The safety of discontinuation of oral anticoagulation therapy after apparently successful atrial fibrillation ablation: a report from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang-Yang Yang ◽  
Xin Du ◽  
Chao Jiang ◽  
Liu He ◽  
Ameenathul M Fawzy ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims We aimed to investigate the safety of discontinuing oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy after apparently successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, using data from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study. Methods and results We identified 4512 consecutive patients who underwent successful AF ablation between August 2011 and December 2017. Of them, 3149 discontinued OAC 3 months post-ablation (Off-OAC group) and 1363 continued OAC beyond this period (On-OAC group). Regular follow-up examinations were undertaken to detect AF recurrence, monitor OAC therapy, and measure clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes included thromboembolic and major bleeding (MB) events experienced beyond 3 months after ablation. Low thromboembolic and MB event rates were noted in the on-treatment analysis. The incidence rates for thromboembolism were 0.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.76] and 0.86 (95% CI 0.56–1.30) per 100 patient-years, and that for MB events were 0.19 (95% CI 0.11–0.34) and 0.35 (95% CI 0.18–0.67) per 100 patient-years, for the Off-OAC and On-OAC groups over mean follow-up periods of 24.2 ± 14.7 and 23.0 ± 13.6 months, respectively. Similar results were observed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Previous history of ischaemic stroke (IS)/transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/systemic embolism (SE) [hazard ratio (HR) 3.40, 95% CI 1.92–6.02; P < 0.01] and diabetes mellitus (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.20–3.55, P = 0.01) were independently associated with thromboembolic events, while OAC discontinuation (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41–1.23, P = 0.21) remained insignificant in multivariable analysis. Conclusions This study suggests that it may be safe to discontinue OAC in post-ablation patients under diligent monitoring, in the absence of AF recurrence, history of IS/TIA/SE, and diabetes mellitus. However, further large-scale randomized trials are required to confirm this. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-OCH-13003729. URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=5831.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.F Esteves ◽  
L Parreira ◽  
M Fonseca ◽  
J.M Farinha ◽  
J Ferreira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background CHA2DS2-VASc risk score is the main determinant for maintaining anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, irrespective of the procedure outcome. The presence of aortic plaques is included in the score, but isn't regularly assessed previously to AF ablation. This way, risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) other than arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus may influence stroke risk in patients with AF, albeit not being included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Purpose We sought to evaluate the prevalence of aortic plaques diagnosed during transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in patients submitted to AF ablation and to assess its determinants and clinical impact on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Methods Retrospective study of patients submitted to AF ablation that performed TOE prior to the procedure, with assessment of aortic plaques. CHA2DS2-VASc risk score was evaluated in the pre-ablation patient evaluation and reassessed after TOE. Demographic, clinical and echocardiographic data, including cardiovascular risk factors, were analyzed. We assessed AF recurrence rate, cerebrovascular events and death during follow-up. Results 120 patients were submitted to TOE prior to AF ablation from November 2015 to December 2020, mean age 66.6 (±9.55) years, 48% male. In 30 (25%) patients aortic plaques were identified in TOE. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc was 2.2 (±1.47) in pre-ablation evaluation and 2.5 (±1.69) post-TOE, increasing in all patients with aortic plaques and prompting beginning of oral anticoagulation in 5 patients. AF was paroxysmal in 74% and persistent in 26% of patients, mean duration of 6.28 (±3.76) years. Arterial hypertension was present in 79 (66%) of patients, type 2 diabetes mellitus in 24 (20%) and dyslipidemia in 67 (56%). 17 (14%) patients had a prior stroke. During a mean follow-up of 30 (±18.3) months, 32 (27%) patients had AF recurrence and 10 (8%) were submitted to redo procedures. 107 (89%) patients remained under oral anticoagulation, stroke occurred in 1 patient and 2 patients died. In univariate analysis, age, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia predicted an increase in CHA2DS2-VASc score after TOE (respectively, OR 1.113, 95% CI 1.041–1.190, p-value 0.002; OR 2.907, 95% CI 1.145–7.379, p-value 0.025; and OR 2.442, 95% CI 1.016–5.868, p-value 0.046). In multivariate analysis, age is the only independent predictor of increased CHA2DS2-VASc score after TOE (OR 1.095, 95% CI 1.013–1.185, p-value 0.023). No risk factor for CAD was independently associated with the presence of aortic plaques (Table 1). Conclusion In this population, single CAD risk factors were not independent predictors of aortic plaques. If TOE had not been performed prior to AF ablation, 25% of patients would have had an underestimated CHA2DS2-VASc score and would be off anticoagulation after the procedure, unprotected from thromboembolic events. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Table 1


EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1476-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Donnellan ◽  
Oussama M Wazni ◽  
Mohamed Kanj ◽  
Bryan Baranowski ◽  
Paul Cremer ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Obesity decreases arrhythmia-free survival after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by mechanisms that are not fully understood. We investigated the impact of pre-ablation bariatric surgery (BS) on AF recurrence after ablation. Methods and results In this retrospective observational cohort study, 239 consecutive morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related complications) were followed for a mean of 22 months prior to ablation. Of these patients, 51 had BS prior to ablation, and our primary outcome was whether BS was associated with a lower rate of AF recurrence during follow-up. Adjustment for confounding was performed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and propensity-score based analyses. During a mean follow-up of 36 months after ablation, 10/51 patients (20%) in the BS group had recurrent AF compared with 114/188 (61%) in the non-BS group (P < 0.0001). In the BS group, 6 patients (12%) underwent repeat ablation compared with 77 patients (41%) in the non-BS group, (P < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, the association between BS and lower AF recurrence remained significant. Similarly, after weighting and adjusting for the inverse probability of the propensity score, BS was still associated with a lower hazard of AF recurrence (hazard ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.39; P = 0.002). Conclusion Bariatric surgery is associated with a lower AF recurrence after ablation. Morbidly obese patients should be considered for BS prior to AF ablation, though prospective multicentre studies should be performed to confirm our novel finding.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Tanaka ◽  
KOICHI INOUE ◽  
Atsushi Kobori ◽  
Kazuaki Kaitani ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto ◽  
...  

Background: Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of death in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of AF is effective for maintaining sinus rhythm though its impact on heart failure still remains controversial. Purpose: We sought to elucidate whether AF recurrence following RFCA was associated with subsequent HF hospitalizations. Methods: We conducted a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, observational study. A total of 4931 consecutive patients who underwent an initial RFCA for AF with longer than 1-year of follow-up in 26 centers were enrolled (average age, 64±10 years; non-paroxysmal AF, 35.7%). The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years. The primary endpoint was an HF hospitalization more than 1-year after the index RFCA. We compared the patients without AF recurrences (group A) to those with AF recurrences within 1-year post RFCA (group B). Results: The 1-year cumulative incidence of AF recurrences after a single procedure was 30.7% (group A=3418, group B=1513 patients). Group B had a lower body mass index (group A vs. group B,24.1±3.6 vs. 23.8±3.4 kg/m 2 , p=0.014), longer history of AF (1.9 vs. 3.1 years, p<0.0001), higher prevalence of non-paroxysmal AF (32.1% vs. 33.9%, p<0.0001), and valvular heart disease (5.9% vs. 7.8%, p=0.013). They also had a lower ejection fraction (63.7±9.4% vs. 62.8±9.6%, p=0.0043) and larger left atrial dimeter (39.7±6.6 vs. 40.6±7.0 mm, p<0.0001) on echocardiography. Hospitalizations for HF were observed in 57 patients (1.14%) more than 1-year after the RFCA and were significantly higher in group B than group A (group A vs. group B, 0.91% vs 1.72%, log-rank p=0.019). Conclusions: Among AF patients receiving RFCA, those with AF recurrences were at a greater risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalizations than those without AF recurrences. Recognition that AF recurrence following RFCA is a risk factor for a subsequent HF-related hospitalization is appropriate in clinical practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H E Lim ◽  
J Ahn ◽  
S J Han ◽  
J Shim ◽  
Y H Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Risk factors for the occurrence of embolic stroke (ES) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have not been fully elucidated. Our aim was to assess incidence of ES during long-term follow-up following AF ablation and to identify predicting factors associated with post-ablation ES. Methods We enrolled patients who experienced ES after AF ablation and body mass index-matched controls from AF ablation registries. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) was assessed using multislice computed tomography prior to ablation. Results A total of 3,464 patients who underwent AF ablation were recruited. During a mean follow-up of 47.2 months, ES occurred in 47 patients (1.36%) with a mean CHA2DS2-VAS score of 2.15 and overall incidence of ES was 0.34 per 100 patients/year. Compared with control group (n=190), ES group had more higher prior thromboembolic event and AF recurrence rates, larger LA size, lower creatinine clearance rate (CCr), and greater total and periatrial EAT volumes although no differences in AF type, CHA2DS2-VASc score, ablation extent, and anti-thrombotics use were found. On multivariate regression analysis, a prior history of thromboembolism, CCr, and periatrial EAT volume were independently associated with ES occurrence after AF ablation. Cox regression analysis Risk factor Univariate Multivariate HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value Age 1.017 (0.984–1.051) 0.31 Prior thromboembolism 2.488 (1.134–5.460) 0.023 2.916 (1.178–7.219) 0.021 CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.139 (0.899–1.445) 0.282 CCr 0.984 (0.970–0.999) 0.038 0.982 (0.996–0.998) 0.029 LA diameter (mm) 1.070 (1.012–1.130) 0.017 1.072 (0.999–1.150) 0.054 EAT_total (ml) 1.020 (1.010–1.029) <0.001 1.008 (0.993–1.023) 0.297 EAT_periatrial (ml) 1.085 (1.045–1.126) <0.001 1.065 (1.005–1.128) 0.032 PVI + additional ablation 0.846 (0.460–1.557) 0.592 No anticoagulant use 0.651 (0.346–1.226) 0.184 Recurrence 2.011 (1.007–4.013) 0.048 1.240 (0.551–2.793) 0.603 CCr, creatinine clearance rate; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; LA, left atrium; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation. K-M curve for stroke-free survival Conclusions Incidence of ES after AF ablation was lower than expected rate based on CHA2DS2-VASc score even though anticoagulants use was limited. Periatrial EAT volume, a prior thromboembolism event, and CCr were independent factors in predicting ES irrespective of AF recurrence and CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients who underwent AF ablation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Wang ◽  
Yi-Jia Wang ◽  
Zhi-Yu Liu ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
Ya-wei Kong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recurrence after atrial fibrillation(AF) ablation has many risk factors. the relationship between the recurrence rate after ablation and IR in the non-diabetic patients with AF is not clear.MethodsRetrospective cohort study enrolled AF patients without diabetes who underwent ablation between 2018~2019 in the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) was calculated and a value of ≥2.69 was defined as insulin resistant(IR). The patients were categaried into two groups: those with HOMA‐IR<2.69 in group 1(n=163); HOMA‐IR≥2.69 in group 2 (n=69). Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were performed to compare the risk of AF recurrence after ablation. The definition of AF recurrence was documented AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting >30 seconds recorded in ECG or 24‐hour Holter monitoring after 3 months blanking period.Results232 AF patients receiving ablation were enrolled and the median age was 59.5±11.3 years . There were 166 cases of paroxysmal AF and 66 cases of persistent AF. Patients with IR (n=69)were more likely to have Dyslipidemia, higher fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin than those in non-IR group. Patients with IR also were more likely to recieve antiarrhythmic drugs before ablation. After a mean follow‐up of 322±85 days, 62(26.7%) patients had documented recurrence of AF. Multivariable analysis showed that HOMA-IR value and left atrial diameter(LAD)were independent risk factors for recurrence after AF ablation (HR: 1.259, 95% CI:1.086~1.460, P=0.002; HR: 1.043, 95% CI:1.005~1.083, P=0.025; respectively).ConclusionsHOMA-IR and LAD are independent risk factors for AF recurrence after ablation in patients without diabetes.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Papakonstantinou ◽  
E Simantirakis ◽  
E Kanoupakis ◽  
F Parthenakis ◽  
P Vardas

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements The study was supported by Medtronic Inc Background The natural history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after the first clinical AF episode is not well known. AF burden is of clinical significance as it may have clinical implications concerning the long-term management of the arrhythmia and the decision-making on AF patients.  Purpose To observe the natural history of AF in patients after their first clinical paroxysmal AF episode.  Methods Thirty consecutive patients (age 66.9 ± 10 years; 14 men) received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) after their first symptomatic paroxysmal AF episode. We recorded the AF recurrences and burden (clinical and subclinical AF) during a follow-up period of three years. We excluded patients with persistent or permanent AF and patients with an episode of AF attributed to reversible or transient causes.  Results Eight patients (26.6%) did not present any AF recurrence during the first year of the follow-up period. Five patients (16.6%) did not also suffer any AF episode during the second year, while in three patients (10%) no AF episode was recorded during the three-year follow-up period. In 16 patients (53.3%) the AF burden was increased during the second year of follow-up period while in 9 patients (30%) the AF burden was decreased. During the third year of follow-up period the AF burden was increased in 19 patients (63.3%), decreased in 7 patients (23.3%) and remained almost the same in 4 patients (13.3%). Five patients (16.6%) presented at least one episode of persistent AF during the follow-up period. Seven patients (23.3%) suffered only from symptomatic AF episodes, while in nine patients (30%) only asymptomatic AF episodes were recorded. Eleven patients (36.7%) had both types of AF episodes (symptomatic and asymptomatic).  Conclusions The AF recurrence and burden increased in most AF patients during the three-year follow-up period. However, some patients did not suffer any AF recurrence or they presented a decrease in AF burden. Paroxysmal AF clinical profile differs among the AF patients significantly and this indicates that an individualized approach via long-term rhythm monitoring may be of clinical significance, at least in some newly diagnosed AF patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Nunes Ferreira ◽  
N Cortez-Dias ◽  
P Silverio Antonio ◽  
G Lima Silva ◽  
I Goncalves ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation presents suboptimal results in patients (pts) with persistent long-lasting forms (LSPAF, AF ≥12 months). Recently, the STAR AF-II trial has shown that in these pts complex additional strategies do not improve success compared to only performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Objectives To evaluate the success of AF ablation, particularly in long-standing persistent AF Methods Single-center prospective study of pts with AF submitted to ablation. The strategy, regardless of the type of AF, was based on PVI, complemented by cavo-tricuspid isthmus line (CTI) in pts with history of flutter. Additional ablation strategies were selectively considered in pts with stable atypical flutter conversion, persistent triggers or no electrograms in the VPs. Pts were monitored with Holter/7-day event loop recorder (3, 6, 12 months and annually up to 5 years). Success was assessed from the 90th day after ablation, with the absence of recurrences of any sustained atrial arrhythmias (>30 sec). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival were used to compare the success of ablation as a function of the clinical type of AF in our population and with pts included in STAR-II AF trial. Results 620 patients were submitted to AF ablation, 67% male, 58±12 years, including 78 pts (13%) with LSPAF - pts with paroxysmal and persistent short duration AF represented 61% and 26% of the population. In LSPAF, VPI was performed with irrigated catheter (N=33), PVAC (N=44) or nMARQ (N=1), complemented by CTI ablation in 15, linear left atrial lesions in 3, ablation of areas of low voltage in 3 and elimination of fractionated electrograms in 1 patient. With a median follow-up of 426 days (94–989), the 3-year success rate after a single procedure was 53% in LSPAF, lower than that observed in patients with paroxysmal AF (69%) or short-duration persistent AF (61%) - LogRank P=0.002. The risk of arrhythmias was double in LSPAF vs paroxysmal AF (HR: 2.0; P=0.001). However, after an average of 1.2 procedures/patient, the success rate in LSPAF was 80% at 3 years, comparable to that observed for other types of AF (Log Rank 2.5, p=0.29). Effectively, the long-term success rate of our LSPAF pts treated with PVI and very selective additional strategies was higher than that observed in the STAR-II AF pts treated with PVI and indiscriminate complex ablations (80% vs. 69%, t-test p<0.001, with similar mean follow-up). Conclusions AF ablation is more effective if it is performed earlier in the natural history of the disease. However, even in LSPAF, high success rates are achieved through PVI-based ablation strategies, although more procedures are required.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Giehm-Reese ◽  
M B Kronborg ◽  
P Lukac ◽  
S B Kristiansen ◽  
J M Nielsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Cavo tricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) is an effective first-line treatment for typical atrial flutter (AFL). However, many patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful CTIA. Knowledge about recurrent arrhythmia after CTIA mainly comes from small cohort studies with limited follow-up. Purpose To describe incidences of AFL re-ablation and AF-ablation after first-time CTIA in a nation-wide cohort. Method In the Danish National Ablation Registry we identified patients undergoing first-time CTIA during 2010–2016. Subsequent CTIA and AF-ablation procedures were identified until March 1st, 2018. We gathered information on patient comorbidities in the Danish National Patient Registry. Results We identified 2409 patients undergoing first-time CTIA. Median age was 66 (IQR 58–72) years, and 1952 (81%) were men. 78 (3%) had a history of AF. Acute procedural succes was achieved in 2288 (95%) patients. During mean follow-up of 4±1.7 years, 242 (10%) patients underwent CTI re-ablation and 326 (13.5%) ablation for AF. Baseline characteristics associated with CTI re-ablation included prolonged procedural time, unsuccessful first CTIA, age<75 years and CHA2DS2-VASc score<2. Hypertension, history of AF, age<65 years and CHA2DS2-VASc score<2 were associated with later AF-ablation (Table). Predictive characteristics Characteristics associated with CTI re-ablation HR 95% CI p-value Procedural time 1.003 (1.001–1.006) 0.01 Unsuccesful first CTIA procedure 3.42 (2.10–5.55) <0.0001 Age <75 years 1.52 (1.03–2.26) 0.04 CHA2DS-VAS2c score <2 1.45 (1.11–1.90) 0.01 Characteristics associated with later AF-ablation   Hypertension 1.31 (1.02–1.69) 0.04   History of AF 1.70 (1.07–2.71) 0.03   Age <65 years 2.38 (1.89–3.01) <0.0001   CHA2DS-VAS2c score <2 1.77 (1.40–2.45) <0.0001 AF: Atrial fibrillation; HR: Hazard ratio. All HR's are adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, iscemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney disease and history of AF using Cox regression analysis. Conclusion In a nation-wide cohort undergoing CTIA for AFL, 10% of patients underwent CTI re-ablation and 13.5% were ablated for AF during mean follow-up of 4±1.7 years. Probability of undergoing a second ablation procedure was higher in younger patients with less comorbidity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Nasso ◽  
Roberto Lorusso ◽  
Marco Moscarelli ◽  
Giuseppe De Martino ◽  
Angelo M. Dell’Aquila ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The debate on the best treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has expanded following the introduction of the so-called “hybrid procedure” that combines minimally invasive epicardial ablation with endocardial catheter ablation. However, the advantage of the hybrid approach over conventional epicardial ablation remains to be established. Methods From June 2008 to December 2020, 609 surgical AF ablation procedures through a right minithoracotomy were performed at our institution. From 2008 to 2011, a unipolar radiofrequency (RF) device was used, whereas from 2011 to 2020 a bipolar RF device was used. In addition, between September 2016 and April 2017, 60 patients underwent endocardial completion of epicardial linear ablation. In 30 of these latter patients, surgical isolation of the Bachmann’s bundle (BB) was also performed. Starting from 2021, surviving patients at follow-up were asked to undergo electrocardiographic evaluation and left ventricular function assessment and to complete a questionnaire addressing quality of life and predisposing factors for recurrent AF. Results The ablation procedure was completed in all patients. Upon discharge, 30 (4.9%) patients showed recurrence of AF, whereas the remaining patients (95.1%) were in sinus rhythm. All patients in whom a hybrid approach was used either with or without BB ablation were discharged in sinus rhythm. After a mean follow-up of 74 months, 122 (20%) patients developed recurrent AF, including 19.9% in whom a unipolar RF device was used, 21% in whom a bipolar RF device was used, 23% who had undergone a hybrid procedure without BB ablation and 3.3% who had undergone a hybrid procedure with BB ablation. On multivariate analysis, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, worsening of European Heart Rhythm Association symptom class, and cognitive impairment or depression during follow-up were found to be significantly associated with AF recurrence. Conclusions Surgical AF ablation through a right minithoracotomy is safe and may allow the creation of additional linear lesions, particularly in the BB. The placement of adjunctive linear lesions in the setting of a hybrid procedure can be more effective in reducing the risk for AF recurrence than isolated surgical ablation or hybrid ablation without the addition of further linear lesions, with no incremental risk to the patient.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Proietti ◽  
J Gumprecht ◽  
A Farcomeni ◽  
G.F Romiti ◽  
G.Y.H Lip

Abstract Introduction The role of diabetes mellitus in determining of major adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is well-established. Little is known about fasting plasma glucose (FPG) visit-to-visit variability (VVV) and its impact on outcomes. Aim To analyse the role of FPG-VVV in determining major adverse outcomes in AF patients. Second, to evaluate the prognostic impact of history of diabetes mellitus and antidiabetic regimens. Methods Warfarin-treated patients from the SPORTIF trials were considered for analysis if they had FPG evaluation at baseline and at least 4 determinations throughout follow-up. Standard deviation (SD) of the mean of FPG throughout follow-up was the main measure of VVV, according to its quartiles (SD-Qs). A composite of cardiovascular events and the occurrence of all-cause death was the adverse outcome considered. Results Among the 3665 patients originally included, 3415 (93.2%) were included in this analysis. Throughout a mean (±SD) of 577.59 (±122.09) days of follow-up patients in the highest SD-Q (SD-Q4) had the highest rate of the composite outcome and all-cause death [Figure]. A Cox multi-regression analysis confirmed that SD-Q4 had a significant independent association with occurrence of composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10–2.35) [Figure, Upper Panel], with a non-significant trend for all-cause death, [Figure, Lower Panel]. If no significant impact of history of diabetes mellitus was found, there was a significant impact on the composite outcome of the various antidiabetic regimes: there was no difference found in patients treated with oral antidiabetics, compared to no antidiabetic treatment, but those patients treated with insulin (±oral antidiabetics) were independently associated with the occurrence of composite outcome (HR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.05–5.38) (Table). Conclusion In AF patients treated with warfarin, patients with the highest FPG-VVV had an increased rate of outcomes and the largest FPG-VVV being significantly associated with the composite outcome of adverse clinical events. In diabetic patients, use of insulin is independently associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome, reflecting the more severe disease in determining adverse events amongst AF patients. Major Adverse Outcomes Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document