56 Reduced Length of Stay with Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Reduces Burn Injuries

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S37-S38
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E Carter ◽  
Blake Platt ◽  
Charles T Tuggle
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cell Suspension ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Skin Cell ◽  
Donor Skin ◽  
Injured Patients

Abstract Introduction Burn injuries remain a surgical challenge with few recent innovations. Grafting with split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) has been the standard of care for decades. Although shown to have mortality benefits, STSGs are associated with significant morbidity in the form of pain and additional open wounds. For years, surgeons have looked for ways to decrease this associated morbidity. To that end, autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) is a recently FDA-approved point of care regenerative medicine technology that reduces donor skin requirements without compromising clinical outcomes. Our study evaluated the cost and length of stay comparing STSG alone versus ASCS. Methods We obtained IRB-approval for single institution, retrospective chart review of patients age >14 years admitted with burn injuries from March 2018 – September 2018. Primary outcome was length of stay/%TBSA for patients undergoing STSG alone as compared to patients undergoing ASCS. The 2016 American Burn Association National Burn Repository (NBR) was used to benchmark LOS/%TBSA. Age, percentage burn injury (TBSA), LOS, mortality, and number of surgeries were reviewed. Student’s t-test was used to assess statistical significance of intragroup analysis. Results 36 patients were treated with ASCS in combination with meshed autografts for full-thickness acute burn injuries. 37 patients were treated with STSGs at our center. Mean age and %TBSA was 45.2 years and 6.6% for the STSG group and 46.0 years and 18.6% for the ASCS group. The LOS/%TBSA for the STSG was 1.72 versus 1.19 for the ASCS patients (p-value=0.02). The NBR predicts a LOS/%TBSA of 3.38 and 3.42 for the STSG and ASCS groups. Patients in the STSG group and ASCS group had statistically similar surgeries and mortalities. Conclusions Burn injured patients treated with ASCS had a decreased LOS/%TBSA when compared to both the STSGs and NBR predictions. ASCS is a novel technology allowing for point-of-care treatment that may decrease LOS for burn injured patients and should be considered as an adjunct to traditional techniques for burn patients. Applicability of Research to Practice Reduced length of stay compared to traditional burn care.

102 Wildfire Burns: Implications for Burn Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S67-S67
Author(s):  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
Kathleen S Romanowski ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
David G Greenhalgh
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Mass Casualty ◽  
Inhalation Injury ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Injury Incidence ◽  
Burn Centers ◽  
Burn Care

Abstract Introduction Climate change, the encroachment of populations into wilderness, and carelessness have combined to increase the incidence of wildfire injuries. With the increased incidence has come an increase in the number of burn injuries. Prolonged extrication, delays in resuscitation, and the extreme fire and toxic air environment in a wildfire has the potential to cause more severe burn injury. The purpose of this study is to examine the demographics and outcomes of wildfire injuries and compare those outcomes to non-wildfire injuries. Methods Charts of patients admitted to a regional burn center during a massive wildfire in 2018 were reviewed for demographic, treatment, and outcome. We then obtained age, gender, and burn size matched controls from within 2 years of the incident, analyzed the same measures, and compared treatment and outcomes between the two groups. Results A total of 20 patients, 10 wildfire (WF) burns and 10 non-wildfire (NWF) burns, were included in the study. Age (59.6±7.8 WF vs. 59.4±7.4 years), total body surface area burn (TBSA) (14.9±4.7 WF vs. 17.2±0.9 NWF) and inhalation injury incidence (2 WF and 2 NWF) were similar between groups. Days on mechanical ventilation (24.3±19.4 WF vs. 9.4±9.8 NWF), length of stay (49.9±21.8 WF vs. 28.2±11.7 days) and ICU length of stay (43.0±25.6 WF vs 24.4±11.2 NWF) were higher in the WF group. WF patients required twice the number of operations. Mortality was similar in both groups (1 death/group). Conclusions Wildfire burn injuries, when compared to age, inhalation injury, and burn size matched controls, require more ventilatory support and have more operations. As a result, they have longer lengths of stay and have a prolonged ICU course. Burn centers should be prepared for the increased resource utilization that accompanies wildfire injuries. Applicability of Research to Practice All burn centers must be prepared for the possibility of wildfires and the increased resource utilzation that accompanies mass casualty events.

96 Treatment of Donor Sites in Large TBSA Burn Injuries with an Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Supports Early Reharvesting

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S62-S63
Author(s):  
Kevin N Foster ◽  
James H Holmes ◽  
William L Hickerson ◽  
Jeffrey W Shupp ◽  
Robert Sheridan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Suspension ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Skin Cell ◽  
Skin Loss ◽  
One Year ◽  
Delayed Closure

Abstract Introduction Treatment of large TBSA burn injuries is often limited by donor site availability and requires reharvesting to obtain definitive closure. Patients with severe injuries may have delayed closure compared to uncompromised patients that typically have their donor sites healed in 7–14 days. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) can be prepared to treat burn wounds at the point-of-care. The safety and effectiveness have not yet been established for use in the treatment of donor sites. This study presents the use of ASCS for the treatment of donor sites in patients with life-threatening burn injuries that were enrolled in a prospective uncontrolled observational study (IDE 15945—NCT02992249). Methods ASCS was applied to the donor site after harvesting of STSGs. Clinical outcomes out to one year were evaluated including percentage of re-epithelialization, long-term cosmetic outcomes, and adverse events. Results Ninety-six subjects from 22 burn centers had their donor sites treated with ASCS as part of their treatment regimen. The average subject age was 30.1 and the average TBSA injury was 53.7 ±17.3%. The mean Baux score was 89.2 with 36% of subjects having a score greater than 100. Collectively, 528 donor sites were individually treated. In this compromised patient population 37.5% were ≥95% re-epithelialized by week 1 (n=435), and by week 2, 82.7% of the donor sites were ≥95% re-epithelialized (n=434), regardless of how many times they were harvested. Approximately 19% of the donor sites treated with ACSC were reharvested multiple times following initial healing (15% two times, 2.3% three times, and 7 donor sites were harvested 4 times) and retreated. Of donor sites harvested more than once, 39.3% (n=84), 81% (n=79), and 85.7% (n=77) of sites were ≥ 95% re-epithelialized by week 1, 2 and 4, respectively. One-year data was available for 427 donor sites and the majority had matched or mildly mismatched color, pigment, and texture. Adverse events included one site with a hematoma, one patient with donor sites that had fragile skin loss secondary to traumatic friction, one patient with active bleeding, two patients with anemia secondary to donor site bleeding, one patient with delayed closure due to mild infection of staph species. All AEs were unlikely or unrelated to the device. Conclusions ASCS has been successfully used to achieve closure of donor site wounds without significant safety risk in patients with extensive burn injuries. Applicability of Research to Practice Application of ASCS for donor site healing may be particularly relevant for patients with large burn injuries requiring subsequent reharvesting to achieve definitive closure.

656 Autologous Skin Cell Suspension is Associated with Decreased Hospital Length of Stay and Limited Surgical Interventions

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S194-S194
Author(s):  
Nicole M Kopari ◽  
Yazen Qumsiyeh
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cell Suspension ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Skin Cell

Abstract Introduction Hospital length of stay is a measure of burn care quality and resource allocation. Traditionally, the average length of stay (LOS) for patients with burns is estimated at 1 day/% total body surface area (TBSA) although the 2016 American Burn Association National Burn Repository predicts closer to 3 days/%TBSA. Recent literature has shown that application of autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) is associated with decreased hospital LOS and therefore is considered economically advantageous. Our study evaluated the LOS as it related to TBSA as well as the number of operations in patients treated with ASCS. Methods This is a single institution, retrospective review of burn patients at an American Burn Associated verified burn center admitted from August 2019 - August 2020 who underwent epidermal autografting. Patients were treated for partial thickness and full thickness burns either with epidermal grafting alone or in combination with widely meshed skin grafting. Demographics included age and sex of patient. The TBSA, LOS, number of operations, and re-admission rates were also collected. Results A total of 52 patients were included in the review. 73% were male with an average age of 42 years (range 15 months to 88 years. The patients were stratified into 4 different categories based on their burn TBSA: 0-10% (n=25), 11-20% (n=16), 21-30% (n=5), and >30% (n=6). The average number of operations increased with %TBSA (0-10%=1, 11-20%=1, 21-30%=2, >30%=4). The average LOS overall was 0.9 days/%TBSA (0-10%=1.0, 11-20%=0.7, 21-30%=0.9, >30%=0.8). Only one patient required re-admission after the first dressing takedown and underwent a second application of ASCS with subsequent healing. No patients required reconstructive surgery. Conclusions Burn patients treated with ASCS continue to demonstrate a decreased LOS/%TBSA and an overall decrease in the number of operations. The most significant impact may be noted as burn size increases.

scholarly journals Epidemiology of burn injury in older adults: An Australian and New Zealand perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205951312095233
Author(s):  
Lincoln M Tracy ◽  
Yvonne Singer ◽  
Rebecca Schrale ◽  
Jennifer Gong ◽  
Anne Darton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Burn Care

Introduction: The ageing global population presents a novel set of challenges for trauma systems. Less research has focused on the older adult population with burns and how they differ compared to younger patients. This study aimed to describe, and compare with younger peers, the number, causes and surgical management of older adults with burn injuries in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: The Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand was used to identify patients with burn injuries between 1 July 2009 and 31 December 2018. Temporal trends in incidence rates were evaluated and categorised by age at injury. Patient demographics, injury severity and event characteristics, surgical intervention and in-hospital outcomes were investigated. Results: There were 2394 burn-injured older adults admitted during the study period, accounting for 13.4% of adult admissions. Scalds were the most common cause of burn injury in older adults. The incidence of older adult burns increased by 2.96% each year (incidence rate ratio = 1.030, 95% confidence interval = 1.013–1.046, P < 0.001). Compared to their younger peers, a smaller proportion of older adult patients were taken to theatre for a surgical procedure, though a larger proportion of older adults received a skin graft. Discussion: Differences in patient and injury characteristics, surgical management and in-hospital outcomes were observed for older adults. These findings provide the Australian and New Zealand burn care community with a greater understanding of burn injury and their treatments in a unique group of patients who are at risk of poorer outcomes than younger people. Lay Summary The number and proportion of older persons in every country of the world is growing. This may create challenges for healthcare systems. While burn injuries are a unique subset of trauma that affect individuals of all ages, less is known about burns in older adults and how they differ from younger patients. We wanted to look at the number, type, management, and outcomes of burns in older adults in Australia and New Zealand. To do this, we used data from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand, or BRANZ. The BRANZ is a database that collects information on patients that present to Australian and New Zealand hospitals that have a specialist burns unit. Our research found that one in eight adult burns patients was over the age of 65, and that the rate of burn injuries in older adults has increased over the last decade. Older adult burns patients were most commonly affected by scalds after coming in contact with wet heat such as boiling liquids or steam. Fewer older adults went to theatre for an operation or surgical procedure compared to their younger counterparts. However, a larger proportion of older adults that went to theatre had a skin graft (where skin is removed from an uninjured part of the body and placed over the injured part). This research provides important information about a unique and growing group of patients to the local burn care community. It also highlights potential avenues for injury prevention initiatives.

scholarly journals Comparative effectiveness of Biobrane®, RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings in partial thickness paediatric burns: BRACS randomised trial protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjana Bairagi ◽  
Bronwyn Griffin ◽  
Zephanie Tyack ◽  
Dimitrios Vagenas ◽  
Steven M. McPhail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Suspension ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Wound Management ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Skin Cell ◽  
Partial Thickness

Abstract Background Mixed partial thickness burns are the most common depth of burn injury managed at a large Australian paediatric hospital specialty burns unit. Prolonged time until re-epithelialisation is associated with increased burn depth and scar formation. Whilst current wound management approaches have benefits such as anti-microbial cover, these are not without inherent limitations including multiple dressing changes. The Biobrane® RECELL® Autologous skin Cell suspension and Silver dressings (BRACS) trial aims to identify the most effective wound management approach for mixed partial thickness injuries in children. Methods All children presenting with an acute burn injury to the study site will be screened for eligibility. This is a single-centre, three-arm, parallel group, randomised trial. Children younger than 16 years, with burns ≥ 5% total body surface area involving any anatomical location, up to 48 h after the burn injury, and of a superficial partial to mid-dermal depth, will be included. A sample size of 84 participants will be randomised to standard silver dressing or a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension (RES™) with Biobrane® or Biobrane® alone. The first dressing will be applied under general anaesthesia and subsequent dressings will be changed every 3 to 5 days until the wound is ≥ 95% re-epithelialised, with re-epithelialisation time the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes of acute pain, acute itch, scar severity, health-related quality of life, treatment satisfaction, dressing application ease and healthcare resource use will be assessed at each dressing change and 3, 6 and 12 months post-burn injury. Discussion The findings of this study can potentially change the wound management approach for superficial partial to mid-dermal burns in children locally and worldwide. Trial registration The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000245291) approved prospective registration on 15 February 2018. Registration details can be viewed at https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374272&isReview=true.

scholarly journals The Effect of Early Tangential Excision and Split Thickness Skin Graft in Reducing Length of Stay in Burns Patients in Jakarta Islamic Hospital Cempaka Putih

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Gammaditya Adhibarata Winarno ◽  
Aditya Wardhana ◽  
Sanjaya Faisal Tanjunga ◽  
A. S Augiani ◽  
An’umillah Arini Zidna
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Skin Graft ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Graft ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Thickness Skin

Introduction: Early tangential excision (TE) and split-thickness skin graft (STSG) have increased the outcome in burn patients treated at specialized burn centers. This study was conducted to compare the length of stay (LOS) in burn patients undergoing early TE & STSG and delayed TE & STSG. Method: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including 42 patients with varied burn degrees, and TBSA admitted to Jakarta Islamic Hospital Cempaka Putih (JIHCP) Burn Unit. Patients were assigned to two study groups, the early TE & STSG group including 32 patients and the delayed TE & STSG group including 10 patients. All data were collected from the medical record and compared between two study groups. Result: The mean of LOS in a group with early TE & STSG was shorter (9.81±6.41 days) than LOS in the delayed TE & STSG group (15.80±5.67 days). The data of LOS between these groups were compared using an independent T-test. The LOS in the early TE & STSG group was significantly shorter than the delayed TE & STSG group (p=0.012). Conclusion: In patients with burn injuries, early TE & STSG is associated with a shorter length of stay than the delayed TE & STSG. Our study indicates that early excision within five days after burn injury is optimal to reduce the length of stay in burn patients.

scholarly journals Perception and Practice among Community People and Health Service Providers on Care and Management of Burn Injuries in Nepal: A Qualitative Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-319
Author(s):  
Santosh Bikram Bhandari ◽  
Sujit Kumar Sah ◽  
Khakindra Bahadur Bhandari ◽  
Jaswan Sakya ◽  
Laxmi Raj Pathak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Service ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Health Service Providers ◽  
Community People

Background: According to WHO, burns are a serious public health problem and the second most common cause for injury in rural Nepal, accounting for 5% of disabilities. The overall objective of the study is to assess the prevailing perception and practice among community people and health service providers on care and management of burn injuries in Nepal. Methods: This was a qualitative study conducted in 2016 representing all eco-development regions. A total of 40 key informants interviews with health personnel and 18 focus group discussions with the community people were conducted.Results: There are very limited dedicated burn care facilities in Nepal. During discussion, the service providers and community people mentioned that a burn injury can affect any one irrespective of their age and socioeconomic status. The study showed that females are at higher risk for burn injury which is associated mostly with wood fire cooking.The burn cases in the hospitals were more during winter than insummer season. Among all the ethnic groups, Dalit and indigenous population were found more vulnerable towards burn injuries. Intentional burn injuries such as self-inflicted burns/suicidal attemptwere found to occur more in females.The community people had a good practice of taking the majority ofpatients having burn injury immediately to the hospital,if not, they at least provided them with a first aid treatment. Conclusions: Majority of burn injured cases are getting first aid treatment at the incident places and taking hospital immediately. Main reasons, who reached late, are unaware about seeking services and financial constraint. Overall, the community people are partially aware about the burn injury.Keywords: Burn injuries; community practice; hospitals; incident and types.

scholarly journals A Review of Burn Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation at a Burns Facility

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-300
Author(s):  
Stephen Frost ◽  
Liz Davies ◽  
Claire Porter ◽  
Avinash Deodhar ◽  
Reena Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Respiratory Compromise ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Regular Time ◽  
Major Burn

Respiratory compromise is a recognised sequelae of major burn injuries, and in rare instances requires extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Over a ten-year period, our hospital trust, an ECMO centre and burns facility, had five major burn patients requiring ECMO, whose burn injuries would normally be managed at trusts with higher levels of burn care. Three patients (60%) survived to hospital discharge, one (20%) died at our trust, and one patient died after repatriation. All patients required regular, time-intensive dressing changes from our specialist nursing team, beyond their regular duties. This review presents these patients, as well as a review of the literature on the use of ECMO in burn injury patients. A formal review of the overlap between the networks that cater to ECMO and burn patients is recommended.

scholarly journals Pre-hospital care in burn injury

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S15-S22
Author(s):  
Prabhat Shrivastava ◽  
Arun Goel
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Care ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Management Plans

ABSTRACTThe care provided to the victims of burn injury immediately after sustaining burns can largely affect the extent and depth of the wound. Although standard guidelines have been formulated by various burn associations, they are still not well known to public at large in our country. In burn injuries, most often, the bystanders are the first care providers. The swift implementation of the measures described in this article for first aid in thermal, chemical, electrical and inhalational injuries in the practical setting, within minutes of sustaining the burn, plays a vital role and can effectively reduce the morbidity and mortality to a great extent. In case of burn disasters, triage needs to be carried out promptly as per the defined protocols. Proper communication and transport from the scene of the accident to the primary care centre and onto the burn care facility greatly influences the execution of the management plans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document