scholarly journals Microtensile Bond Strength, Marginal Leakage, and Antibacterial Effect of Bulk Fill Resin Composite with Alkaline Fillers versus Incremental Nanohybrid Composite Resin

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Ismail Mohamed ◽  
Rehab Khalil Safy ◽  
Ahmed Fawzy Abo Elezz
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Antibacterial Effect ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Aluminum Silicate ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Agar Disc ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Broth Dilution

Abstract Objective This study aims to investigate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS), microleakage, and antibacterial effect of bulk fill resin composite with alkaline fillers (alkasite) (alkaline fillers such as barium aluminum silicate glass and ytterbium trifluoride) in comparison to incremental nanohybrid resin composite. Materials and Methods µTBS was evaluated by using 30 human mandibular molars. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (C): nanohybrid resin composite (C0), self-cured alkasite (C1), and dual-cured alkasite (C2). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the bulk thickness: 4 mm (T1) and 6 mm (T2). The occlusal enamel of teeth was removed and the resin composite was applied to a flat dentin surface. Then, teeth were sectioned into beams to be tested under tension. For microleakage testing, mesio-occlusal class II cavities were prepared in 15 molars and divided into three groups as mentioned before. Then, cavities were restored, thermocycled, immersed in a dye, sectioned mesiodistally, and then dye penetration was assessed. The antibacterial effect of both tested materials was evaluated using agar disc diffusion and broth dilution methods against chlorhexidine as a control positive group. Results There was no significant difference in µTBS between all tested groups. Bulk fill self-cured alkasite showed the lowest microleakage value followed by bulk fill dual-cured alkasite and incremental nanohybrid resin composite, respectively. Also, cervical microleakage showed significantly higher mean value than the occlusal one. The antibacterial effect of alkasite was less than chlorhexidine. Alkasite showed maximum broth clarity at lowest tested bacterial concentration. Conclusion Resin composite with alkaline fillers was characterized by good µTBS and marginal integrity with weak antibacterial effect.

scholarly journals Influence of Water Aging on Microtensile Bond Strength of a Flowable and a Packable Bulk-fill Resin Composites to Dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Ayah Atif Selim ◽  
Ahmed Fawzy Abo Elezz ◽  
Rehab Khalil Safy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Aging Effect ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Influence Of Water

AIM: Investigation of the aging effect on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite (RC) versus a conventionally incrementally applied one. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 45 sound human impacted third molars extracted molars have been selected to prepare specimens for the μTBS test. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (C) according to type of RC material which used for restoring the teeth. Where nanohybrid RC (Grandio®SO) was used as the control Group (C1), packable bulk-fill RC (X-tra fil®) was used for restoring teeth in C2 group and flowable bulk-fill RC (X-tra base®) was used for restoring teeth in C3 group. Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 5) according to the water storage time, where in subgroup 1; teeth were stored for 24 h, subgroup 2; teeth were stored for 3 months while for subgroup 3; and teeth were stored for 6 months. After water storage, teeth were sectioned for preparation of μTBS testing beams. Maximum tensile stresses were recorded in megapascal (MPa). RESULTS: After 24 h of water storage, the X-tra base® showed a higher statistically significant μTBS to dentin (33.82 ± 9.84 MPa) than did the other two types of RCs. After 3 months, the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean value of μTBS (10.90 ± 5.66 MPa), meanwhile, after 6 months of water storage Grandio®SO showed the highest mean value of μTBS (15.85 ± 6.76 MPa). Regardless of the time the X-tra fil® showed the lowest mean of μTBS (15.07 ± 11.73 MPa), while there is no significant difference between the X-tra base® and Grandio®SO. Furthermore, the water aging adversely affects μTBS values which deceased gradually by time. CONCLUSION: The packable bulk-fill RC characterized by lower μTBS to dentin in comparison to the flowable bulk fill and the incrementally applied nanohybrid RCs. Furthermore, the μTBS of the three tested materials decreased gradually by aging.

Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL Quock ◽  
JA Barros ◽  
SW Yang ◽  
SA Patel
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Silver Diamine Fluoride ◽  
Microtensile Testing ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Diamond Saw ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of the cariostatic and preventive agent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Forty-two caries-free, extracted molars were flattened occlusally and apically using a diamond saw, and the exposed occlusal dentin was polished with a series of silicon carbide papers, all under water irrigation. The teeth were then randomly divided into six groups of seven teeth each that were treated as follows: 1) Peak SE self-etch bonding agent; 2) 12% SDF + Peak SE; 3) 38% SDF + Peak SE; 4) Peak LC etch-and-rinse bonding agent; 5) 12% SDF + Peak LC; and 6) 38% SDF + Peak LC. Four-millimeter buildups of Amelogen Plus were incrementally placed on all teeth; after a 24-hour storage period in distilled water, the specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to produce beams of cross-sectional surface area measuring approximately 1 mm2. The beams were placed on a microtensile testing machine, which utilized a single-speed pump motor and force gauge at 20 kgf × 0.01 second to record maximum tensile force before failure occurred. Two-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were performed to compare the effects of the SDF on microtensile bond strength, with statistical significance set at α = 0.05. None of the experimental groups treated with different concentrations of SDF showed a significant difference in bond strength compared to the control groups, and there was no significant difference in bond strength between self-etch and etch-and-rinse groups. However, the effect of SDF on self-etch bonded teeth compared to etch-and-rinse bonded teeth was statistically significant (p=0.0363), specifically at the 12% concentration. SDF does not adversely affect the bond strength of resin composite to noncarious dentin.

scholarly journals Bond strength of universal adhesive applied to dry and wet dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e201662
Author(s):  
Maria Luísa de Alencar e Silva Leite ◽  
Caroline de Farias Charamba ◽  
Renally Bezerra Wanderley e Lima ◽  
Sônia Saeger Meireles ◽  
Rosângela Marques Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Bonding Quality ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Aim: This study evaluated the influence of dentin wettability on the immediate and extended microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of a universal adhesive system used in the etch-and-rinse strategy. Methods: Twenty human third molars were selected and divided into four groups according to the adhesive system and dentin wettability. The mTBS values of each group were registered 24 h and one year after adhesive system application and resin composite block build-up (n=30). Data were analyzed by the t-test (p<0.05). Results: When both adhesive systems were compared, there was no statistically significant difference when they were applied following wet bonding (p>0.05). However, the dry bonding reduced μTBS values of the Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive (p<0.05). Regarding storage time, both groups presented similar μTBS values at 24 h and one year (p>0.05). Conclusions: Therefore, the Scotchbond Universal Adhesive can be applied to dry or wet dentin without compromising the etch-and-rinse bonding quality and the durability of the restorations.

scholarly journals Influence of increment thickness on microhardness and bond strength in composite resins

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e32810917974
Author(s):  
Isis Almela Endo Hoshino ◽  
Mariana de Oliveira Bachega ◽  
Paulo Henrique dos Santos ◽  
André Luiz Briso ◽  
Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Knoop Microhardness ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
New Generation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop microhardness and the microtensile bond strength of a second-generation of bulk-fill (BF) and a nanohybrid composite resins (NH) in different thicknesses of increments. For this, ninety disks of composite resin were made for Knoop microhardness, being divided into six groups (n = 15). The Knoop microhardness obtained in each millimeter of the internal face. For microtensile bond strength, ninety restored in third molars were used, divided into six groups (n = 15). For Knoop microhardness, the Wilcoxon and Friedman test was used. For the microtensile bond strength were used the Two-way Anova test and Tukey's post-test (p <0.05). The NH resin showed higher Knoop micro hardness than BF and it was observed that hardness value decreases as increases the thickness of the resin. There was no significant difference in microtensile bond strength comparing NH and BF. However, there was a significant difference between G2 and G4 for the NH groups, with the highest and lowest bond strength values, respectively. Thus, the new generation of the bulk-fill composite resin provided lower microhardness values as the thickness of the increments increases in comparison with the nanohybrid composite resin. The microtensile bond strength does not appear to have been influenced by the type of resin, or the thickness of the increment.

scholarly journals Effect of chitosan nanoparticles on microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin: an in vitro study

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Mohsen Mohamed ◽  
Sameh Mahoud Nabih ◽  
Mohamed Ahmed Wakwak
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Chitosan Nanoparticles ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of chitosan nanoparticles on microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin using self etch adhesive after aging. Material and Methods: A total number of 90 freshly extracted, sound human molar teeth. Flat tooth surface was gained after cut of the occlusal surface. Three main groups according to pretreatment of dentin before adhesive application; 0.2 % chitosan, 2.5 % chitosan and no treatment control group. Universal self etch adhesive were applied according to manufacture instruction and 4 mm of Feltik Z250 xt composite. Storage of specimens for 1 day, 3 months and 6 months in 37O C distilled water. After that, the tooth was sectioned to beams of 1 mm x8 mm sticks for microtensile bond strength test using universal testing machine. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to evalute the effect of chitosan nanoparticles on dentin and smear layer. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare between the three groups as well as the three aging periods. Dunn’s test was used for pair-wise comparisons. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: chitosan 0.2% is statistically significant increase in bond strength than chitosan 2.5% and control in one day group. Three months chitosan 0.2 % groups have statistically significant increase in bond strength than chitosan 2.5%. It was found in 6 months that control and chitosan 0.2 % have statistically significant increase in bond strength than chitosan 2.5%. There was statistically significant difference found between the three studied groups regarding bond strength at different storage times . Conclusion: Microtensile bond strength was influenced by different chitosan concentration. Different aging periods had no effect on the microtensile bond strength without application of chitosan and with application of 2.5% chitosan concentration.KEYWORDSChitosan nanoparticles; Microtensile bond strength; MMPs.

scholarly journals Evaluating Resin-Dentin Bond by Microtensile Bond Strength Test: Effects of Various Resin Composites and Placement Techniques

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 409-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horieh Moosavi ◽  
Fatemeh Maleknejad ◽  
Maryam Forghani ◽  
Elham Afshari
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Class I ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Filling Method ◽  
Bulk Insertion

Objectives : This in vitro study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of a methacrylate- based compared to a silorane-based resin composite in Class I cavity using different placement techniques.Materials and Methods: Class I cavities with dimension of (4 mm long, 4 mm wide, 3 mm deep) were prepared in extracted sound human molars. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups. The first three groups were filled with Filtek P90 using three methods of insertion; bulk, incremental and snow-plow, and the remaining three groups were filled with Clearfil AP-X using the same three placement techniques. After 24 hours of storage in water at 37°C, the specimens were thermocycled to 1000 cycles. Specimens were prepared for MTBS testing by creating bonded beams obtained from the pulpal floor. Statistical analysis used: Statistical analyses of data were performed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey (α=.05). Results: The experiment showed significant differences between the two resin composites with regard to filling techniques (P<0.05). The MTBS was significantly higher in each of Filtek P90 subgroup compared to Clearfil AP-X ones (P<0.05). With respect to filling technique in both resin composites, bulk insertion showed the significantly lowest MTBS (P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between the outcome of incremental and snow-plow techniques (P>0.05). Conclusion: Silorane-based resin composite as opposed to methacrylate based resin composite and layering placements in contrast to bulk filling method had higher microtensile bond strength.

scholarly journals Impact of Immediate Dentin Sealing Using Universal Adhesive under Simulated Pulp Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Indirect Resin Composite Restorations and Dentin Permeability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Abd Elfatah Abo-Alazm ◽  
Rehab Khalil Safy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Dentin Permeability ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of immediate dentin sealing (IDS) technique using universal adhesive under simulated pulp pressure on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of indirect resin composite restorations and dentin permeability. Materials and Methods Fifty extracted caries-free human third molars were used for specimens' preparation. Each molar's occlusal table was abraded flat and their roots were separated under continuous water cooling. Forty specimens were used for microtensile bond strength test (µTBST) evaluation. The µTBST specimens were randomly assigned to two groups according to the dentin sealing time; Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) and delayed dentin sealing (DDS). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to the adhesive system used for dentin sealing: iBOND self-etch adhesive and GLUMA Bond Universal. All specimens were exposed to simulated pulp pressure for 1 week then restored using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin composite blocks. The µTBS was evaluated for all tested subgroups after 24 hours and 6 months of water storage. The remaining 10 teeth were used for the preparation of dentin discs for dentin permeability evaluation. They were divided into two groups according to type of self-etch adhesive used. Fluid filtration rate was evaluated after etching, with smear layer and after adhesive application. Results obtained were statistically analyzed using Shapiro–Wilk test and Weibull analysis. Results Statistically significant difference was recorded between μTBS mean values of both IDS and DDS techniques at 24 hours and after 6 months of water storage. GLUMA Bond Universal adhesive had significantly higher bond strength compared with iBond at both IDS and DDS techniques, but both adhesives showed a significant reduction in the Weibull characteristic strength after 6 months of water storage. Significant reduction in dentin permeability was recorded by both adhesives without any significant difference between them. Conclusions The IDS technique using universal adhesive in self-etch mode is an effective strategy for improving the final bond strength of CAD/CAM resin composite restorations and reducing dentin permeability.

scholarly journals Anti-Microbial and Remineralizing Properties of Self-Adhesive Orthodontic Resin Containing Mesoporous Bioactive Glass

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 3550
Author(s):  
Aerin Choi ◽  
Kyung-Hyeon Yoo ◽  
Seog-Young Yoon ◽  
Bong-Soo Park ◽  
In-Ryoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Antibacterial Effect ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mesoporous Bioactive Glass

Self-adhesive resins (SARs) contain adhesives, which simplify the procedures of resin application, and primers, which provide sufficient bonding ability. In this study, mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBN) were added to a SAR to easily improve the physical properties and remineralization ability. The experimental resins comprised 1%, 3%, and 5% MBN mixed in Ortho Connect Flow (GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan). As the MBN content in the SAR increased, the microhardness increased, and a statistically significant difference was observed between the cases of 1% and 5% MBN addition. Shear bond strength increased for 1% and 3% MBN samples and decreased for 5% MBN. The addition of MBN indicated a statistically significant antibacterial effect on both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. The anti-demineralization experiment showed that the remineralization length increased with the MBN content of the sample. Through the above results, we found that SAR containing MBN has antibacterial and remineralization effects. Thus, by adding MBN to the SAR, we investigated the possibility of orthodontic resin development, wherein the strength is enhanced and the drawbacks of the conventional SAR addressed.

scholarly journals Effects of Immediate and Delayed Cementations for CAD/CAM Resin Block after Alumina Air Abrasion on Adhesion to Newly Developed Resin Cement

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 7058
Author(s):  
Akane Chin ◽  
Masaomi Ikeda ◽  
Tomohiro Takagaki ◽  
Toru Nikaido ◽  
Alireza Sadr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Water Sorption ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Curing Methods

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of one week of Computer-aided design/Computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crown storage on the μTBS between resin cement and CAD/CAM resin composite blocks. The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) test groups were divided into 4 conditions. There are two types of CAD/CAM resin composite blocks, namely A block and P block (KATANA Avencia Block and KATANA Avencia P Block, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) and two types of resin cements. Additionally, there are two curing methods (light cure and chemical cure) prior to the μTBS test—Immediate: cementation was performed immediately; Delay: cementation was conducted after one week of storage in air under laboratory conditions. The effect of Immediate and Delayed cementations were evaluated by a μTBS test, surface roughness measurements, light intensity measurements, water sorption measurements and Scanning electron microscope/Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) analysis. From the results of the μTBS test, we found that Delayed cementation showed significantly lower bond strength than that of Immediate cementation for both resin cements and both curing methods using A block. There was no significant difference between the two types of resin cements or two curing methods. Furthermore, water sorption of A block was significantly higher than that of P block. Within the limitations of this study, alumina air abrasion of CAD/CAM resin composite restorations should be performed immediately before bonding at the chairside to minimize the effect of humidity on bonding.

scholarly journals Microtensile Bond Strength of Methacrylate and Silorane Resins to Enamel and Dentin

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Rodrigues da Silva ◽  
Isabela Sousa Araújo ◽  
Rodrigo Dantas Pereira ◽  
Bruno de Castro Ferreira Barreto ◽  
Célio Jesus do Prado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aging Time ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Plate ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Interaction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Storage

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of two substrates (enamel and dentin) considering two study factors: type of composite resin [methacrylate-based (Filtek Supreme) or silorane-based (Filtek LS)] and aging time (24 h or 3 months). Twenty human molars were selected and divided into 2 groups (n=10) considering two dental substrates, enamel or dentin. The enamel and dentin of each tooth was divided into two halves separated by a glass plate. Each tooth was restored using both tested composite resins following the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were sectioned, producing 4 sticks for each composite resin. Half of them were tested after 24 h and half after 3 months. µTBS testing was carried out at 0.05 mm/s. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests at α=0.05. Significant differences between composite resins and substrates were found (p<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found for aging time and interactions among study factors. The methacrylate-based resin showed higher µTBS than the silorane-based resin. The µTBS for enamel was significantly higher than for dentin, irrespective of the composite resin and storage time. Three months of storage was not sufficient time to cause degradation of the bonding interaction of either of the composite resins to enamel and dentin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document