Nitrogen fertilizer and wheat in a semi-arid environment. 3. Soil and cultural factors affecting response

1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (32) ◽  
pp. 340 ◽  
Author(s):  
JS Russell

The response of Gabo wheat to applied nitrogen at 52 sites in the wheat growing areas of South Australia during 1956-61 was examined in relation to soil and cultural factors, as separate groups and together with climatic factors, by a stepwise multiple regression analysis using a computer. The 10 dependent variables were the linear and quadratic coefficients obtained by fitting orthogonal polynomials to response curves of various parameters (grain yield, grain + straw yield, harvest index, grain nitrogen percentage, and grain nitrogen yield) to applied nitrogen at each of 52 sites. The independent variables were 14 soil properties, such as total nitrogen content and initial nitrate status, and 6 cultural characteristics, including date of sowing and period of cultivation. In addition, 23 climatic variables were also included in analysis considering all independent variables. Of the soil variables the most potent was initial nitrate content of the 0-6 inch horizon. Date of sowing was the most potent cultural variable. The proportion of variance explained in the final analysis by the variables examined was greatest for grain nitrogen yield (73.0 per cent) and grain + straw yield (72.1 per cent). The value for grain yield was 48.9 per cent. Differences between nitrogen and phosphorus response in a semi-arid environment and the theoretical and practical implications of these differences are discussed in relation to the predictive value of soil analyses.


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (31) ◽  
pp. 223 ◽  
Author(s):  
JS Russell

The response of Gabo wheat to nitrogen fertilizer at 52 sites in the wheat growing areas of South Australia during 1956-61 was examined in relation to climatic factors by a stepwise multiple regression analysis using a computer. The ten dependent variables were the linear and quadratic coefficients obtained by fitting orthogonal polynomials to response curves of various parameters (grain yield, grain + straw yield, harvest index, grain nitrogen percentage, and grain nitrogen yield) to applied nitrogen at each of the 52 sites. The 23 independent variables were the amounts of rainfall and evaporation during the growing period, maximum and minimum temperatures and estimates of high temperature stress during spring and amount of rainfall immediately after sowing at each site. The climatic variables examined explained 46.5, 64.3, and 64.3 per cent of the variation in the response to nitrogen fertilizer of grain yield, grain + straw yield, and grain nitrogen yield respectively. The positive effects of increasing amounts of winter rainfall on yield response to applied nitrogen were marked. On the other hand, the negative effects of high maximum temperatures in the latter part of the growing period, particularly during October, on yield response were also evident.



1971 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. K. Jain ◽  
D. P. Maurya ◽  
H. P. Singh

SUMMARYLinear regression of grain and straw yield of dwarf wheats on level of fertilizer nitrogen was significant, but the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen was determined by the time and method of its application. A single application as a basal dressing was the least productive for grain yield, while split fertilization at sowing and at first irrigation increased the efficiency of applied nitrogen. Further splitting in three doses did not benefit wheat. Foliar application of nitrogen to replace top dressing at the heading stage was of no advantage while replacement of a top dressing at first irrigation by urea spray at heading was definitely deleterious.



1983 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hadjichristodoulou

SUMMARYA series of trials were conducted during 1979–82 under semi-arid conditions in a Mediterranean-type environment to study the edge effects in mechanized durum wheat and barley variety trials when uncropped pathways are left between plots. Varietal differences in edge effects on grain yield were in most trials not significant. Thus, edge effects do not distort significantly the relative ranking of varieties.Edge effects were significant for all traits studied and higher in grain and straw yields. These effects were also higher in drier seasons. The overestimation of grain yield from whole plots was 13–18% in relatively high rainfall seasons and 29% in a dry season. In two seasons the scores on the two outer rows were higher than on the two central rows by 89 and 117 % for grain yield, by 72 and 73% for straw yield, by 44 and 48% for numbers of tillers, by 6% for 1000-grain weight and by 14 and 40% for number of grains per tiller. The edge effect was not confined to the outer rows, but it extended to the inner rows of the plot; the magnitude of this effect varied with season and trait.Rows adjacent to the pathway and unprotected from wind had a lower value for all traits than the opposite rows of the pathway, which were protected by the inner rows.





2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 894
Author(s):  
M. K. Conyers ◽  
J. E. Holland ◽  
B. Haskins ◽  
R. Whitworth ◽  
G. J. Poile ◽  
...  

Soil testing guidelines for sulfur (S) under dryland cropping in south-eastern Australia are not well developed. Our objective was to assess the value of soil and tissue tests for S and nitrogen (N), because the two minerals frequently interact), in predicting S-deficient sites and hence increasing the probability of response to application of S (and N). Here, we report three proximal experiments in 2014–16 for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on a sandy soil in a semi-arid environment near Merriwagga in western New South Wales. The trials contained a factorial combination of four rates of each of applied N as urea and S as high-grade gypsum. Responses to S were obtained for dry matter (DM) quantity and nutrient content at flowering in 2014, but no grain-yield response was obtained in any year. DM response to applied S was obtained when the concentration of S in the DM was increased from 0.08% in barley and 0.09% in wheat without S application to 0.10–0.11% in both crops with S applied as gypsum. Because we obtained no grain-yield responses to applied S, the 0.10% S in grain was likely to have been adequate for both crops in these experiments. A pool of subsoil S was accessed during each season and this compensated for any DM deficiencies of S by the time of grainfill. Shallow soil tests (0–10 cm) for S can therefore indicate sufficiency but not necessarily deficiency; therefore, in grain-cropping areas, we recommend soil S tests on the same samples as used for deep N testing (to 60 cm) and that an S-budgeting approach be used following the soil tests. Furthermore, for marginal nutritional circumstances such as occurred in this study, the supporting use of N:S ratio is recommended, with values >17 in DM or grain likely to indicate S deficiency for both barley and wheat.



2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2670-2686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garry J. O'Leary ◽  
Brendan Christy ◽  
James Nuttall ◽  
Neil Huth ◽  
Davide Cammarano ◽  
...  


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (35) ◽  
pp. 736 ◽  
Author(s):  
JS Russell

The difficulties in predicting grain yield response to applied nitrogen under conditions of low and variable rainfall are discussed. Three models of grain yield response to applied nitrogen fertilizer for each of two strategies are proposed, based on data from field experiments carried out in the wheat growing areas of South Australia. In the first strategy (nitrogen applied at sowing) the parameters are May-August rainfall, October mean maximum temperature and one of three alternative site criteria, initial soil nitrate content (0-6 inches sampled shortly before sowing), 15-atmospheres soil moisture percentage (0-6 inches), or estimated nitrogen status. In the second strategy (nitrogen applied in late winter) the parameters are similar, except that May-July rainfall replaced May-August rainfall and a statistical relationship between yield response due to late application as compared with application at sowing was used. The response surfaces were examined using a calculated most profitable rate of application with a range of grain : fertilizer price ratios from 2 to 8. These calculations emphasize the importance of economic factors in affecting fertilizer use in areas where responses are small and variable. The limitations of the models and problems associated with the use of predicted climatic criteria are discussed. There is a need for further studies to iteratively test and modify these empirical models and ultimately to develop mechanistic models. Further study is also suggested on field aspects of late application and the possible role of both plant analysis and the single ion nitrate electrode for site characterization.



Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 611
Author(s):  
Lamptey ◽  
Xie ◽  
Li ◽  
Coulter ◽  
Jagadabhi

Soil degradation and C emissions are a threat to sustainable agriculture in many arid and semi-arid areas. For sustainable agriculture, the influence of soil amendments on crop production and soil respiration has been a key focus of research. A three-year field study to assess how soil amendments influence soil properties, soil respiration (Rs), and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) was conducted. Treatments were: no amendment (NA), chemical fertilizer (CF), swine (Sus scrofa L.) manure (SM), maize stover (MS), and swine manure + chemical fertilizer (SC). Soil amendment (CF, SM, MS, and SC) consistently produced greatest grain yield and aboveground biomass, which averaged 38 and 34% greater than NA, respectively. No amendment reduced Rs by an average of 12% compared to amendment treatments. Enhanced grain yield with soil amendment resulted in increased carbon emission efficiency (CEE) with SC>MS>CF>SM>NA. Across years, SC decreased soil bulk density by 13% and increased CEE, soil total C, and soil hydraulic conductivity by 52, 19, and 21%, respectively, compared to NA. These results demonstrate the viability of swine manure + chemical fertilizer at 200 kg N ha−1 as a soil amendment for improved CEE and advancing sustainable maize production in semi-arid rainfed environments.



2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 546-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Burgos ◽  
L.J. Odens ◽  
R.J. Collier ◽  
L.H. Baumgard ◽  
M.J. VanBaale


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document