The Occurrence of Pseudomonas-Syringae Pv Pisi in-Field Pea (Pisum-Sativum) Crops in the Wimmera Region of Victoria, Australia

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 133 ◽  
Author(s):  
GJ Hollaway ◽  
TW Bretag
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Field Pea

The epidemiology and management of bacterial blight (Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi) of field pea (Pisum sativum) in Australia: a review

2007 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Hollaway ◽  
T. W. Bretag ◽  
T. V. Price
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Bacterial Blight ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Frost Damage ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Crop Damage ◽  
Avirulence Genes ◽  
Race 2 ◽  
Sowing Seed

Bacterial blight caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi is an important, but sporadic, disease of field peas (Pisum sativum) in Australia. The presence of P. syringae pv. pisi reduces the profitability of peas due to yield loss and, in some cases, it also limits Australia’s export of peas to some countries. Pseudomonoas syringae pv. pisi is primarily a seed-borne pathogen, but infected pea trash can be an important source of inoculum. Alternative hosts and soil are not regarded as epidemiologically important sources of inoculum. P. syringae pv. pisi survives, multiplies and spreads epiphytically in pea crops. Epiphytic populations of P. syringae pv. pisi only become pathogenic following crop damage caused by frost or severe weather conditions. Frost damage is especially important because the ice nucleating activity of P. syringae pv. pisi initiates frost damage at higher temperatures than occurs in the absence of the bacterium. In addition early-sown crops are more prone to damage from bacterial blight than crops sown later in the season. Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi consists of seven identified races. One of these (Race 6) lacks all avirulence genes and is common around the world and in Australia. Globally, Race 2 and Race 6 predominate; however, in Australia, Race 3 predominates due to the widespread cultivation of cultivars susceptible to Race 3, but resistant to Race 2. Resistance to Race 6 within P. sativum has not been found but attempts are being made to incorporate a race non-specific resistance identified from P. abyssinicum into field pea. Bacterial blight can be successfully controlled using an integrated disease management strategy incorporating crop rotation, pathogen-free seed, avoidance of planting in areas prone to frequent frosts or extreme wet weather, crop hygiene and avoiding early sowing. Seed treatment and application of foliar bactericides have limited use in control of this disease.

Occurrence and distribution of races of Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi in Australia and their specificity towards various field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars

1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 629 ◽  
Author(s):  
GJ Hollaway ◽  
TW Bretag
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Bacterial Blight ◽  
New South ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Causal Organism ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
High Incidence

The occurrence of races among 65 Australian isolates of Pseudornonas syringae pv. pisi, the causal organism of bacterial blight of field peas, was investigated. Race 3 was most common in Victoria and New South Wales, while race 6 was most common in South Australia. Field pea cultivars were screened for their resistance or susceptibility toward the 7 races of P. syringae pv. pisi. The most common cultivars were susceptible to races 3 and 6, explaining the high incidence of these races in this survey. All cultivars tested were susceptible to race 6, which was identified in all 3 States.

Mitigation Effects of 24-Epibrassinolide and Thiourea in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Drought Stress

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prachi Garg ◽  
◽  
A. Hemantaranjan ◽  
Jyostnarani Pradhan ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L

DS Admiral field pea

2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 751-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Andersen ◽  
T. Warkentin ◽  
O. Philipp ◽  
A. Xue ◽  
A. Sloan
Keyword(s):  
Powdery Mildew ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Powdery Mildew Resistance ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Mildew Resistance ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Cultivar Description ◽  
Good Yielding ◽  
Growing Region

DS Admiral, a yellow cotyledon field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivar, was released in 2000 by Agriprogress Inc., Morden, Manitoba. DS Admiral has a semileafless leaf type, powdery mildew resistance, medium sized, round seeds, and good yielding ability. DS Admiral is adapted to the field-pea-growing region of western Canada. Key words: Field pea, Pisum sativum L., cultivar description, powdery mildew resistance

Combining management and breeding advances to improve field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yields under changing climatic conditions in south-eastern Australia

Euphytica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. S. McMurray ◽  
J. A. Davidson ◽  
M. D. Lines ◽  
A. Leonforte ◽  
M. U. Salam
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
South Eastern ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
South Eastern Australia

BELLEVUE FIELD PEA

1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 805-806
Author(s):  
A. E. SLINKARD ◽  
R. A. A. MORRALL
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Seed Weight ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Cultivar Description

Bellevue field pea (Pisum sativum L.) was licensed in 1986. It is about 15% higher yielding than the check cultivars Century and Trapper. Bellevue has smooth seeds with yellow cotyledons. It has the le gene for shortened internodes and is about 6 d later maturing than Century and Trapper. Seed weight is about 179 g/1000 seeds, intermediate between Century and Trapper.Key words: Cultivar description, pea (field), Pisum sativum L.

Proximate and mineral composition of field peas

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Warkentin ◽  
A. G. Sloan ◽  
S. T. Ali-Khan
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Mineral Composition ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Total Protein ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
Pea Seeds ◽  
Proximate And Mineral Composition

Field pea seeds from 10 cultivars grown at two locations in Manitoba in 1986 and 1987 were analyzed for proximate and mineral profiles. Cultivars differed significantly in their level of total protein, crude fat, ADF, and all minerals tested. However, differences were not extremely large and were comparable to European reports. Location-year also had a significant effect on the levels of total protein, ADF, and all minerals tested. In most cases, the warmest location-year produced relatively higher levels of minerals, ash, and total protein, and lower seed yield than the coolest location-year. Key words: Field pea, Pisum sativum L., mineral

Seasonal Incidence of Pulse Aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) and its Natural Enemies on Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Relation to Some Abiotic Factors in Alluvial Zone of West Bengal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pal ◽  
S. Samanta ◽  
A. Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Relative Humidity ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Natural Enemies ◽  
West Bengal ◽  
Insect Pests ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pest Population ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Aphis Craccivora Koch ◽  
Weather Parameters

Background: Field pea, Pisum sativum L. is an important winter-season pulse crop. It is subjected to damage by both field and storage insect pests and approximately 10-15 per cent reduction in yield was reported due to the infestation of different insect pests. Among these, pulse aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) affects plant physiology directly by removal of nutrients or indirectly by dispersal of various viral diseases. The present investigation has been aimed to study the seasonal fluctuations of aphids and their natural enemies as well as their correlation. Another objective was to know the effect of various weather parameters on pulse aphids and their natural enemies which ultimately would be helpful to develop a forewarning model.Methods: The field experiment was conducted at the A-B Block Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal using two varieties of field pea (KPMR 935 and IFPD 122) during rabi seasons of two consecutive years of 2017-18 and 2018-19 following a Randomized Block Design with three replications. After recording the total population of both pests (nymphs and adults) and their natural enemies across the season, the mean population was worked out and used for correlation and regression studies along with the weather parameters. Result: Maximum aphid population was noticed during the peak pod formation stage of the crop irrespective of the varieties. The pest population was very strongly correlated with the incidence of coccinellid and ant population in both test varieties. Among the weather parameters, both maximum and minimum temperature and sunshine hour showed a positive correlation with the pest population and their natural enemies but relative humidity and rainfall showed a negative correlation. Regression studies indicated that temperature and relative humidity were the most influencing factors over the incidence of aphid in both the seasons.

Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. [Distribution map].

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
New York ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
New South ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
South Wales ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi (Sackett) Young, Dye & Wilkie. Hosts: Pea (Pisum sativum) and other Apiaceae. Information is given on the geographical distribution in Africa, Kenya, Malawi, Morocco, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Asia, India, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Armenia, Kirghizistan, Australasia & Oceania, Australia, New South Wales, South Australia, Western Australia, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria, New Zealand, Europe, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, Voronezh, Moldavia, Switzerland, UK, England, Yugoslavia, North America, Bermuda, Canada, Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Mexico, USA, New York, South America, Argentina, Colombia, Uruguay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document