Radioembolization for Rare Metastatic Disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Niekamp ◽  
Govindarajan Narayanan ◽  
Brian J. Schiro ◽  
Constantino Pena ◽  
Alex Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Hepatic Malignancies ◽  
Yttrium 90

AbstractRadioembolization has become a widespread treatment modality for both primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies. Although the majority of data and indication for yttrium-90 radioembolization have been for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer, radioembolization with yttrium-90 has rapidly expanded into the treatment options for multiple tumor types with metastases to the liver. This article reviews the clinical data and expanding utilization of radioembolization for rare metastatic diseases with an emphasis on efficacy and safety.

scholarly journals 4CPS-294 Efficacy and safety profile of trifluridine–tipiracil and regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Cantarelli ◽  
JA Morales Barrios ◽  
F Gutierrez Nicolas ◽  
S Garcia Gil ◽  
B Del Rosario Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation and management of adverse events associated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110311
Author(s):  
Chiun Hsu ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Hui-Chuan Sun ◽  
Arndt Vogel ◽  
Ahmed O. Kaseb
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line

In light of positive efficacy and safety findings from the IMbrave150 trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, this novel combination has become the preferred first-line standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several additional trials are ongoing that combine an immune checkpoint inhibitor with another agent such as a multiple kinase inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent. Therefore, the range of first-line treatment options for unresectable HCC is likely to increase, and healthcare providers need succinct information about the use of such combinations, including their efficacy and key aspects of their safety profiles. Here, we review efficacy and safety data on combination immunotherapies and offer guidance on monitoring and managing adverse events, especially those associated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Because of their underlying liver disease and high likelihood of portal hypertension, patients with unresectable HCC are at particular risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and this risk may be exacerbated by treatments that include antiangiogenic agents. Healthcare providers also need to be alert to the risks of proteinuria and hypertension, colitis, hepatitis, and reactivation of hepatitis B or C virus infection. They should also be aware of the possibility of rarer but potentially life-threatening adverse events such as pneumonitis and cardiovascular events. Awareness of the risks associated with these therapies and knowledge of adverse event monitoring and management will become increasingly important as the therapeutic range broadens in unresectable HCC.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong Hak Bang ◽  
Jeong Eun Kim ◽  
Ji Sung Lee ◽  
Sun Young Kim ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Significant Disease

AbstractThere is an unmet medical need for later-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Considering that, beyond progression, co-treatment with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy showed less toxicity and a significant disease control rate, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and bevacizumab. This single-center retrospective study included 157 patients between May 2011 and February 2018, who received bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line chemotherapy after progressing with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. The study treatment consisted of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 orally (PO) twice daily on day 1 to 14, repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9–5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (95% CI 8.3–11.1). The overall response rate was 14% (22/157). Patients who had not received prior targeted agents showed better survival outcomes in the multivariable analysis of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.82, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.85, P = 0.004). Bevacizumab plus capecitabine could be a considerably efficacious option for patients with mCRC refractory to prior standard treatments.

scholarly journals The Evolutionary Landscape of Treatment for BRAFV600E Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Gianluca Mauri ◽  
Erica Bonazzina ◽  
Alessio Amatu ◽  
Federica Tosi ◽  
Katia Bencardino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor

The BRAFV600E mutation is found in 8–10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and it is recognized as a poor prognostic factor with a median overall survival inferior to 20 months. At present, besides immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for those tumors with concomitant MSI-H status, recommended treatment options include cytotoxic chemotherapy + anti-VEGF in the first line setting, and a combination of EGFR and a BRAF inhibitor (cetuximab plus encorafenib) in second line. However, even with the latter targeted approach, acquired resistance limits the possibility of more than an incremental benefit and survival is still dismal. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for this subset of patients and perform a systematic review of ongoing clinical trials. Overall, we identified six emerging strategies: targeting MAPK pathway (monotherapy or combinations), targeting MAPK pathway combined with cytotoxic agents, intensive cytotoxic regimen combinations, targeted agents combined with CPIs, oxidative stress induction, and cytotoxic agents combined with antiangiogenic drugs and CPIs. In the future, the integration of new therapeutic strategies targeting key players in the BRAFV600E oncogenic pathways with current treatment approach based on cytotoxic chemotherapy and surgery is likely to redefine the treatment landscape of these CRC patients.

Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Progressing on Irinotecan: MABEL Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (33) ◽  
pp. 5335-5343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansjochen Wilke ◽  
Robert Glynne-Jones ◽  
Josef Thaler ◽  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Peter Preusser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Practice Setting ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
N 93

Purpose This large, multinational study aimed to confirm in a community practice setting the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with epidermal growth factor–expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had recently failed an irinotecan-containing regimen. Patients and Methods The primary objective was to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks. The initial cetuximab dose was 400 mg/m2 and was followed weekly by 250 mg/m2; irinotecan (according to prestudy regimen) was given weekly (125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 of 6 weeks), every 2 weeks (180 mg/m2 each), or every 3 weeks (350 mg/m2 each). Results The intention-to-treat/safety population comprised 1,147 treated patients who received irinotecan weekly (n = 93); every 2 weeks (n = 670); every 3 weeks (n = 356); or another dose (n = 28). The PFS rate at 12 weeks was 61%, and the median survival was 9.2 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. The most common treatment-related grades 3 to 4 adverse events were diarrhea (19%), neutropenia (10%), rash (7%), and asthenia (6%). The rate of grades 3 to 4 infusion-related reactions (IRRs; composite adverse event category) was 1% for patients who received both antihistamine and corticosteroid premedication. Conclusion Tolerability (except IRR incidence), PFS rate, and overall survival rate were in line with previous results. At 1%, the rate of IRRs in patients who received prophylactic premedication with both antihistamine and corticosteroid is lower than previously reported. MABEL clearly confirms in a community practice setting the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus irinotecan in the treatment of mCRC.

scholarly journals Treatments after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with dMMR/MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 406
Author(s):  
Quang Loc Bui ◽  
Léo Mas ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
David Tougeron ◽  
Christelle de la Fouchardière ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Repair Deficiency ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Tumor Types

Background: Several studies reported improved outcomes with conventional treatments (CT, i.e., chemotherapy ± targeted therapy) administered after immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) in certain tumor types. No data are available concerning patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI). We aimed to assess the outcomes of dMMR/MSI mCRC pts receiving CT after ICI failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study investigating the outcomes of all dMMR/MSI mCRC pts who received post-ICI CT between 2015 and 2020. Results: 31 pts (male 61%, median age 56 years) were included. ICI was an anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy in 71% of pts, and 61% received >2 lines before post-ICI CT. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 13% and 45%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of 2.9 and 7.4 months, respectively. No association of the outcomes with either ICI efficacy or anti-angiogenic agents was observed. Prolonged PFS (range 16.1–21.3 months) was observed in 4 pts (13%). Conclusions: Although conducted on a limited number of patients, our results do not support an association of previous ICI treatment with an enhanced efficacy of CT in dMMR/MSI mCRC. However, prolonged disease control was observed in several cases, suggesting that some pts might derive an unexpected benefit from post-ICI treatments.

scholarly journals Regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer: more data for clinical decisions

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 436-441
Author(s):  
Vladislav V. Petkau ◽  
Alisa A. Karimova ◽  
Zinaida V. Akishina
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Tumor Immunogenicity ◽  
Metastatic Activity ◽  
Multiple Kinase Inhibitor

Regorafenib is a multiple kinase inhibitor. It influences/blocks angiogenesis (VEGFR1-3, TIE2), proliferation (KIT, RET, RAF-1, BRAF), metastatic activity (VEGFR2-3, PDGFR), tumor immunogenicity (CSF1R), tumor microenvironment (PDGFR-, PDGFR-, FGFR1-2). Regorafenib has several indications including metastatic colorectal cancer. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib data from clinical trials (CORRECT, CONCUR, CONSIGN) and observational trials from real world (REBECCA, CORRELATE, RECORA, PMS, REGOTAS) are summarized and presented in this issue. State of the matter of molecular-biologic predictors (KRAS, PIK3CA ANG-2, VEGF-A, LDH, CCL5/CCR5, CA 19-9) and radiological predictors (RadioCORRECT and other trials) is highlighted. Regimens with dose modification and its influence on effectiveness and tolerability of regorafenib are described according to the data from ReDOS, RESET, REARRANGE trials. The results from retrospective trials comparing regorafenib and another approved for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer drug trifluridine/tipiracil are presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document