Comparison of treatment options in adults with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent minimal change disease

Author(s):  
Cihan Heybeli ◽  
Stephen B Erickson ◽  
Fernando C Fervenza ◽  
Marie C Hogan ◽  
Ladan Zand ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Studies comparing all treatment options for frequently-relapsing/steroid-dependent (FR/SD) minimal change disease (MCD) in adults are lacking. Methods Medical records of 76 adults with FR/SD MCD who were treated with corticosteroids as the first-line therapy were reviewed. Treatment options were compared for the time to relapse, change of therapy and progression (relapse on full-dose treatment). Results Second-line treatments included rituximab (RTX; n = 13), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 12), calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; n = 26) and cyclophosphamide (CTX; n = 16). During the second-line treatments, 48 (71.6%) patients relapsed at median 17 (range 2–100)  months. The majority of relapses occurred during dose tapering or off drug. Twenty of 65 (30.8%) changed therapy after the first relapse. The median time to relapse after the second line was 66 versus 28 months in RTX versus non-RTX groups (P = 0.170). The median time to change of treatment was 66 and 44 months, respectively (P = 0.060). Last-line treatment options included RTX (n = 8), MMF (n = 4), CNI (n = 3) and CTX (n = 2). Seven (41.2%) patients had a relapse during the last-line treatment at median 39 (range 5–112)  months. The median time to relapse was 48 versus 34 months in the RTX versus non-RTX groups (P = 0.727). One patient in the RTX group died presumably of heart failure. No major adverse event was observed. During the median follow-up of 81 (range 9–355)  months, no patients developed end-stage renal disease. Conclusions Relapse is frequent in MCD in adults. Patients treated with RTX may be less likely to require a change of therapy and more likely to come off immunosuppressive drugs.

Author(s):  
Patrick Niaudet ◽  
Alain Meyrier

Minimal change disease is characteristically responsive to high-dose corticosteroids. As this is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in children, and responses are usually prompt, response to 60 mg/m2/day of oral prednisolone (max. 80 mg) is often used as a diagnostic test. Adults respond more slowly and have a wider differential diagnosis, and often a high risk of side effects, so therapy is not recommended without confirmation by renal biopsy. Then first-line treatment is again prednisolone or prednisone, at 1 mg/kg/day (max. 60 mg). KDIGO and other treatment protocols recommend 6 weeks treatment at full dose then 6 weeks at half dose. Shorter protocols seem to increase the risk of relapse. Children frequently have a relapsing pattern of disease which may be managed by less extreme steroid exposure, but for which second-line therapies may be needed to avoid severe steroid side effects. This can arise in adults too. Some children and adults have steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant disease, leading to earlier initiation of treatment with second-line agents. These include levamisole, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-B cell antibodies. The evidence for these and recommendations for relapsing/resistant disease are given in this chapter.


Author(s):  
B. González Astorga ◽  
F. Salvà Ballabrera ◽  
E. Aranda Aguilar ◽  
E. Élez Fernández ◽  
P. García-Alfonso ◽  
...  

AbstractColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, it is recommended, as first-line treatment, chemotherapy (CT) based on doublet cytotoxic combinations of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). In addition to CT, biological (targeted agents) are indicated in the first-line treatment, unless contraindicated. In this context, most of mCRC patients are likely to progress and to change from first line to second line treatment when they develop resistance to first-line treatment options. It is in this second line setting where Aflibercept offers an alternative and effective therapeutic option, thought its specific mechanism of action for different patient’s profile: RAS mutant, RAS wild-type (wt), BRAF mutant, potentially resectable and elderly patients. In this paper, a panel of experienced oncologists specialized in the management of mCRC experts have reviewed and selected scientific evidence focused on Aflibercept as an alternative treatment.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 645-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Saylor ◽  
M. Dror Michaelson

Systemic treatment options for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have expanded considerably with the development of targeted therapies. Clear cell RCC commonly features mutation or inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau gene and resultant overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The first drug to validate VEGF as a target in the treatment of clear cell RCC was the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab. Since then, anti-VEGF receptor therapy with multitargeted kinase inhibitors also has shown substantial efficacy. Sunitinib is now a standard first-line therapy for advanced disease and sorafenib is among the second-line treatment options. Other kinase inhibitors are in development. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a second validated therapeutic target as the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus has been shown to prolong survival in first-line treatment of poor prognosis RCC of all histologies. Everolimus is an oral mTOR inhibitor and has been shown to prolong progression-free survival when used in second-line treatment. Non-clear cell and sarcomatoid RCC are both underrepresented in completed trials but are the subject of active research. Ongoing and planned studies will also evaluate the use of combinations of targeted agents, a strategy that is not advisable outside of clinical trials. Finally, postnephrectomy adjuvant treatment with targeted agents is not yet standard but is under investigation in phase III trials.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 946-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girindra G Raval ◽  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Martha Q Lacy ◽  
Suzanne R Hayman ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 946 Background: The emerging therapies directed at the plasma cell clone have dramatically increased overall survival (OS) for both myeloma and amyloidosis patient populations. As more treatment trials are done in patients (pts) with AL, benchmarks for outcomes among previously treated AL pts are required, especially for those pts who are not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Inadequate information is available about the number of non-transplant pts who go on to receive second line treatment for AL amyloidosis. Methods: To ascertain the outcomes of pts who did not receive ASCT as primary therapy but who required a second line of therapy, we reviewed the experience of pts seen at Mayo Rochester between 1990 and 2010 according to an IRB approved retrospective review protocol. 1828 pts had their first Mayo visit for AL during this time period. Pts were excluded from this study for the following reasons: 571 had upfront transplant; 907 pts had received only one line of treatment for their amyloid; 91 had longstanding other associated malignancy [Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (8), lymphoma (15), CLL (6), multiple myeloma (62)]; and 93 had inadequate follow-up information. One-hundred and sixty-six pts received 2 or more lines of therapy for their AL amyloid and are the subject of these analyses. Statistical analyses were done using JMP statistical software (SAS, Carey, NC). Results: Of the 166 pts, the median age was 64 years (range 34, 84). 49% were male. Baseline organ involvement was as follows: cardiac 84/166 (50%); renal 118/166 (71); liver 23/166 (13.8%); peripheral nerves 19/166 (11.4%); and gastrointestinal 14/166(8.4%). Thirty-one percent (52/16) had both cardiac and renal involvement. Only 73 pts had cardiac biomarkers (NT pro BNP and Troponin T) done at baseline. Of these pts, 26% were stage 1, 49.3% were stage 2, and 24.6% were stage 3 according to original Mayo cardiac biomarker staging system. By inclusion criteria definition, all 166 pts received 1st and 2nd line therapies; 53 (32%) pts received 3rd line of treatment; 20 (12%) received 4th line of treatment; and 10 (6%) received 5th line of treatment. For first line therapy, the most common drugs given either singly or in combination were corticosteroid (147/166; 88.5 %), alkylator (99/166; 59.6%), IMID (34/166; 20.4 %), and bortezomib (19/166; 11.4%). The median time from diagnosis to 2nd line therapy was 10.3 months. Second line regimens received included: corticosteroid, 108/166 (65.1%); alkylator, 76/166 (45.8 %); IMID, 46/166 (27.7%); and bortezomib, 46/166 (27.8%). The median time from diagnosis to 3rd line therapy was 19.8 months. For the 53 pts who received 3rd line treatment, regimens included: corticosteroid, 41/53 (77.3%); IMIDs, 17/53 (32.1%); alkylator, 17/53 (32.1%); bortezomib, 12/53 (22.6%). The median time from diagnosis to 4th line therapy was 31.8 months. For the 20 pts receiving 4th line treatment, regimens included: corticosteroids, 15/20(75%); alkylator, 12/20 (60%), bortezomib, 7/20 (35%); and IMIDs, 4/20(20%). Eighty-three pts have died. The 1 year mortality of our study population was only 8%. The median follow-up of surviving pts was 47.6 months. Figure 1 demonstrates Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) from initiation of each successive therapy. The median OS from initiation of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd lines of treatment were 65, 49.5 and 36.7 months respectively. The median OS after the 4th line of treatment was not reached. The 4 year OS rates from initiation of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th lines of therapy were 58%, 50.8 %, 50 % and 53.4% respectively. Conclusion: Outcomes among relapsed or refractory AL pts are better than what one might expect. Multiple publications have demonstrated that the 1 year mortality of newly diagnosed AL is in the vicinity of 40%. Thereafter, the rate at which pts die dramatically decreases. Our study provides explicit data characterizing the fate of pts unfortunate enough to require additional therapy but fortunate enough to survive past the exceedingly high risk period of death that occurs within 6–12 months of diagnosis. These data provide useful information for benchmarking future trials for treatments of AL amyloidosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5578-5578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Chiattone ◽  
David Gomez-Almaguer ◽  
Carolina Pavlovsky ◽  
Elena Tuna-Aguilar ◽  
Ana Lisa Basquiera ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: There are few reports of standard of care and outcomes in Latin America. The HOLA study is a retrospective chart review of patients with B-cell malignancies in Latin America (LATAM). Methods: The objective of this registry is to describe patient characteristics, diagnostic and treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) from a mix of public and private sites in Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, and Panama. We report 472 patients with CLL diagnosed in the period from January 2006 to March 2016. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 23 - 95). Male gender predominance (53.6 vs 46.4%). Twenty-three percent of the patients (n=103) were dead, median time from diagnosis to death of 2.4 years (range 0-6.6 years). Seventeen percent (n=19) died before frontline treatment, 35%(39) after first-line treatment, 19%(21) in second-line, 27%(30) at or after third-line treatment. Anemia reported on 34%. Of the 34% (n=162) patients with COOMBS test, it was positive on 13%. Frequent comorbidities were high blood pressure (46%), heart disease (17%) and diabetes (15%). Binet status reported on 63% of patients, Rai status on 55%. (Table 1) Flow cytometry missing on 27% of patients (not performed/missing report). Diagnostic markers were positive as follows: CD23, 94% and CD5, 92%. Prognostic markers: 52% tested for CD38 and 10% ZAP 70, positivity on 24% and 26% of tested patients, respectively. Cytogenetic/FISH test performed on 21% (102), del(17p) was present on 7.4% of tested patients at diagnosis. Seventy two per cent of patients were considered for watch- and-wait approach. Median time from diagnosis to treatment initiation was 113 days (range 1 -2808). Sixty one per cent (288/472) receive front line treatment at any time. Frequent reasons to start treatment were B symptoms (25%), anemia (21%) and lymphocyte doubling time <6 months (17%). (Table 2) Response was assessed by clinical exam and blood count in 95% of patients, CT scan 24 %, abdominal ultrasonography 12%. Twenty-eight per cent of patients (135) relapsed and received second-line treatment. The most frequent second-line treatments were Chlorambucil (Chl) 37%; Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide (FC) 16%, Cyclophosphamide + Vincristine + Prednisone (CVP) 9%. Clinical complete responses were as follows: FC = 4.5%, FCR= 25%. Sixty-five out of 472 patients (14%) received third-line treatment. Most frequently used treatments at this line were: Chlorambucil 23%, FC 20%, CVP 13%, FCR 9.2%, BR 4.6 %, and other chemotherapies 4.6%. Only 7% of patients in the registry relapsed and received fourth-line treatment. Conclusions: HOLA registry describes patterns of demographics, diagnosis and treatments in the real world in Latin America. CLL diagnosis in Latin America is made based on flow cytometry for the majority of the patients. Cytogenetic and FISH test are scarcely performed. For the deceased patients, median time from diagnosis to death was 2.4 years. This could be related to the high risk, but since prognostic tests were not always present this merits further investigation. Watch-and-wait was the most frequent approach. Time elapsed from diagnosis to treatment initiation was less than a year. Lymphocyte doubling time as reason to start treatment was frequent. Chlorambucil remains the most frequently used treatment for elderly in newly diagnosed and relapsed /refractory patients, use is also frequent in the young/fit patient population. Access barriers to innovative drugs and monoclonal antibodies could explain this situation. Disclosures Chiattone: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gomez-Almaguer:Bristol: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Pavlovsky:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squib: Speakers Bureau. Tuna-Aguilar:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Farias:Janssen: Consultancy. Galvez:Novartis: Consultancy. Santos:Janssen: Employment. De La Mora Estrada:Janssen: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 284-284
Author(s):  
Renana Barak ◽  
Barliz Waissengrin ◽  
Ido Wolf

284 Background: A common perception of some oncologists is that the vast majority of their patients with metastatic disease will receive second-line treatment upon progression. Therefore, “saving” good treatment options for the future may be acceptable. We aimed to examine whether this perception correlates with real-life. Methods: Using an oncology electronic database, consisting of >27,000 patients treated at our institution, we selected consecutive patients with metastatic or locally advanced lung, colon, pancreatic, bile duct and gastric cancers who started standard first-line. We then assessed the correlation between proceeding to second-line therapy and demographic and clinical variables, including age, gender, initial performance status, BMI, hemoglobin, WBC, creatinine, glucose, calcium, as well as duration on first line therapy and survival. Results: A total of 492 patients met the inclusion criteria. Their median age was 67 and 285 were men. Their diagnoses were colon (169), lung (102), pancreas (101), bile duct (65) and gastric (55) cancers. Only 52% (255) received second-line treatment for at least 30 days (36% colon, 26% lung, 18% pancreas, 9% bile duct and 11% gastric). Receipt of second-line therapy was associated with disease site (P=0.001) as well as with age, with patients who received second-line being 5 years younger compared to those who did not (64 vs. 69 years, P=0.004). Patients who reached second-line had better performance status and higher hemoglobin level at presentation, additionally their median duration on first-line chemotherapy was substantially longer (P<0.007 for all comparisons). Survival of patients not starting second-line was significantly shorter across all tumor types (19.8 vs 6.5 months P=0.001). General deterioration and toxicity were the major reasons for avoiding second-line therapy at progression, 43% and 30% respectively. Conclusions: These real-life data indicate that only half of the patients starting standard doublet or triplet treatment for advanced cancers will commence second-line therapy; and this can be hardly predicted in advance using standard clinical and laboratory characteristics. Our data challenge the practice of saving good treatment options for subsequent lines, and call for the development of tools enabling prediction of response and tolerance to treatment, pursuing for better patient selection and patient-tailored therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofang Yu ◽  
Jieru Cai ◽  
Xiaoyan Jiao ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
...  

Background: Currently, there is an urgent need to find ways of identifying primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) patients who are likely to benefit from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) or who are resistant to them. In this study, we employed nano-HPLC-MS/MS analysis to identify serum biomarkers that predict the clinical response to CNI therapy in PMN patients. Methods: The endpoint was complete remission (CR) after CNI treatment. PMN patients were grouped into no-remission (NR) or CR groups to screen predictive candidates using the nano-HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Results: Compared with NR patients, 3 upregulated proteins and 5 downregulated proteins were found to present a twofold change in CR patients’ serum. Serum amyloid A1 protein (SAA1) was further validated by ELISA; it was decreased in patients in the NR group compared with patients in the CR group, but SAA1 in patients in these groups was lower than in healthy controls and minimal change disease patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of SAA1 was used to distinguish PMN NR patients from those in remission and was 0.901, with a sensitivity of 78.3% and specificity of 86.8%, similar to that of the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody. Combining SAA1 with the PLA2R antibody, the area under the ROC curve was 0.956, which was higher than that of SAA1 or the PLA2R antibody alone. Conclusions: Serum SAA1 may be a candidate PMN biomarker that can be used to discriminate CNI NR cases from remission patients. The combination of SAA1 and the PLA2R antibody increases the accuracy of diagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document