scholarly journals P3858Relationship between diabetes mellitus and a risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Fushimi AF registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ishii ◽  
H Ogawa ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
K Doi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systemic Embolism

scholarly journals ATRIAL FIBRILLATION COMBINED WITH DIABETES MELLITUS. POSSIBILITIES OF USING RIVAROXABAN

2018 ◽  
pp. 68-74
Author(s):  
Alexey D. Ehrlich
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Theoretical Data ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Actual Clinical Practice ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

The presented material summarizes the main clinical and theoretical data on the peculiarities of atrial fibrillation (AP) flow in combination with diabetes mellitus (DM). This combination, although associated with a lower age than in patients without diabetes, is associated with a higher risk of stroke and systemic embolism and other adverse complications. The material presents the data of the rocket-AF randomized trial subanalysis on the peculiarities of the use of oral anticoagulant - a direct inhibitor of Xa-factor Rivaroxaban in patients with non-valve AF in combination with DM. Comparative efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban in patients with diabetes were comparable to those in patients without diabetes. Rivaroxaban in patients with diabetes was associated with lower vascular death rates than warfarin. The results of the randomized trial are largely confirmed in several observational studies that reflect actual clinical practice. Thus, it can be affirmed that Rivaroxaban is not only the most commonly used direct oral anticoagulant in russian practice, but can also be widely used in patients with non-valve AF and diabetes to prevent strokes and systemic embolisms.

scholarly journals Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation and comorbidities — how to choose the optimal solution?

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 4801
Author(s):  
E V Schlyakhto ◽  
E I Baranova ◽  
V A Ionin
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Gastrointestinal Diseases ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Heart Valve Surgery ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Emergency Operations ◽  
Artery Disease

The review discusses the problem of anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and comorbidities (hypertension, heart defects, including after heart valve surgery, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, gastrointestinal diseases, anemia, cancer), as well as with a high risk of emergency operations and injuries.

scholarly journals Real-world safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban using Japan-specific dosage during long-term follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation: XAPASS

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0251325
Author(s):  
Takanori Ikeda ◽  
Satoshi Ogawa ◽  
Takanari Kitazono ◽  
Jyoji Nakagawara ◽  
Kazuo Minematsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Real World ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Background The Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (XAPASS) was designed to investigate safety and effectiveness during long-term follow-up of rivaroxaban treatment, using reduced doses compared with other global regions, in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in real-world clinical practice. Methods In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, observational study, 11,308 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly prescribed rivaroxaban (15/10 mg once daily) at 1416 sites across Japan were enrolled and followed for a mean of 2.5 years. Results In total, 10,664 and 10,628 patients were included in the safety and effectiveness analyses, respectively. In the safety population, mean (standard deviation) age was 73.1 (9.8) years and Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years, Diabetes mellitus, previous Stroke/TIA (2 points) (CHADS2) score was 2.2 (1.3). Incidences (95% confidence intervals) of any and major bleeding were 3.77 (3.53–4.01) and 1.16 (1.03–1.29) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Age ≥75 years, creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, diabetes mellitus, and vascular disease were independently associated with incidence of major bleeding. The primary composite effectiveness outcome of stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism, and myocardial infarction occurred at an incidence (95% confidence interval) of 1.32 (1.18–1.46) events per 100 patient-years. Age ≥75 years, hypertension, prior ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, and concomitant use of antiplatelets were independently associated with incidence of the composite outcome of stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism, and myocardial infarction. Conclusion In the XAPASS, a large-scale study involving a broad range of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly prescribed rivaroxaban using Japan-specific dosage in real-world clinical practice, no unexpected safety or effectiveness concerns were detected during up to 5 years of follow-up.

scholarly journals CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS LOWERS THE RISK FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN MEN WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. A365
Author(s):  
Andreas Pittaras ◽  
Michael E. Doumas ◽  
Charles Faselis ◽  
F. Kyritsi ◽  
JP Kokkinos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Cardiorespiratory Fitness

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Diabetes Using a Risk Index

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2924
Author(s):  
Domenico Acanfora ◽  
Marco Matteo Ciccone ◽  
Valentina Carlomagno ◽  
Pietro Scicchitano ◽  
Chiara Acanfora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Efficacy Rate ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Diabetes mellitus (DM) represents an independent risk factor for chronic AF and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), with and without diabetes mellitus (DM), using a new risk index (RI) defined as: RI =Rate of EventsRate of Patients at Risk. In particular, an RI lower than 1 suggests a favorable treatment effect. We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The risk index (RI) was calculated in terms of efficacy (rate of stroke/systemic embolism (stroke SEE)/rate of patients with and without DM; rate of cardiovascular death/rate of patients with and without DM) and safety (rate of major bleeding/rate of patients with and without DM) outcomes. AF patients with DM (n = 22,057) and 49,596 without DM were considered from pivotal trials. DM doubles the risk index for stroke/SEE, major bleeding (MB), and cardiovascular (CV) death. The RI for stroke/SEE, MB, and CV death was comparable in patients treated with warfarin or DOACs. The lowest RI was in DM patients treated with Rivaroxaban (stroke/SEE, RI = 0.08; CV death, RI = 0.13). The RIs for bleeding were higher in DM patients treated with Dabigatran (RI110 = 0.32; RI150 = 0.40). Our study is the first to use RI to homogenize the efficacy and safety data reported in the DOACs pivotal studies against warfarin in patients with and without DM. Anticoagulation therapy is effective and safe in DM patients. DOACs appear to have a better efficacy and safety profile than warfarin. The use of DOACs is a reasonable alternative to vitamin-K antagonists in AF patients with DM. The RI can be a reasonable tool to help clinicians choose between DOACs or warfarin in the peculiar set of AF patients with DM.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T.J Jernberg ◽  
E.O Omerovic ◽  
E.H Hamilton ◽  
K.L Lindmark ◽  
L.D Desta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Additional Risk Factor ◽  
Additional Risk

Abstract Background Left ventricular dysfunction after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with poor outcome. The PARADISE-MI trial is examining whether an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (HF) in this population. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and prognosis of different subsets of post-MI patients in a real-world setting. Additionally, the prognostic importance of some common risk factors used as risk enrichment criteria in the PARADISE-MI trial were specifically examined. Methods In a nationwide myocardial infarction registry (SWEDEHEART), including 87 177 patients with type 1 MI between 2011–2018, 3 subsets of patients were identified in the overall MI cohort (where patients with previous HF were excluded); population 1 (n=27 568 (32%)) with signs of acute HF or an ejection fraction (EF) &lt;50%, population 2 (n=13 038 (15%)) with signs of acute HF or an EF &lt;40%, and population 3 (PARADISE-MI like) (n=11 175 (13%)) with signs of acute HF or an EF &lt;40% and at least one risk factor (Age ≥70, eGFR &lt;60, diabetes mellitus, prior MI, atrial fibrillation, EF &lt;30%, Killip III-IV and STEMI without reperfusion therapy). Results When all MIs, population 1 (HF or EF &lt;50%), 2 (HF or EF &lt;40%) and 3 (HF or EF &lt;40% + additional risk factor (PARADISE-MI like)) were compared, the median (IQR) age increased from 70 (61–79) to 77 (70–84). Also, the proportion of diabetes (22% to 33%), STEMI (38% to 50%), atrial fibrillation (10% to 24%) and Killip-class &gt;2 (1% to 7%) increased. After 3 years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of death or readmission because of heart failure in the overall MI population and in population 1 to 3 was 17.4%, 26.9%, 37.6% and 41.8%, respectively. In population 2, all risk factors were independently associated with death or readmission because of HF (Age ≥70 (HR (95% CI): 1.80 (1.66–1.95)), eGFR &lt;60 (1.62 (1.52–1.74)), diabetes mellitus (1.35 (1.26–1.44)), prior MI (1.16 (1.07–1.25)), atrial fibrillation (1.35 (1.26–1.45)), EF &lt;30% (1.69 (1.58–1.81)), Killip III-IV (1.34 (1.19–1.51)) and STEMI without reperfusion therapy (1.34 (1.21–1.48))) in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. The risk increased with increasing number of risk factors (Figure 1). Conclusion Depending on definition, post MI HF is present in 13–32% of all MI patients and is associated with a high risk of subsequent death or readmission because of HF. The risk increases significantly with every additional risk factor. There is a need to optimize management and improve outcomes for this high risk population. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document