Practical guidance for P2Y12 inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hun Lee ◽  
Hyun Kuk Kim ◽  
Myung Ho Jeong ◽  
Satoshi Yasuda ◽  
Satoshi Honda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
New Scoring ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Aims Potent P2Y12 inhibitors for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is crucial for managing acute myocardial infarction; however, the selection of drugs is based on limited clinical information such as age and body weight. The current study sought to develop and validate a new risk scoring system that can be used to guide the selection of potent P2Y12 inhibitors by balancing ischaemic benefit and bleeding risk. Methods and results Derivation cohort of 10 687 patients who participated in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health study was used to construct a new scoring system. We combined the ischaemic and bleeding models to establish a simple clinical prediction score. Among the low score group (n = 1764), the observed bleeding risk (8.7% vs. 4.4%, P < 0.001) due to potent P2Y12 inhibitors exceeded ischaemic benefit (1.3% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.185) during 12 months. Conversely, the high score group (n = 1898) showed an overall benefit from taking potent P2Y12 inhibitors from the standpoint of observed ischaemic (17.1% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.001) and bleeding events (10.1% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.073). The performance of ischaemic [integrated area under the curve (iAUC) = 0.809] and bleeding model (iAUC = 0.655) was deemed to be acceptable. Conclusion The new scoring system is a useful clinical tool for guiding DAPT by balancing ischaemic benefit and bleeding risk, especially among Asian populations. Further validation studies with other cohorts will be required to verify that the new system meets the needs of real clinical practice.

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in high bleeding risk patients presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes: insights from the multicenter START-ANTIPLATELET registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Gragnano ◽  
E Moscarella ◽  
P Calabro' ◽  
A Cesaro ◽  
P.C Pafundi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
P Value ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains debated. Although current guidelines recommend the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in these patients (according to the labeled indications), clopidogrel is frequently used in clinical practice based on a perceived advantage in terms of safety in the HBR population. Purpose We sought to investigate the use of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in consecutive HBR ACS patients and their impact on ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year. Methods ACS patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry with at least 1 HBR criterion were included in the present analysis and stratified according to DAPT type (clopidogrel versus ticagrelor). The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoint (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and stroke, each individual component of NACE and MACE, and target vessel revascularization. Results Among a total of 1,209 patients with 1-year follow-up in the registry, 383 patients were considered at HBR, of whom 174 (45.4%) were on clopidogrel and 209 (54.6%) on ticagrelor. Clopidogrel was more likely to be administered in patients at increased ischemic and bleeding risk, while ticagrelor in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Mean DAPT duration was longer in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (10.40±4.29 versus 9.35±5.4; p-value=0.03). At 1-year follow-up, the risk of NACE and MACE events was significantly higher in the clopidogrel than in the ticagrelor group (NACE: HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.07–3.09; p-value=0.02; MACE: HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.04–3.24; p-value=0.03) (Figure). After multivariate adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, no difference in NACEs nor MACEs was observed between patients on clopidogrel versus ticagrelor (NACE: adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.71–2.27; p-value=0.42; MACE: adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.63–2.24; p-value=0.59) (Figure). Age, number of HBR criteria, and mean DAPT duration were independent predictors of NACEs. Conclusions In a real-world ACS registry, approximately 50% of patients are at HBR and frequently treated with clopidogrel. In HBR ACS patients, no difference was observed in ischemic and bleeding events between clopidogrel and ticagrelor after adjustment for potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier curves at 1-year follow-up. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Third-Generation P2Y12 Inhibitors in East Asian Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Nationwide Prospective Multicentre Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (03) ◽  
pp. 591-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeehoon Kang ◽  
Jung-Kyu Han ◽  
Youngkeun Ahn ◽  
Shung Chull Chae ◽  
Young Jo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
All Cause Mortality

AbstractThird-generation P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor) are recommended in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors in East Asian AMI patients. From the Korean AMI Registry, 9,355 patients who received dual antiplatelet agent (aspirin with clopidogrel [AC], 6,444 [70.5%] patients; aspirin with prasugrel [AP], 1,100 [11.8%] patients; or aspirin with ticagrelor [AT], 1,811 [19.4%] patients) were analysed. In-hospital endpoints were all-cause mortality or bleeding events during admission and 1-year endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major bleeding events. Regarding in-hospital events, AP and AT showed similar all-cause mortality rates but higher bleeding event rates compared with AC. This trend was extended to 1-year endpoints; Cox regression analysis showed that third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors had significantly higher bleeding risk (AP vs. AC: hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53–2.99; p < 0.001; AT vs. AC: HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.73–2.95; p < 0.001). A propensity score matched triplet of 572 patients showed similar 1-year MACCE and higher bleeding events with third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors (2.1 vs. 2.6 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.790 for MACCE and 3.1 vs. 8.0 vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001 for bleeding events, in AC, AP and AT groups, respectively). Inverse probability weighted regression analysis and pooled analysis after randomly imputing missing variables showed consistent results. Collectively, prasugrel and ticagrelor showed similar rates of 1-year MACCE, but a higher rate of bleeding events, compared with clopidogrel in Korean AMI patients. Further studies are warranted to adapt Western guidelines on third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors for East Asians.

scholarly journals ADP-induced platelet reactivity and bleeding events in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Scherer ◽  
E Luesebrink ◽  
S Massberg ◽  
D Sibbing ◽  
M Orban
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Platelet Aggregation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background While previous reports showed ADP-induced platelet reactivity to be an independent predictor of bleeding after PCI in stable patients, this has never been investigated in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods The association of bleeding events with respect to ADP-induced platelet aggregation was investigated in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) and with available on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation measurements. Results Out of 233 patients, 74 suffered from a severe BARC 3 or higher bleed. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was significantly lower in patients with BARC≥3 bleedings (10 AU [IQR 3 - 13] vs. 15 AU [IQR 9 - 25], p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation as an independent risk factor for bleeding (HR = 0.968 per AU, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.942-0.994). An optimal cut-off value of &lt;12 AU for ADP-induced platelet aggregation to predict BARC≥3 bleedings was identified via ROC analysis. Moreover, use of VA-ECMO (HR 1.972, 95% CI 1.003-3.879) or coaxial left ventricular pump (HR 2.593, 95% CI 1.509-4.455), first lactate (HR 1.093 per mmol/l, 95% CI 1.037-1.152) and thrombocyte count (HR 0.994 per G/l, 95% CI 0.990-0.998) were independent predictors of BARC≥3 bleedings. There was no significant difference in survival nor ischemic events between patients with low and high on-treatment platelet reactivity. Conclusion: Lower on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation was independently associated with severe bleeding events in patients with AMI-CS. The value of platelet function testing for bleeding risk prediction and guidance of anti-thrombotic treatment in CS warrants further investigation.

Outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after acute myocardial infarction stratified by renal function

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (19) ◽  
pp. 1575-1582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Edfors ◽  
Anders Sahlén ◽  
Karolina Szummer ◽  
Henrik Renlund ◽  
Marie Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models

ObjectivesWe aimed to analyse outcomes of ticagrelor and clopidogrel stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in a large unselected cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).MethodsWe used follow-up data in MI survivors discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel enrolled in the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies registry. The association between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and the primary composite outcome of death, MI or stroke and the secondary outcome rehospitalisation with bleeding diagnosis at 1 year, was studied using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, stratifying after eGFR levels.ResultsIn total, 45 206 patients with MI discharged on clopidogrel (n=33 472) or ticagrelor (n=11 734) were included. The unadjusted 1-year event rate for the composite endpoint of death, MI or stroke was 7.0%, 18.0% and 48.0% for ticagrelor treatment and 11.0%, 33.0% and 64.0% for clopidogrel treatment in patients with eGFR>60 (n=33 668), eGFR30–60 (n=9803) and eGFR<30 (n=1735), respectively. After adjustment, ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel was associated with a lower 1-year risk of the composite outcome (eGFR>60: HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 99, eGFR30–60: 0.82 (0.70 to 0.97), eGFR<30: 0.95 (0.69 to 1.29), P for interaction=0.55) and a higher risk of bleeding (eGFR>60: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.35, eGFR30–60: 1.13 (0.84 to 1.51), eGFR<30: 1.79 (1.00 to 3.21), P for interaction=0.30) across the eGFR strata.ConclusionsTreatment with ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel in patients with MI was associated with lower risk for the composite of death, MI or stroke and a higher bleeding risk across all strata of eGFR. Of caution, bleeding events were more abundant in patients with eGFR<30.

P4619Comparison of the CRUSADE, ACUITY-HORIZONS, and ACTION bleeding risk scores for predicting in-hospital bleeding in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary PCI

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Mehmedbegovic ◽  
D Milasinovic ◽  
D Jelic ◽  
V Zobenica ◽  
D Matic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Goodness Of Fit Test ◽  
Catheterization Laboratory

Abstract Background Considering clinical importance of bleeding complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), bleeding risk stratification is a key part of the management of these patients. CRUSADE, ACTION and ACUITY-HORIZONS bleeding risk scores are available for predicting in-hospital major bleeding events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Purpose We aimed to evaluate performance of the three above mentioned risk scores for predicting in-hospital bleeding events defined according to The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. Methods From a prospective electronic registry of a high-volume catheterization laboratory in a period from January 2009 to December 2017, a total of 6505 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent pPCI were included in analysis. Calibration and discrimination of the three risk models were evaluated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test and C-statistic, respectively. Results Overall there were 372 (5.7%) bleeding events out of which 117 (1.8%) fulfilled stage BARC 3 or higher bleeding criteria. All three scores showed good model calibration as assessed by the H-Ls test and very good discriminative power for BARC 3 of higher bleeding events detection as assessed by C-statistics (Table 1 & Figure 1): Bleeding events stage BARC 3 or higher were statistically highly related with higher in-hospital mortality (13.7% vs. 3.5%; p<0.000). Table 1 Risk score H-L H-L p AUC 95% CI p CRUSADE 11.46 0.177 0.761 0.750–0.771 vs. ACUITY = ns vs. ACTION <0.000 ACUITY-HORIZONS 10.47 0.236 0735 0.724–0.745 vs. ACTION = ns ACTION 5.74 0.677 0.701 0.698–0.712 Figure 1 Conclusions All three evaluated scores showed very good discriminative capacity for predicting BARC 3 or higher bleeding events in patients undergoing pPCI for AMI.

scholarly journals 180-day readmission risk model for older adults with acute myocardial infarction: the SILVER-AMI study

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001442
Author(s):  
John A Dodson ◽  
Alexandra M Hajduk ◽  
Terrence E Murphy ◽  
Mary Geda ◽  
Harlan M Krumholz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Functional Mobility ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
History Of ◽  
Reported Health ◽  
Self Reported Health Status ◽  
Readmission Risk

ObjectiveTo develop a 180-day readmission risk model for older adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) that considered a broad range of clinical, demographic and age-related functional domains.MethodsWe used data from ComprehenSIVe Evaluation of Risk in Older Adults with AMI (SILVER-AMI), a prospective cohort study that enrolled participants aged ≥75 years with AMI from 94 US hospitals. Participants underwent an in-hospital assessment of functional impairments, including cognition, vision, hearing and mobility. Clinical variables previously shown to be associated with readmission risk were also evaluated. The outcome was 180-day readmission. From an initial list of 72 variables, we used backward selection and Bayesian model averaging to derive a risk model (N=2004) that was subsequently internally validated (N=1002).ResultsOf the 3006 SILVER-AMI participants discharged alive, mean age was 81.5 years, 44.4% were women and 10.5% were non-white. Within 180 days, 1222 participants (40.7%) were readmitted. The final risk model included 10 variables: history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of heart failure, initial heart rate, first diastolic blood pressure, ischaemic ECG changes, initial haemoglobin, ejection fraction, length of stay, self-reported health status and functional mobility. Model discrimination was moderate (0.68 derivation cohort, 0.65 validation cohort), with good calibration. The predicted readmission rate (derivation cohort) was 23.0% in the lowest quintile and 65.4% in the highest quintile.ConclusionsOver 40% of participants in our sample experienced hospital readmission within 180 days of AMI. Our final readmission risk model included a broad range of characteristics, including functional mobility and self-reported health status, neither of which have been previously considered in 180-day risk models.

scholarly journals Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
André Åström ◽  
Lars Söderström ◽  
Thomas Mooe
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
Over Time

AbstractOnly sparse epidemiological data are available regarding the risk of ischemic stroke (IS) after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Here we aimed to describe the incidence and predictors of IS associated with CABG performed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), as well as trends over time. We analyzed data for 248,925 unselected AMI patients. We separately analyzed groups of patients who underwent CABG early or late after the index infarction. IS incidence rates per year at risk were 15.8% (95% confidence interval, 14.5–17.1) and 10.9% (10.6–11.2), respectively, among patients with and without CABG in the early cohort, and 4.0% (3.5–4.5) and 2.3% (2.2–2.3), respectively, among patients with and without CABG in the late cohort. Predictors of post-AMI IS included prior IS, CABG, prior atrial fibrillation, prior hemorrhagic stroke, heart failure during hospitalization, older age, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Reduced IS risk was associated with use of statins and P2Y12 inhibitors. IS incidence markedly decreased among patients who did not undergo CABG, while no such reduction over time occurred among those who underwent CABG. This emphasizes the need to optimize modifiable risk factors and to consistently use treatments that may reduce IS risk among CABG patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document