scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF THE SCHEDULE OF DNA REPLICATION IN HEAT-SYNCHRONIZED TETRAHYMENA

1973 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Jeffery ◽  
Joseph Frankel ◽  
Lawrence E. de Bault ◽  
Leslie M. Jenkins
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Shock Treatment ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
S Period ◽  
Selection Of

The temporal schedule of DNA replication in heat-synchronized Tetrahymena was studied by autoradiographic and cytofluorometric methods. It was shown that some cells, which were synchronized by selection of individual dividing cells or by temporary thymidine starvation, incorporated [3H]thymidine into macronuclei in a periodic fashion during the heat-shock treatment. It was concluded that supernumerary S periods occurred while cell division was blocked by high temperature. The proportion of cells which initiated supernumerary S periods was found to be dependent on the duration of the heat-shock treatment and on the cell cycle stage when the first heat shock was applied. Cytofluorometric measurements of Feulgen-stained macronuclei during the heat-shock treatment indicated that the DNA complement of these cells was substantially increased and probably duplicated during the course of each S period. Estimates of DNA content also suggested that the rate of DNA synthesis progressively declined during long heat-shock treatments. These results indicate that the mechanism which brings about heat-induced division synchrony is not an interruption of the process of DNA replication. Further experiments were concerned with the regulation of DNA synthesis during the first synchronized division cycle. It was shown that participation in DNA synthesis at this time increased as more cells were able to conclude the terminal S period during the preceding heat-shock treatment. It is suggested that a discrete period of time is necessary after the completion of DNA synthesis before another round of DNA synthesis can be initiated.

scholarly journals EVIDENCE FOR A TEMPORAL INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN DNA REPLICATION AND DIVISION DURING THE CELL CYCLE OF TETRAHYMENA

1972 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 624-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Jeffery
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Shock Treatment ◽  
Coupling Mechanism ◽  
Complete Suppression ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
S Period

The mechanism of coordination between DNA replication and cell division was studied in Tetrahymena pyriformis GL-C by manipulation of the timing of these events with heat shocks and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Preliminary experiments showed that the inhibitor combination methotrexate and uridine (M + U) was an effective inhibitor of DNA synthesis. Inhibition of the progression of DNA synthesis with M + U in exponentially growing cells, in which one S period usually occurs between two successive divisions, or in heat-shocked cells, when successive S periods are known to occur between divisions, resulted in the complete suppression of the following division. In further experiments in which the division activities were reassociated with the DNA synthetic cycle by premature termination of the heat-shock treatment, it was shown that (a) the completion of one S period during the treatment was sufficient for cell division, (b) the beginning of division events suppressed the initiation of further S periods, and (c) if further S periods were initiated while the heat-shock treatment was continued, division preparations could not begin until the necessary portion of the S period was completed, even though DNA had previously been duplicated. It was concluded that a temporal incompatibility exists between DNA synthesis and division which may reflect a coupling mechanism which insures their coordination during the normal cell cycle.

scholarly journals THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID REPLICATION AND CELL DIVISION IN HEAT-SYNCHRONIZED TETRAHYMENA

1970 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Jeffery ◽  
Kenneth D. Stuart ◽  
Joseph Frankel
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
Heat Shocks ◽  
Prolonged Heat ◽  
S Period ◽  
C 50 ◽  
The Relationship

The effect of supraoptimal temperature on macronuclear DNA synthesis in Tetrahymena was studied by radioautography during prolonged heat and heat-shock synchronization treatments. Prolonged heat treatments (34°C) delayed the initiation of S, but did not appreciably delay DNA synthesis in progress. Return to optimal temperature (28°C) 50 or 100 min later resulted in initiation of S, in delayed cells, at a rate greater than in controls. During the synchronization treatment, most cells were unable to enter S during a heat shock, but initiated S with a slight delay during the following intershock period. These cells were not appreciably delayed in completion of S by subsequent heat shocks. Supraoptimal temperature appears to affect the DNA synthetic cycle near the G1 to S transition. Cells subjected to the heat-shock treatment in early G1 all participated in one S period, and many underwent a succession of two S periods. DNA synthesis occurred in about 50% of the cells between EST and the first synchronous division, with the likelihood of DNA synthesis becoming greater the longer the interval between these two events. In some cells no detectable DNA synthesis occurred between EST and the second synchronous division. It was concluded that a precise temporal alternation of DNA replication and cell division is not obligatory in Tetrahymena.

Heat-induced triploids in Brycon amazonicus: a strategic fish species for aquaculture and conservation

Zygote ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Nivaldo Ferreira do Nascimento ◽  
Rafaela Manchin Bertolini ◽  
Lucia Soares Lopez ◽  
Laura Satiko Okada Nakaghi ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Monzani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Early Development ◽  
Fish Species ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Shock Treatment ◽  
Hatching Rate ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
Control Survival ◽  
Ploidy Status

Summary Triploidization plays an important role in aquaculture and surrogate technologies. In this study, we induced triploidy in the matrinxã fish (Brycon amazonicus) using a heat-shock technique. Embryos at 2 min post fertilization (mpf) were heat shocked at 38°C, 40°C, or 42°C for 2 min. Untreated, intact embryos were used as a control. Survival rates during early development were monitored and ploidy status was confirmed using flow cytometry and nuclear diameter analysis of erythrocytes. The hatching rate reduced with heat-shock treatment, and heat-shock treatments at 42°C resulted in no hatching events. Optimal results were obtained at 40°C with 95% of larvae exhibiting triploidy. Therefore, we report that heat-shock treatments of embryos (2 mpf) at 40°C for 2 min is an effective way to induce triploid individuals in B. amazonicus.

scholarly journals Characterization of the thermotolerant cell. I. Effects on protein synthesis activity and the regulation of heat-shock protein 70 expression.

1988 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1105-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
L A Mizzen ◽  
W J Welch
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Stress Proteins ◽  
Stress Protein ◽  
Shock Treatment ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
Normal Medium ◽  
Growth Environment ◽  
Mammalian Cell Lines ◽  
C 30

Exposure of mammalian cells to a nonlethal heat-shock treatment, followed by a recovery period at 37 degrees C, results in increased cell survival after a subsequent and otherwise lethal heat-shock treatment. Here we characterize this phenomenon, termed acquired thermotolerance, at the level of translation. In a number of different mammalian cell lines given a severe 45 degrees C/30-min shock and then returned to 37 degrees C, protein synthesis was completely inhibited for as long as 5 h. Upon resumption of translational activity, there was a marked induction of heat-shock (or stress) protein synthesis, which continued for several hours. In contrast, cells first made thermotolerant (by a pretreatment consisting of a 43 degrees C/1.5-h shock and further recovery at 37 degrees C) and then presented with the 45 degrees C/30-min shock exhibited considerably less translational inhibition and an overall reduction in the amount of subsequent stress protein synthesis. The acquisition and duration of such "translational tolerance" was correlated with the expression, accumulation, and relative half-lives of the major stress proteins of 72 and 73 kD. Other agents that induce the synthesis of the stress proteins, such as sodium arsenite, similarly resulted in the acquisition of translational tolerance. The probable role of the stress proteins in the acquisition of translational tolerance was further indicated by the inability of the amino acid analogue, L-azetidine 2-carboxylic acid, an inducer of nonfunctional stress proteins, to render cells translationally tolerant. If, however, analogue-treated cells were allowed to recover in normal medium, and hence produce functional stress proteins, full translational tolerance was observed. Finally, we present data indicating that the 72- and 73-kD stress proteins, in contrast to the other major stress proteins (of 110, 90, and 28 kD), are subject to strict regulation in the stressed cell. Quantitation of 72- and 73-kD synthesis after heat-shock treatment under a number of conditions revealed that "titration" of 72/73-kD synthesis in response to stress may represent a mechanism by which the cell monitors its local growth environment.

scholarly journals DNA damage and heat shock dually regulate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
T McClanahan ◽  
K McEntee
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Shock Treatment ◽  
Northern Hybridization ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
S1 Nuclease ◽  
Hsp70 Family ◽  
Transcriptional Start Sites

Two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes isolated in a differential hybridization screening for DNA damage regulation (DDR genes) were also transcriptionally regulated by heat shock treatment. A 0.45-kilobase transcript homologous to the DDRA2 gene and a 1.25-kilobase transcript homologous to the DDR48 gene accumulated after exposure of cells to 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (NQO; 1 to 1.5 microgram/ml) or brief heat shock (20 min at 37 degrees C). The DDRA2 transcript, which was undetectable in untreated cells, was induced to high levels by these treatments, and the DDR48 transcript increased more than 10-fold as demonstrated by Northern hybridization analysis. Two findings argue that dual regulation of stress-responsive genes is not common in S. cerevisiae. First, two members of the heat shock-inducible hsp70 family of S. cerevisiae, YG100 and YG102, were not induced by exposure to NQO. Second, at least one other DNA-damage-inducible gene, DIN1, was not regulated by heat shock treatment. We examined the structure of the induced RNA homologous to DDRA2 after heat shock and NQO treatments by S1 nuclease protection experiments. Our results demonstrated that the DDRA2 transcript initiates equally frequently at two sites separated by 5 base pairs. Both transcriptional start sites were utilized when cells were exposed to either NQO or heat shock treatment. These results indicate that DDRA2 and DDR48 are members of a unique dually regulated stress-responsive family of genes in S. cerevisiae.

Repetitive Dictyostelium heat-shock promotor functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-598
Author(s):  
J Cappello ◽  
C Zuker ◽  
H F Lodish
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Nucleotide Sequence ◽  
Dna Sequence ◽  
Base Pair ◽  
Shock Treatment ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Genomic Segment ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
Shock Response

The Dictyostelium genome contains 40 copies of a 4.7-kilobase repetitive and apparently transposable DNA sequence (DIRS-1) and about 250 smaller elements that appear to be deletions or rearrangements of DIRS-1. Transcripts of these sequences are induced during differentiation and also by heat shock treatment of growing cells. We showed that one such cloned element, pB41.6 (2.5 kilobases) contains a nucleotide sequence identical to the Drosophila consensus heat shock promotor. To test whether this sequence might indeed control the expression of DIRS-1-related RNAs, we have cloned this genomic segment into yeast cells. In yeast cells, 41.6 directs synthesis of a 1.7-kilobase RNA that is induced at least 10-fold by heat shock. Transcription initiates at about 124 bases 3' of the putative promotor sequence and terminates within the 41.6 insert. A 381-base-pair subclone that contains the putative promotor sequence is sufficient to induce the heat shock response of 41.6 in yeast cells.

Heat Shock Treatment Enhances Graft Cell Survival in Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation to the Heart

Circulation ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Suzuki ◽  
Ryszard T. Smolenski ◽  
Jay Jayakumar ◽  
Bari Murtuza ◽  
Nigel J. Brand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Shock ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Shock Treatment ◽  
Heat Shock Treatment ◽  
Skeletal Myoblast ◽  
Skeletal Myoblasts ◽  
Myoblast Transplantation ◽  
Hypoxia Reoxygenation

Background —Graft survival after skeletal myoblast transplantation is affected by various pathological processes caused by environmental stress. Heat shock is known to afford protection of several aspects of cell metabolism and function. We hypothesized that prior heat shock treatment of graft cells would improve their survival after cell transplantation. Methods and Results —L6 rat skeletal myoblasts expressing β-galactosidase (β-gal) were subjected to heat shock (42°C, 1 hour). Increased expression of heat shock protein 72 was detected 24 hours later in the heat-shocked cells. After hypoxia-reoxygenation in vitro, lactate dehydrogenase leakage was significantly attenuated in the heat-shocked cells; in addition, the percentage of early apoptosis was lower in this group measured by flow cytometry with annexin V staining. For the in vivo study, 1×10 6 heat-shocked (hsCTx) or normal-cultured (CTx) myoblasts were infused into the explanted rat hearts through the coronary artery followed by heterotopic heart transplantation. β-gal activity was significantly higher in the hsCTx group after cell transplantation, with an estimated 8×10 6 surviving cells per heart in the hsCTx group and 5×10 6 cells in the CTx group on day 28. Discrete loci of grafted cells were globally observed in the myocardium of the hsCTx and CTx groups, with a higher frequency in the hsCTx group. Surviving myoblasts occasionally differentiated into myotubes and had integrated with the native cardiomyocytes. Conclusions —Heat-shocked skeletal myoblasts demonstrated improved tolerance to hypoxia-reoxygenation insult in vitro and enhanced survival when grafted into the heart. Heat shock treatment could be useful in improving graft cell survival in cell transplantation.

scholarly journals CHANGES IN THE DNA SYNTHESIS PATTERN OF PARAMECIUM WITH INCREASED CLONAL AGE AND INTERFISSION TIME

1974 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Smith-Sonneborn ◽  
Michael Klass
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Unicellular Organism ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Synchronized Cells ◽  
Different Ages ◽  
Self Fertilization ◽  
Autoradiographic Analysis ◽  
S Period ◽  
First Time

The clonal age in paramecia refers to the total number of vegetative divisions a clone has undergone since its origin at autogamy (self-fertilization). As clonal age increases, the interfission time usually increases. The DNA synthesis pattern of cells of different ages was compared by autoradiographic analysis of the DNA synthesis of synchronized cells at various time intervals during the cell cycle (from one division to the next). The study showed that the G1 period (the lag in DNA synthesis post division) was constant, irrespective of interfission time or clonal age; but the duration of the DNA synthesis period increased with increased interfission time or clonal age. Therefore, we have shown for the first time that the G1 period is fixed, and the S period is increased in a eukaryotic unicellular organism as a function of interfission time and clonal age.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document