frequency of surveillance and the findings thereof are lacking. Our aim was to determine whether consecutive negative surveillance colonoscopies adequately predict low neoplastic risk.DesignA multicentre, multinational database of patients with long-standing IBD colitis without high-risk features and undergoing regular CRC surveillance was constructed. A ‘negative’ surveillance colonoscopy was predefined as a technically adequate procedure having no postinflammatory polyps, no strictures, no endoscopic disease activity and no evidence of neoplasia; a ‘positive’ colonoscopy was a technically adequate procedure that included at least one of these criteria. The primary endpoint was advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN), defined as high-grade dysplasia or CRC.ResultsOf 775 patients with long-standing IBD colitis, 44% (n=340) had >1 negative colonoscopy. Patients with consecutive negative surveillance colonoscopies were compared with those who had at least one positive colonoscopy. Both groups had similar demographics, disease-related characteristics, number of surveillance colonoscopies and time intervals between colonoscopies. No aCRN occurred in those with consecutive negative surveillance, compared with an incidence rate of 0.29 to 0.76/100 patient-years (P=0.02) in those having >1 positive colonoscopy on follow-up of 6.1 (P25–P75: 4.6–8.2) years after the index procedure.ConclusionWithin this large surveillance cohort of patients with colonic IBD and no additional high-risk features, having two consecutive negative colonoscopies predicted a very low risk of aCRN occurrence on follow-up. Our findings suggest that longer surveillance intervals in this selected population may be safe.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5312-5312
Author(s):  
J.A. Perez-Simon ◽  
R. Martino ◽  
R. de la Camara ◽  
J. Perez de Oteiza ◽  
J.M. Moraleda ◽  
...  

Abstract Some studies have suggested that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) offers a similar efficacy in terms of GVHD prophylaxis as compared to methotrexate (MTX) but a faster engraftment and a lower incidence of mucositis. We have analyzed the results of fludarabine (150 mg/m2) and melphalan (140 mg/m2) or busulphan (10 mg/m2) plus Cyclosporine (CsA) and MMF instead of MTX as GVHD prophylaxis in a series of 30 patients undergoing unrelated allogeneic transplantation. Median age was 44 years (18–60). Patients younger than 40 were required to have a previous comorbid condition (8 had a previous autologous transplant; 2 had proven fungal infection; 1 had severe altered lung capacity). Twelve patients were diagnosed with AML, 4 had ALL, 4 MDS, 2 CML, 3 CLL, 3 NHL, 2 MM/WM. Disease status at transplant was 1st or 2nd CR in 12 patients, &gt;2nd CR or PR in 11 patients while the remaining patients had active disease at the time of transplant (relapse, refractory, untreated diasease). Median day to reach &gt; 0,5 x 109 granulocytes / L was +17 and to reach &gt; 20 x 109 platelets / L was +13. At a median follow up of 445 days among patients alive, projected overall survival (OS) and event free survival at 3 years are 47% and 30%, respectively. Overall TRM was 32%. Cumulative incidence of grades 2–4 and 3–4 aGVHD was 67% and 33%, respectively while cumulative incidence of extensive cGVHD was 70%. Gut was the organ most severely involved in aGVHD in 10 out of 16 patients while liver was involved in only 3 cases. Interestingly, among patients who developed aGVHD, incidence of skin (80%) and liver (22%) involvement were similar to that observed in a similar series of patients receiving related donor transplant using the same RIC plus CsA and MTX instead of MMF while the incidence of gut involvement was significantly higher (64% vs 42%). In conclusion, the RIC used in the current study plus CsA and MMF offers promising results in high risk patients. In terms of GVHD prophylaxis, MMF shows a good efficacy at skin and liver but poor at the gastrointestinal tract.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12118-e12118
Author(s):  
Meng Xiu ◽  
Pin Zhang

e12118 Background: HR-/HER2+ breast cancer is a subtype with aggressive characteristic and poor survival. More clinical evidence are needed for choice of therapeutic strategies. Methods: Patients with T1-3N0-3M0 received preoperative chemotherapy (PTX 175 mg/m2, CBP AUC 4, q2w*6) combined with trastuzumab (2mg/kg qw) or standard postoperative chemotherapy such as ddAC-PH, AC-PH, TCH. The primary endpoint was RFS. Results: 86 patients were enrolled, 43 received preoperative chemotherapy (pre arm) and the other 43 received postoperative chemotherapy (post arm). There was no significant difference in baseline between the two arms. 22.1% of patients were stage IIA, 25.6% IIB, 34.9% IIIA, and 18.6% IIIC. At a median follow-up of 33.4 months, 16 patients had relapsed (pre arm 8, post arm 8). The median time from diagnosis to relapse was 22.8 months (7.1-49.2) and 23.8 months (11.4-37.4) in pre and post arm. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated that the 3-year RFS were similar (pre vs post: 73.4% vs 75.4%, p= 0.631). Only 1 death occurred in post arm. Table showed that in subgroups, there was no statistical difference in risk of recurrence between pre and post arms. In pre arm, ORR was 97.7% clinically, and pCR (ypT0/TisN0) was 39.0%. No patients achieved pCR relapsed, and the residual invasive lesions indicated poor prognosis. Table showed that Neo-Bioscore 4-5 was related to recurrence event significantly ( p= 0.021). The rate of breast-conserving in pre arm was higher (19.5% vs 9.3%), and PCb regiments every 2 weeks had similar adverse effects with standard chemotherapy, and less patients had dose reductions (18.6% vs 25.6%). Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy versus standard postoperative chemotherapy results in similar RFS among HR-/HER2+ patients. Preoperative chemotherapy can identify prognosis of patients early by Neo-Bioscore and adjuvant therapy should be strengthened for high-risk patients. PCb every 2 weeks combined with trastuzumab can be an option of preoperative therapy for HER2+ breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02934828. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Kyoo Park ◽  
Woo Jin Jeong ◽  
Gab Jin Cheon

Serrated polyps are classified into 3 distinct types: hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated adenoma, or transitional serrated adenoma. A serrated adenoma is a precursor lesion for colorectal carcinoma. Serrated polyps are commonly found in the colorectum but have rarely been described in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract. Serrated adenomas in the small intestine may represent aggressive lesions with high malignant potential, according to some reports. A 66-year-old man with no significant medical history underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for general examination. He had a 1-cm sized, Yamada type IV polyp, with focal white patch in the second portion of the duodenum. The biopsy result revealed gastric metaplasia and chronic inflammation. He wanted regular follow -up examinations. The follow-up EGDs were done every year. There were no changes in the shape and size of the polyp. The pathologic findings were unchanged. Then, he underwent EGD for general medical check-up again 5 years after the first detection. The size of the polyp was slightly increased. The biopsy result revealed serrated polyp, unclassified. Endoscopic mucosal resection was done. The pathologic result revealed a 0.8 × 0.5-cm sized, well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Carcinomas are multifocally spread on the traditional serrated adenoma, and the proportion of the adenocarcinoma component is approximately 50%. The tumor had invaded the lamina propria but confined to the mucosa. The resection margins were negative, and no lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion was seen. Abdominal pelvic computed tomography and positron emission tomography showed no other solid organ involvement or metastasis. Surveillance follow-up EGDs were done after 3 months and 1 year. There was no evidence of recurrence.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2018-2018
Author(s):  
E. Franceschi ◽  
A. Tosoni ◽  
M. Ermani ◽  
V. Blatt ◽  
P. Amistà ◽  
...  

2018 Background: Due to the rarity of medulloblastoma (MB) in adults, the few studies available on this condition are retrospective, and the follow-up tends to be short. Furthermore, the different therapeutic strategies used in these patients makes it difficult to assess survival rates and prognostic factors. Methods: Between January 1989 and February 2001, a prospective phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatment for adults with medulloblastoma. Patients were completely staged with a neuroradiological examination of the brain and neuraxis and by CSF cytology, according to Chang’s staging system. Low risk patients received radiotherapy alone, while high risk patients were given 2 cycles of upfront chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The results of the preliminary analysis of this study at a median follow-up of 3.7 years are reported elsewhere. The present papers reports on the long- term results of the same trial. Results: After a median follow up of 7.6 years, among a total of 36 enrolled adults with medulloblastoma, overall progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 72% (range 59% to 84%) and 75% (62% to 91%), respectively. No difference was found between low and high risk patients in terms of PFS and OS at 5 years: in low-risk patients the 5-year PFS was 80% (range, 59–100%) and the 5-year OS, 80% (range, 58 - 100%); in high-risk patients the 5-year PFS was 69% (range, 54 -89%) and the 5-year OS, 73% (range, 58 - 92%). Conclusions: A long-term follow-up is essential to evaluate the real impact of treatments in adult patients with MB. Since there is no significant difference between low-risk and high-risk patients for PFS and OS, the use of chemotherapy is also questionable in low-risk patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 423-423
Author(s):  
Gaurav Bahl ◽  
Rima Sanjay Pathak ◽  
Jenny J. Ko ◽  
Michael Sia ◽  
Gale Bowering ◽  
...  

423 Background: The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of Second Cancers (SC) in patients with Stage I or II Seminoma treated in British Columbia (BC), and compare rates between patients managed with Radiation Therapy, Chemotherapy, or Active Surveillance. Methods: Consecutive patients with Stage I or II Seminoma (n = 1549, 21167 person years) diagnosed in British Columbia between 1984 and 2013 were identified from the BC Cancer Registry and included in this study. Patients were managed with Radiation Therapy (RT; n = 663), Chemotherapy (CT; n = 259) or Active Surveillance (AS; n = 624). Data was extracted from the registry and verified by individual patient chart review. Cumulative incidence rates were computed using competing risk analysis. Age and Sex Standardized Incidence Ratios (ASIR) were calculated (compared to the Canadian population). Results: After a median follow-up of 14 years (RT group: 21.5yrs, CT group: 10yrs, AS group: 8yrs), the 15 year Overall Survival was 91.4%. Only 15 patients died from progressive Seminoma, while 46 died from second cancers. A total of 115 patients developed SCs, and the cumulative incidence (CI) of SC, at 15 years, was: 5.9% for patients who received RT, 8.6% for those who had CT, and 4.9% for patients managed with AS. The higher CI for patients treated with CT, versus RT, was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The ASIR for RT, CT and AS groups were 1.31 (95% Confidence Intervals: 0.92- 1.86), 2.57 (1.07- 6.15; p = 0.03), and 1.38 (0.75- 2.54), respectively. Patients who underwent treatment at ages 30-44yr and 45-59yr had a significantly higher ASIRs of 4.33 (2.1- 8.9; p < 0.001) and 1.8 (1.16- 2.8; p = 0.008). ASIR was not significantly different when stratified by radiation dose, field types, or year of diagnosis. Conclusions: We found no statistically significant difference in the Cumulative Incidence of Second Cancers for patients treated with Radiation Therapy versus Chemotherapy in our patient population. Longer follow-up for the CT group is required to confirm trends evident in our analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document