scholarly journals Adaptive Alignment of Plasticity With Genetic Variation and Selection

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Anderson Berdal ◽  
Ned A Dochtermann
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Phenotypic Plasticity ◽  
Matrix Form ◽  
Theoretical Research ◽  
Adaptive Plasticity ◽  
Genetic Variances ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
Variation And Selection ◽  
Trait Space ◽  
General Prediction

AbstractTheoretical research has outlined how selection may shape both genetic variation and the expression of phenotypic plasticity in multivariate trait space. Specifically, research regarding the evolution of patterns of additive genetic variances and covariances (summarized in matrix form as G) and complementary research into how selection may shape adaptive plasticity lead to the general prediction that G, plasticity, and selection surfaces are all expected to align with each other. However, less well discussed is how this prediction might be assessed and how the modeled theoretical processes are expected to manifest in actual populations. Here, we discuss the theoretical foundations of the overarching prediction of alignment, what alignment mathematically means, how researchers might test for alignment and important caveats to this testing. The most important caveat concerns the fact that, for plasticity, the prediction of alignment only applies to cases where plasticity is adaptive, whereas organisms express considerable plasticity that may be neutral or even maladaptive. We detail the ramifications of these alternative expressions of plasticity vis-à-vis predictions of alignment. Finally, we briefly highlight some important interpretations of deviations from the prediction of alignment and what alignment might mean for populations experiencing environmental and selective changes.

Plasticity

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Jane West-Eberhard
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Phenotypic Plasticity ◽  
Division Of Labor ◽  
Universal Property ◽  
Developmental Pathways ◽  
Living Things ◽  
Universal Properties ◽  
Variation And Selection ◽  
Development And Evolution ◽  
Mechanisms Of Plasticity

A phenotype-centered view of evolution needs to start with a solid idea about the nature of the phenotype. This chapter and the next are devoted to two universal properties of phenotypes, plasticity, or responsiveness to environmental inputs; and modularity, or subdivision into semi-independent and dissociable parts (chapter 4). Of these two properties, plasticity is probably the more fundamental, for the ability to replicate, which distinguishes organic from inorganic nature, requires molecules which are interactive and precisely responsive— adaptively plastic. So plasticity must have been an early universal property of living things. The universality of modularity is a secondary, or “emergent” result of the universality of plasticity (see Wilczek, 2002, on emergent universality in physics). Any organism whose size, whether due to accretion or growth, is large enough to create internal environmental differences, such as those between the inner and the outer regions of a clump of material, has the potential for regional internal differentiation. As differentiation evolves to produce specialized parts and an internal division of labor, internal heterogeneity gives rise to conditional switches between developmental pathways. The result is a stucture characterized by somewhat discrete parts—modularity. Thus, given plasticity as a universal property of living matter, modularity follows. The present chapter describes some of the remarkable mechanisms of phenotypic plasticity. One reason to focus on mechanisms is to indicate the material basis for the evolution of plasticity, which is a product of concrete devices that are subject to genetic variation and selection. A cursory look at these mechanisms, however incomplete, by itself suggests the importance of plasticity in development and evolution, for the mechanisms of plasticity include some of the most ingenious and widely conserved creations of nature. Mechanisms of plasticity are further discussed in chapter 23, which describes how organisms assess environmental conditions when they adaptively switch between alternative developmental pathways. Phenotypic plasticity has already been defined as the ability of an organism to react to an environmental input with a change in form, state, movement, or rate of activity.

Variation during growth of twin cattle

1967 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Taylor ◽  
Jean Craig
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Body Part ◽  
Body Measurements ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Genetic Variances ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Early Maturing ◽  
Degree Of Maturity

Phenotypic variances within pairs of monozygotic and dizygotic twin heifers and also genetic variances and heritabilities were calculated for 12 linear body measurements at a sequence of eight ages up to two years old. The 60 pairs of fraternal and 60 pairs of identical twins used were reared as part of a larger uniformity trial in which feeding was effectively ad libitum throughout.Size differences between members of DZ twin pairs were found to be approximately normally distributed with about the same variance for all breeds and crosses. The variance within DZ pairs increased strongly with age, with a marked increase between 9 and 12 months of age and with most body measurements showing a broadly similar trend. On a logarithmic scale DZ variances increased roughly linearly with degree of maturity and at about the same rate in each body measurement. Coefficients of variation within DZ pairs corrected for measuring error had an average value of 2%. They did not change greatly with age, and were roughly the same for most body measurements although width measurements tended to be more variable than average.Coefficients of variation within MZ pairs had a corresponding overall average of 1·4%; they declined rapidly with age from 2·0% to 1·1%, were roughly the same for all body measurements, but at early ages tended to be greater in late than in early maturing body parts. However, they showed no association with the earliness of maturing of a body part provided variation was measured at the same degree of maturity for each body part.Genetic variation increased rapidly with age in all body measurements. The rate of increase with age was greater for late than for early maturing parts. The rate of increase with degree of maturity, however, was about the same for all body measurements. Coefficients of genetic variation increased slowly with age; they had an average value of 1·6%.Estimates of heritability are given at a sequence of eight ages for each of 12 body measurements. They increased strongly with age from 0·14 on average at three months of age to 0·67 on average at two years of age. At any fixed age, early maturing body parts tended to have higher heritabilities than later maturing body parts. However, if heritability was measured at the same degree of maturity in each body part, early and late maturing parts had about equal heritabilities.The present results are compared with those obtained from twin cattle studies in New Zealand, Sweden and Wisconsin, U.S.A.Inferences from twins about genetic variances and heritabilities for unrelated animals are discussed.

scholarly journals Effects of Heterogeneous Environment After Deforestation on Plant Phenotypic Plasticity of Three Shrubs Based on Leaf Traits and Biomass Allocation

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinniu Wang ◽  
Jing Gao ◽  
Yan Wu ◽  
Bo Xu ◽  
Fusun Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phenotypic Plasticity ◽  
Carbon Content ◽  
Nitrogen Content ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Biomass Allocation ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Leaf Traits ◽  
Adaptive Plasticity ◽  
Heterogeneous Environments ◽  
Heterogeneous Environment

Phenotypic plasticity among natural plant populations is a species-specific ecological phenomenon of paramount importance that depends on their life forms, development stages, as well as environmental factors. While this phenomenon is broadly understood, it has hardly been observed in nature. This study aimed at understanding phenotypic plasticity and ecological adaptability in three shrubs (Salix etosia, Rubus setchuenensis, and Hydrangea aspera) affected by potential environmental variables after deforesting in sparse Larix spp. forest and tall shrub mixed secondary forests. Soil organic carbon content, total nitrogen content, and available nitrogen content were greater outside the forests, contrary to other measured factors whose availability was higher in the forest interiors. In case of leaf traits and stoichiometric indicators, there were significant interactions of leaf area (LA), leaf dry matter (DW), specific leaf area (SLA), and leaf phosphorus content (LPC) between shrub species and heterogeneous environments (P < 0.05) but not for leaf C/N, N/P, and C/P. Principal components analysis (PCA) indicated that soil temperature, pH value, soil carbon content, soil nitrogen content, and MBC and MBN mainly constituted the first component. Summarized results indicated that TB and leaf C/P of S. etosia were significantly correlated with three principal components, but only marginal significant correlations existed between R/S and relevant components. SLA and R/S of R. setchuenensis had marginal significant relationships with independent variables. Both SLA and TB of H. aspera were significantly correlated with three principal components. Based on the pooled values of leaf functional traits and leaf stoichiometric indicators, R. setchuenensis (vining type) had better leaf traits plasticity to adapt to a heterogeneous environment. In descending order, the ranks of biomass allocation plasticity index of three shrubs were H. aspera (bunch type), R. setchuenensis (vining type), and S. etosia (erect type). The highest integrated plasticity values of leaf traits and biomass allocation was observed in H. aspera (bunch type), followed by R. setchuenensis, and by S. etosia with less adaptive plasticity in heterogeneous environments.

scholarly journals High differentiation in functional traits but similar phenotypic plasticity in populations of a soil specialist along a climatic gradient

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. 969-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Matesanz ◽  
Marina Ramos-Muñoz ◽  
Mario Blanco-Sánchez ◽  
Adrián Escudero
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Phenotypic Plasticity ◽  
Functional Traits ◽  
Common Garden ◽  
Population Level ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Environment Interaction ◽  
Moisture Variation ◽  
Neutral Genetic Variation

Abstract Background and Aims Plants experiencing contrasting environmental conditions may accommodate such heterogeneity by expressing phenotypic plasticity, evolving local adaptation or a combination of both. We investigated patterns of genetic differentiation and plasticity in response to drought in populations of the gypsum specialist Lepidium subulatum. Methods We created an outdoor common garden with rain exclusion structures using 60 maternal progenies from four distinct populations that substantially differ in climatic conditions. We characterized fitness, life history and functional plasticity in response to two contrasting treatments that realistically reflect soil moisture variation in gypsum habitats. We also assessed neutral genetic variation and population structure using microsatellite markers. Key Results In response to water stress, plants from all populations flowered earlier, increased allocation to root tissues and advanced leaf senescence, consistent with a drought escape strategy. Remarkably, these probably adaptive responses were common to all populations, as shown by the lack of population × environment interaction for almost all functional traits. This generally common pattern of response was consistent with substantial neutral genetic variation and large differences in population trait means. However, such population-level trait variation was not related to climatic conditions at the sites of origin. Conclusions Our results show that, rather than ecotypes specialized to local climatic conditions, these populations are composed of highly plastic, general-purpose genotypes in relation to climatic heterogeneity. The strikingly similar patterns of plasticity among populations, despite substantial site of origin differences in climate, suggest past selection on a common norm of reaction due to similarly high levels of variation within sites. It is thus likely that plasticity will have a prevalent role in the response of this soil specialist to further environmental change.

scholarly journals Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in circadian rhythms in an armed beetle, Gnatocerus cornutus (Tenebrionidae)

2020 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentarou Matsumura ◽  
Masato S Abe ◽  
Manmohan D Sharma ◽  
David J Hosken ◽  
Taishi Yoshii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Phenotypic Plasticity ◽  
Circadian Rhythms ◽  
Temperature Effects ◽  
Temperature Compensation ◽  
Biological Rhythms ◽  
Total Activity ◽  
Biological Clocks ◽  
Isofemale Lines ◽  
Free Running

Abstract Circadian rhythms, their free-running periods and the power of the rhythms are often used as indicators of biological clocks, and there is evidence that the free-running periods of circadian rhythms are not affected by environmental factors, such as temperature. However, there are few studies of environmental effects on the power of the rhythms, and it is not clear whether temperature compensation is universal. Additionally, genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in biological clocks are important for understanding the evolution of biological rhythms, but genetic and plastic effects are rarely investigated. Here, we used 18 isofemale lines (genotypes) of Gnatocerus cornutus to assess rhythms of locomotor activity, while also testing for temperature effects. We found that total activity and the power of the circadian rhythm were affected by interactions between sex and genotype or between sex, genotype and temperature. The males tended to be more active and showed greater increases in activity, but this effect varied across both genotypes and temperatures. The period of activity varied only by genotype and was thus independent of temperature. The complicated genotype–sex–environment interactions we recorded stress the importance of investigating circadian activity in more integrated ways.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document