scholarly journals Spindle Checkpoint Signaling Requires the Mis6 Kinetochore Subcomplex, Which Interacts with Mad2 and Mitotic Spindles

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 3666-3677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeaki Saitoh ◽  
Kojiro Ishii ◽  
Yasuyo Kobayashi ◽  
Kohta Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Centromeric Chromatin ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Potential Binding ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

The spindle checkpoint coordinates cell cycle progression and chromosome segregation by inhibiting anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome until all kinetochores interact with the spindle properly. During early mitosis, the spindle checkpoint proteins, such as Mad2 and Bub1, accumulate at kinetochores that do not associate with the spindle. Here, we assess the requirement of various kinetochore components for the accumulation of Mad2 and Bub1 on the kinetochore in fission yeast and show that the necessity of the Mis6-complex and the Nuf2-complex is an evolutionarily conserved feature in the loading of Mad2 onto the kinetochore. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Nuf2 is required for maintaining the Mis6-complex on the kinetochore during mitosis. The Mis6-complex physically interacts with Mad2 under the condition that the Mad2-dependent checkpoint is activated. Ectopically expressed N-terminal fragments of Mis6 localize along the mitotic spindle, highlighting the potential binding ability of Mis6 not only to the centromeric chromatin but also to the spindle microtubules. We propose that the Mis6-complex, in collaboration with the Nuf2-complex, monitors the spindle–kinetochore attachment state and acts as a platform for Mad2 to accumulate at unattached kinetochores.

scholarly journals Two Complexes of Spindle Checkpoint Proteins Containing Cdc20 and Mad2 Assemble during Mitosis Independently of the Kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atasi Poddar ◽  
P. Todd Stukenberg ◽  
Daniel J. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT Favored models of spindle checkpoint signaling propose that two inhibitory complexes (Mad2-Cdc20 and Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20) must be assembled at kinetochores in order to inhibit mitosis. We have directly tested this model in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The proteins Mad2, Mad3, Bub3, Cdc20, and Cdc27 in yeast were quantified, and there are sufficient amounts to form stoichiometric inhibitors of Cdc20 and the anaphase-promoting complex. Mad2 is present in two separate complexes in cells arrested in mitosis with nocodazole. There is a small amount of Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20 and a much larger amount of a complex that contains Mad2-Cdc20. We use conditional mutants to show that both Mad2 and Mad3 are essential for establishment and maintenance of the spindle checkpoint. Both spindle checkpoint complexes containing Mad2 form in mitosis, not in response to checkpoint activation. The kinetochore is not required to form either complex. We propose that the conversion of Mad1-Mad2 to Cdc20-Mad2, a key step in generating inhibitory checkpoint complexes, is limited to mitosis by the availability of Cdc20 and is kinetochore independent.

scholarly journals Bub3p Facilitates Spindle Checkpoint Silencing in Fission Yeast

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 5096-5105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Vanoosthuyse ◽  
John C. Meadows ◽  
Sjaak J.A. van der Sar ◽  
Jonathan B.A. Millar ◽  
Kevin G. Hardwick
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Checkpoint Recovery

Although critical for spindle checkpoint signaling, the role kinetochores play in anaphase promoting complex (APC) inhibition remains unclear. Here we show that spindle checkpoint proteins are severely depleted from unattached kinetochores in fission yeast cells lacking Bub3p. Surprisingly, a robust mitotic arrest is maintained in the majority of bub3Δ cells, yet they die, suggesting that Bub3p is essential for successful checkpoint recovery. During recovery, two defects are observed: (1) cells mis-segregate chromosomes and (2) anaphase onset is significantly delayed. We show that Bub3p is required to activate the APC upon inhibition of Aurora kinase activity in checkpoint-arrested cells, suggesting that Bub3p is required for efficient checkpoint silencing downstream of Aurora kinase. Together, these results suggest that spindle checkpoint signals can be amplified in the nucleoplasm, yet kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint components is required for proper recovery from a spindle checkpoint-dependent arrest.

scholarly journals XRad17 Is Required for the Activation of XChk1 But Not XCds1 during Checkpoint Signaling in Xenopus

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 3898-3910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhiannon E. Jones ◽  
J. Ross Chapman ◽  
Chandrakala Puligilla ◽  
Johanne M. Murray ◽  
Antony M. Car ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Replication Block ◽  
Processivity Factor ◽  
Factor C ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

The DNA damage/replication checkpoints act by sensing the presence of damaged DNA or stalled replication forks and initiate signaling pathways that arrest cell cycle progression. Here we report the cloning and characterization of Xenopus orthologues of the RFCand PCNA-related checkpoint proteins. XRad17 shares regions of homology with the five subunits of Replication factor C. XRad9, XRad1, and XHus1 (components of the 9-1-1 complex) all show homology to the DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA. We demonstrate that these proteins associate with chromatin and are phosphorylated when replication is inhibited by aphidicolin. Phosphorylation of X9-1-1 is caffeine sensitive, but the chromatin association of XRad17 and the X9-1-1 complex after replication block is unaffected by caffeine. This suggests that the X9-1-1 complex can associate with chromatin independently of XAtm/XAtr activity. We further demonstrate that XRad17 is essential for the chromatin binding and checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of X9-1-1 and for the activation of XChk1 when the replication checkpoint is induced by aphidicolin. XRad17 is not, however, required for the activation of XCds1 in response to dsDNA ends.

scholarly journals The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Anaphase-Promoting Complex Interacts with Multiple Histone-Modifying Enzymes To Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1418-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma L. Turner ◽  
Mackenzie E. Malo ◽  
Marnie G. Pisclevich ◽  
Megan D. Dash ◽  
Gerald F. Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromatin Assembly ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Complex ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
Histone Modifying Enzymes

ABSTRACT The anaphase-promoting complex (APC), a large evolutionarily conserved ubiquitin ligase complex, regulates cell cycle progression through mitosis and G1. Here, we present data suggesting that APC-dependent cell cycle progression relies on a specific set of posttranslational histone-modifying enzymes. Multiple APC subunit mutants were impaired in total and modified histone H3 protein content. Acetylated H3K56 (H3K56Ac) levels were as reduced as those of total H3, indicating that loading histones with H3K56Ac is unaffected in APC mutants. However, under restrictive conditions, H3K9Ac and dimethylated H3K79 (H3K79me2) levels were more greatly reduced than those of total H3. In a screen for histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) mutants that genetically interact with the apc5 CA (chromatin assembly) mutant, we found that deletion of GCN5 or ELP3 severely hampered apc5 CA temperature-sensitive (ts) growth. Further analyses showed that (i) the elp3Δ gcn5Δ double mutant ts defect was epistatic to that observed in apc5 CA cells; (ii) gcn5Δ and elp3Δ mutants accumulate in mitosis; and (iii) turnover of the APC substrate Clb2 is not impaired in elp3Δ gcn5Δ cells. Increased expression of ELP3 and GCN5, as well as genes encoding the HAT Rtt109 and the chromatin assembly factors Msi1 and Asf1, suppressed apc5 CA defects, while increased APC5 expression partially suppressed elp3Δ gcn5Δ growth defects. Finally, we demonstrate that Gcn5 is unstable during G1 and following G1 arrest and is stabilized in APC mutants. We present our working model in which Elp3/Gcn5 and the APC work together to facilitate passage through mitosis and G1. To progress into S, we propose that at least Gcn5 must then be targeted for degradation in an APC-dependent fashion.

scholarly journals Regulation of cell cycle drivers by Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1637-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Min Jang ◽  
Christophe E. Redon ◽  
Bhushan L. Thakur ◽  
Meriam K. Bahta ◽  
Mirit I. Aladjem
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle ◽  
F Box Protein

Abstract The last decade has revealed new roles for Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) in a myriad of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression. In addition to CRL1, also named SCF (SKP1-Cullin 1-F box protein), which has been known for decades as an important factor in the regulation of the cell cycle, it is now evident that all eight CRL family members are involved in the intricate cellular pathways driving cell cycle progression. In this review, we summarize the structure of CRLs and their functions in driving the cell cycle. We focus on how CRLs target key proteins for degradation or otherwise alter their functions to control the progression over the various cell cycle phases leading to cell division. We also summarize how CRLs and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ligase complex closely cooperate to govern efficient cell cycle progression.

Recombinant expression, reconstitution and structure of human anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C)

2012 ◽  
Vol 449 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziguo Zhang ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Eric H. Kong ◽  
William C. H. Chao ◽  
Edward P. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Recombinant Expression ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Homology Model ◽  
Particle Analysis ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Dimensional Reconstruction ◽  
A Subunit

Mechanistic and structural studies of large multi-subunit assemblies are greatly facilitated by their reconstitution in heterologous recombinant systems. In the present paper, we describe the generation of recombinant human APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that regulates cell-cycle progression. Human APC/C is composed of 14 distinct proteins that assemble into a complex of at least 19 subunits with a combined molecular mass of ~1.2 MDa. We show that recombinant human APC/C is correctly assembled, as judged by its capacity to ubiquitinate the budding yeast APC/C substrate Hsl1 (histone synthetic lethal 1) dependent on the APC/C co-activator Cdh1 [Cdc (cell division cycle) 20 homologue 1], and its three-dimensional reconstruction by electron microscopy and single-particle analysis. Successful reconstitution validates the subunit composition of human APC/C. The structure of human APC/C is compatible with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae APC/C homology model, and in contrast with endogenous human APC/C, no evidence for conformational flexibility of the TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) lobe is observed. Additional density present in the human APC/C structure, proximal to Apc3/Cdc27 of the TPR lobe, is assigned to the TPR subunit Apc7, a subunit specific to vertebrate APC/C.

scholarly journals The ESCRT protein Chmp4c regulates mitotic spindle checkpoint signaling

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (3) ◽  
pp. 861-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Petsalaki ◽  
Maria Dandoulaki ◽  
George Zachos
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Membrane Remodeling ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Endosomal Sorting ◽  
Anaphase Onset

The mitotic spindle checkpoint delays anaphase onset in the presence of unattached kinetochores, and efficient checkpoint signaling requires kinetochore localization of the Rod–ZW10–Zwilch (RZZ) complex. In the present study, we show that human Chmp4c, a protein involved in membrane remodeling, localizes to kinetochores in prometaphase but is reduced in chromosomes aligned at the metaphase plate. Chmp4c promotes stable kinetochore–microtubule attachments and is required for proper mitotic progression, faithful chromosome alignment, and segregation. Depletion of Chmp4c diminishes localization of RZZ and Mad1-Mad2 checkpoint proteins to prometaphase kinetochores and impairs mitotic arrest when microtubules are depolymerized by nocodazole. Furthermore, Chmp4c binds to ZW10 through a small C-terminal region, and constitutive Chmp4c kinetochore targeting causes a ZW10-dependent checkpoint metaphase arrest. In addition, Chmp4c spindle functions do not require endosomal sorting complex required for transport–dependent membrane remodeling. These results show that Chmp4c regulates the mitotic spindle checkpoint by promoting localization of the RZZ complex to unattached kinetochores.

scholarly journals MAD1-dependent recruitment of CDK1-CCNB1 to kinetochores promotes spindle checkpoint signaling

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (4) ◽  
pp. 1108-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Alfonso-Pérez ◽  
Daniel Hayward ◽  
James Holder ◽  
Ulrike Gruneberg ◽  
Francis A. Barr
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Upstream Regulator ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Integral Component ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Cyclin B–dependent kinase (CDK1-CCNB1) promotes entry into mitosis. Additionally, it inhibits mitotic exit by activating the spindle checkpoint. This latter role is mediated through phosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase MPS1 and other spindle checkpoint proteins. We find that CDK1-CCNB1 localizes to unattached kinetochores and like MPS1 is lost from these structures upon microtubule attachment. This suggests that CDK1-CCNB1 is an integral component and not only an upstream regulator of the spindle checkpoint pathway. Complementary proteomic and cell biological analysis demonstrate that the spindle checkpoint protein MAD1 is one of the major components of CCNB1 complexes, and that CCNB1 is recruited to unattached kinetochores in an MPS1-dependent fashion through interaction with the first 100 amino acids of MAD1. This MPS1 and MAD1-dependent pool of CDK1-CCNB1 creates a positive feedback loop necessary for timely recruitment of MPS1 to kinetochores during mitotic entry and for sustained spindle checkpoint arrest. CDK1-CCNB1 is therefore an integral component of the spindle checkpoint, ensuring the fidelity of mitosis.

scholarly journals The HECT E3 ligase Smurf2 is required for Mad2-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint

2008 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan C. Osmundson ◽  
Dipankar Ray ◽  
Finola E. Moore ◽  
Qingshen Gao ◽  
Gerald H. Thomsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Carboxyl Terminus ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Anaphase Onset

Activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) by Cdc20 is critical for the metaphase–anaphase transition. APC/C-Cdc20 is required for polyubiquitination and degradation of securin and cyclin B at anaphase onset. The spindle assembly checkpoint delays APC/C-Cdc20 activation until all kinetochores attach to mitotic spindles. In this study, we demonstrate that a HECT (homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus) ubiquitin ligase, Smurf2, is required for the spindle checkpoint. Smurf2 localizes to the centrosome, mitotic midbody, and centromeres. Smurf2 depletion or the expression of a catalytically inactive Smurf2 results in misaligned and lagging chromosomes, premature anaphase onset, and defective cytokinesis. Smurf2 inactivation prevents nocodazole-treated cells from accumulating cyclin B and securin and prometaphase arrest. The silencing of Cdc20 in Smurf2-depleted cells restores mitotic accumulation of cyclin B and securin. Smurf2 depletion results in enhanced polyubiquitination and degradation of Mad2, a critical checkpoint effector. Mad2 is mislocalized in Smurf2-depleted cells, suggesting that Smurf2 regulates the localization and stability of Mad2. These data indicate that Smurf2 is a novel mitotic regulator.

scholarly journals Spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 are required for cytostatic factor–mediated metaphase arrest

2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (6) ◽  
pp. 1231-1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Tunquist ◽  
Patrick A. Eyers ◽  
Lin G. Chen ◽  
Andrea L. Lewellyn ◽  
James L. Maller
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Metaphase Arrest ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Cytostatic Factor ◽  
Sustained Inhibition

In cells containing disrupted spindles, the spindle assembly checkpoint arrests the cell cycle in metaphase. The budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (Bub) 1, mitotic arrest-deficient (Mad) 1, and Mad2 proteins promote this checkpoint through sustained inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Vertebrate oocytes undergoing meiotic maturation arrest in metaphase of meiosis II due to a cytoplasmic activity termed cytostatic factor (CSF), which appears not to be regulated by spindle dynamics. Here, we show that microinjection of Mad1 or Mad2 protein into early Xenopus laevis embryos causes metaphase arrest like that caused by Mos. Microinjection of antibodies to either Mad1 or Mad2 into maturing oocytes blocks the establishment of CSF arrest in meiosis II, and immunodepletion of either protein blocked the establishment of CSF arrest by Mos in egg extracts. A Mad2 mutant unable to oligomerize (Mad2 R133A) did not cause cell cycle arrest in blastomeres or in egg extracts. Once CSF arrest has been established, maintenance of metaphase arrest requires Mad1, but not Mad2 or Bub1. These results suggest a model in which CSF arrest by Mos is mediated by the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins in a manner distinct from the spindle checkpoint.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document