An Objective Trial of Alternative Methods of Heparin Administration
Although it ts generally agreed that heparin is truly a life saving drug, the best method of administration remains to be determined. 100 patients with calf vein thrombosis were randomly allocated to receive either subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) heparin for seven days. Venography was performed in each patient to confirm the exact size and site of thrombus and was repeated at the end of heparin treatment. IV heparin was administered using a constant infusion pump. Platelet count, haemoglobin and haematocrit estimations were performed at the beginning, mid point, and end of hep rin treatment. The dose of heparin to be administered was determined by dally estimation of KCCT. In SC group, thrombi increased in size in 2%. remained unchanged in 50% and decreased in 48%. In IV group, they increased in size in 20%, were unchanged in 62% and decreased in 18%. The difference in decreases in size was significant (P < 0.01). Pre-treatment lung scans corfirmed the presence of emboli in 10 patients in SC and 11 in IV group; post treatmel scan showed improvement in 60% in SC compared to 91% in IV group. The mean daily heparin requirement (±SD) was 36,998 ± 7. 12IU in the SC group and 36,814 ± 6.63 IU in the IV group. The average KCCT fluctuation index in the SC group was 59.08 seconds compared to 64.4 seconds in the IV group. Major bleeding complications occurred in 2 patients on SC heparin and in 4 treated with IV heprin. The clinical signficance of these will be discussed