scholarly journals Meiotic Recombination Initiated by a Double-Strand Break in rad50Δ Yeast Cells Otherwise Unable to Initiate Meiotic Recombination

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 741-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Malkova ◽  
L Ross ◽  
D Dawson ◽  
Merl F Hoekstra ◽  
J E Haber
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs ◽  
The Times ◽  
Rad50 Gene

Abstract Meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs). We have developed a system to compare the properties of meiotic DSBs with those created by the site-specific HO endonuclease. HO endonuclease was expressed under the control of the meiotic-specific SPO13 promoter, creating a DSB at a single site on one of yeast's 16 chromosomes. In Rad+ strains the times of appearance of the HO-induced DSBs and of subsequent recombinants are coincident with those induced by normal meiotic DSBs. Physical monitoring of DNA showed that SPO13::HO induced gene conversions both in Rad+ and in rad50Δ cells that cannot initiate normal meiotic DSBs. We find that the RAD50 gene is important, but not essential, for recombination even after a DSB has been created in a meiotic cell. In rad50Δ cells, some DSBs are not repaired until a broken chromosome has been packaged into a spore and is subsequently germinated. This suggests that a broken chromosome does not signal an arrest of progression through meiosis. The recombination defect in rad50Δ diploids is not, however, meiotic specific, as mitotic rad50 diploids, experiencing an HO-induced DSB, exhibit similar departures from wild-type recombination.

scholarly journals Coordination of the Initiation of Recombination and the Reductional Division in Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Jiao ◽  
Steven A Bullard ◽  
Laura Salem ◽  
Robert E Malone
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Proper Timing ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs ◽  
Reductional Division

Abstract Early exchange (EE) genes are required for the initiation of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cells with mutations in several EE genes undergo an earlier reductional division (MI), which suggests that the initiation of meiotic recombination is involved in determining proper timing of the division. The different effects of null mutations on the timing of reductional division allow EE genes to be assorted into three classes: mutations in RAD50 or REC102 that confer a very early reductional division; mutations in REC104 or REC114 that confer a division earlier than that of wild-type (WT) cells, but later than that of mutants of the first class; and mutations in MEI4 that do not significantly alter the timing of MI. The very early mutations are epistatic to mutations in the other two classes. We propose a model that accounts for the epistatic relationships and the communication between recombination initiation and the first division. Data in this article indicate that double-strand breaks (DSBs) are not the signal for the normal delay of reductional division; these experiments also confirm that MEI4 is required for the formation of meiotic DSBs. Finally, if a DSB is provided by the HO endonuclease, recombination can occur in the absence of MEI4 and REC104.

scholarly journals The Mitotic DNA Damage Checkpoint Proteins Rad17 and Rad24 Are Required for Repair of Double-Strand Breaks During Meiosis in Yeast

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 855-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miki Shinohara ◽  
Kazuko Sakai ◽  
Tomoko Ogawa ◽  
Akira Shinohara
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs ◽  
Γ Ray ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

Abstract We show here that deletion of the DNA damage checkpoint genes RAD17 and RAD24 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae delays repair of meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) and results in an altered ratio of crossover-to-noncrossover products. These mutations also decrease the colocalization of immunostaining foci of the RecA homologs Rad51 and Dmc1 and cause a delay in the disappearance of Rad51 foci, but not of Dmc1. These observations imply that RAD17 and RAD24 promote efficient repair of meiotic DSBs by facilitating proper assembly of the meiotic recombination complex containing Rad51. Consistent with this proposal, extra copies of RAD51 and RAD54 substantially suppress not only the spore inviability of the rad24 mutant, but also the γ-ray sensitivity of the mutant. Unexpectedly, the entry into meiosis I (metaphase I) is delayed in the checkpoint single mutants compared to wild type. The control of the cell cycle in response to meiotic DSBs is also discussed.

scholarly journals A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection

Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 355 (6320) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni P. Mimitou ◽  
Shintaro Yamada ◽  
Scott Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Naked Dna ◽  
Global View ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
End Resection

DNA double-strand breaks that initiate meiotic recombination are exonucleolytically processed. This 5′→3′ resection is a central, conserved feature of recombination but remains poorly understood. To address this lack, we mapped resection endpoints genome-wide at high resolution inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Full-length resection requires Exo1 exonuclease and the DSB-responsive kinase Tel1, but not Sgs1 helicase. Tel1 also promotes efficient and timely resection initiation. Resection endpoints display pronounced heterogeneity between genomic loci that reflects a tendency for nucleosomes to block Exo1, yet Exo1 also appears to digest chromatin with high processivity and at rates similar to naked DNA in vitro. This paradox points to nucleosome destabilization or eviction as a defining feature of the meiotic resection landscape.

scholarly journals Tex19.1 Regulates Meiotic DNA Double Strand Break Frequency in Mouse Spermatocytes

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Crichton ◽  
Christopher J. Playfoot ◽  
Marie MacLennan ◽  
David Read ◽  
Howard J. Cooke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genetic Pathway ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromosome Synapsis ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs

AbstractMeiosis relies on the SPO11 endonuclease to generate the recombinogenic DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) required for homologous chromosome synapsis and segregation. The number of meiotic DSBs needs to be sufficient to allow chromosomes to search for and find their homologs, but not excessive to the point of causing genome instability. Here we report that meiotic DSB frequency in mouse spermatocytes is regulated by the mammal-specific gene Tex19.1. We show that the chromosome asynapsis previously reported in Tex19.1-/- spermatocytes is preceded by reduced numbers of recombination foci in leptotene and zygotene. Tex19.1 is required for the generation of normal levels of Spo11-dependent DNA damage during leptotene, but not for upstream events such as MEI4 foci formation or accumulation of H3K4me3 at recombination hotspots. Furthermore, we show that mice carrying mutations in the E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR2, a TEX19.1-interacting partner, phenocopy the Tex19.1-/- recombination defects. These data show that Tex19.1 and Ubr2 are required for mouse spermatocytes to generate sufficient meiotic DSBs to ensure that homology search is consistently successful, and reveal a hitherto unknown genetic pathway regulating meiotic DSB frequency in mammals.Author SummaryMeiosis is a specialised type of cell division that occurs during sperm and egg development to reduce chromosome number prior to fertilisation. Recombination is a key step in meiosis as it facilitates the pairing of homologous chromosomes prior to their reductional division, and generates new combinations of genetic alleles for transmission in the next generation. Regulating the amount of recombination is key for successful meiosis: too much will likely cause mutations, chromosomal re-arrangements and genetic instability, whereas too little causes defects in homologous chromosome pairing prior to the meiotic divisions. This study identifies a genetic pathway requiredto generate robust meiotic recombination in mouse spermatocytes. We show that male mice with mutations in Tex19.1 or Ubr2, which encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase that interacts with TEX19.1, have defects in generating normal levels of meiotic recombination. We show that the defects in these mutants impact on the recombination process at the stage when programmed DNA double strand breaks are being made. This defect likely contributes to the chromosome synapsis and meiotic progression phenotypes previously described in these mutant mice. This study has implications for our understanding of how this fundamental aspect of genetics and inheritance is controlled.

scholarly journals Vilya, a component of the recombination nodule, is required for meiotic double-strand break formation in Drosophila

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathleen M Lake ◽  
Rachel J Nielsen ◽  
Fengli Guo ◽  
Jay R Unruh ◽  
Brian D Slaughter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Actual Process ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Recombination Nodules ◽  
Immuno Electron Microscopy ◽  
Break Formation ◽  
Selection Of

Meiotic recombination begins with the induction of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). In most organisms only a fraction of DSBs become crossovers. Here we report a novel meiotic gene, vilya, which encodes a protein with homology to Zip3-like proteins shown to determine DSB fate in other organisms. Vilya is required for meiotic DSB formation, perhaps as a consequence of its interaction with the DSB accessory protein Mei-P22, and localizes to those DSB sites that will mature into crossovers. In early pachytene Vilya localizes along the central region of the synaptonemal complex and to discrete foci. The accumulation of Vilya at foci is dependent on DSB formation. Immuno-electron microscopy demonstrates that Vilya is a component of recombination nodules, which mark the sites of crossover formation. Thus Vilya links the mechanism of DSB formation to either the selection of those DSBs that will become crossovers or to the actual process of crossing over.

scholarly journals Massive crossover elevation via combination of HEI10 and recq4a recq4b during Arabidopsis meiosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (10) ◽  
pp. 2437-2442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heïdi Serra ◽  
Christophe Lambing ◽  
Catherine H. Griffin ◽  
Stephanie D. Topp ◽  
Divyashree C. Nageswaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Crop Improvement ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs ◽  
Competing Pathways

During meiosis, homologous chromosomes undergo reciprocal crossovers, which generate genetic diversity and underpin classical crop improvement. Meiotic recombination initiates from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are processed into single-stranded DNA that can invade a homologous chromosome. The resulting joint molecules can ultimately be resolved as crossovers. In Arabidopsis, competing pathways balance the repair of ∼100–200 meiotic DSBs into ∼10 crossovers per meiosis, with the excess DSBs repaired as noncrossovers. To bias DSB repair toward crossovers, we simultaneously increased dosage of the procrossover E3 ligase gene HEI10 and introduced mutations in the anticrossovers helicase genes RECQ4A and RECQ4B. As HEI10 and recq4a recq4b increase interfering and noninterfering crossover pathways, respectively, they combine additively to yield a massive meiotic recombination increase. Interestingly, we also show that increased HEI10 dosage increases crossover coincidence, which indicates an effect on interference. We also show that patterns of interhomolog polymorphism and heterochromatin drive recombination increases distally towards the subtelomeres in both HEI10 and recq4a recq4b backgrounds, while the centromeres remain crossover suppressed. These results provide a genetic framework for engineering meiotic recombination landscapes in plant genomes.

scholarly journals The Yeast Motor Protein, Kar3p, Is Essential for Meiosis I

1997 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Bascom-Slack ◽  
Dean S. Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Molecular Motor ◽  
Motor Protein ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Meiosis I

The recognition and alignment of homologous chromosomes early in meiosis is essential for their subsequent segregation at anaphase I; however, the mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. We demonstrate here that, in the absence of the molecular motor, Kar3p, meiotic cells are blocked with prophase monopolar microtubule arrays and incomplete synaptonemal complex (SC) formation. kar3 mutants exhibit very low levels of heteroallelic recombination. kar3 mutants do produce double-strand breaks that act as initiation sites for meiotic recombination in yeast, but at levels severalfold reduced from wild-type. These data are consistent with a meiotic role for Kar3p in the events that culminate in synapsis of homologues.

scholarly journals The cohesion protein ORD is required for homologue bias during meiotic recombination

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley A. Webber ◽  
Louisa Howard ◽  
Sharon E. Bickel
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Sister Chromatid Exchange ◽  
Ring Chromosome ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

During meiosis, sister chromatid cohesion is required for normal levels of homologous recombination, although how cohesion regulates exchange is not understood. Null mutations in orientation disruptor (ord) ablate arm and centromeric cohesion during Drosophila meiosis and severely reduce homologous crossovers in mutant oocytes. We show that ORD protein localizes along oocyte chromosomes during the stages in which recombination occurs. Although synaptonemal complex (SC) components initially associate with synapsed homologues in ord mutants, their localization is severely disrupted during pachytene progression, and normal tripartite SC is not visible by electron microscopy. In ord germaria, meiotic double strand breaks appear and disappear with frequency and timing indistinguishable from wild type. However, Ring chromosome recovery is dramatically reduced in ord oocytes compared with wild type, which is consistent with the model that defects in meiotic cohesion remove the constraints that normally limit recombination between sisters. We conclude that ORD activity suppresses sister chromatid exchange and stimulates inter-homologue crossovers, thereby promoting homologue bias during meiotic recombination in Drosophila.

scholarly journals Mouse TEX15 is essential for DNA double-strand break repair and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Yang ◽  
Sigrid Eckardt ◽  
N. Adrian Leu ◽  
K. John McLaughlin ◽  
Peijing Jeremy Wang
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Male Meiosis ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Recombination Proteins ◽  
Meiotic Chromosomes ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

During meiosis, homologous chromosomes undergo synapsis and recombination. We identify TEX15 as a novel protein that is required for chromosomal synapsis and meiotic recombination. Loss of TEX15 function in mice causes early meiotic arrest in males but not in females. Specifically, TEX15-deficient spermatocytes exhibit a failure in chromosomal synapsis. In mutant spermatocytes, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed, but localization of the recombination proteins RAD51 and DMC1 to meiotic chromosomes is severely impaired. Based on these data, we propose that TEX15 regulates the loading of DNA repair proteins onto sites of DSBs and, thus, its absence causes a failure in meiotic recombination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document