scholarly journals Chromosome misalignment is associated with PLK1 activity at cenexin-positive mitotic centrosomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (13) ◽  
pp. 1598-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica G. Colicino ◽  
Katrina Stevens ◽  
Erin Curtis ◽  
Lindsay Rathbun ◽  
Michael Bates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Binding Partner ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Chromosome Distribution ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Mother Centriole

The mitotic kinase, polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), facilitates the assembly of the two mitotic spindle poles, which are required for the formation of the microtubule-based spindle that ensures appropriate chromosome distribution into the two forming daughter cells. Spindle poles are asymmetric in composition. One spindle pole contains the oldest mitotic centriole, the mother centriole, where the majority of cenexin, the mother centriole appendage protein and PLK1 binding partner, resides. We hypothesized that PLK1 activity is greater at the cenexin-positive older spindle pole. Our studies found that PLK1 asymmetrically localizes between spindle poles under conditions of chromosome misalignment, and chromosomes tend to misalign toward the oldest spindle pole in a cenexin- and PLK1-dependent manner. During chromosome misalignment, PLK1 activity is increased specifically at the oldest spindle pole, and this increase in activity is lost in cenexin-depleted cells. We propose a model where PLK1 activity elevates in response to misaligned chromosomes at the oldest spindle pole during metaphase.

scholarly journals The mitotic spindle mediates inheritance of the Golgi ribbon structure

2009 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Hsuan Wei ◽  
Joachim Seemann
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Daughter Cell ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Golgi Membranes ◽  
Ribbon Structure ◽  
Golgi Ribbon

The mammalian Golgi ribbon disassembles during mitosis and reforms in both daughter cells after division. Mitotic Golgi membranes concentrate around the spindle poles, suggesting that the spindle may control Golgi partitioning. To test this, cells were induced to divide asymmetrically with the entire spindle segregated into only one daughter cell. A ribbon reforms in the nucleated karyoplasts, whereas the Golgi stacks in the cytoplasts are scattered. However, the scattered Golgi stacks are polarized and transport cargo. Microinjection of Golgi extract together with tubulin or incorporation of spindle materials rescues Golgi ribbon formation. Therefore, the factors required for postmitotic Golgi ribbon assembly are transferred by the spindle, but the constituents of functional stacks are partitioned independently, suggesting that Golgi inheritance is regulated by two distinct mechanisms.

scholarly journals Stu1p Is Physically Associated with β-Tubulin and Is Required for Structural Integrity of the Mitotic Spindle

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1881-1892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Yin ◽  
Liru You ◽  
Danielle Pasqualone ◽  
Kristen M. Kopski ◽  
Tim C. Huffaker
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Balance Of Forces ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Β Tubulin

Formation of the bipolar mitotic spindle relies on a balance of forces acting on the spindle poles. The primary outward force is generated by the kinesin-related proteins of the BimC family that cross-link antiparallel interpolar microtubules and slide them past each other. Here, we provide evidence that Stu1p is also required for the production of this outward force in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the temperature-sensitive stu1–5mutant, spindle pole separation is inhibited, and preanaphase spindles collapse, with their previously separated poles being drawn together. The temperature sensitivity of stu1–5 can be suppressed by doubling the dosage of Cin8p, a yeast BimC kinesin–related protein. Stu1p was observed to be a component of the mitotic spindle localizing to the midregion of anaphase spindles. It also binds to microtubules in vitro, and we have examined the nature of this interaction. We show that Stu1p interacts specifically with β-tubulin and identify the domains required for this interaction on both Stu1p and β-tubulin. Taken together, these findings suggest that Stu1p binds to interpolar microtubules of the mitotic spindle and plays an essential role in their ability to provide an outward force on the spindle poles.

scholarly journals Cell shape impacts on the positioning of the mitotic spindle with respect to the substratum

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1286-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Lázaro-Diéguez ◽  
Iaroslav Ispolatov ◽  
Anne Müsch
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Shape ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mdck Cells ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Spindle Position

All known mechanisms of mitotic spindle orientation rely on astral microtubules. We report that even in the absence of astral microtubules, metaphase spindles in MDCK and HeLa cells are not randomly positioned along their x-z dimension, but preferentially adopt shallow β angles between spindle pole axis and substratum. The nonrandom spindle positioning is due to constraints imposed by the cell cortex in flat cells that drive spindles that are longer and/or wider than the cell's height into a tilted, quasidiagonal x-z position. In rounder cells, which are taller, fewer cortical constraints make the x-z spindle position more random. Reestablishment of astral microtubule–mediated forces align the spindle poles with cortical cues parallel to the substratum in all cells. However, in flat cells, they frequently cause spindle deformations. Similar deformations are apparent when confined spindles rotate from tilted to parallel positions while MDCK cells progress from prometaphase to metaphase. The spindle disruptions cause the engagement of the spindle assembly checkpoint. We propose that cell rounding serves to maintain spindle integrity during its positioning.

scholarly journals Mechanisms for focusing mitotic spindle poles by minus end–directed motor proteins

2005 ◽  
Vol 171 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gohta Goshima ◽  
François Nédélec ◽  
Ronald D. Vale
Keyword(s):  
Rna Interference ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Computer Modeling ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Motor Proteins ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
S2 Cells ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Drosophila S2 Cells ◽  
High Resolution Microscopy

During the formation of the metaphase spindle in animal somatic cells, kinetochore microtubule bundles (K fibers) are often disconnected from centrosomes, because they are released from centrosomes or directly generated from chromosomes. To create the tightly focused, diamond-shaped appearance of the bipolar spindle, K fibers need to be interconnected with centrosomal microtubules (C-MTs) by minus end–directed motor proteins. Here, we have characterized the roles of two minus end–directed motors, dynein and Ncd, in such processes in Drosophila S2 cells using RNA interference and high resolution microscopy. Even though these two motors have overlapping functions, we show that Ncd is primarily responsible for focusing K fibers, whereas dynein has a dominant function in transporting K fibers to the centrosomes. We also report a novel localization of Ncd to the growing tips of C-MTs, which we show is mediated by the plus end–tracking protein, EB1. Computer modeling of the K fiber focusing process suggests that the plus end localization of Ncd could facilitate the capture and transport of K fibers along C-MTs. From these results and simulations, we propose a model on how two minus end–directed motors cooperate to ensure spindle pole coalescence during mitosis.

scholarly journals LRRK2-phosphorylated Rab10 sequesters Myosin Va with RILPL2 during ciliogenesis blockade

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izumi Yanatori ◽  
Herschel S. Dhekne ◽  
Edmundo G. Vides ◽  
Yuriko Sobu ◽  
Federico Diez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Rab Gtpases ◽  
Tail Domain ◽  
Binding Partner ◽  
Activating Mutations ◽  
High Affinity Binding Site ◽  
Mother Centriole ◽  
Myosin Va ◽  
Lrrk2 Kinase ◽  
Rab Effector

AbstractActivating mutations in LRRK2 kinase cause Parkinson’s disease. Pathogenic LRRK2 phosphorylates a subset of Rab GTPases and blocks ciliogenesis. Thus, defining novel phospho-Rab interacting partners is critical to our understanding of the molecular basis of LRRK2 pathogenesis. RILPL2 binds with strong preference to LRRK2-phosphorylated Rab8A and Rab10. RILPL2 is a binding partner of the motor protein and Rab effector, Myosin Va. We show here that the globular tail domain of Myosin Va also contains a high affinity binding site for LRRK2-phosphorylated Rab10, and certain tissue-specific Myosin Va isoforms strongly prefer to bind phosphorylated Rab10. In the presence of pathogenic LRRK2, RILPL2 relocalizes to the peri-centriolar region in a phosphoRab10- and Myosin Va-dependent manner. In the absence of phosphoRab10, expression of RILPL2 or depletion of Myosin Va increase centriolar RILPL2 levels, and either condition is sufficient to block ciliogenesis in RPE cells. These experiments show that LRRK2 generated phosphoRab10 dramatically redistributes Myosin Va-RILPL2 complexes to the mother centriole, which may sequester Myosin Va and RILPL2 in a manner that blocks their normal roles in ciliogenesis.

Probing The Mechanisms Underlying Kinetochore Behavior In Vertebate Cells Using Combinations of Advanced Light and 3-D Electron Microscopy

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 217-218
Author(s):  
B. F. McEwen ◽  
A.B. Heagle ◽  
C.L. Rieder
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Attachment Site ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Primary Constriction ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Chromosome Motion

For daughter cells to receive equal copies of the genome during mitosis, the replicated chromosomes must attach to and move bi-directionally on the mitotic spindle. A chromosome becomes attached to the spindle via a pair specialized structures, known as kinetochores, that are positioned on opposite sides of its primary constriction (one on each of the two chromatids). In addition to being the spindle attachment site, kinetochores are also involved in producing and/or transmitting the forces for chromosome motion. In vertebrates the kinetochore closest to a spindle pole at the time of nuclear envelope breakdown usually is the first to attach to the spindle. As a result of this attachment the now “monooriented” chromosome moves toward the closest pole where its only attached kinetochore initiates oscillatory motions toward and away from that pole until the unattached sister kinetochore acquires microtubules (Mts) from the opposite spindle pole.

Two domains of p80 katanin regulate microtubule severing and spindle pole targeting by p60 katanin

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (9) ◽  
pp. 1623-1633 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.P. McNally ◽  
O.A. Bazirgan ◽  
F.J. McNally
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Microtubule Binding ◽  
Microtubule Severing ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Wd40 Domain

The assembly and function of the mitotic spindle requires the activity of a number of microtubule-binding proteins. Some microtubule-binding proteins bind microtubules in vitro but do not co-localize with microtubules in interphase cells. Instead these proteins associate with specific subregions of the mitotic spindle. Katanin, a heterodimeric microtubule-severing ATPase, is found localized at mitotic spindle poles. In this paper we demonstrate that human p60 katanin and the C-terminal domain of human p80 katanin both bind microtubules in vitro. Association of these two proteins results in an increased microtubule affinity and increased microtubule-severing activity in vitro. Association of these subunits in transfected HeLa cells increases microtubule disassembly activity and targeting to spindle poles. The N-terminal WD40 domain of p80 katanin acts as a negative regulator of microtubule disassembly activity and is also required for spindle pole localization, possibly through interactions with another spindle-pole protein. These results support a model in which katanin is targeted to spindle poles through a combination of direct microtubule binding by the p60 subunit and through interactions between the WD40 domain and an unknown protein. We propose that both domains of p80 are essential in precisely regulating katanin's activity in vivo.

Influence of the centrosome in cytokinesis of brown algae: polyspermic zygotes of Scytosiphon lomentaria (Scytosiphonales,Phaeophyceae)

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (12) ◽  
pp. 2541-2548
Author(s):  
Chikako Nagasato ◽  
Taizo Motomura
Keyword(s):  
Brown Algae ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Male Gametes ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Scytosiphon Lomentaria ◽  
Polar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Position ◽  
The Relationship

We examined the relationship between the spindle orientation and the determination site of cytokinesis in brown algal cells using polyspermic zygotes of Scytosiphon lomentaria. When two male gametes fuse with one female gamete, the zygote has two pairs of centrioles derived from male gametes and three chloroplasts from two male and one female gametes. Just before mitosis, two pairs of centrioles duplicate and migrate towards the future mitotic poles. Spindle MTs develop and three or four spindle poles are formed. In a tri-polar spindle, one pair of centrioles shifts away from the spindle, otherwise, two pairs of centrioles exist adjoining at one spindle pole. Chromosomes arrange at several equators of the spindle. As a result of these multipolar mitoses, three or four daughter nuclei developed. Subsequently, these daughter nuclei form a line along the long axis of the cell. Cell partition always takes place between daughter nuclei, perpendicular to the long axis of the cell. Three or four daughter cells are produced by cytokinesis. Some of the daughter cells after cytokinesis do not have a nucleus, but all of them always contain the centrosome and chloroplast. Therefore, the number of daughter cells always coincides with the number of centrosomes or microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs). These results show that the cytokinetic plane in the brown algae is determined by the position of centrosomes after mitosis and is not dependent on the spindle position.

The Role of the Centrosome in Development and Progression of Breast Cancer

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 582-583
Author(s):  
W. Lingle ◽  
J. Salisbury ◽  
S. Barrett ◽  
V. Negron ◽  
C. Whitehead
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Interphase Cells ◽  
Organizing Center

The centrosome is the major microtubule organizing center in most mammalian cells, and as such it determines the number, polarity, and spatial distribution of microtubules (MTs). Interphase MTs, together with actin and intermediate filaments, constitute the cell's cytoskeleton, which dynamically maintains cell polarity and tissue architecture. Interphase cells begin Gl of the cell cycle with one centrosome. During S phase, the centrosome duplicates concomitantly with DNA replication. Duplicated centrosomes usually remain in close proximity to one another until late G2, at which time they separate and then move during prophase to become the poles that organize the bipolar mitotic spindle. During the G2/M transition, interphase MTs depolymerize and a new population of highly dynamic mitotic MTs are nucleated at the spindle poles. The bipolar mitotic spindle apparatus constitutes the machinery that partitions and separates sister chromatids equally between two daughter cells.

scholarly journals A Potential Role for Human Cohesin in Mitotic Spindle Aster Assembly

2001 ◽  
Vol 276 (50) ◽  
pp. 47575-47582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather C. Gregson ◽  
John A. Schmiesing ◽  
Jong-Soo Kim ◽  
Toshiki Kobayashi ◽  
Sharleen Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

The cohesin multiprotein complex containing SMC1, SMC3, Scc3 (SA), and Scc1 (Rad21) is required for sister chromatid cohesion in eukaryotes. Although metazoan cohesin associates with chromosomes and was shown to function in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during interphase, the majority of cohesin was found to be off chromosomes and reside in the cytoplasm in metaphase. Despite its dissociation from chromosomes, however, microinjection of an antibody against human SMC1 led to disorganization of the metaphase plate and cell cycle arrest, indicating that human cohesin still plays an important role in metaphase. To address the mitotic function of human cohesin, the subcellular localization of cohesin components was reexamined in human cells. Interestingly, we found that cohesin localizes to the spindle poles during mitosis and interacts with NuMA, a spindle pole-associated factor required for mitotic spindle organization. The interaction with NuMA persists during interphase. Similar to NuMA, a significant amount of cohesin was found to associate with the nuclear matrix. Furthermore, in the absence of cohesin, mitotic spindle asters failed to formin vitro. Our results raise the intriguing possibility that in addition to its well demonstrated function in sister chromatid cohesion, cohesin may be involved in spindle assembly during mitosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document