scholarly journals Risk for Clostridioides difficile infection among hospitalized patients associated with multiple healthcare exposures prior to admission

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C Miller ◽  
Daniel K Sewell ◽  
Alberto M Segre ◽  
Sriram V Pemmaraju ◽  
Philip M Polgreen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Case Definitions ◽  
Multiple Exposures ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Degree Of Association ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Purpose Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are a common healthcare-associated infection and often used as indicators of hospital safety or quality. However, healthcare exposures occurring prior to hospitalization may increase risk for CDI. We conduct a case-control study comparing hospitalized patients with and without CDI to determine if healthcare exposures prior to hospitalization (i.e., clinic visits, antibiotics, family members with CDI) were associated with increased risk for hospital onset CDI, and how risk varied with time between exposure and hospitalization. Methods Records were collected from a large insurance-claims database from 2001-2017 for hospitalized adult patients. Prior healthcare exposures were identified using inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, and prescription drug claims; results were compared between various CDI case definitions. Results Hospitalized patients with CDI had significantly more frequent healthcare exposures prior to admission. Healthcare visits, antibiotics and family exposures were associated with greater likelihood of CDI during hospitalization. The degree of association diminished with time between exposure and hospitalization. Results were consistent across CDI case definitions. Conclusions Many different prior healthcare exposures appear to increase risk for CDI presenting during hospitalization. Moreover, patients with CDI typically have multiple exposures prior to admission, confounding the ability to attribute cases to a particular stay.

scholarly journals Defining the black box: a narrative review of factors associated with adverse outcomes from severe Clostridioides difficile infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110481
Author(s):  
Adam Ressler ◽  
Joyce Wang ◽  
Krishna Rao
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Chronic Illnesses ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Healthcare Associated

In the United States, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated infection, affecting nearly half a million people and resulting in more than 20,000 in-hospital deaths every year. It is therefore imperative to better characterize the intricate interplay between C. difficile microbial factors, host immunologic signatures, and clinical features that are associated with adverse outcomes of severe CDI. In this narrative review, we discuss the implications of C. difficile genetics and virulence factors in the molecular epidemiology of CDI, and the utility of early biomarkers in predicting the clinical trajectory of patients at risk of developing severe CDI. Furthermore, we identify associations between host immune factors and CDI outcomes in both animal models and human studies. Next, we highlight clinical factors including renal dysfunction, aging, blood biomarkers, level of care, and chronic illnesses that can affect severe CDI diagnosis and outcome. Finally, we present our perspectives on two specific treatments pertinent to patient outcomes: metronidazole administration and surgery. Together, this review explores the various venues of CDI research and highlights the importance of integrating microbial, host, and clinical data to help clinicians make optimal treatment decisions based on accurate prediction of disease progression.

scholarly journals 1016. Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratio (SAAR) and Clostridioides difficile Infection Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR): Are they connected? An Evaluation of 28 Hospitals

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S357-S357
Author(s):  
Danielle Sebastian ◽  
Florian Daragjati ◽  
Karl Saake ◽  
Lisa K Sturm ◽  
Mohamad G Fakih
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agent ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Antibacterial Agents ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Antimicrobial Administration

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are the most prevalent healthcare-associated infection in the U.S. Of all CDIs, most are related to healthcare exposures and are potentially preventable by reducing unnecessary antibiotic use and interrupting patient-to-patient transmission of CDI. Methods The adult SAARs for 4 antimicrobial agent categories were compared with the CDI SIR at 28 facilities with greater than 100 beds across the health system for the calendar year of 2018. The 4 adult antimicrobial agent categories chosen for comparison were: antibacterial agents posing the highest risk for CDI, broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for hospital-onset infections (BSHO), broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for community-acquired infections (BSCA) and all antibacterial agents. Results The 2018 aggregate CDI SIR for the 28 facilities was 0.609. The aggregate SAAR for the adult antimicrobial agent categories were 1.05 for the antibacterial agents posing the highest risk for CDI, 1.05 for BSHO, 0.88 for BSCA, and 1.03 for all antibacterial agents. No correlation was seen between any of the 4 adult SAAR antimicrobial agent categories and the facility CDI SIR (Figure 1–4). Conclusion While reducing unnecessary antibiotics is an important strategy in preventing CDIs, having a higher observed vs. predicted administration ratio in the four antimicrobial agent categories studied was not correlated with a higher CDI SIR, including the CDI SAAR category. Reduction of CDI is challenging requiring a multipronged approach to include infection control strategies, appropriate testing, and antimicrobial stewardship. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: the ever-changing guidelines

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shruti Khurana ◽  
Alyssa Kahl ◽  
Kevin Yu ◽  
Andrew W DuPont
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Antibody Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
The Past ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), formerly known as Clostridium difficile, continues to be the most common healthcare-associated infection worldwide. With the shifting epidemiology towards higher a incidence of community-acquired CDI and the continued burden on the healthcare system posed by high rates of CDI recurrence, there has been an impetus to advance the diagnostic testing and treatment strategies. Recent advancements over the past decade have led to rapidly changing guidelines issued by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. With our comprehensive review, we aim to summarize the latest advances in diagnosing and treating CDI and thus attempt to help readers guide best practices for patient care. This article also focusses on cost-effectiveness of various therapies currently available on the market and provides an analysis of the current evidence on a relatively new monoclonal antibody therapy, Bezlotoxumab, to treat recurrent CDI.

scholarly journals 803. Risk factors associated with Clostridioides difficile infection in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S445-S445
Author(s):  
William Justin Moore ◽  
Caroline C Jozefczyk ◽  
Paul R Yarnold ◽  
Karolina Harkabuz ◽  
Valerie Widmaier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Structural Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background Patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are hospitalized and treated with antibiotics may carry an increased risk for developing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Accurate risk estimation tools are needed to guide monitoring and CDI mitigation efforts. We aimed to identify patient-specific risk factors associated with CDI among hospitalized patients with CAP. Methods Design: retrospective case-control study of hospitalized patients who received CAP-directed antibiotic therapy between 1/1/2014 and 5/29/2018. Cases were hospitalized CAP patients who developed CDI post-admission. Control patients did not develop CDI and were selected at random from CAP patients hospitalized during this period. Variables: comorbidities, laboratory results, vital signs, severity of illness, prior hospitalization, and past antibiotic use. Propensity-score weights: identified via structural decomposition analysis of pre-treatment variables. Analysis: weighted classification tree models that predicted any CDI, hospital-onset CDI, and any healthcare-associated CDI according to CAP antibiotic treatment. Performance: percent accuracy in classification (PAC) and weighted positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). Modeling: completed using the ODA package (v1.0.1.3) for R (v3.5.1). Results A total of 32 cases and 232 controls were identified. Sixty pre-treatment variables were screened. Structural decomposition analysis, completed in two stages, identified prior hospitalization (OR 6.56, 95% CI: 3.01-14.31; PAC: 80.3%) and BUN greater than 29 mg/dL (OR 11.67, 95% CI: 2.41-56.5; PAC: 80.8%) as propensity-score weights. With respect to CDI, receipt of broad-spectrum anti-pseudomonal antibiotics was significantly (all P’s< 0.05) associated with any CDI (NPV: 90.29%, PPV: 27.94%), hospital-onset CDI (NPV: 97.53%, PPV: 26.86%), and healthcare-associated CDI (NPV: 92.89%, PPV: 27.94%). Conclusion We identified risk factors available at hospital admission and empiric use of broad-spectrum Gram-negative antibiotics as being associated with the development of CDI. Model PPVs were over two-fold greater than our sample base rate. Increased monitoring and avoidance of overly broad antibiotic use in high-risk patients appears warranted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Clostridium difficile Infection: An Epidemiology Update

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (02) ◽  
pp. 049-057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. De Roo ◽  
Scott E. Regenbogen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hospitalized Older Adults ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Clostridium (reclassified as “Clostridioides”) difficile infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated infection and significant source of potentially preventable morbidity, recurrence, and death, particularly among hospitalized older adults. Additional risk factors include antibiotic use and severe underlying illness. The increasing prevalence of community-associated CDI is gaining recognition as a novel source of morbidity in previously healthy patients. Even after recovery from initial infection, patients remain at risk for recurrence or reinfection with a new strain. Some pharmaco-epidemiologic studies have suggested an increased risk associated with proton pump inhibitors and protective effect from statins, but these findings have not been uniformly reproduced in all studies. Certain ribotypes of C. difficile, including the BI/NAP1/027, 106, and 018, are associated with increased antibiotic resistance and potential for higher morbidity and mortality. CDI remains a high-morbidity healthcare-associated infection, and better understanding of ribotypes and medication risk factors could help to target treatment, particularly for patients with high recurrence risk.

scholarly journals The interplay of Clostridioides difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110202
Author(s):  
Kanika Sehgal ◽  
Devvrat Yadav ◽  
Sahil Khanna
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Molecular Tests ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
High Index Of Suspicion

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease of the intestinal tract that commonly presents with diarrhea. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common complications associated with IBD that lead to flare-ups of underlying IBD. The pathophysiology of CDI includes perturbations of the gut microbiota, which makes IBD a risk factor due to the gut microbial alterations that occur in IBD, predisposing patients CDI even in the absence of antibiotics. Superimposed CDI not only worsens IBD symptoms but also leads to adverse outcomes, including treatment failure and an increased risk of hospitalization, surgery, and mortality. Due to the overlapping symptoms and concerns with false-positive molecular tests for CDI, diagnosing CDI in patients with IBD remains a clinical challenge. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion for CDI in patients who seem to be experiencing an exacerbation of IBD symptoms. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are the first-line treatments for the management of CDI in IBD. Microbiota restoration therapies effectively prevent recurrent CDI in IBD patients. Immunosuppression for IBD in IBD patients with CDI should be managed individually, based on a thorough clinical assessment and after weighing the pros and cons of escalation of therapy. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, the diagnosis of CDI in IBD, and outlines the principles of management of both CDI and IBD in IBD patients with CDI.

scholarly journals Assessment of Testing and Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Initiated in the Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A Petty ◽  
Valerie M Vaughn ◽  
Scott A Flanders ◽  
Twisha Patel ◽  
Anurag N Malani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Altered Mental Status ◽  
Estimating Equation ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background Reducing antibiotic use in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) has been inpatient focused. However, testing and treatment is often started in the emergency department (ED). Thus, for hospitalized patients with ASB, we sought to identify patterns of testing and treatment initiated by emergency medicine (EM) clinicians and the association of treatment with outcomes. Methods We conducted a 43-hospital, cohort study of adults admitted through the ED with ASB (February 2018–February 2020). Using generalized estimating equation models, we assessed for (1) factors associated with antibiotic treatment by EM clinicians and, after inverse probability of treatment weighting, (2) the effect of treatment on outcomes. Results Of 2461 patients with ASB, 74.4% (N = 1830) received antibiotics. The EM clinicians ordered urine cultures in 80.0% (N = 1970) of patients and initiated treatment in 68.5% (1253 of 1830). Predictors of EM clinician treatment of ASB versus no treatment included dementia, spinal cord injury, incontinence, urinary catheter, altered mental status, leukocytosis, and abnormal urinalysis. Once initiated by EM clinicians, 79% (993 of 1253) of patients remained on antibiotics for at least 3 days. Antibiotic treatment was associated with a longer length of hospitalization (mean 5.1 vs 4.2 days; relative risk = 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.23) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) (0.9% [N = 11] vs 0% [N = 0]; P = .02). Conclusions Among hospitalized patients ultimately diagnosed with ASB, EM clinicians commonly initiated testing and treatment; most antibiotics were continued by inpatient clinicians. Antibiotic treatment was not associated with improved outcomes, whereas it was associated with prolonged hospitalization and CDI. For best impact, stewardship interventions must expand to the ED.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document