scholarly journals P-OGC81 The learning curve for robotic assisted abdominal phase in two stage oesophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick McQuillan ◽  
Salman Ahmed ◽  
Mazair Navidi ◽  
Shajahan Wahed ◽  
Arul Immanual
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Open Group ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Nodal Count ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Group ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Robotic assisted oesophagectomy (RAO) is increasingly being utilised in the management of oesophageal cancer. RAO implementation into practice has an inevitable learning curve. As oesophagectomy usually involves at least 2 stages, a staggered approach to training and introduction of RAO can be done. A major advantage of this is that the surgeon can concentrate on overcoming the learning curve in one phase of the procedure at a time, whilst the remaining phase can be completed by an established technique. This study looks at the learning curve of a robotic assisted abdominal phase for two-stage oesophagectomy compared to an open abdominal phase to achieve parity. Methods This study uses a prospectively maintained database to retrospectively analyse the abdominal phase of the first 17 RAO compared to the previous 20 open abdominal phase procedures. The cases are sequential, done by a single surgeon at a large UK oesophagogastric referral centre. Operating time, nodal count, and R0 rate were reviewed to determine the number of cases on the learning curve to reach parity with the open procedure. Results The open abdominal phase group had a similar age (65.6 vs 65.7), pre-op anaerobic threshold (13.9 vs 14.6 p = 0.3) but a higher BMI (mean 30.6 vs 24.6 p < 0.05) then the RAO group. All cases were T3 adenocarcinoma except for 2 cases in the robotic group (one HGD and one T2 adenocarcinoma). No RAO cases were converted to open. The mean time for the abdominal phase in the open group was 175.4 minutes with an average nodal count of 32.9. After 8 robotic assisted cases the mean operating time decreased from 267 minutes to 197 minutes, which was when a non-significant difference to the open group (p = 0.094) became apparent. The mean nodal count in the first 8 robotic assisted cases was 29.5 and increased to 38.4 in the subsequent cases. All patients had a R0 resection. Conclusions The multi-phase nature of oesophagectomy allows for modular implementation of a robotic programme. We have found that the learning curve for robotic assisted abdominal is around 8 cases. This allows for parity to open abdominal phase to be achieved regarding operative time, nodal count and R0 resection.

scholarly journals Total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach – Does experience influence the learning curve?

SICOT-J ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constant Foissey ◽  
Mathieu Fauvernier ◽  
Cam Fary ◽  
Elvire Servien ◽  
Sébastien Lustig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Proficiency in the direct anterior approach (DAA) as with many surgical techniques is considered to be challenging. Added to this is the controversy of the benefits of DAA compared to other total hip arthroplasty (THA) approaches. Our study aims to assess the influence of experience on learning curve and clinical results when transitioning from THA via posterior approach in a lateral position to DAA in a supine position. Methods: A consecutive retrospective series of 525 total hip arthroplasty of one senior and six junior surgeons was retrospectively analysed from May 2013 to December 2017. Clinical results were analysed and compared between the two groups and represented as a learning curve. Mean follow up was 36.2 months ± 11.8. Results: This study found a significant difference in complications between the senior and junior surgeons for operating time, infection rate, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) neuropraxia. A trainee’s learning curve was an average of 10 DAA procedures before matching the senior surgeon. Of note, the early complications correlated with intraoperative fractures increased with experience in both groups. Operating time for the senior equalised after 70 cases. Dislocation rate and limb length discrepancy were excellent and did not show a learning curve between the two groups. Conclusion: DAA is a safe approach to implant a THA. There is a learning curve and initial supervision is recommended for both seniors and trainees. Level of evidence: Retrospective, consecutive case series; level IV.

scholarly journals Comparable surgery time for robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty after initial learning curve

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0031
Author(s):  
Peter Savov ◽  
Lars-René Tücking ◽  
Henning Windhagen ◽  
Max Ettinger
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Robotic System ◽  
Robotic Group ◽  
Absolute Deviation ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Time Of Surgery ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Initial Learning ◽  
Manual Group ◽  
The Mean

Aims and Objectives: In the past years, further development in knee replacement still continues. Computer-assisted surgery techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are on the rise. One point of criticism is the prolonged time of surgery and associated cost as known from old techniques like navigation. The primary objective of this study was to determine the learning curve for the time of surgery and accuracy in implant positioning for an imageless robotic system for TKA. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, the first 30 robotic-assisted TKA from a single senior surgeon were analyzed with regard to time of surgery and accuracy of implant position on the basis of the intraoperative plan and the postoperative x-rays. This data was compared to the last 30 manual TKAs of the same surgeon with the same prosthesis. Evaluation of the learning curve was performed with CUSUM analysis. The time of surgery after finishing the learning curve in the robotic group was compared to the manual group. Results: The learning curve in the robotic group for surgery time was finished after 11 cases. The robotic experience did not affect the accuracy of implant positioning, such as limb alignment and restoration of the joint line. The mean absolute deviation of the postoperative limb alignment to the intraoperative plan was 2° (+/- 1,1). The mean absolute deviation of the medial proximal tibial (mPTA) and distal lateral femoral angle (dLFA) was 1° (+/- 0,9) for both. The mean surgery time in the robotic group after finishing the learning curve was 66 minutes (+/- 4,2) and in the total manual group 67 minutes (+/- 3,5) (n.s.). Conclusion: After finishing the initial learning curve of 11 cases for robotic-assisted TKA the time of surgery is equal to the manual conventional technique. However, there is no learning curve for implant positioning with the imageless robotic system. The implementation of the intraoperative plan is accurate to 1° with the robotic system.

Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for Ulcerative Colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (7) ◽  
pp. 782-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salini Hota ◽  
Salvatore Parascandola ◽  
Richard Amdur ◽  
Vincent Obias
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Confounding Variables ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory intestinal disorder that can be managed surgically with a proctocolectomy. Minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopic or robotic-assisted surgery are available based on the surgeon’s preference and familiarity. To date, there is a paucity of literature evaluating the safety of these techniques in comparison to the open approach in patients with UC. Methods We surveyed the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to select patients with the diagnosis of UC who underwent either robotic, laparoscopic, or open proctocolectomy between 2012 and 2017. A total of 2129 patients were included in the study. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression models after adjusting for confounding variables. The confounding variables were defined as any preoperative variable that was associated with the type of procedure. Results The 30-day postoperative outcomes reported in the NSQIP database were reviewed for each of the treatment groups (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). The anastomotic leak rate was significantly higher in the open group ( P = .022). The robotic and laparoscopic groups had significantly fewer occurrences of postoperative ileus ( P = .0006) and wound infections ( P < .0001). There were significantly more strokes, cardiac events, and pulmonary events in the open surgical group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the open group ( P < .0001). Reintervention rates were not significantly different among the groups. Conclusions Minimally invasive proctocolectomy has significantly fewer postoperative complications compared with open proctocolectomy for UC. There is no significant difference in the postoperative outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic proctocolectomy.

Impact of robotic-assisted approach on lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 787-787
Author(s):  
Reza Gamagami ◽  
Paul Kozak ◽  
Venkata R. Kakarla
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Lymph Node Harvest ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

787 Background: In most recent years, robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has proven to be a viable alternative to laparoscopic and traditional open surgery for colorectal cancer. Obtaining the adequate number of lymph nodes is not only essential for accurate staging, but also impacts both prognosis and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy. To date, the efficacy of lymph node harvest for RALS is not well studied or established. The aim of our study is to analyze the impact of RALS on lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent curative resections for colorectal cancer over a five-year period at a single institution by a single surgeon. Resections were classified as right-sided, sigmoid, or rectal, and subdivided into robotic and non-robotic surgery groups. The demographic data and histopathology were obtained, with an emphasis on the number lymph nodes harvested (LNH) during resections. Emergencies and non-curative resections were excluded. Results: Between January 2010 and December 2015, 136 patients with colorectal cancer underwent curative resections. Sixty-four underwent right-sided resections (28 laparoscopic, 36 robotic). Twenty-five underwent sigmoid resections (11 laparoscopic, 14 robotic), and 47 underwent rectal resections (15 open, 32 robotic). There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI and ASA scores between the cohorts examined. The mean number of LNH with RALS was significantly higher in all three groups (right-sided—24 vs. 15 ( p= .0001), sigmoid—16 vs. 12 ( p= .046), rectal—19 vs. 4 ( p= .0016)). There was no difference in the rate of adequate lymph node extraction for staging purpose, i.e., 12 lymph nodes in all three groups. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is associated with a statistically significant increase in lymph node harvest for right-sided, sigmoid and rectal resections for malignancy. Future studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these findings.

Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini–open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 560-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay S. Dhall ◽  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mini Open

Object As minimally invasive approaches gain popularity in spine surgery, clinical outcomes and effectiveness of mini–open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) compared with traditional open TLIF have yet to be established. The authors retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients who underwent mini–open TLIF with those who underwent open TLIF. Methods Between 2003 and 2006, 42 patients underwent TLIF for degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis; 21 patients underwent mini–open TLIF and 21 patients underwent open TLIF. The mean age in each group was 53 years, and there was no statistically significant difference in age between the groups (p = 0.98). Data were collected perioperatively. In addition, complications, length of stay (LOS), fusion rate, and modified Prolo Scale (mPS) scores were recorded at routine intervals. Results No patient was lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up was 24 months for the mini-open group and 34 months for the open group. The mean estimated blood loss was 194 ml for the mini-open group and 505 ml for the open group (p < 0.01). The mean LOS was 3 days for the mini-open group and 5.5 days for the open group (p < 0.01). The mean mPS score improved from 11 to 19 in the mini-open group and from 10 to 18 in the open group; there was no statistically significant difference in mPS score improvement between the groups (p = 0.19). In the mini-open group there were 2 cases of transient L-5 sensory loss, 1 case of a misplaced screw that required revision, and 1 case of cage migration that required revision. In the open group there was 1 case of radiculitis as well as 1 case of a misplaced screw that required revision. One patient in the mini-open group developed a pseudarthrosis that required reoperation, and all patients in the open group exhibited fusion. Conclusions Mini–open TLIF is a viable alternative to traditional open TLIF with significantly reduced estimated blood loss and LOS. However, the authors found a higher incidence of hardware-associated complications with the mini–open TLIF.

scholarly journals Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: Case series and literature review

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Y. Hoy ◽  
Stephan Van Zyl ◽  
Blair A. St. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Simple Prostatectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has been touted as an alternative to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) to treat large gland benign prostatic hyperplasia. Our study assesses our institution’s experience with RASP and reviews the literature.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review from January 2011 to November 2013 of all patients undergoing RASP and OSP. Operative and 90-day outcomes, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay (LOS), transfusion requirements, and complication rates, were assessed.Results: Thirty-two patients were identified: 4 undergoing RASP and 28 undergoing OSP. There was no difference in mean age at surgery (69.3 vs. 75.2 years; p = 0.17), mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.5 vs. 3.5; p = 0.19), and mean prostate volume on TRUS (239 vs. 180 mL; p = 0.09) in the robotic and open groups, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean length of operation, with RASP exceeding OSP (161 vs. 79 min; p = 0.008). The mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the open group (835.7 vs. 218.8 mL; p = 0.0001). Mean LOS was shorter in the RASP group (2.3 vs. 5.5 days; p = 0.0001). No significant differences were noted in the 90-day transfusion rate (p = 0.13), or overall complication rate at 0% with RASP vs. 57.1% with OSP (p = 0.10).Conclusions: Our data suggest RASP has a shorter LOS and lower intraoperative volume of blood loss, with the disadvantage of a longer operating time, compared to OSP. It is a feasible technique and deserves further investigation and consideration at Canadian centres performing robotic prostatectomies.

scholarly journals Learning Curve for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fracture by Extensile Lateral Approach Using the Cumulative Summation Control Chart

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0008
Author(s):  
Jungtae Ahn ◽  
Tae Yong Kim ◽  
Tae Wook Kim ◽  
Bi O Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Moving Average ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Calcaneal Fracture ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Extensile Lateral Approach ◽  
Cumulative Summation ◽  
The Mean

Category: Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture (DIACF) by extensile lateral approach is widely used but is technically challenging. In this study, the learning curve for ORIF of DIACF by extensile lateral approach was investigated. Methods: Between March 2014 and July 2018, 45 cases consisting of 40 patients underwent operative treatment for DIACF by the extensile lateral approach performed in all instances by a single surgeon. A moving average and cumulative summation control chart (CUSUM) were used for learning curve analyses. Operative failure was defined when at least one of the following parameters were unsatisfactory: reduction of Gissane angle and Böhler angle, posterior facet congruency, calcaneal width, subfibular impingement, axial alignment, or calcaneocuboid joint congruency. Results: The mean operating time was 117.4 min. Regarding the quality of reduction, the mean preoperative sum of the 7 parameters was 5.1 and improved to 0.6 postoperatively. The CUSUM for operative success peaked in the 20th case. The CUSUM and moving average graphics of operating time peaked at the 9th case and registered nadirs at the 34th case, with slight ascent and decent. The operating time for twenty cases in phase 1 (1–20) and for twenty-five cases in phase 2 (21–45) of the learning curve did not differ significantly. There was no statistical difference in the severity of fracture pattern. By comparison, significant differences in phase 2 patients showed a better postoperative reduction quality. Conclusion: As indicated by multidimensional statistical analyses, primary technical competence in improving the reduction quality of DIACF was achieved after the initial learning period with 20 cases. After the learning curve for ORIF of DIACF, a better reduction quality in the sum of reduction parameters was observed.

scholarly journals Accuracy of the One-Stage and Two-Stage Impression Techniques: A Comparative Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ladan Jamshidy ◽  
Hamid Reza Mozaffari ◽  
Payam Faraji ◽  
Roohollah Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Standard Method ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Finish Line ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Impression Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The One

Introduction. One of the main steps of impression is the selection and preparation of an appropriate tray. Hence, the present study aimed to analyze and compare the accuracy of one- and two-stage impression techniques. Materials and Methods. A resin laboratory-made model, as the first molar, was prepared by standard method for full crowns with processed preparation finish line of 1 mm depth and convergence angle of 3-4°. Impression was made 20 times with one-stage technique and 20 times with two-stage technique using an appropriate tray. To measure the marginal gap, the distance between the restoration margin and preparation finish line of plaster dies was vertically determined in mid mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual (MDBL) regions by a stereomicroscope using a standard method. Results. The results of independent test showed that the mean value of the marginal gap obtained by one-stage impression technique was higher than that of two-stage impression technique. Further, there was no significant difference between one- and two-stage impression techniques in mid buccal region, but a significant difference was reported between the two impression techniques in MDL regions and in general. Conclusion. The findings of the present study indicated higher accuracy for two-stage impression technique than for the one-stage impression technique.

Safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Sebastian G. De La Fuente ◽  
Jill M. Weber ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Ravi Shridhar ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Oncology ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

93 Background: The introduction of robotic systems to surgical oncology has allowed improved visualization with more precise manipulation of tissues. In esophageal cancer patients, this is crucial since most patients undergo neoadjuvant therapy (NT) prior to surgical resection. We report our initial experience in patients undergoing robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy (RAIL) for oncologic purposes at a large-referral center. Methods: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing RAIL from 2010-2011 was performed. Basic demographics such as age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. Oncologic outcomes include tumor type, location, NT, post-operative tumor margins, and nodal harvest. Immediate 30-day postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: We identified 50 patients who under went RAIL with median age of 66 (42-82 years). The mean BMI was 28.6 ± 0.7, 67% of patients received NT and 54% had an ASA classification of 3. The mean and median number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery was 20 ± 1.4 and 18.5 (8-63) respectively. R0 resections were achieved in all patients. The mean estimated blood loss was 146 ± 15 ml and there were no conversions to an open procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 (26 %) of patients. Complications included atrial fibrillation 5 (10%), pneumonia 5 (10%), anastamotic leak 1 (2%), conduit staple line leak 1(2%), and chylous thorax 2 (4%). There were no wound infections documented. The median ICU stay and length of hospitalization (LOH) were 2 and 9 days respectively. Total mean operating time calculated from time of skin incision to wound closure was 453 ± 13 minutes. The mean operative time significantly decreased over time (first 23 cases 479 min vs. second 23 cases 428 min, p<0.05). Similarly the frequency of complications decreased significantly after 28 cases: 10 (35%) vs. 3 (13%) p=0.04. There were no in hospital mortalities. Conclusions: We demonstrated that RAIL for esophageal cancer can be performed safely with acceptable oncologic outcomes. RAIL may be associated with fewer complications after a learning curve, and shorter ICU stay and LOH.

Effect of body mass index on operative complications after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrostomy: Retrospective analysis of 133 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Thau ◽  
Tobin Joel Crill Strom ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
Nadia Saeed ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
High Volume ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
High Bmi

109 Background: The impact of body weight on robotic-assisted surgical morbidity has not been studied in esophageal cancer. We thus examined operative outcomes in patients according to their body mass index (BMI) following robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagogastrostomy (RAIL) at a high-volume tertiary-care referral cancer center and evaluated the safety of robotic surgery in patients with an elevated BMI. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who underwent RAIL for pathologically confirmed malignancy in the distal esophagus and assessed morbidity and intraoperative outcomes relative to BMI. We evaluated operative complications from surgery to discharge, including average operating time, estimated blood loss (EBL), pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, wound infection, and surgical leaks. Median ICU days after surgery and 30 day operative mortality was assessed. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and Spearman Coefficient were used. Results: Of 134 total patients, 106 were male and 28 were female, with an average age of 67 years. Among patients, 76% (N=102) received neoadjuvant therapy. According to BMI, 3 patients were underweight, 35 were normal weight, 62 were overweight, and 34 were obese. All patients had R0 resection, with a median of 19 lymph nodes removed. Among evaluated surgical complications, anastomotic leak rate was significantly higher in patients with high BMI (p=0.01). Median operating time was 407 mins and EBL was 150cc. High BMI was significantly associated with increased operation time and EBL (p=0.01 & p=0.05, respectively). Conclusions: This retrospective study shows that patients with distal esophageal cancer and an elevated BMI undergoing RAIL have increased operative times and EBL during the procedure. An elevated postoperative risk for anastomotic leak also exists and must be carefully monitored. However, BMI does not affect the quality of oncological resection as determined by the number of harvested lymph nodes and rates of R0 resection, suggesting similar outcomes irrespective of BMI among all patients undergoing RAIL at a high volume tertiary center.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document