P1731High-sensitivity troponin with sex-specific thresholds in suspected acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K K Lee ◽  
A V Ferry ◽  
A Anand ◽  
F E Strachan ◽  
A R Chapman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Thresholds ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background/Introduction Major disparities between women and men in the diagnosis, management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome are well recognised. Whether sex-specific diagnostic thresholds for myocardial infarction will address these differences is uncertain. Purpose To evaluate the impact of implementing a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with sex-specific diagnostic thresholds for myocardial infarction in women and men with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Methods In a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial across ten hospitals we evaluated the implementation of a hs-cTnI assay in 48,282 (47% women) consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. During a validation phase the hs-cTnI assay results were suppressed and a contemporary cTnI assay with a single threshold was used to guide care. Myocardial injury was defined as any hs-cTnI concentration >99th centile of 16 ng/L in women and 34 ng/L in men. The primary outcome was myocardial infarction after the initial presentation or cardiovascular death at 1 year. In this prespecified analysis, we evaluated outcomes in men and women before and after implementation of the hs-cTnI assay. Results Use of the hs-cTnI assay with sex-specific thresholds increased myocardial injury in women by 42% (from 3,521 (16%) to 4,991 (22%)) and by 6% in men (from 5,068 (20%) to 5,369 (21%)). Whilst treatment increased in both sexes, women with myocardial injury remained less likely than men to undergo coronary revascularisation (15% versus34%), or to receive dual anti-platelet (26% versus43%), statin (16% versus26%) or other preventative therapies (P<0.001 for all). The primary outcome occurred in 18% (369/2,072) and 17% (488/2,919) of women with myocardial injury during the validation and implementation phase respectively (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.33), compared to 18% (370/2,044) and 15% (513/3,325) of men (adjusted hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.01). Patient management Conclusion Use of sex-specific thresholds identified five-times more additional women than men with myocardial injury, such that the proportion of women and men with myocardial injury is now similar. Despite this increase, women received approximately half the number of treatments for coronary artery disease as men and their outcomes were not improved. Acknowledgement/Funding The British Heart Foundation

scholarly journals Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management: A prespecified subgroup analysis from VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 510-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Völz ◽  
Oskar Angerås ◽  
Sasha Koul ◽  
Inger Haraldsson ◽  
Giovanna Sarno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Transradial Access

Aims: In the Bivalirudin versus Heparin in ST-Segment and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients on Modern Antiplatelet Therapy in the Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated according to Recommended Therapies Registry Trial (VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART), bivalirudin was not superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management. We assessed whether the access site had an impact on the primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction or major bleeding at 180 days and whether it interacted with bivalirudin/unfractionated heparin. Methods and results: A total of 6006 patients with acute coronary syndrome planned for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomised to either bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin. Arterial access was left to the operator discretion. Overall, 90.5% of patients underwent transradial access and 9.5% transfemoral access. Baseline risk was higher in transfemoral access. The unadjusted hazard ratio for the primary outcome was lower with transradial access (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.43–0.67, p<0.001) and remained lower after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.52–0.84, p<0.001). Transradial access was associated with lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.28–0.60, p<0.001) and major bleeding (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.44–0.75, p<0.001). There was no interaction between treatment with bivalirudin and access site for the primary endpoint ( p=0.976) or major bleeding ( p=0.801). Conclusions: Transradial access was associated with lower risk of death, myocardial infarction or major bleeding at 180 days. Bivalirudin was not associated with less bleeding, irrespective of access site.

scholarly journals Impact of timing of randomization after an acute coronary syndrome and subsequent events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the EXAMINE trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Elharram ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
W White ◽  
G Bakris ◽  
P Rossignol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The timing of enrolment following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and potentially treatment effect in clinical trials. Using a large contemporary trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) post-ACS, we examined the impact of timing of enrolment on subsequent CV outcomes. Methods EXAMINE was a randomized trial of alogliptin versus placebo in 5380 patients with T2DM and a recent ACS. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], or non-fatal stroke. The median follow-up was 18 months. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the occurrence of subsequent CV events by timing of enrollment divided by tertiles of time from ACS to randomization: 8–34, 35–56, and 57–141 days. Results Patients randomized early (compared to the latest times) had less comorbidities at baseline including a history of heart failure (HF; 24.7% vs. 33.0%), prior coronary artery bypass graft (9.6% vs. 15.9%), or atrial fibrillation (5.9% vs. 9.4%). Despite the reduced comorbidity burden, the risk of the primary outcome was highest in patients randomized early compared to the latest time (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.47; 95% CI 1.21–1.74) (Figure 1). Similarly, patients randomized early had an increased risk of recurrent MI (aHR 1.51; 95% CI 1.17–1.96) and HF hospitalization (1.49; 95% CI 1.05–2.10). Conclusion In a contemporary cohort of T2DM with a recent ACS, early randomization following the ACS increases the risk of CV events including recurrent MI and HF hospitalization. This should be taken into account when designing future clinical trials. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Takeda Pharmaceutical

scholarly journals Short-term prognostic effect of prior cerebrovascular and peripheral artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Can we do better?

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 652-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipa Cordeiro ◽  
Pedro S Mateus ◽  
Alberto Ferreira ◽  
Silvia Leao ◽  
Miguel Moz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Prior Stroke

Background: We sought to evaluate the impact of prior cerebrovascular and/or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Methods: From 1 October 2010 to 26 February 2016, 13,904 acute coronary syndrome patients were enrolled in a national multicentre registry. They were divided into four groups: prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack (stroke/TIA); prior PAD; prior stroke/TIA and PAD; none. The endpoints included in-hospital mortality and a composite endpoint of death, re-infarction and stroke during hospitalization. Results: 6.3% patients had prior stroke/TIA, 4.2% prior PAD and 1.4% prior stroke/TIA and PAD. Prior stroke/TIA and/or PAD patients were less likely to receive evidence-based medical therapies (dual antiplatelet therapy: stroke/TIA= 88.6%, PAD= 86.6%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 85.7%, none= 92.2%, p<0.001; β-blockers: stroke/TIA= 77.1%, PAD= 72.1%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 71.9%, none= 80.8%, p<0.001; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers: stroke/TIA= 86.3%, PAD= 83.6%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 83.2%, none= 87.1%, p=0.030) and to undergo percutaneous revascularization (stroke/TIA= 52.8%, PAD= 45.6%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 43.7%, none= 67.9%, p<0.001), despite more extensive coronary artery disease (three-vessel disease: stroke/TIA= 29.1%, PAD= 38.3%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 38.3%, none= 20.2%, p<0.001). In a multivariable analysis, prior stroke/TIA+PAD was a predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio= 2.828, 95% confidence interval 1.001–7.990) and prior stroke/TIA (odds ratio= 1.529, 95% confidence interval 1.056–2.211), prior PAD (odds ratio= 1.618, 95% confidence interval 1.034–2.533) and both conditions (odds ratio= 3.736, 95% confidence interval 2.002–6.974) were associated with the composite endpoint. Conclusion: A prior history of stroke/TIA and/or PAD was associated with lower use of medical therapy and coronary revascularization and with worst short-term prognosis. An individualized management may improve their poor prognosis.

scholarly journals Prognostic Implication of Non-Obstructive Coronary Lesions: A New Classification in Different Settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1863
Author(s):  
Jorge Rodríguez-Capitán ◽  
Andrés Sánchez-Pérez ◽  
Sara Ballesteros-Pradas ◽  
Mercedes Millán-Gómez ◽  
Rosa Cardenal-Piris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cardiovascular Prognosis ◽  
Artery Disease

The clinical significance of non-obstructive coronary artery disease is the subject of debate. Our objective was to evaluate the long-term cardiovascular prognosis associated with non-obstructive coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography, and to conduct a stratification by sex, diabetes, and clinical indication. We designed a multi-centre retrospective longitudinal observational study of 3265 patients that were classified into three groups: normal coronary arteries (lesion <20%, 1426 patients), non-obstructive coronary artery disease (20–50%, 643 patients), and obstructive coronary artery disease (>70%, 1196 patients). During a mean follow-up of 43 months, we evaluated a combined cardiovascular event: acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models showed a worse prognosis in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease, in comparison with patients of normal coronary arteries group, in the total population (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.23–2.39; p for trend <0.001), in non-diabetics (hazard ratio 2.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.40–3.22), in women (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.10–2.77), and after acute coronary syndrome (hazard ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.25–3.44). In conclusion, non-obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with an impaired long-term cardiovascular prognosis. This association held for non-diabetics, women, and after acute coronary syndrome.

scholarly journals Prognostic values of fasting hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: A prospective cohort study

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 589-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baris Gencer ◽  
Fabio Rigamonti ◽  
David Nanchen ◽  
Roland Klingenberg ◽  
Lorenz Räber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
University Medicine ◽  
Fasting Hyperglycaemia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
One Year

Background: Controversy remains regarding the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome and its prognostic value for long-term outcomes. Methods and results: We evaluated the prevalence of hyperglycaemia (defined as fasting glycaemia ⩾10 mmol/l) among patients with no known diabetes at the time of enrolment in the prospective Special Program University Medicine-Acute Coronary Syndromes cohort, as well as its impact on all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and incidence of diabetes at one year. Among 3858 acute coronary syndrome patients enrolled between December 2009–December 2014, 709 (18.4%) had known diabetes, while 112 (3.6%) of non-diabetic patients had hyperglycaemia at admission. Compared with non-hyperglycaemic patients, hyperglycaemic individuals were more likely to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and acute heart failure. At discharge, hyperglycaemic patients were more frequently treated with glucose-lowering agents (8.9% vs 0.66%, p<0.001). At one-year, adjudicated all-cause death was significantly higher in non-diabetic patients presenting with hyperglycaemia compared with patients with no hyperglycaemia (5.4% vs 2.2%, p=0.041) and hyperglycaemia was a significant predictor of one-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.03–5.56). Among patients with hyperglycaemia, 9.8% had developed diabetes at one-year, while the corresponding proportion among patients without hyperglycaemia was 1.8% ( p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, hyperglycaemia at presentation predicted the onset of treated diabetes at one-year (odds ratio 4.15, 95% confidence interval 1.59–10.86; p=0.004). Conclusion: Among non-diabetic patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome, a fasting hyperglycaemia of ⩾10 mmol/l predicted one-year mortality and was associated with a four-fold increased risk of developing diabetes at one year.

scholarly journals Effect of Apabetalone on Cardiovascular Events in Diabetes, CKD, and Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

2021 ◽  
pp. CJN.16751020
Author(s):  
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh ◽  
Gregory G. Schwartz ◽  
Stephen J. Nicholls ◽  
Kevin A. Buhr ◽  
Henry N. Ginsberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Background and objectivesCKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus interact to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (i.e., cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke) and congestive heart failure. A maladaptive epigenetic response may be a cardiovascular risk driver and amenable to modification with apabetalone, a selective modulator of the bromodomain and extraterminal domain transcription system. We examined this question in a prespecified analysis of BETonMACE, a phase 3 trial.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsBETonMACE was an event-driven, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing effects of apabetalone versus placebo on major adverse cardiovascular events and heart failure hospitalizations in 2425 participants with type 2 diabetes and a recent acute coronary syndrome, including 288 participants with CKD with eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at baseline. The primary end point in BETonMACE was the time to the first major adverse cardiovascular event, with a secondary end point of time to hospitalization for heart failure.ResultsMedian follow-up was 27 months (interquartile range, 20–32 months). In participants with CKD, apabetalone compared with placebo was associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events (13 events in 124 patients [11%] versus 35 events in 164 patients [21%]; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.96) and fewer heart failure–related hospitalizations (three hospitalizations in 124 patients [3%] versus 14 hospitalizations in 164 patients [9%]; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.86). In the non-CKD group, the corresponding hazard ratio values were 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.24) for major adverse cardiovascular events, and 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.27) for heart failure–related hospitalization. Interaction of CKD on treatment effect was P=0.03 for major adverse cardiovascular events, and P=0.12 for heart failure–related hospitalization. Participants with CKD showed similar numbers of adverse events, regardless of randomization to apabetalone or placebo (119 [73%] versus 88 [71%] patients), and there were fewer serious adverse events (29% versus 43%; P=0.02) in the apabetalone group.ConclusionsApabetalone may reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes who have a high burden of cardiovascular disease.

Abstract 10982: Persistence of “Gender Gap” in St-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Networks

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Fernández-Rodríguez ◽  
Ander Regueiro ◽  
Xavier Freixa ◽  
Marc Trilla ◽  
Mónica Masotti
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Prognosis and management of women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction remains controversial. Hypothesis: The gender (female sex) influences the prognosis and the care of patients in a regional myocardial infarction network. Methods: Outcomes of patients activated by the Catalan network between January 2010 and December 2011, were analyzed according to gender. Time intervals, revascularization proportion, type of revascularization, in-hospital all-cause mortality and complications, 30-day all-cause mortality and one-year all-cause mortality were evaluated. Results: From a total of 5831 patients activated by the myocardial infarction network, 4380 patients had a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 961 (21.9%) of them were women. Women were older (69.8±13.4 vs. 60.6±12.8, p<0.001), had a higher prevalence of diabetes (27.1% vs. 18.1%, pI (24.9% vs. 17.3%, p<0.001), and no reperfusion (8.8% vs. 5.2%, p<0.001) as compared with men. In addition, women had greater time delays in medical care (first medical contact-to-balloon: 132-minutes vs. 122-minutes, p<0.001; symptoms onset-to-balloon: 236-minutes vs. 210-minutes, p<0.001). Women presented higher percentages of overall in-hospital complications (20.6% vs. 17.4%, p=0.031), in-hospital mortality (4.8% vs. 2.6%, p=0.001), 30-day mortality (9.1% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and one-year mortality (14.0% vs. 8.3%, p<0.001) compared with men. Nevertheless, after multivariate adjustment, no differences in 30-day and one-year mortality were observed (30-day adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.25 [0.94-1.65], p=0.123; one-year adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.88 [0.69-1.07], p=0.128). . Conclusions: Despite a higher risk profile and poorer medical management, women present similar 30-day and one-year outcome as their male counterparts in the context of myocardial infarction network.

Abstract 1517: Does Angiogram Make A Difference In The Outcome Of Acute Coronary Syndrome? A Study On Sex Difference In Outcomes In South America.

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Bugiardini ◽  
Florencia Rolandi ◽  
Oscar Bazzino ◽  
Olivia Manfrini ◽  
Andres Pascua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Significant Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Artery Disease

HYPOTHESIS. Women presenting with acute coronary syndrome are less likely to have significant coronary artery disease (CAD) than men, which could narrow wide differences in sex outcomes when evaluating the study population as a whole. METHODS. The Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry enrolled 823 patients (591 men and 232 women) who had been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation and had undergone cardiac catheterization. We explored sex-based differences in presentation and outcomes, sorted by angiographic groups: obstructive (≥50% stenosis, accordingly to quantitative computerized analysis) versus non-obstructive CAD. Patients were followed up for 6 months. RESULTS. In obstructive CAD, women were older than men (71.4 ± 9.7 versus 64.4 ± 11.1 years, p<0.001), and had significantly higher rates of hypertension (51.9% versus 39.7%, p<0.001). Women were less likely to have smoked (19.3% versus 29.8%, p<0.01). A smaller percentage of women than men had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction as an index event (7.7% versus 22.8%, p<0.001) and positive troponin value (51.3% versus 67.4%, p<0.01). At follow-up women showed no differences in myocardial infarction, rehospitalization for unstable angina or revascularization, but they did suffer an increased rate of cardiovascular death (8.4% versus 3.4%, p<0.01), with a hazard ratio 2.34 (95%CI: 1.13– 4.84, p=0.023). Relation between sex and death remained significant even after adjustment for any confounders (hazard ratio 2.48; 95%CI: 1.19–5.15, p=0.015). In non-obstructive CAD group, the clinical characteristics and prognostic end-points (death: 0% men versus 1% women) did not significantly differ between men and women. CONCLUSIONS. In conclusion, women with obstructive CAD suffer an increased rate of cardiovascular death after acute coronary syndrome. Inclusion of large numbers of women with non-obstructive coronary disease in calculations based on the entire cohort may mistakenly shift results toward apparent outcome similarity with men.

The Timed Up and Go test and the ageing heart: Findings from a national health screening of 1,084,875 community-dwelling older adults

2019 ◽  
pp. 204748731988211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohyun Chun ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Kyungdo Han ◽  
Jin Hyung Jung ◽  
Bongseong Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Group 3

Aim This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Timed Up and Go test performance and the incidence of older adult heart diseases and mortality. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,084,875 older adults who participated in a national health screening program between 2009–2014 (all aged 66 years old). Participants free of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation at baseline were included and were divided into Group 1 (<10 s), Group 2 (10−20 s) and Group 3 (≥20 s) using the Timed Up and Go test scores. The endpoints were incident myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and all-cause mortality. Results During mean follow-up of 3.6 years (maximum 8.0 years), 8885 myocardial infarctions, 10,617 congestive heart failures, 15,322 atrial fibrillations, and 22,189 deaths occurred. Compared with participants in Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 participants had higher incidences of myocardial infarction (Group 3: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval = 1.11–1.77), congestive heart failure (Group 3: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval = 1.31–1.94) and total mortality (Group 3: adjusted hazard ratio=1.93, 95% confidence interval = 1.69–2.20). The additional risks remained after adjusting for multiple conventional risk factors. For atrial fibrillation, a linear trend of increased risk was observed with slower Timed Up and Go test speed, but was statistically marginal (Group 3: adjusted hazard ratio=1.17, 95% confidence interval=0.96–1.44). Conclusion Slower Timed Up and Go test speed is associated with increased risk of developing myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and mortality in older adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document