scholarly journals A148 EFFICIENCY IN THE ENDOSCOPY UNIT: CAN WE ‘TURN AROUND’ ROOM TURNOVER?

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 11-12
Author(s):  
C M Tan ◽  
J Tinmouth ◽  
M Bernstein

Abstract Background Endoscopy units across Canada are being challenged to meet the growing demand for procedures despite limited resources, highlighting the need to optimize endoscopy unit efficiency. Earlier studies have found that non-procedural factors, such as room turnover, represent an ideal target to improve efficiency. Aims The objective of this research project was to identify practices that will improve efficiency for routine outpatient gastrointestinal (GI) procedures at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC). There were 2 sub-aims: 1) to understand practices at Toronto hospitals that shorten room turnover time and 2) to describe the variation in room turnover time at SHSC. Methods Sub-aim #1: A survey of endoscopy units at five other Toronto hospitals was completed. Questions were designed to gain a better understanding of routine practices and any initiatives undertaken to improve room turnover efficiency. Sub-aim #2: Median room turnover time from April 2018 to March 2019, defined as ‘patient out’ to ‘patient in’, was reported in an anonymized fashion for the following categories: 1) by endoscopist, 2) by nurse, and 3) by unique endoscopist-nurse pair. Only data from routine outpatient endoscopic procedures (e.g. colonoscopy, gastroscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy) were included. In order to evaluate turnover times by endoscopist-nurse pair, consecutive cases not performed by the same pair were excluded. Procedures affected by patient- and transportation-related delays were also excluded. Results Of the five centers surveyed, three allocated 5 minutes for turnover and two allocated 10 minutes. All centers reported tracking turnover time and four centers reported undertaking initiatives to decrease turnover time such as involving a flow team, hiring team attendants, and sharing performance data. Over the 12-month period, 2504 routine outpatient GI endoscopic procedures were performed at SHSC, with 803 cases meeting inclusion criteria. Median turnover time for the unit was 6 minutes, ranging from 5 to 9 minutes across endoscopists, 5 to 7 minutes across nurses, and 3 to 10 minutes across unique endoscopist-nurse pairs (Figure 1). Efficiency of endoscopist-nurse pairs did not correlate with the number of cases performed as a pair over the 12-month period. Conclusions Endoscopy room turnover times at SHSC are similar to those reported by other local centers, with important variation across endoscopists and nurses. The next phase of this study will involve directly observing each of the most and least efficient individuals and pairs and recording common practices. It is anticipated that these findings will enable us to identify efficient practices that should be incorporated into standard operating procedures and training for endoscopy room personnel. Funding Agencies None

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (11) ◽  
pp. E1680-E1685
Author(s):  
Abdelhai Abdelqader ◽  
Avik Sarkar ◽  
Haroon Shahid ◽  
Amy Tyberg ◽  
Sohini Sameera ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic heavily impacted the New York metro area causing most institutions to either reduce case volume or fully close remaining open units incorporated specific guidelines for procedures lockdown potentially leading to a greater turn-over time. We analyzed the quantitative and financial impact of this lost time on our tertiary care center’s endoscopy unit. Patients and methods This single-center, retrospective study included demographics, procedure details and turn-over times (TOT) from all endoscopic procedures between December 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020. Cases were categorized as pre-COVID-19 group from December 1, 2019 to March 15, 2020 and during COVID-19 (lockdown) group from March 16, 2020 to June 30, 2020. The financial impact was assessed using national averages for reimbursement of outpatient endoscopic procedures provided by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Results A total of 3622 procedures were performed during the study period: 2297 in the pre-COVID-19 period, 1325 in the COVID-19 period, representing a 42.32 % decrease. In the COVID-19 lockdown group, there was a significant increase in TOT in both the general endoscopy cases (18.11 minutes, P = 0.000) and advanced endoscopy cases (17.7 minutes, P = 0.000). The 42.3 % decrease in volume equated to at least $1.6 million USD in lost revenue during the lockdown. Conclusions COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in TOT with overall reduced procedure volume and a negative effect on revenue. Providing continued endoscopic management during a pandemic avoids delays in reopening the endoscopy unit and hampers the post-pandemic surge of delayed cases and its financial impact.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Agrawal ◽  
Rajeev Jain

Background. Endoscopy nurse (RN) has a pivotal role in administration and monitoring of moderate sedation during endoscopic procedures. When sedation for the procedure is administered and monitored by an anesthesia specialist, the role of an RN is less clear. The guidelines on this issue by nursing and gastroenterology societies are contradictory. Methods. Survey study of endoscopy lab managers and directors at outpatient endoscopy units in Texas. The questions related to staffing patterns for outpatient endoscopies and responsibilities of different personnel assisting with endoscopies. Results. Responses were received from 65 endoscopy units (response rate 38%). 63/65 (97%) performed at least a few cases with an anesthesia specialist. Of these, 49/63 (78%) involved only an endoscopy technician, without an additional RN in the room. At 12/49 (25%) units, the RN performed tasks of an endoscopy technician. At 14/63 (22%), an additional RN was present during endoscopic procedures and performed tasks not directly related to patient care. Conclusions. Many ambulatory endoscopy units do not have an RN present at all times when sedation is administered by an anesthesia specialist. An RN, when present, did not perform tasks commensurate with the education and training. This has implications about optimal utilization of nurses and cost of performing endoscopies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadav Willner ◽  
Maya Peled-Raz ◽  
Dan Shteinberg ◽  
Michal Shteinberg ◽  
Dean Keren ◽  
...  

Aims and Methods.Conducting a survey study of a large number of patients and gastroenterologists aimed at identifying relevant predictors of interest in digital recording and documentation (DRD) of endoscopic procedures. Outpatients presenting to the endoscopy unit at our institution for an endoscopy examination were anonymously surveyed, regarding their views and opinions of a possible recording of the procedure. A parallel survey for gastroenterologists was conducted.Results.417 patients and 62 gastroenterologists participated in two parallel surveys regarding DRD of endoscopic procedures. 66.4% of the patients expressed interest in digital documentation of their endoscopic procedure, with 90.5% of them requesting a copy. 43.6% of the physicians supported digital recording while 27.4% opposed it, with 48.4% opposing to making a copy of the recording available to the patient. No sociodemographic or background factors predicted patient’s interest in DRD. 66% of the physicians reported having recording facilities in their institutions, but only 43.6% of them stated performing recording. Having institutional guidelines for DRD was found to be the only significant predictor for routine recording.Conclusions.Our study exposes patients’ positive views of digital recording and documentation of endoscopic procedures. In contrast, physicians appear to be much more reluctant towards DRD and are centrally motivated by legal concerns when opposing DRD, as well as when supporting it.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2(May-August)) ◽  
pp. e342020
Author(s):  
Luciano Lopes Furlanetti ◽  
Matheus Fernando Manzolli Ballestero ◽  
Ricardo Santos De Oliveira

Introduction: Hydrocephalus is the most common neurosurgical condition among children worldwide and shunt diversion of the cerebral-spinal fluid (CSF) has been widely available. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review on types and models of shunt devices available and critically evaluate scientific evidence in favor of the usage of specific technologies. Methods: Searches of the PubMed database were performed for relevant articles published from until March 2020. Appropriate keywords were used to identify all studies, including: “shunt”, “technology”, “hydrocephalus”, “children”, “pediatric”. The indications and scientific evidence in favor of the usage of specific shunt technology for the treatment of hydrocephalus according to age, underlying pathology and other features of specific patients were discussed under the light of the current literature. Results: A total of 178 peer-reviewed papers were found. Out of them, only 21 matched our inclusion criteria and were finally selected. The papers were reviewed and described technology discussed below. A summary of the main types of shunts commercially available worldwide, including their respective working mechanism and construction was also included. Conclusion:Shunt technology has evolved during the last decades and continues to be intensively developed. Despite of the huge arsenal of different types of shunt systems currently available on the market, the treatment of hydrocephalus remains challenging. Investment in research, education and training, as well as prospective randomized multicentric controlled trials evaluating the role of specific valves in the treatment of individual group of hydrocephalic pediatric patients are urgently needed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 466 ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Seidler

Construction chemistry is underdeveloped compared to other chemical branches. Innovation is realized by new products, improved pro¬cesses or / and more efficient organization. Innovation becomes evident when a noticeable progress is achieved by implementing changes. There are seven fundamental hindrances or flaws possible which are briefly considered. The state-of-the-art must be known. Innovation is measured in comparison to this state-of-the-art. If this level is not yet attained, progress is easily realized by introducing the actual knowledge. The realization is measured according to qualitative or preferably quantitative bench¬marks. Unfortunately, this is not currently done in the field of construction chemistry. Before benchmarking starts, communication based on truth and trust must be effective. The available scientific me¬tho¬dology must be known. Benchmarking will possibly show deficiencies in education and training. This will stress the need for adequate trans¬parency to improve efficiency. Hope¬ful¬ly, a self-regulating process improving pro-ducts and processes will be created in this way.


2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 1197-1212
Author(s):  
Yeow Chong Goh ◽  
Xin Qing Cai ◽  
Walter Theseira ◽  
Giovanni Ko ◽  
Khiam Aik Khor

AbstractWe study whether humans or machine learning (ML) classification models are better at classifying scientific research abstracts according to a fixed set of discipline groups. We recruit both undergraduate and postgraduate assistants for this task in separate stages, and compare their performance against the support vectors machine ML algorithm at classifying European Research Council Starting Grant project abstracts to their actual evaluation panels, which are organised by discipline groups. On average, ML is more accurate than human classifiers, across a variety of training and test datasets, and across evaluation panels. ML classifiers trained on different training sets are also more reliable than human classifiers, meaning that different ML classifiers are more consistent in assigning the same classifications to any given abstract, compared to different human classifiers. While the top five percentile of human classifiers can outperform ML in limited cases, selection and training of such classifiers is likely costly and difficult compared to training ML models. Our results suggest ML models are a cost effective and highly accurate method for addressing problems in comparative bibliometric analysis, such as harmonising the discipline classifications of research from different funding agencies or countries.


2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khan W. Li ◽  
Clarke Nelson ◽  
Ian Suk ◽  
George I. Jallo

Neuroendoscopy began with a desire to visualize the ventricles and deeper structures of the brain. Unfortunately, the technology available to early neuroendoscopists was not sufficient in most cases for these purposes. The unique perspective that neuroendoscopy offered was not fully realized until key technological advances made reliable and accurate visualization of the brain and ventricles possible. After this technology was incorporated into the device, neuro-endoscopic procedures were rediscovered by neurosurgeons. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and other related procedures are now commonly used to treat a wide array of neurosurgically managed conditions. A seemingly limitless number of neurosurgical applications await the endoscope. In the future, endoscopy is expected to become routine in modern neurosurgical practice and training.


Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (01) ◽  
pp. 65-71
Author(s):  
Mauro Manno ◽  
Simona Deiana ◽  
Tommaso Gabbani ◽  
Matteo Gazzi ◽  
Alessandro Pignatti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several scientific societies have endorsed non-anesthesiologist sedation (NAS) during gastrointestinal endoscopy, considering it a safe procedure when administered by adequately trained personnel. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of adverse events after implementation of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) sedation training program. Methods From January 2017 to August 2018, data from all consecutive endoscopic procedures in adults (≥ 18 years) performed at our endoscopy unit were collected using an electronic reporting system. Results All staff (physicians and nurses) completed the ESGE-ESGENA sedation course. In total, 12 132 patients underwent endoscopic procedures, 10 755 (88.6 %) of which were performed in a non-anesthesiological setting. Of these, about 20 % used moderate sedation with midazolam + fentanyl and 80 % used deep sedation with additional propofol. No sentinel, 5 (0.05 %) moderate risk, and 18 (0.17 %) minor risk adverse events occurred, all during moderate or deep sedation, and all managed by endoscopy staff without the need for anesthesiologist assistance. Conclusions After completing the ESGE-ESGENA sedation training program, the rate of adverse events was very low in our institution. The findings support implementation of the program in all digestive endoscopy units and inclusion in the curriculum for physicians and nurses to ensure safe endoscopic procedures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1437-1443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Batailler ◽  
Philippe Saviuc ◽  
Romain Picot-Gueraud ◽  
Jean-Luc Bosson ◽  
Marie-Reine Mallaret

OBJECTIVETo assess the diagnostic value of an adenosinetriphosphate bioluminescence assay (ATPmetry) to monitor the effectiveness of the reprocessing of endoscopes compared with microbiologic sampling.DESIGNDiagnostic study.SETTINGA 2,200-bed teaching hospital performing 5,000 to 6,000 endoscopic procedures annually.INCLUSION CRITERIAAll samples from bronchial or gastrointestinal endoscopes whatever the context.METHODSSamples for microbiologic analysis and ATPmetry measurements were taken when each endoscope was inspected following reprocessing. Sampling was performed by flushing each endoscope with 300 mL Neutralizing Pharmacopeia Diluent thiosulfate rinsing solution divided equally between the endoscope channels. For each endoscope a series of 3 ATPmetry measurements were made on a vial containing the first jet from each channel and a second series on the whole sample.RESULTSOf 165 samples from endoscopes, 11 exceeded the acceptability threshold of 25 colony-forming units/endoscope. In the first jet collected, the median (interquartile range) level of ATPmetry was 30.5 (15.3–37.7) relative light units (RLU) for samples with 25 or fewer colony-forming units compared with 37.0 (34.7–39.3) RLU for samples with more than 25 colony-forming units (P=.008). For the whole sample, the median (interquartile range) level of ATPmetry was 24.8 (14.3–36.3) RLU and 36.3 (36.0–38.3) RLU (P=.006), respectively. After adjusting on the batch of cleansing solution used, no difference in ATPmetry values was found between microbiologically acceptable and unacceptable samples.CONCLUSIONATPmetry cannot be used as an alternative or complementary approach to microbiologic tests for monitoring the reprocessing of endoscopes in FranceInfect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(12):1437–1443


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document