Natural-Image Discrimination in the Periphery: The Importance of Phase and Amplitude Information
Previous studies with simplified stimuli such as combinations of sinusoidal gratings have revealed phase identification losses in the periphery that are not eliminated by a scaling factor. How do these phase processing problems influence our ability to discriminate natural images in the periphery? In this study the ability of an observer to identify the ‘odd-image-out’ when there is either an amplitude-only, phase-only, or amplitude and phase change in one out of three stimuli is compared. Pairs of Fourier-manipulated black-and-white digitised photographs of natural images were used and phase and amplitude spectral exchanges of varying proportions were made between two different images. Measurements were made to determine the smallest phase change needed in order for the observer to reliably discriminate the manipulated image, compared to two reference stimuli, at eccentricities of 0°, 2.5°, 5°, and 10°. This was compared to discrimination thresholds found when amplitude and phase, and amplitude alone were exchanged. The ability to discriminate images on the basis of phase information alone did fall off quickly with eccentricity (comparable to phase and amplitude discriminations). However, there was a much more rapid decline in amplitude-only discrimination. It appears that phase information in natural scenes remains a relatively more important visual cue in the periphery than amplitude.