#60: Knowledge of Diagnosis and Management of Chagas-related Heart Disease Among Pediatric Cardiologists in the United States
Abstract Background Chagas disease is a highly pathogenic infection with a prevalence of approximately 5.7 million cases worldwide and greater than 300,000 cases in the United States. Up to 40% of immigrants to the United States are from highly endemic Latin American countries. An estimated 40,000 women of childbearing age in the United States are infected, with a 1–5% risk of vertical transmission. The impact of this disease is extensive, often life-long, and difficult to eradicate. The purpose of our study was to better understand current knowledge and experience among pediatric cardiologists in the United States with the cardiac presentations of Chagas disease to determine where to focus educational programs and critical content. Methods We prospectively disseminated a 19-question survey to pediatric cardiologists via the PediHeart, WSOPC, and Pediatric CHF listservs three times between September and November 2019. The survey included demographic, multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions. We used Qualtrics to ensure anonymity. Respondents outside of the United States were excluded. Results Of 140 responses received, 120 cardiologists treated pediatric patients in the United States. Over half (62.5%) of respondents served a >10% Latin American patient population. Most providers (87%) had not seen a case of Chagas disease in their practice; however, most (72%) also had never tested for Chagas. In response to the statement: “I feel comfortable recognizing cardiac presentations of Chagas disease in children”, (85%) of respondents disagreed. Most respondents selected that they would not include Chagas on their differential diagnosis for cardiac presentations that included conduction anomalies, myocarditis, and/or apical aneurysms (Figure 1). However, when considering patients who recently immigrated from Latin American nations, inclusion of Chagas in the differential diagnosis increased. In response to the statement: “If I was offered a lecture on Chagas-related heart disease, I would be likely to attend,” 87% of respondents agreed. Conclusions In our sample of pediatric cardiologists, very few had seen cases of Chagas disease, albeit very few tested for it or included it in their differential diagnosis. However, most individuals agreed that education on Chagas disease would be worth-while. Education could help ensure these cases are not missed in pediatrics. Future analysis should focus on changes in provider knowledge and/or testing as the incidence grows, or as educational programs are implemented.