Neurological Outcome of Chest Compression-Only Bystander CPR in Asphyxial and Non-Asphyxial Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Observational Study

Abstract Background: According to guidelines and bystander skill, two different methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are feasible: standard CPR (S-CPR) with mouth-to-mouth ventilations and chest compression-only CPR (CO-CPR) without rescue breathing. CO-CPR appears to be most effective for cardiac causes, but there is a lack of evidence for asphyxial causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Thus, the aim of our study was to compare CO-CPR versus S-CPR in adult OHCA from medical etiologies and assess neurologic outcome in asphyxial and non-asphyxial causes.Methods: Using the French National OHCA Registry (RéAC), we performed a multicenter retrospective study over a five-year period (2013 to 2017). All adult-witnessed OHCA who had benefited from either S-CPR or CO-CPR by bystanders were included. Non-medical causes as well as professional rescuers as witnesses were excluded. The primary end point was 30-day neurological outcome in a weighted population for all medical causes, and then for asphyxial, non-asphyxial and cardiac causes. Results: Of the 8 619 subjects included for all medical causes, 6 742 had a non-asphyxial etiology, including 5 904 of cardiac causes, and 1 710 had an asphyxial OHCA. 8.6%; 95% CI [8.1-9.3] of subjects had a good neurological outcome (i.e. cerebral performance category of 1 or 2). Bystanders who performed S-CPR began more often immediately (89.0%; 95% CI [87.3-90.5] versus 78.2%; 95% CI [77.2-79.2]) and in younger subjects (64.1 years versus 65.7; p < 0.001). In the weighted population, subjects receiving bystander-initiated CO-CPR had an adjusted relative risk (aRR) of 1.04; 95% CI [0.79-1.38] of having a good neurological outcome at 30 days for all medical causes, 1.28; 95% CI [0.92-1.77] for asphyxial etiologies, 1.08; 95% CI [0.80-1.46] for non-asphyxial etiologies and 1.09; 95% CI [0.93-1.28] for cardiac-related OHCA.Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in neurological outcome when lay bystanders of OHCA initiated CO-CPR or S-CPR, whether the cause was asphyxial or not. CO-CPR should probably be promoted in adults because it has many advantages (easier to learn and lower infection risk).

Download Full-text

Abstract 284: Association of Neurological Outcome and Survival With Interventions by Bystander and Emergency Medical Service for Unwitnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patient; Results From the JCS-ReSS Study

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.284 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Chisato Okamoto ◽

Yoshio Tahara ◽

Atsushi Hirayama ◽

Satoshi Yasuda ◽

Teruo Noguchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Airway Management ◽

Emergency Medical Service ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Medical Service ◽

Favorable Outcome ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Advanced Airway ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Although studies have shown that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with better neurological prognosis, whether bystander and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) interventions are associated with prognosis in unwitnessed OHCA patients is not fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the prognostic importance of bystander and EMS interventions among unwitnessed OHCA patients in Japan. Methods and Results: This study was a nation-wide population-based observational study of OHCA in Japan from 2011 to 2015 based on data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. The outcome measures were neurological outcome and survival at 30-day. The neurologically favorable outcome was defined as Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category score 1 or 2. First, to investigate the effectiveness of bystander interventions, we included 105,655 unwitnessed cardiogenic OHCA patients (aged 18-80 years). Of these, 1,614 (1.5%) showed neurologically favorable outcome and 3,273 (3.1%) survived at 30-day. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, geographical region, year and EMS response time showed that bystander CPR was associated with neurologically favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.35-1.65, P<0.001). Additionally, to investigate the effectiveness of EMS interventions for patients with non-shockable rhythm, we examined 43,342 patients who were performed public CPR and had the initial rhythm of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole. Of these, 101 (0.2%) showed neurologically favorable outcome and 453 (1.0%) were survival at 30-day. Advanced airway management by EMS was negatively associated with neurologically favorable outcome (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81, P=0.003) and administration of epinephrine by EMS was associated with survival (aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.89-2.92, P<0.001). Conclusions: Among unwitnessed OHCA patients, bystander CPR was associated with neurologically favorable prognosis. For unwitnessed OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm, epinephrine administration was associated with survival, but advanced airway management was negatively associated with neurological outcome.

Download Full-text

Abstract 24: Sex Differences in Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: Insights From the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compression Trial

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.24 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Purav Mody ◽

Ambarish Pandey ◽

Rohan Khera ◽

Colby Ayers ◽

Mark Link ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Chest Compression ◽

Regression Models ◽

Neurological Function ◽

Future Studies ◽

Logistic Regression Models ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Sex Disparities ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Previous studies examining sex-based differences among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients have been conflicting. Methods: Patients with OHCA enrolled in the Continuous Chest Compression trial between 2011 and 2016 were included in the present analysis. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between sex and sustained ROSC i.e. ROSC on ER arrival, discharge survival and survival with favorable neurological function after adjustment for age, witnessed status, presenting rhythm, public location, bystander CPR, resuscitation duration, and EMS response time. Results: Among 22,540 OHCA patients, 8,099 (35.9%) were women. Women were older (median 71 vs. 67 years), received less bystander CPR (45% vs. 47%), and had a lower proportion of cardiac arrests that were witnessed (39% vs. 45%) or had an initial shockable rhythm (15% vs. 28%, p<= 0.001 for all). There was no difference in sustained ROSC rates (24.7% vs. 24.8%, p=0.7) but discharge survival (6.5% vs. 10.3%, p<0.001) and survival with favorable neurological function (4.9 vs. 8.6%, p<0.001) were significantly lower in women (vs. men). In adjusted analysis, women (vs. men) had significantly higher likelihood of sustained ROSC ( Table ) but no difference in likelihood of discharge survival and survival with favorable neurological function. In the adjusted landmark analysis beginning after achieving ROSC, women had significantly lower likelihood of discharge survival and survival with favorable neurological function ( Table ) . Conclusions: Among resuscitated OHCA patients, women have a higher likelihood of achieving sustained ROSC despite a higher burden of poor prognostic factors. However, after successful ROSC, the likelihood of discharge survival is significantly lower in women (vs. men). Future studies are needed to understand how care provided post-ROSC may modify the sex-disparities in discharge survival outcomes.

Download Full-text

Citizen bystander–patient relationship and 1-month outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin from the All-Japan Utstein Registry: a prospective, nationwide, population-based, observational study

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024715 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. e024715 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yasunori Suematsu ◽

Bo Zhang ◽

Takashi Kuwano ◽

Hideto Sako ◽

Masahiro Ogawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Observational Study ◽

Family Member ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Neurological Impairment ◽

Population Based ◽

Public Access ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

ObjectivesThe presence of a bystander witness is a crucial predictor of patient survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the differences in survival and neurological outcomes among different types of citizen bystanders are not well understood.DesignWe analysed data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based, observational study that was started in January 2005.SettingThe registry includes all patients with OHCA who were transported to the hospital by emergency medical service (EMS) in Japan. The type of citizen bystander was classified as family member, friend, colleague, passerby or other.ParticipantsWe analysed 210 642 patients in the registry who were 18 years or older and experienced OHCA of cardiac origin witnessed by a citizen bystander between 2005 and 2014.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe main outcomes were 1 month survival and 1 month survival with minimal neurological impairment.ResultsOf the citizen bystander-witnessed cases, 65.1% (137 147/210 642) were witnessed by a family member. However, among patients who survived to 1 month and who had a favourable 1 month neurological outcome, much lower proportions (53.9% (10 907/20 239) and 48.9% (5722/11 696)) were witnessed by a family member. Witness by a friend, colleague or passerby was associated with good 1 month neurological function, after controlling for the patient’s age, first recorded rhythm, gender, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), use of a public-access automated external defibrillator, dispatcher instructions, collapse-call time and response time compared with witness by a family member (friend: OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.46, colleague: OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.98, passerby: OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.84).ConclusionsOne-month survival and favourable1 month neurological outcome of patients with OHCA of cardiac origin witnessed by a family member were worse than those in cases witnessed by a friend, colleague or passerby, independent of the patient characteristics and the response of EMS.

Download Full-text

Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1186/s13049-015-0114-2 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Tinne Tranberg ◽

Jens F Lassen ◽

Anne K Kaltoft ◽

Troels M Hansen ◽

Carsten Stengaard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Observational Study ◽

Chest Compression ◽

Prospective Observational Study ◽

Compression Device ◽

Mechanical Chest Compression ◽

Before And After ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Download Full-text

Abstract 186: Sex Differences in Outcomes for Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.140.suppl_2.186 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Pavitra Kotini-Shah ◽

Oksana Pugach ◽

Ruizhe Chen ◽

Marina Del Rios ◽

Kimberly Vellano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Sex Differences ◽

Coronary Angiography ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

The United States ◽

Neurological Outcomes ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Approximately 1,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occur per day in the United States. Although survival rates remains low, the extent to which OHCA neurological outcomes differ between men and women remains poorly characterized. Methods: Within the national Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry, we identified 195,722 adult individuals with an OHCA between 2013-2017. Using multi-variable logistic regression models, we evaluated for sex differences in rates of survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcome (survival with discharge CPC score of 1 or 2), adjusted for cardiac arrest characteristics, race, location, year of arrest, age, and use of targeted temperature management (TTM) and coronary angiography. Results: Overall, 70,767 (31%) patients were women. Median age was 64 and 62 years for women and men, respectively. An initial shockable rhythm (14.9% vs. 25.7%) and a witnessed arrest (40.9% vs. 45.6%) was more common in men. Bystander CPR was provided to 37% of women and 39% of men. Men were less likely to survive to hospital discharge than women (8.7% vs. 10.9%; adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.73, 0.78). Similarly, men were less likely to have favorable neurological outcome (6.6% vs. 9.2% for women; adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74, 0.82). Further interaction analysis for the pre-hospital elements found small, but statistically significant sex differences in favorable neurological survival for witnessed status (among female OR 2.29, 95% CI 2.10, 2.49; among males OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92, 2.23, p= 0.04) and for bystander CPR (among females OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11, 1.29; among males OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.27, 1.42, p= 0.01). Interaction of sex with the hospital level variables of TTM and coronary angiography, for the subset of patients that survived to hospital admission, had no sex differences in favorable neurological outcome. Conclusion: Our analysis shows that for OHCA in the United States, women have better survival outcomes than men. There was a sex differences in the pre-hospital variable of BCPR, but not in the other modifiable variables of TTM and coronary angiography. Further study is needed to better understand sex differences in overall survival and neurological outcomes.

Download Full-text

Abstract 18304: Are Prolonged Resuscitation Efforts Worthwhile? Patient Outcomes by Time to Restoration of Spontaneous Circulation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.18304 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Kristian Kragholm ◽

Monique Anderson ◽

Carolina Malta Hansen ◽

Phillip J. Schulte ◽

Michael C. Kurz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Significant Survival ◽

Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Using Data ◽

Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: How long resuscitation attempts should be continued before termination of efforts is not clear in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We studied outcomes in patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) across quartiles of time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. Hypothesis: Survival with favorable neurological outcome is seen in all time intervals from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. Methods: Using data from Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Prehospital Resuscitation clinical trials: IMpedance valve and an Early vs. Delayed analysis (PRIMED) available via National Institute of Health, patients with ROSC not witnessed by the emergency medical service (EMS) were identified and grouped by quartiles of time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. We defined favorable neurological outcome as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of ≤3. Results: Included were 3,431 OHCA patients with ROSC. Median time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC was 22.8 min (25%-75% 17 min–29.2 min); 953 (27.8%) survived to discharge (20.4% mRS ≤3). Significant survival and favorable neurological outcome were seen in each quartile (Figure). In patients who received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rates were 60.9%, 33.2%, 18.3% and 11.1% across quartiles of time to ROSC versus (vs.) 51.5%, 25.6%, 13.3% and 8.9% in patients without bystander CPR; corresponding rates of favorable neurological outcome were 50.7%, 23.8%, 12.2% and 9.1% vs. 40.1%, 16.6%, 8% and 4.8%. Correspondingly, survival rates in defibrillated patients were 70.1%, 45.9%, 25.5% and 16.4% vs. 36.3%, 9.5%, 6% and 3.4% in non-defibrillated patients; corresponding rates of favorable neurological outcome were 59.8%, 33.4%, 18.3% and 11.4% vs. 24.4%, 4.1%, 1.9% and 1.8%. Conclusions: Survival with favorable neurological outcome was seen in all quartiles of time to ROSC, even in cases without bystander CPR or shocks delivered. This suggests that EMS personnel should not terminate resuscitation efforts too early.

Download Full-text

Abstract 265: Impact of Changes in the Telephone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Instruction After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.265 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Ken Nagao ◽

Hiroyuki Hanada ◽

Yoshio Tahara ◽

Hiroshi Nonogi ◽

Naohiro Yonemoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Chest Compression ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Group Versus ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Similar Proportion ◽

International Consensus ◽

Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: The international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations (CoSTR) 2010 changed the dispatcher-initiated telephone CPR instruction. Major changes of the telephone CPR instruction were simplified algorithm, elimination of “Look, listen, and feel for breathing” chest compressions first (C-A-B), chest compression only CPR if bystander was not trained in CPR, et al. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of telephone CPR instruction based on the CoSTR 2010. Methods: From the All-Japan Utstein Registry for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) between 2006 and 2015, we enrolled adult (18 years or older) patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA and stratified by the two CoSTR eras (the CoSTR 2010 group from 2011 through 2015 versus the CoSTR 2005 group from 2006 through 2010). The primary endpoint was 30-day favorable neurological outcome after OHCA. Results: Of the 378,757 adult patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA, 199,117 (52.5%) received CPR based on the CoSTR 2010 and 179,640 (47.4%) received CPR based on the CoSTR 2005. In the whole cohort, the CoSTR 2010 group had higher proportion of cases receiving telephone CPR instruction than the CoSTR 2005 group (48.8% versus 40.9%, P<0.001). In the subgroups of patients receiving telephone CPR instruction, the CoSTR 2010 group had higher proportion of bystander chest compression-only CPR (60.5% versus 47.3%, p<0.001) and public access defibrillation (1.9% versus 0.9%, P<0.001) than the CoSTR 2005 group. Although those subgroups had similar proportion of initial shockable cardiac arrest rhythm (15.2 % in the CoSTR 2010 group versus 15.3 % in the CoSTR 2005 group, P=0.63), the CoSTR 2010 group had higher frequency of the favorable neurological outcome than the CoSTR 2005 group (4.5 % versus 3.7%%, P<0.001). In the subgroup of patients receiving telephone CPR instruction, an adjusted odds ratio for the favorable neurological outcome in the CoSTR 2010 group (reference, the CoSTR 2005 group) was 1.47 (95 % CI, 1.43-1.51, p<0.001). Conclusions: Telephone CPR instruction based on the CoSTR 2010 was the preferable approach to resuscitation for adult patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA.

Download Full-text