scholarly journals Blood transfusion prescribing in the ACT: an insight into clinical decision making

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J Crispin ◽  
Bethany J Crowe ◽  
Anne M McDonald
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Organisation Of Care ◽  
Metropolitan Hospital ◽  
Loss Of Appetite ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Structured Questionnaire

This study aimed to determine the perspectives of a group of patients categorised as ?long-stay outliers? at a large South Australian metropolitan hospital about aspects of organisation of care and the perceived impact of long-term hospitalisation. Nineteen patients were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Eighty-nine percent of participants stated that they had no knowledge of how long they were to be in hospital. Forty-two percent indicated that they did not know when they would be discharged from hospital. This was of concern, especially considering the vulnerability of this patient group and the known benefits of patient involvement in decision making and the improvements this can make to health outcomes and early discharge. Participants indicated concern about sleep deprivation, diet, ability to return to paid employment, and missing their family as the main areas of impact of their long hospitalisation. Concerns about being discharged from hospital included: apprehension as to whether they were well enough to leave; the recurrence of infection; whether they would be able to sleep well when they got home; their recent loss of appetite and associated weight loss; mobility concerns; and what supports they would have when they were discharged home. All these issues require staff to be more patient and family-centred in their approach to preparing for discharge.

scholarly journals CLINICAL DECISION MAKING FOR THE HEMODYNAMIC GRAY ZONE (FFR 0.75-0.80) AND IMPACT ON LONG TERM OUTCOMES

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (13) ◽  
pp. 379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiv Kumar Agarwal ◽  
Mohan Edupuganti ◽  
Ahmed Almomani ◽  
Naga Venkata Pothineni ◽  
Jason Payne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Gray Zone ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

Can we identify who will adhere to long-term physical activity? Signal detection methodology as a potential aid to clinical decision making.

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abby C. King ◽  
Michaela Kiernan ◽  
Roy F. Oman ◽  
Helena C. Kraemer ◽  
Mary Hull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Signal Detection ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision

Diagnostic conversations: Clinical Decision Making in surgery – Part 2

Diagnosis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Allan Watters ◽  
Spencer Wynyard Beasley ◽  
Wendy Crebbin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
Clinical Decisions ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Royal Australasian College ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Made In

AbstractProceduralists who fail to review their decision making are unlikely to learn from their experiences, irrespective of whether the operative outcome is successful or not. Teaching junior surgeons to develop ‘insight’ into their own decision making has long been a challenge. Surgeons and staff of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons worked together to develop a model to help explain the processes around clinical decision making and incorporated this model into a Clinical Decision Making (CDM) training course. In this course, faculty apply the model to specific surgical cases, within the model’s framework of how clinical decisions are made; thus providing an opportunity to identify specific decision making processes as they occur and to highlight some of the learning opportunities they provide. The conversation in this paper illustrates the kinds of case-based interactions which typically occur in the development and teaching of the CDM course.The focus in this, the second of two papers, is on reviewing post-operative clinical decisions made in relation to one case, to improve the quality of subsequent decision making.

scholarly journals FUTURES: Forecasting the Unexpected Transfer to Upgraded Resources in Sepsis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-191
Author(s):  
Alexa Profozich ◽  
Trevor Sytsma ◽  
Ryan Arnold ◽  
Kristen Miller ◽  
Muge Capan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Initial Point ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Sepsis Management ◽  
Insight Into

Sepsis is one of the most deadly and costly diseases. The Emergency Department (ED) is the initial point of care for most patients who become hospitalized due to sepsis. Quantifying the accuracy of ED clinician forecasting regarding patients’ clinical trajectories and outcomes can provide insight into clinical decision making and inform sepsis management.

Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgical Oncology

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 3178-3186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane M. Blazeby ◽  
Kerry Avery ◽  
Mirjam Sprangers ◽  
Hynek Pikhart ◽  
Peter Fayers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Surgical Oncology ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Surgical Trials ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Purpose There is debate about the value of measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) in clinical trials in oncology because of evidence suggesting that HRQL does not influence clinical decisions. Analysis of HRQL in surgical trials, however, may inform decision making because it provides detailed assessment of the immediate detrimental short-term impact of surgery on HRQL that needs to be considered against the long-term survival benefits and functional outcomes of surgery. This study evaluated whether HRQL in randomized trials in surgical oncology contributes to clinical decision making. Methods A systematic review identified randomized trials in surgical oncology with HRQL. Trials were evaluated independently by two reviewers and the value of HRQL in clinical decision making was categorized in three ways: whether trial investigators reported that HRQL influenced final treatment recommendations, whether trial investigators reported that HRQL would be useful for informed consent, and whether HRQL was assessed robustly according to predefined criteria. Results Thirty-three randomized trials with valid HRQL questionnaires were identified; 22 (67%) concluded that HRQL outcomes influenced treatment decisions or provided valuable data for informed consent, and seven of these trials had robust HRQL design. Another five trials had robust HRQL design but investigators reported that HRQL outcomes were not clinically important enough to influence treatment recommendations. Conclusion In surgical trials in oncology, HRQL informed clinical decision making. It is recommended that HRQL be included in relevant surgical trials, and that information be used to inform clinicians and patients about the impact of surgery on short- and long-term HRQL.

scholarly journals Understanding Neonatal Ventilation: Strategies for Decision Making in the NICU

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Petty
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Neonatal Ventilation ◽  
Ventilation Modes ◽  
Ventilation Strategies

AbstractNeonatal ventilation is an integral component of care delivered in the neonatal unit. The aim of any ventilation strategy is to support the neonate’s respiratory system during compromise while limiting any long-term damage to the lungs. Understanding the principles behind neonatal ventilation is essential so that health professionals caring for sick neonates and families have the necessary knowledge to understand best practice. Given the range of existing ventilation modes and parameters available, these require explanation and clarification in the context of current evidence. Many factors can influence clinical decision making on both an individual level and within the wider perspective of neonatal care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document