scholarly journals Dystonia-causing mutations in the transcription factor THAP1 disrupt HCFC1 cofactor recruitment and alter gene expression

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 2975-2983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronja Hollstein ◽  
Benedikt Reiz ◽  
Lucas Kötter ◽  
Alev Richter ◽  
Susen Schaake ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2371-2371
Author(s):  
Amy E Campbell ◽  
Gerd A. Blobel

Abstract Abstract 2371 Missense mutations in the gene encoding hematopoietic transcription factor GATA1 cause congenital anemias and/or thrombocytopenias. Seven such mutations are reported. All of these give rise to amino acid substitutions within the amino terminal zinc finger (NF) of GATA1, producing a range of clinical phenotypes. Thus, V205M, G208R, and D218Y cause severe anemia and thrombocytopenia; G208S, R216Q, and D218G cause thrombocytopenia with minimal anemia; R216W gives rise to thrombocytopenia and congenital erythropoietic porphyria. One of these mutations, R216Q, occurs at the DNA binding interface and alters the ability of GATA1 to recognize a subset of cis motifs in vitro. Other mutations, including V205M, G208S, D218G, and D218Y, occur outside the DNA binding domain of the NF and inhibit interactions with the GATA1 cofactor FOG1 as determined by in vitro binding assays. However, these two mechanisms do not easily explain the broad spectrum of phenotypes associated with the mutations. For example, how do two substitutions of the same residue bring about disparate phenotypes? We examined the effects of each mutation on erythroid maturation, lineage-specific gene expression, in vivo target gene occupancy, and cofactor recruitment by introducing altered forms of GATA1 into murine GATA1-null proerythroblasts. The V205M, G208R, and D218Y mutations severely impaired erythroid maturation, recapitulating patient phenotypes. The G208S mutation also severely impaired erythroid maturation, causing a more pronounced defect than that expected from the clinical presentation. In contrast, R216Q and D218G produced mild effects in erythroid cells consistent with patient phenotypes. The porphyria-associated mutation R216W also produced relatively subtle effects in erythroid cells. We note that among the mutants, failure to activate gene expression strongly correlated with failure to repress gene expression. ChIP assays revealed that the V205M, G208R, and D218Y mutations impaired GATA1 target site occupancy. This indicates that despite normal DNA binding in vitro, the association with cofactor complexes is required for stable binding to chromatinized target sites in vivo. In contrast, the G208S mutant exhibited relatively normal chromatin occupancy, but reduced recruitment of FOG1 and SCL/Tal1 to GATA1-bound sites at erythroid genes. D218G also perturbed cofactor recruitment without greatly affecting GATA1 binding to its target genes. Notably, this mutation diminished SCL/Tal1 recruitment without significantly altering FOG1 occupancy. This implicates the SCL/Tal1 transcription complex in the pathogenesis of disorders caused by certain GATA1 mutations. Moreover, by uncoupling GATA1 chromatin occupancy and cofactor recruitment, G208S and D218G offer potentially useful tools for unraveling site-specific mechanisms of GATA1-regulated gene expression. Finally, both the R216Q and R216W mutants displayed relatively normal GATA1 chromatin occupancy and FOG1 and SCL/Tal1 recruitment at most sites. R216W presents as porphyria, and selective defects in the regulation of heme biosynthetic genes have yet be uncovered. Given that R216Q presents as thrombocytopenia, defects caused by this mutation may be revealed only in the context of megakaryocytes. Studies using similar rescue assays of a GATA1-null megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor line are underway and will be discussed. In concert, our results reveal that in vivo analysis of GATA1 in its native environment provides mechanistic insights not obtainable from in vitro studies. Moreover, they demonstrate the usefulness of gene complementation assays for the dissection of transcription pathways surrounding normal and altered GATA1 to improve our understanding of disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (48) ◽  
pp. 30639-30648
Author(s):  
Dan Hu ◽  
Emily C. Tjon ◽  
Karin M. Andersson ◽  
Gabriela M. Molica ◽  
Minh C. Pham ◽  
...  

IL-17–producing Th17 cells are implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and TNF-α, a proinflammatory cytokine in the rheumatoid joint, facilitates Th17 differentiation. Anti-TNF therapy ameliorates disease in many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to this therapy. The impact of anti-TNF therapy on Th17 responses in RA is not well understood. We conducted high-throughput gene expression analysis of Th17-enriched CCR6+CXCR3−CD45RA−CD4+T (CCR6+T) cells isolated from anti-TNF–treated RA patients classified as responders or nonresponders to therapy. CCR6+T cells from responders and nonresponders had distinct gene expression profiles. Proinflammatory signaling was elevated in the CCR6+T cells of nonresponders, and pathogenic Th17 signature genes were up-regulated in these cells. Gene set enrichment analysis on these signature genes identified transcription factor USF2 as their upstream regulator, which was also increased in nonresponders. Importantly, short hairpin RNA targetingUSF2in pathogenic Th17 cells led to reduced expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-17A, IFN-γ, IL-22, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as well as transcription factor T-bet. Together, our results revealed inadequate suppression of Th17 responses by anti-TNF in nonresponders, and direct targeting of the USF2-signaling pathway may be a potential therapeutic approach in the anti-TNF refractory RA.


2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.


Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1021
Author(s):  
Carla Abrahamian ◽  
Christian Grimm

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is the principal transcription factor regulating pivotal processes in melanoma cell development, growth, survival, proliferation, differentiation and invasion. In recent years, convincing evidence has been provided attesting key roles of endolysosomal cation channels, specifically TPCs and TRPMLs, in cancer, including breast cancer, glioblastoma, bladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and melanoma. In this review, we provide a gene expression profile of these channels in different types of cancers and decipher their roles, in particular the roles of two-pore channel 2 (TPC2) and TRPML1 in melanocytes and melanoma. We specifically discuss the signaling cascades regulating MITF and the relationship between endolysosomal cation channels, MAPK, canonical Wnt/GSK3 pathways and MITF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 23.2-24
Author(s):  
Y. P. Tsao ◽  
F. Y. Tseng ◽  
C. W. Chao ◽  
M. H. Chen ◽  
S. T. Chen

Background:Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with diverse etiological factors. It was recognized that interferon (IFN) signature involved in the progress of SLE. NLRP12 (NOD-like receptor family (NLR) pyrin domain containing 12) is a pyrin containing NLR protein that we had linked its new biological function to the cross-regulation of Toll like receptor (TLRs) and Rig-I like receptor (RIG-I) pathways. NLPR12 acts as an innate immune check-point in regulating type I IFNs expression during TLRs and RIG-I activation. The importance of NLRP12 in lupus disease activity remained to be elucidated.Objectives:To clarify the role of NLRP12 in regulating the interferon signature.Methods:Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from SLE patients and healthy donors for analysis of NLRP12 and IFN-α gene expression by RT-QPCR. PBMCs were applied for Chromatin immuneprecipitation (ChIP) assay and electrical mobility shift assay (EMSA) to determine the putative transcription factor that regulates NLRP12 expression. An involvement of epigenetic regulation of NLRP12 expression in SLE patients was also analyzed. Bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were collected from wild type mouse and Nlrp12 knocked-out mice. Another CD14+ monocytes were isolated from 10 cases of lupus patients and 8 cases of healthy control, following by stimulating different type of nucleic acids, and IFN-α and IL-6 were measured with ELISA assay. CD14+ monocytes in lupus patients were also pre-treated with IFNAR2 antibody for further nucleic acid stimulation. Two mice models were applied for evaluation the role of Nlrp12: intraperitoneal injection of TMPD (2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane, or pristane) in C57BL/6 mice and Faslpr mice. Both models were conducted with and without Nlrp12 knockout.Results:NLRP12 expression was significantly lower in PBMC isolated from SLE patients compared to healthy donors. The inverse correlation was observed in NLRP12 and IFNA gene expression as well as NLRP12 expression and amount of double-stranded DNA autoantibody in SLE patients. NLRP12 expression showed negative correlations with IFN-α treatment, as well as herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection. Results from ChIP and EMSA analysis indicated a potential transcription factor 1 (TF-1) regulating NLRP12 promoter activity. TF-1 lead to transcriptional suppression of NLRP12 in SLE PBMC, and it was gradually induced after IFN treatment. Recruitment of TF-1 to NLRP12 promoter in SLE PBMC compared to the healthy PBMC was detected, and increased when treating with IFN. Human CD14+ monocytes collected from lupus and healthy control stimulating with different type of nucleic acids revealing significant increasing level of IFN-α and IL-6 in lupus patients. Among animal models, both pristine induced mice and Faslpr mice revealed increasing autoantibodies production and severity of glomerulonephritis in Nlrp12-/- group in comparison with Nlrp12+/+ ones, indicating the role of NLRP12 in maintaining positive interferon signature as well as disease activity.Conclusion:Expression level of NLRP1.2 has been demonstrated to be a biomarker of disease activity in SLE patients. The NLRP12 was involved in the interferon signature, which was also negatively regulated by TF-1. Both clinical samples and animal models revealed NLRP12 in maintaining the positive interferon signature, indicating the possible role of exacerbating factor for lupus disease activity.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document