scholarly journals Clinical activity profile of preregistration physiotherapy students during clinical placements

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Stoikov ◽  
Kassie Shardlow ◽  
Mark Gooding ◽  
Suzanne Kuys
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Care ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Activity Profile ◽  
Clinical Area ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Physiotherapy Student ◽  
Care Activity ◽  
Student Contribution ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Objective The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical activity profile of preregistration physiotherapy students during clinical placements and their clinical activity contribution to health service delivery. Methods Clinical activity data for 2014 were obtained from five Queensland public sector hospitals providing preregistration physiotherapy students clinical education in three key clinical areas (cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neurological) over four 5-week placement blocks. Data regarding the number of student occasions of service (OOS) and the length of the OOS (LOOS) were collected to determine the average OOS and LOOS per student in each clinical area. Results Twenty weeks of student data were collected from each hospital in each clinical area, representing 29.1% of cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neurorehabilitation student placements. Students completed 19051 OOS. The average OOS per student per block for cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neurorehabilitation placements was 98.3, 74.0 and 72.4 respectively. Two-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of weeks (F=402.1, P<0.001) and clinical area (F =1331.5, P<0.001) for LOOS.In addition, an interaction was found between clinical placement week and clinical area for LOOS (F=8.4, P<0.001). Conclusions Student clinical activity data are useful for understanding the student contribution to health services. Student contribution appears to increase throughout the clinical placement and consideration should be given to the clinical educator:student ratio to enhance overall student contribution. What is known about the topic? Quantitative data describing physiotherapy student clinical care activity during placements are limited. What does this paper add? This paper profiles physiotherapy student clinical care activity and the changes occurring over 5-week placements. What are the implications for practitioners? Physiotherapy students provide clinical activity for health services that changes over their 5-week placement. Student clinical activity should be considered when responding to placement demand and planning service delivery.

scholarly journals Corrigendum to: Clinical activity profile of preregistration physiotherapy students during clinical placements

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 720
Author(s):  
Susan Stoikov ◽  
Kassie Shardlow ◽  
Mark Gooding ◽  
Suzanne Kuys
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Activity Profile ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Physiotherapy Student ◽  
Care Activity ◽  
Student Contribution ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Objective The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical activity profile of preregistration physiotherapy students during clinical placements and their clinical activity contribution to health service delivery.Methods Clinical activity data for 2014 were obtained from five Queensland public sector hospitals providing preregistration physiotherapy students clinical education in three key clinical areas (cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neurological) over four 5-week placement blocks. Data regarding the number of student occasions of service (OOS) and the length of the OOS (LOOS) were collected to determine the average OOS and LOOS per student in each clinical area.Results Twenty weeks of student data were collected from each hospital in each clinical area, representing 29.1% of cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neurorehabilitation student placements. Students completed 19051 OOS. The average OOS per student per block for cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neurorehabilitation placements was 98.3, 74.0 and 72.4 respectively. Two-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of weeks (F=402.1, PF =1331.5, PF=8.4, PConclusions Student clinical activity data are useful for understanding the student contribution to health services. Student contribution appears to increase throughout the clinical placement and consideration should be given to the clinical educator:student ratio to enhance overall student contribution.What is known about the topic? Quantitative data describing physiotherapy student clinical care activity during placements are limited.What does this paper add? This paper profiles physiotherapy student clinical care activity and the changes occurring over 5-week placements.What are the implications for practitioners? Physiotherapy students provide clinical activity for health services that changes over their 5-week placement. Student clinical activity should be considered when responding to placement demand and planning service delivery.

scholarly journals Fitting in with the team: Facilitative mentors in physiotherapy student placements’

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Wibberley ◽  
Claire Hamshire
Keyword(s):  
Student Perspective ◽  
Individual Student ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Physiotherapy Student ◽  
Academic Settings ◽  
Positive Experiences ◽  
Fitting In ◽  
Support Students ◽  
Resultant Stress ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Clinical placements are central to physiotherapy students’ education, providing an environment in which students can apply learning they have been introduced to in academic settings. However placement learning has been identified as fraught with problems and resultant stress, and there is limited evidence available on what exactly makes a good placement for physiotherapy students. This paper reports on selected findings from a study exploring narratives of physiotherapy students over three years, relating to their overall experiences of being a student. A narrative prompt provided an opportunity for the students to speak about ‘episodes’ of their learning experiences. A number of these ‘episodes’ related to the students’ experiences of clinical placements; thus it was decided to extract these from the narratives and undertake a separate qualitative analysis of these placement experiences. The majority of the students reported positive experiences of placements overall; however, it was clear that some placement teams and mentors did not support students appropriately. A welcoming team and a mentor who facilitated learning from an individual student perspective were considered to be key to a good placement experience, whilst an unwelcoming team and a mentor who objectified the student resulted in bad placement experiences.

A phase Ib/II study of selinexor in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): SeliGIST/GEIS-41 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11534-11534
Author(s):  
Cesar Serrano ◽  
Claudia Valverde ◽  
Josefina Cruz Jurado ◽  
Javier Martinez-Trufero ◽  
Xavier Guri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antitumoral Activity ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

11534 Background: KIT or PDGFRA oncogenic activation drives GIST progression throughout the disease course. Accordingly, currently approved agents in metastatic GIST focus on the therapeutic suppression of these receptors. However, the clinical benefit after imatinib (IM) progression is still modest, suggesting the co-operation of KIT/PDGFRA-independent mechanisms in GIST cell survival. Selinexor is an oral, selective inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export, and preclinical studies evidenced antitumoral activity in GIST as single agent and in combination with IM in both IM-sensitive and IM-resistant models. Methods: The phase Ib portion studied IM 400 mg daily plus weekly selinexor in patients (pts) with IM-resistant, advanced GIST. Prior intolerance to IM was not allowed. A standard 3+3 dosing schema was utilized to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of this combination. Investigator-assessed response was evaluated every 8 weeks using RECIST 1.1. Results: At data cutoff of Sep 25, 2020, 12 pts were enrolled and received treatment with IM 400 mg and selinexor once weekly at dose levels (DL) 1 (60 mg), DL2 (80 mg) and DL3 (100 mg). Median age 57 (range 46-77), 42% female, median prior therapies 4 (range 2-7). Although only 1/6 pts developed a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at DL3, the RP2D was defined at DL2 (IM 400 mg daily and selinexor 80 mg once weekly) based on activity data in the DL2 and the need for dose reductions in 5/6 pts at DL3 after the DLT window. All pts were evaluable for toxicity and response. One DLT occurred at DL3 (G3 nausea). Non-DLT G3/4 toxicities were anemia (1/12 pts), neutropenia (1/12 pts), vomiting (1/12 pts) and fatigue (2/12 pts). Common G1/2 toxicities were nausea (11/12 pts), vomiting (10/12 pts), neutropenia (5/12 pts) and anemia, fatigue, diarrhea, and periorbital edema (4/12 pts each). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Overall response rate in the 12 pts evaluable for response was 67% (95% CI 0.349-0.901), with 2 pts achieving PR (17%) and 6 pts SD (50%) as the best response. Clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR, PR, SD) ≥ 16 weeks was 42% (95% CI 0.157-0.723). Median progression free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.7-7.3). Four pts remain on trial at data cutoff. Conclusions: IM and selinexor combination is well-tolerated and has clinical activity in heavily pretreated GIST pts. The trial is currently exploring selinexor as single agent in the IM-resistant GIST population. Clinical trial information: NCT04138381.

Physiotherapy Students’ Performance in Clinical Education: An Analysis of 1 Year of Canadian Cross-Sectional Data

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200018
Author(s):  
Sarah Wojkowski ◽  
Kathleen E. Norman ◽  
Paul Stratford ◽  
Brenda Mori
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Education ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Entry Level ◽  
Typical Performance ◽  
Performance Profiles ◽  
Assessment Of Clinical Performance ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Purpose: This research examines 1 year of cross-sectional, Canada-wide ratings from clinical instructors using the Canadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance (ACP) and analyzes the performance profiles of physiotherapy students’ performance ratings over the course of their entry-to-practice clinical placements. Method: Canadian physiotherapy programmes that use the ACP were invited to submit anonymized, cross-sectional data for placements completed during 2018. Descriptive analyses and summary statistics were completed. Mixed-effects modelling was used to create typical performance profiles for each evaluation criterion in the ACP. Stepwise ordered logistic regression was also completed. Results: Ten programmes contributed data on 3,290 placements. Profiles were generated for each ACP evaluative item by means of mixed-effects modelling; three profiles are presented. In all cases, the predicted typical performance by the end of 24 months of study was approximately the rating corresponding to entry level. Subtle differences among profiles were identified, including the rate at which a student may be predicted to receive a rating of “entry level.” Conclusions: This analysis identified that, in 2018, the majority of Canadian physiotherapy students were successful on clinical placements and typically achieved a rating of “entry level” on ACP items at the end of 24 months.

scholarly journals Factors underlying effective clinical education: Perceptions of physiotherapy students and preceptors.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senthilnathan Ramakrishnan ◽  
Kalyana Chakravarthy Bairapareddy
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Educational Strategies ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Academic Leaders ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Clinical Educator ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Abstract Background Clinical education is the cornerstone of physiotherapy education and it plays a pivotal role in shaping physiotherapy students’ attitude towards future professional practice. But the implementation of physiotherapy clinical education varies significantly between the institutions. Clinical educators adapt various strategies to teach students in the clinical settings which have several advantages as well as disadvantages. Research has shown several factors influencing the clinical education of healthcare students and the objective of this study was to explore the factors that affect the effectiveness of clinical education of physiotherapy students. Methods This research used mixed-methods approach and included 34 physiotherapy students and 26 clinical educators. Data collection was conducted in two stages. First stage of data collection used a 13 items survey at the end of 12 weeks of clinical placements to collect the student’s perspectives about clinical education. Then the second stage of data collection used semi-structured interviews that included both students and clinical educators. Results Descriptive statistics of the survey was useful to analyze the survey results and majority of students reported clinical education was effective and high levels of satisfaction was found among the students about the placement environments and clinical educator skills. Clinical education fulfilled students learning needs and the educators provided necessary support and supervision. However, the findings showed few factors hindering the effectiveness of clinical education and the qualitative study was useful in exploring those factors that are related students, clinical educators and the physiotherapy curriculum. Conclusion The findings of this study are useful to clinical educators, students and academic leaders in physiotherapy as it provides an insight into the factors that affect the effectiveness of clinical education and recommends evidence-based educational strategies to overcome those factors.

scholarly journals Physiotherapy students’ DiSC behaviour styles can be used to predict the likelihood of success in clinical placements

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki Milne ◽  
Chanelle Louwen ◽  
Dianne Reidlinger ◽  
Jo Bishop ◽  
Megan Dalton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Master's Level ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Postgraduate Students ◽  
Physiotherapy Practice ◽  
Living Organisms ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Abstract Background Behaviour can be defined as the internally coordinated responses (actions or inactions) of whole living organisms (individuals or groups) to internal and/or external stimuli, excluding responses more easily understood as developmental changes. Unlike personality traits, that are thought to be biologically consistent, behaviour, through the application of cognition and reasoning is open to change across time and circumstance, although most humans will display preferred ways of behaving. The objective of this study was to: i) identify the behaviour styles of physiotherapy students and investigate if there is a relationship (predictive or otherwise) between students’ unique behaviour patterns and their clinical placement grades and; ii) examine if this relationship differs when student’s in a Master’s level program as well as student’s in a Bachelor’s level program are explored separately. Methods This cross-sectional study with 132 (F = 78, M = 54) physiotherapy students was conducted across two Australian university settings. Measures included Everything DiSC Workplace profile, Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP). Results Physiotherapy students (n = 133) profiled the following ways: Dominance (D) style n = 20 (15%), Influence (i) style n = 33 (25%), Steadiness (S) style n = 36 (27%) and Conscientiousness (C) n = 44 (33%). Students with the individual DiSC styles of i and Conscientiousness / Steadiness (CS) were in the lowest APP quartile for clinical grades and the D style was in the highest quartile. Binary logistic regressions revealed students with an i DiSC style had 3.96 times higher odds, and students with a CS DiSC style had 4.34 times higher odds, of failing a clinical placement. When explored independently, the same trend remained for Master’s level students. Bachelor’s level students with DiSC styles of S and C had failed placements, however these styles were not significantly associated with failure (DiSC S Style: Exp(B) 1.667, p = 0.713 (CI: 0.109 to 25.433), DiSC C Style: Exp(B) 11.00, p = 0.097 (CI: 0.646 to 187.166)). Conclusion Physiotherapy students with DiSC styles i and CS appear to be more likely to fail physiotherapy clinical placements. Further research with larger undergraduate samples is required to establish if relations differ for undergraduate versus postgraduate students.

scholarly journals Influence of Cardiorespiratory Clinical Placements on the Specialty Interest of Physiotherapy Students

Healthcare ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Irene Torres Sánchez ◽  
Laura López López ◽  
Janet Rodríguez Torres ◽  
Esther Prados Román ◽  
María Granados Santiago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Clinical Placement ◽  
Clinical Environment ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Significant Change ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Clinical placements are an important part of health students’ training. Whilst much value is placed on the clinical environment as a place to learn, there is a paucity of direct evidence about its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the competence, importance, and interest in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy of students before and after one month of clinical practice. A pre- and post-placement questionnaire about students’ interest in different physiotherapy subspecialties was used. The students with a cardiorespiratory clinical placement showed a significant change in their perception about the importance of the cardiorespiratory specialty (0.348 ± 1.01; p < 0.001), while no significant change was observed in the students without cardiorespiratory placement (−0.014 ± 0.825; p = 0.883). The presence or absence of clinical placements seems to have a definitive impact on students’ choice of a specialty. This implies the need for developing a set of clinical placements in all the subareas of physiotherapy in order to give undergraduate students the opportunity to make a better decision.

scholarly journals The use of portfolios for continuing assessment of physiotherapy students in clinical practice settings

2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Naidoo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
South African ◽  
Core Curriculum ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Continuous Assessment ◽  
Physiotherapy Student ◽  
Life Long Learning ◽  
Self Development ◽  
Physiotherapy Students

Many and varied methods of assessment are used to evaluate undergraduate physiotherapy students. Different modes of assessment occur as a result of contrasting educational theories and because the purpose of assessment is variable. In this era of performance assessment related to  the students’ mastery of the core curriculum, portfolios can enhance the assessment process by revealing a range of skills and understandings. This fits snugly into the physiotherapy curriculum for undergraduate continuous assessment purposes. Portfolio assessment can facilitate more reflection on students’ learning, more ownership of learning and more awareness of self-development. This supports the South African Qualifications Authority’s objective for higher education of reflection and life-long learning in our students. This article presents discussion on the use of portfolios in physiotherapy student learning and assessment in clinical practice.

Real-world continuous physiologic monitoring in paediatric cardiomyopathy patients: a safety and feasibility study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1400-1401
Author(s):  
Catherine A. Lebo ◽  
Kimberly Y. Lin ◽  
Joseph W. Rossano
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chronic Disease Management ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Activity Monitor ◽  
Mobile Technologies ◽  
Physiologic Monitoring ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Complex Patient ◽  
Device Use

AbstractChronic disease management may be improved with the integration of mobile technologies capable of real-world physiologic monitoring. We performed a prospective, single-centre, pilot study to assess the feasibility of a consumer-based activity monitor use in outpatient management of adolescent cardiomyopathy patients. During the 3-month study period, the activity monitor was worn consistently and provided detailed physiologic and activity data with no adverse events related to the device use. Survey data revealed that the majority of subjects approve of these technologies becoming integrated into routine clinical care. Ongoing study is in need to define optimal disease management for this complex patient population in the age of consumer-driven healthcare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document