scholarly journals Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: systematic review with meta-analyses

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-160
Author(s):  
Mia Schmidt-Hansen ◽  
James E Hawkins ◽  
Jonathan Lord ◽  
Kelly Williams ◽  
Patricia A Lohr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Contraceptive Device ◽  
Simultaneous Administration ◽  
Products Of Conception ◽  
Contraceptive Implant ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Satisfaction Rates

Abstract BACKGROUND Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are safe, effective and convenient post-abortal methods. However, there is concern that some LARCs may reduce the effectiveness of abortifacient drugs or result in other adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We undertook two systematic reviews to examine the early administration of LARCs in women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. (i) For women who are having a medical abortion and who plan to use a progestogen-only contraceptive implant or injectable, does administration of the contraception at the same time as mifepristone influence the efficacy of the abortion? (Implant/injectable review). (ii) For women who have had a medical abortion, how soon after expulsion of the products of conception is it safe to insert an intrauterine contraceptive device/system? (LNG-IUS/Cu-IUD review). SEARCH METHODS On 19 November 2018, we searched Embase Classic, Embase; Ovid MEDLINE(R) including Daily and Epub Ahead-of-Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations; the Cochrane Library; Cinahl Plus; and Web of Science Core Collection. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), in English from 1985 (Implant/injectable review) or 2007 (LNG-IUS/Cu-IUD review) onwards, conducted in women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol and studying either (i) simultaneous administration of mifepristone and a progestogen-only contraceptive implant or injectable compared to administration >24 h after mifepristone, or (ii) immediate insertion of intrauterine contraception after expulsion of the products of conception compared to early insertion (≤7 days) or to delayed insertion (>7 days) or early compared to delayed insertion. One author assessed the risk of bias in the studies using the Cochrane Collaboration checklist for RCTs. All the outcomes were analysed as risk ratios and meta-analysed in Review Manager 5.3 using the Mantel–Haenszel statistical method and a fixed-effect model. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. OUTCOMES Two RCTs (n = 1027) showed lower ‘subsequent unintended pregnancy’ rates and higher ‘patient satisfaction’ rates, and no other differences, after simultaneous administration of mifepristone and the implant compared to delayed administration. One RCT (n = 461) showed higher ‘patient satisfaction’ rates after simultaneous administration than after delayed administration of mifepristone and the injectable, but no other differences between these interventions. Three RCTs (n = 536) found no differences other than higher copper IUC uptake after early compared to delayed insertion at ≤9 weeks of gestation and higher rates of IUC expulsion, continuation and uptake after immediate compared to delayed insertion at 9+1–12+0 weeks of gestation and higher IUC continuation rates after immediate compared to delayed insertion at 12+1–20+0 weeks of gestation. The quality of this evidence ranged from very low to high and was mainly compromised by low event rates, high attrition and no blinding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The contraceptive implant or injectable should be offered on the day of taking mifepristone. Intrauterine methods of contraception should be offered as soon as possible after expulsion of the pregnancy.

Simultaneous compared to interval administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10+0 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2019-200448
Author(s):  
Mia Schmidt-Hansen ◽  
Jonathan Lord ◽  
Elise Hasler ◽  
Sharon Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

BackgroundMedical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol usually involves an interval of 36–48 hours between administering these drugs; however, it is possible that the clinical efficacy at early gestations may be maintained when the drugs are taken simultaneously. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous compared with interval administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for abortion up to 10+0 weeks’ gestation.MethodsWe searched Embase Classic, Embase; Ovid MEDLINE(R) including Daily, and Epub Ahead-of-Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations; and Cochrane Library on 11 December 2019. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published in English from 1985, comparing simultaneous to interval administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for early abortion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration checklist for RCTs. Meta-analysis of risk ratios (RRs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method were performed. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.ResultsMeta-analyses of three RCTs (n=1280) showed no differences in ‘ongoing pregnancy’ (RR 1.78, 95% CI 0.38 to 8.36), ‘haemorrhage requiring transfusion or ≥500 mL blood loss’ (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.03) and ‘incomplete abortion with the need for surgical intervention’ (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.25) between the interventions. Individual study results showed no difference in patient satisfaction, or ‘need for repeat misoprostol’, although ‘time to onset of bleeding or cramping’ was longer after simultaneous than interval administration. The quality of evidence was very low to moderate.ConclusionThe published data support the use of simultaneous mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion up to 9+0 weeks in women who prefer this method of administration.

Surgical or medical abortion of pregnancies between 13+0 and 23+6 weeks’ gestation? A systematic review and new NICE national guidelines

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2019-200460
Author(s):  
Mia Schmidt-Hansen ◽  
Patricia A Lohr ◽  
Sharon Cameron ◽  
Elise Hasler
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Cervical Injury ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundAbortion in the second trimester may be performed surgically or medically. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness, safety and acceptability/satisfaction of surgical compared with medical abortion of pregnancy between 13+0 and 23+6 weeks’ gestation for a new national guideline.MethodsWe searched Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Library on 4 March 2019. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs; any size) and non-randomised comparative studies with n≥100 in each arm, published in English from 1985. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration checklist for RCTs. Meta-analysis of risk ratios (RRs)used the Mantel-Haenszel method. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.ResultsTwo RCTs (n=140) were included. ‘Incomplete abortion requiring surgical intervention’ was clinically significantly higher with medical than surgical methods (RR=4.58, 95% CI 1.07 to 19.64). ‘Abortion completed by the intended method’ was statistically, but not clinically, significantly lower after medical than surgical methods, but was marked by high between-study heterogeneity (RR=0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.98). To the extent that ‘haemorrhage requiring transfusion/≥500 mL blood loss’, ‘uterine injury’, ‘cervical injury requiring repair’ and ‘infection reported within 1 month of abortion’ were reported, they did not differ significantly between methods. Depending on measurement method, ‘patient satisfaction/acceptability’ was either clinically significantly higher or comparable after surgical than medical methods. The quality of this evidence was limited by low event rates and attrition bias.ConclusionBased on this evidence and consensus, women should be offered the choice of medical or surgical methods of abortion between 13+0 and 23+6 weeks’ gestation, unless not clinically appropriate.

Instruments for Measuring Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 1690-1700
Author(s):  
Daniel Gutiérrez-Sánchez ◽  
David Pérez-Cruzado ◽  
Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Health Measurement ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Objective Several instruments to measure patient satisfaction have been developed to assess satisfaction with physical therapy care. The selection of the most appropriate instrument is very important. The purpose of this study was to identify instruments for assessing satisfaction with physical therapy care and their psychometric properties and to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on psychometric properties. Methods A systematic search was conducted in ProQuest Medline, SciELO, ProQuest PsycINFO, Theseus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Articles published from 1990 to 2019, in English and Spanish, were used as limits. This systematic review followed the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. The articles were evaluated by 2 independent reviewers using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments 4-point checklist. Eighteen studies were included. Results Nine instruments were found to be specifically designed to assess satisfaction with physical therapy care. The methodological quality of the studies was “fair” for most of the psychometric characteristics analyzed (43 items), with 24 properties scored as “poor,” 5 as “good,” and 3 as “excellent.” Conclusions Different instrument characteristics—such as the scope and population with which the instrument will be used, its dimensions, the number of items, and the evidence shown in the evaluation of each psychometric property—should be considered by clinicians and researchers to decide which instrument is the best to measure the construct of patient satisfaction with physical therapy. Impact Evaluating patient satisfaction is very useful in clinical practice at the hospital, community, and primary care levels. Physical therapist clinicians and researchers can use this systematic review to select instruments whose characteristics will best measure their patients’ satisfaction with physical therapy care.

scholarly journals The Prevalence and Side Effect of Nexplanon in Baghdad

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (43) ◽  
pp. 3689-3693
Author(s):  
Dalya Thamer Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Contraceptive Device ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Low Sexual Desire ◽  
Contraceptive Implant ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Intermittent Bleeding ◽  
Key Indicators ◽  
Subcutaneous Implant

BACKGROUND Nexplanon is a pregnancy-prevention device that is both safe and reliable. It is a novel reversible long-term contraceptive technique. It's a modern long-acting contraceptive device with a subcutaneous implant that releases etonogestrel (ENG). The main objective of this research was to determine the distribution, tolerability, and adverse reactions of Nexplanon among females who used it in Baghdad and find any relationship between these side effects and the acceptability of the device among contraceptive users. METHODS This study was done via the participation of 80 women who were using Nexplanon at the time of study or had recently removed the implant; the data was obtained from a direct interview and medical records. RESULTS The total number of women enrolled for the study was 80. The mean age of contributors was 33.24 (± 2.69) years. None of the participants was nulliparous; 15 % had two children, 85 % had three or more children. Of the participants, 26.25 % and 65 % had secondary and higher education degrees respectively, while only 7 % had primary education and none of the participants had any education. 6.25 % were smokers, only 28.75 % had irregular cycle and the remaining percentage had a regular one. 57 (71.25 %) of them underwent adverse events while using the contraceptive implant, the most common one was bleeding disorders most likely in the form of light intermittent bleeding. 69 (86.25 %) from those only 18 (26.08 %) removed implant because of this irritant bleeding, the next common adverse event was headache 44 (55 %), 8 (18.18 %) of them removed the implant because of headache, 41 (51.25 %) underwent variable mood swing changes, 36 (45 %) suffered from weight gain with use of the implant, 33 (41.25 %) nausea and bowel habits changes, androgenic effects presented in 19 (23.75 %) and 10 (12.5 %) in the form of acne and hirsutism, respectively. 3 (10.34 %) of them removed the device as they could not cope with this complication, only 6 (7.5 %) suffered from low sexual desire. CONCLUSIONS Nexplanon can be a suitable alternative for women who have been adequately informed about long-term contraception but bleeding disturbances and cycle durations (> 8 days) are also key indicators for early removal. The process of consulting the patient and giving them the appropriate educational advice on this subject should be a priority before using the implant, in addition to establishing special induction and educational programs. KEY WORDS Nexplanon, Contraception Method Contraception Method, A Subcutaneous Implant and Etonogestrel.

Temporal Augmentation: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (03) ◽  
pp. 217-225
Author(s):  
Sammy Othman ◽  
Jason E. Cohn ◽  
Jacob Burdett ◽  
Srihari Daggumati ◽  
Jason D. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Primary Literature ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Key Terms ◽  
Satisfaction Rates ◽  
Procedural Choice

AbstractClinicians employ various modalities in order to achieve temporal augmentation; however, no literature comprehensively describes these methods or provides perspective on available options. Understanding the available methodologies for cosmetic temporal augmentation allows for improved patient satisfaction with limited risk of complications. To synthesize the available literature on cosmetic temporal augmentation, including all available methodologies, patient satisfaction data, and complication rates, as well as to identify gaps in the available literature to encourage further research. A literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Using the key terms “temporal” or “temple” and “augmentation” or “rejuvenation,” all article formats presenting primary literature data involving cosmetic temporal augmentation were included. Articles not presenting patient data or not discussing cosmetic indications were eliminated. A total of 12 articles were deemed appropriate for analysis. Of the 12 articles included, 6 (50%) evaluated filler techniques, 3 discussed fat grafting (25%), and 3 reviewed solid implant (25%) techniques. Eight (67%) of these were retrospective reviews, with the remaining being prospective trials (33%). All studies found high patient satisfaction rates and a small number of complications with their respective methodology. Several methods are employed for cosmetic temporal augmentation, including various types of injectable fillers, solid implants, and fat grafting, with all reporting successful satisfaction and complication outcomes. Further research is necessary to properly compare these modalities. Clinician discretion should guide procedural choice until future well-controlled studies are able to provide standardized outcomes.

scholarly journals Rubber band ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grade II–III haemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Dekker ◽  
I. J. M. Han-Geurts ◽  
H. D. Rørvik ◽  
S. van Dieren ◽  
W. A. Bemelman
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Rubber Band Ligation ◽  
Rubber Band ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to review clinical outcome of haemorrhoidectomy and rubber band ligation in grade II–III haemorrhoids. Methods A systematic review was conducted. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO International Trial Registry Platform were searched, from inception until May 2018, to identify randomised clinical trials comparing rubber band ligation with haemorrhoidectomy for grade II–III haemorrhoids. The primary outcome was control of symptoms. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, postoperative complications, anal continence, patient satisfaction, quality of life and healthcare costs were assessed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Results Three hundred and twenty-four studies were identified. Eight trials met the inclusion criteria. All trials were of moderate methodological quality. Outcome measures were diverse and not clearly defined. Control of symptoms was better following haemorrhoidectomy. Patients had less pain after rubber band ligation. There were more complications (bleeding, urinary retention, anal incontinence/stenosis) in the haemorrhoidectomy group. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. There were no data on quality of life and healthcare costs except that in one study patients resumed work more early after rubber band ligation. Conclusions Haemorrhoidectomy seems to provide better symptom control but at the cost of more pain and complications. However, due to the poor quality of the studies analysed/it is not possible to determine which of the two procedures provides the best treatment for grade II–III haemorrhoids. Further studies focusing on clearly defined outcome measurements taking patients perspective and economic impact into consideration are required.

scholarly journals Patient Satisfaction With Physiotherapy Services in Libya: A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110331
Author(s):  
Alhadi M. Jahan ◽  
Ali E. Rwaiha ◽  
Sara R. Gusaibat ◽  
Nisrin A. Al-Ahwal ◽  
Zaineb M. Al-Jafairi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Questionnaire Data ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Satisfaction Rates ◽  
Structured Questionnaire

Patient satisfaction (PS) is an essential indicator of the quality of physiotherapy services. However, regarding Libya, there has been a dearth of research on PS. This cross-sectional study aimed to measure PS with outpatient physiotherapy services and to examine the sociodemographic factors that influence the levels of satisfaction in Libya. Patient satisfaction with physiotherapy services was assessed using a reliable, valid, and structured questionnaire. Data were collected from 501 patients, and the participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 79 (mean ± standard deviation = 47.19 ± 12.8), with more females (n = 312) than males (n = 189). Participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the physiotherapy they received in the domains that measure PS. The highest percentage of satisfaction was in the physiotherapists’ attributes and ability to provide detailed explanations to their patients. Patient satisfaction was also associated with gender and occupation, with females and unemployed patients reporting higher satisfaction rates. This highlights the value of surveys administered to patients during treatments, as well as the value of strategies to address the influential factors for the improvement of PS in public physiotherapy clinics in Libya.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation on Motor Impairments, Non-motor Symptoms and Compliance in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Vellata ◽  
Stefano Belli ◽  
Francesca Balsamo ◽  
Andrea Giordano ◽  
Roberto Colombo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Non Motor Symptoms

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease involving a progressive alteration of the motor and non-motor function. PD influences the patient's daily living and reduces participation and quality of life in all phases of the disease. Early physical exercise can mitigate the effects of symptoms but access to specialist care is difficult. With current technological progress, telemedicine, and telerehabilitation is now a viable option for managing patients, although few studies have investigated the use of telerehabilitation in PD. In this systematic review, was investigated whether telerehabilitation leads to improvements in global or specific motor tasks (gait and balance, hand function) and non-motor dysfunction (motor speech disorder, dysphagia). The impact of TR on quality of life and patient satisfaction, were also assessed. The usage of telerehabilitation technologies in the management of cognitive impairment was not addressed.Method: An electronic database search was performed using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, COCHRANE Library, PEDro, and SCOPUS for data published between January 2005 and December 2019 on the effects of telerehabilitation systems in managing motor and non-motor symptoms. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guideline and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020141300).Results: A total of 15 articles involving 421 patients affected by PD were analyzed. The articles were divided into two categories based on their topic of interest or outcome. The first category consisted of the effects of telerehabilitation on gait and balance (3), dexterity of the upper limbs (3), and bradykinesia (0); the second category regarded non-motor symptoms such as speech disorders (8) and dysphagia (0). Quality of life (7) and patient satisfaction (8) following telerehabilitation programs were also analyzed, as well as feasibility and costs.Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is feasible in people affected by PD. Our analysis of the available data highlighted that telerehabilitation systems are effective in maintaining and/or improving some clinical and non-clinical aspects of PD (balance and gait, speech and voice, quality of life, patient satisfaction).Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42020141300.

Quality of life of women using the etonogestrel long-acting reversible contraceptive implant after abortion for unplanned pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-258
Author(s):  
Salvatore Caruso ◽  
Salvatore Giovanni Vitale ◽  
Valentina Fava ◽  
Salvatore Di Pasqua ◽  
Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Unplanned Pregnancy ◽  
Contraceptive Implant ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Long Acting Reversible Contraceptive

scholarly journals Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (682) ◽  
pp. e294-e303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poompong Sripa ◽  
Benedict Hayhoe ◽  
Priya Garg ◽  
Azeem Majeed ◽  
Geva Greenfield
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Direct Access ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundGPs often act as gatekeepers, authorising patients’ access to specialty care. Gatekeeping is frequently perceived as lowering health service use and health expenditure. However, there is little evidence suggesting that gatekeeping is more beneficial than direct access in terms of patient- and health-related outcomes.AimTo establish the impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, health use and expenditure, and health outcomes and patient satisfaction.Design and settingA systematic review.MethodThe databases MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles using a search strategy. Two authors independently screened search results and assessed the quality of studies.ResultsElectronic searches identified 4899 studies (after removing duplicates), of which 25 met the inclusion criteria. Gatekeeping was associated with better quality of care and appropriate referral for further hospital visits and investigation. However, one study reported unfavourable outcomes for patients with cancer under gatekeeping, and some concerns were raised about the accuracy of diagnoses made by gatekeepers. Gatekeeping resulted in fewer hospitalisations and use of specialist care, but inevitably was associated with more primary care visits. Patients were less satisfied with gatekeeping than direct-access systems.ConclusionGatekeeping was associated with lower healthcare use and expenditure, and better quality of care, but with lower patient satisfaction. Survival rate of patients with cancer in gatekeeping schemes was significantly lower than those in direct access, although primary care gatekeeping was not otherwise associated with delayed patient referral. The long-term outcomes of gatekeeping arrangements should be carefully studied before devising new gatekeeping policies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document