Replication-dependent cytotoxicity and Spartan-mediated repair of trapped PARP1–DNA complexes

Abstract The antitumor activity of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) has been ascribed to PARP trapping, which consists in tight DNA–protein complexes. Here we demonstrate that the cytotoxicity of talazoparib and olaparib results from DNA replication. To elucidate the repair of PARP1–DNA complexes associated with replication in human TK6 and chicken DT40 lymphoblastoid cells, we explored the role of Spartan (SPRTN), a metalloprotease associated with DNA replication, which removes proteins forming DPCs. We find that SPRTN-deficient cells are hypersensitive to talazoparib and olaparib, but not to veliparib, a weak PARP trapper. SPRTN-deficient cells exhibit delayed clearance of trapped PARP1 and increased replication fork stalling upon talazoparib and olaparib treatment. We also show that SPRTN interacts with PARP1 and forms nuclear foci that colocalize with the replicative cell division cycle 45 protein (CDC45) in response to talazoparib. Additionally, SPRTN is deubiquitinated and epistatic with translesion synthesis (TLS) in response to talazoparib. Our results demonstrate that SPRTN is recruited to trapped PARP1 in S-phase to assist in the excision and replication bypass of PARP1–DNA complexes.

Download Full-text

Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Mutants Defective in DNA Replication Initiation

Molecular Biology of the Cell ◽

10.1091/mbc.e08-01-0020 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 19 (10) ◽

pp. 4374-4382 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Ling Yin ◽

Alexandra Monica Locovei ◽

Gennaro D'Urso

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Replication Fork ◽

S Phase ◽

Replication Initiation ◽

Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽

Origin Firing ◽

Dna Replication Initiation ◽

Fork Stalling ◽

S Phase Checkpoint

In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, blocks to DNA replication elongation trigger the intra-S phase checkpoint that leads to the activation of the Cds1 kinase. Cds1 is required to both prevent premature entry into mitosis and to stabilize paused replication forks. Interestingly, although Cds1 is essential to maintain the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication elongation, mutants defective in DNA replication initiation require the Chk1 kinase. This suggests that defects in DNA replication initiation can lead to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint independent of the intra-S phase checkpoint. This might result from reduced origin firing that leads to an increase in replication fork stalling or replication fork collapse that activates the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. We refer to the Chk1-dependent, Cds1-independent phenotype as the rid phenotype (for replication initiation defective). Chk1 is active in rid mutants, and rid mutant viability is dependent on the DNA damage checkpoint, and surprisingly Mrc1, a protein required for activation of Cds1. Mutations in Mrc1 that prevent activation of Cds1 have no effect on its ability to support rid mutant viability, suggesting that Mrc1 has a checkpoint-independent role in maintaining the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication initiation.

Download Full-text

Replication Fork Slowing and Stalling are Distinct, Checkpoint-Independent Consequences of Replicating Damaged DNA

10.1101/122895 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Divya Ramalingam Iyer ◽

Nicholas Rhind

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Fission Yeast ◽

Single Molecule ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Replication Forks ◽

Origin Firing ◽

Dna Combing ◽

Fork Stalling

AbstractIn response to DNA damage during S phase, cells slow DNA replication. This slowing is orchestrated by the intra-S checkpoint and involves inhibition of origin firing and reduction of replication fork speed. Slowing of replication allows for tolerance of DNA damage and suppresses genomic instability. Although the mechanisms of origin inhibition by the intra-S checkpoint are understood, major questions remain about how the checkpoint regulates replication forks: Does the checkpoint regulate the rate of fork progression? Does the checkpoint affect all forks, or only those encountering damage? Does the checkpoint facilitate the replication of polymerase-blocking lesions? To address these questions, we have analyzed the checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a single-molecule DNA combing assay, which allows us to unambiguously separate the contribution of origin and fork regulation towards replication slowing, and allows us to investigate the behavior of individual forks. Moreover, we have interrogated the role of forks interacting with individual sites of damage by using three damaging agents—MMS, 4NQO and bleomycin—that cause similar levels of replication slowing with very different frequency of DNA lesions. We find that the checkpoint slows replication by inhibiting origin firing, but not by decreasing fork rates. However, the checkpoint appears to facilitate replication of damaged templates, allowing forks to more quickly pass lesions. Finally, using a novel analytic approach, we rigorously identify fork stalling events in our combing data and show that they play a previously unappreciated role in shaping replication kinetics in response to DNA damage.Author SummaryFaithful duplication of the genome is essential for genetic stability of organisms and species. To ensure faithful duplication, cells must be able to replicate damaged DNA. To do so, they employ checkpoints that regulate replication in response to DNA damage. However, the mechanisms by which checkpoints regulate DNA replication forks, the macromolecular machines that contain the helicases and polymerases required to unwind and copy the parental DNA, is unknown. We have used DNA combing, a single-molecule technique that allows us to monitor the progression of individual replication forks, to characterize the response of fission yeast replication forks to DNA damage that blocks the replicative polymerases. We find that forks pass most lesions with only a brief pause and that this lesion bypass is checkpoint independent. However, at a low frequency, forks stall at lesions, and that the checkpoint is required to prevent these stalls from accumulating single-stranded DNA. Our results suggest that the major role of the checkpoint is not to regulate the interaction of replication forks with DNA damage, per se, but to mitigate the consequences of fork stalling when forks are unable to successfully navigate DNA damage on their own.

Download Full-text

Xenopus Cdc7 function is dependent on licensing but not on XORC, XCdc6, or CDK activity and is required for XCdc45 loading

Genes & Development ◽

10.1101/gad.14.12.1528 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 14 (12) ◽

pp. 1528-1540

Author(s):

Pedro Jares ◽

J. Julian Blow

Keyword(s):

Dna Replication ◽

Origin Recognition Complex ◽

Protein Complexes ◽

Present Report ◽

S Phase ◽

Chromosomal Dna ◽

Minichromosome Maintenance ◽

Initiation Of Replication ◽

Sequential Binding

The assembly and disassembly of protein complexes at replication origins play a crucial role in the regulation of chromosomal DNA replication. The sequential binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC), Cdc6, and the minichromosome maintenance (MCM/P1) proteins produces a licensed replication origin. Before the initiation of replication can occur, each licensed origin must be acted upon by S phase-inducing CDKs and the Cdc7 protein kinase. In the present report we describe the role of Xenopus Cdc7 (XCdc7) in DNA replication using cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs. We show that XCdc7 binds to chromatin during G1 and S phase. XCdc7 associates with chromatin only once origins have been licensed, but this association does not require the continued presence of XORC or XCdc6 once they have fulfilled their essential role in licensing. Moreover, XCdc7 is required for the subsequent CDK-dependent loading of XCdc45 but is not required for the destabilization of origins that occurs once licensing is complete. Finally, we show that CDK activity is not necessary for XCdc7 to associate with chromatin, induce MCM/P1 phosphorylation, or perform its essential replicative function. From these results we suggest a simple model for the assembly of functional initiation complexes in the Xenopus system.

Download Full-text

Succinylation at a key residue of FEN1 is involved in the DNA damage response to maintain genome stability

AJP Cell Physiology ◽

10.1152/ajpcell.00137.2020 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 319 (4) ◽

pp. C657-C666

Author(s):

Rongyi Shi ◽

Yiyi Wang ◽

Ya Gao ◽

Xiaoli Xu ◽

Shuyu Mao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Genome Stability ◽

Damage Response ◽

Dna Replication And Repair ◽

Fork Stalling ◽

Stalled Replication Forks ◽

Maintain Genome Stability

Human flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a structure-specific, multifunctional endonuclease essential for DNA replication and repair. Our previous study showed that in response to DNA damage, FEN1 interacts with the PCNA-like Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex instead of PCNA to engage in DNA repair activities, such as stalled DNA replication fork repair, and undergoes SUMOylation by SUMO-1. Here, we report that succinylation of FEN1 was stimulated in response to DNA replication fork-stalling agents, such as ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, hydroxyurea, camptothecin, and mitomycin C. K200 is a key succinylation site of FEN1 that is essential for gap endonuclease activity and could be suppressed by methylation and stimulated by phosphorylation to promote SUMO-1 modification. Succinylation at K200 of FEN1 promoted the interaction of FEN1 with the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex to rescue stalled replication forks. Impairment of FEN1 succinylation led to the accumulation of DNA damage and heightened sensitivity to fork-stalling agents. Altogether, our findings suggest an important role of FEN1 succinylation in regulating its roles in DNA replication and repair, thus maintaining genome stability.

Download Full-text

A Degenerate PCNA-Interacting Peptide (DPIP) box targets RNF168 to replicating DNA to limit 53BP1 signaling

10.1101/2021.03.17.435897 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yang Yang ◽

Deepika Jayaprakash ◽

Robert Hollingworth ◽

Steven Chen ◽

Amy Jablonski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Strand Break ◽

S Phase ◽

C Terminus ◽

Dna Double Strand Break ◽

Damage Response ◽

Phase Functions

The E3 ligase RNF168 has been suggested to have roles at DNA replication forks in addition to its canonical functions in DNA double-strand break (DSB) signaling. However, the precise role of RNF168 in DNA replication remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that RNF168 is recruited to DNA replication factories independent of the canonical DSB response pathway regulators and identify a degenerate PCNA-Interacting Peptide (DPIP) motif in the C-terminus of RNF168 which mediates its binding to PCNA. An RNF168 mutant harboring substitutions in the DPIP box fails to interact with PCNA and is not recruited to sites of DNA synthesis, yet fully retains its ability to promote DSB-induced 53BP1 foci. Surprisingly, the RNF168 DPIP mutant also retains the ability to support ongoing DNA replication fork movement, demonstrating that PCNA-binding is dispensable for normal S-phase functions. However, replisome-associated RNF168 functions to suppress the DSB-induced 53BP1 DNA damage response during S-phase. Moreover, we show that WT RNF168 can perform PCNA ubiquitylation independently of RAD18 and also synergizes with RAD18 to amplify PCNA ubiquitylation. Taken together, our results identify non-canonical functions of RNF168 at the replication fork and demonstrate new mechanisms of cross talk between the DNA damage and replication stress response pathways.

Download Full-text

Replication Fork Stalling at Natural Impediments

Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews ◽

10.1128/mmbr.00030-06 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 71 (1) ◽

pp. 13-35 ◽

Cited By ~ 330

Author(s):

Ekaterina V. Mirkin ◽

Sergei M. Mirkin

Keyword(s):

Dna Replication ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Genetic Factors ◽

Genomic Stability ◽

Molecular Machines ◽

Dna Binding Proteins ◽

Replication Forks ◽

Fork Stalling ◽

Transcription Complexes

SUMMARY Accurate and complete replication of the genome in every cell division is a prerequisite of genomic stability. Thus, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic replication forks are extremely precise and robust molecular machines that have evolved to be up to the task. However, it has recently become clear that the replication fork is more of a hurdler than a runner: it must overcome various obstacles present on its way. Such obstacles can be called natural impediments to DNA replication, as opposed to external and genetic factors. Natural impediments to DNA replication are particular DNA binding proteins, unusual secondary structures in DNA, and transcription complexes that occasionally (in eukaryotes) or constantly (in prokaryotes) operate on replicating templates. This review describes the mechanisms and consequences of replication stalling at various natural impediments, with an emphasis on the role of replication stalling in genomic instability.

Download Full-text

The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress

The Journal of Cell Biology ◽

10.1083/jcb.200412076 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 168 (7) ◽

pp. 999-1012 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Jeff Bachant ◽

Shannon R. Jessen ◽

Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽

Candida S. Fielding

Keyword(s):

Dna Replication ◽

Chromosome Segregation ◽

Replication Fork ◽

S Phase ◽

Origin Of Replication ◽

Independent Manner ◽

Checkpoint Signaling ◽

Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽

Chromatid Cohesion ◽

S Phase Checkpoint

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

Download Full-text

Role of Translesion Synthesis DNA Polymerases in DNA Replication in the Presence of a Weak DNA Polymerase δ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

G3 Genes|Genome|Genetics ◽

10.1534/g3.118.200213 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 754-754

Author(s):

Likui Zhang ◽

Yanchao Huang ◽

Xinyuan Zhu ◽

Yuxiao Wang ◽

Haoqiang Shi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Dna Polymerase ◽

Dna Polymerases ◽

Translesion Synthesis ◽

Dna Polymerase Δ

Download Full-text

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA Helicase Promotes Genome Integrity by Preventing Replication Fork Stalling: Viability of rrm3 Cells Requires the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint and Fork Restart Activities

Molecular and Cellular Biology ◽

10.1128/mcb.24.8.3198-3212.2004 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 24 (8) ◽

pp. 3198-3212 ◽

Cited By ~ 97

Author(s):

Jorge Z. Torres ◽

Sandra L. Schnakenberg ◽

Virginia A. Zakian

Keyword(s):

Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Opportunity To Learn ◽

Normal Growth ◽

Dna Helicase ◽

S Phase ◽

Exogenous Dna ◽

Fork Stalling ◽

S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Rrm3p is a 5′-to-3′ DNA helicase that helps replication forks traverse protein-DNA complexes. Its absence leads to increased fork stalling and breakage at over 1,000 specific sites located throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. To understand the mechanisms that respond to and repair rrm3-dependent lesions, we carried out a candidate gene deletion analysis to identify genes whose mutation conferred slow growth or lethality on rrm3 cells. Based on synthetic phenotypes, the intra-S-phase checkpoint, the SRS2 inhibitor of recombination, the SGS1/TOP3 replication fork restart pathway, and the MRE11/RAD50/XRS2 (MRX) complex were critical for viability of rrm3 cells. DNA damage checkpoint and homologous recombination genes were important for normal growth of rrm3 cells. However, the MUS81/MMS4 replication fork restart pathway did not affect growth of rrm3 cells. These data suggest a model in which the stalled and broken forks generated in rrm3 cells activate a checkpoint response that provides time for fork repair and restart. Stalled forks are converted by a Rad51p-mediated process to intermediates that are resolved by Sgs1p/Top3p. The rrm3 system provides a unique opportunity to learn the fate of forks whose progress is impaired by natural impediments rather than by exogenous DNA damage.

Download Full-text

Set1-dependent H3K4 methylation becomes critical for DNA replication fork progression in response to changes in S phase dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

10.1101/2020.10.26.355008 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Christophe de La Roche Saint-André ◽

Vincent Géli

Keyword(s):

Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Genetic Material ◽

S Phase ◽

Replication Forks ◽

H3k4 Methylation ◽

Origin Firing ◽

Phase Dynamics

AbstractDNA replication is a highly regulated process that occurs in the context of chromatin structure and is sensitive to several histone post-translational modifications. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone methylase Set1 is responsible for the transcription-dependent deposition of H3K4 methylation (H3K4me) throughout the genome. Here we show that a combination of a hypomorphic replication mutation (orc5-1) with the absence of Set1 (set1Δ) compromises the progression through S phase, and this is associated with a large increase in DNA damage. The ensuing DNA damage checkpoint activation, in addition to that of the spindle assembly checkpoint, restricts the growth of orc5-1 set1Δ. Interestingly, orc5-1 set1Δ is sensitive to the lack of RNase H activity while a reduction of histone levels is able to counterbalance the loss of Set1. We propose that the recently described Set1-dependent mitigation of transcription-replication conflicts becomes critical for growth when the replication forks accelerate due to decreased origin firing in the orc5-1 background. Furthermore, we show that an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, likely a consequence of the elevated DNA damage, is partly responsible for the lethality in orc5-1 set1Δ.Author summaryDNA replication, that ensures the duplication of the genetic material, starts at discrete sites, termed origins, before proceeding at replication forks whose progression is carefully controlled in order to avoid conflicts with the transcription of genes. In eukaryotes, DNA replication occurs in the context of chromatin, a structure in which DNA is wrapped around proteins, called histones, that are subjected to various chemical modifications. Among them, the methylation of the lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) is carried out by Set1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, specifically at transcribed genes. We report that, when the replication fork accelerates in response to a reduction of active origins, the absence of Set1 leads to accumulation of DNA damage. Because H3K4 methylation was recently shown to slow down replication at transcribed genes, we propose that the Set1-dependent becomes crucial to limit the occurrence of conflicts between replication and transcription caused by replication fork acceleration. In agreement with this model, stabilization of transcription-dependent structures or reduction histone levels, to limit replication fork velocity, respectively exacerbates or moderates the effect of Set1 loss. Last, but not least, we show that the oxidative stress associated to DNA damage is partly responsible for cell lethality.

Download Full-text