scholarly journals INNV-10. SAFETY OF APIXABAN FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PREVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi132-vi132
Author(s):  
Alissa Thomas ◽  
Heather Wright ◽  
Hannah Walker ◽  
Prachi Prasad ◽  
Kelly Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Prevention Strategy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention

Abstract Venous thromboembolism (VTE) impacts an estimated one in every three patients with malignant glioma (MG), resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Despite the high prevalence and serious consequences of VTE, there is no outpatient standard of care prevention strategy. There have been three prospective clinical trials of VTE prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed MG, all of which used an injectable low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) product. We performed an open-label safety study of apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), for VTE prevention in patients with newly diagnosed MG. All patients had surgery or biopsy two to twenty-one days prior to enrollment in the study. Patients were treated with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for up to 6 months. Peak and trough apixaban concentrations were measured at the beginning and end of treatment. Thirteen patients consented to the study and ten enrolled (2 screen-fail, 1 withdrawal). The patients have completed a mean of 4.5 cycles of apixaban (range 2 to 6, with 2 patients still undergoing treatment). There were no bleeding events while receiving apixaban. There were no hematologic or non-hematologic treatment-related adverse events. There were no VTE events observed in patients receiving apixaban. Two patients who came off treatment early due to disease progression developed VTEs after stopping prophylactic apixaban. Quality of life analysis is ongoing. In this pilot study we found that prophylactic dosing of 2.5 mg twice daily of apixaban was safe in the post-operative period for patients with newly diagnosed MG. Our preliminary results suggest that this may be a safe and effective prevention strategy for VTE prophylaxis in this high risk group of patients.

scholarly journals Safety of dabigatran etexilate for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in children

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (7) ◽  
pp. 491-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo R. Brandão ◽  
Manuela Albisetti ◽  
Jacqueline Halton ◽  
Lisa Bomgaars ◽  
Elizabeth Chalmers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Dabigatran Etexilate ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Clinical Risk Factor ◽  
Postthrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Open Label

Abstract This open-label, single-arm, prospective cohort trial is the first phase 3 safety study to describe outcomes in children treated with dabigatran etexilate for secondary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention. Eligible children aged 12 to <18 years (age stratum 1), 2 to <12 years (stratum 2), and >3 months to <2 years (stratum 3) had an objectively confirmed diagnosis of VTE treated with standard of care (SOC) for ≥3 months, or had completed dabigatran or SOC treatment in the DIVERSITY trial (NCT01895777) and had an unresolved clinical thrombosis risk factor requiring further anticoagulation. Children received dabigatran for up to 12 months, or less if the identified VTE clinical risk factor resolved. Primary end points included VTE recurrence, bleeding events, and mortality at 6 and 12 months. Overall, 203 children received dabigatran, with median exposure being 36.3 weeks (range, 0-57 weeks); 171 of 203 (84.2%) and 32 of 203 (15.8%) took capsules and pellets, respectively. Overall, 2 of 203 children (1.0%) experienced on-treatment VTE recurrence, and 3 of 203 (1.5%) experienced major bleeding events, with 2 (1.0%) reporting clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, and 37 (18.2%) minor bleeding events. There were no on-treatment deaths. On-treatment postthrombotic syndrome was reported for 2 of 162 children (1.2%) who had deep vein thrombosis or central-line thrombosis as their most recent VTE. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of dabigatran were similar to those in adult VTE patients. In summary, dabigatran showed a favorable safety profile for secondary VTE prevention in children aged from >3 months to <18 years with persistent VTE risk factor(s). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197416.

scholarly journals Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e868-e874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris E. Holmes ◽  
Steven Ades ◽  
Susan Gilchrist ◽  
Daniel Douce ◽  
Karen Libby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Successful Model ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked. RESULTS: A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice.

scholarly journals Safety of Rivaroxaban for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Abdominal Body Contouring Surgery: 600 Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios Vasilakis ◽  
Bill G Kortesis ◽  
Gaurav Bharti ◽  
Matthew H Isakson ◽  
Joseph P Hunstad
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Body Contouring ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Postoperative Course ◽  
Body Contouring Surgery ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

Abstract Background Reducing the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following abdominal body contouring surgery remains a top priority for patient safety. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal chemoprophylactic agent for postoperative VTE prophylaxis, and the role of oral anticoagulants warrants further investigation. Objectives The aim of this multisurgeon, single-institution study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a 7-day postoperative rivaroxaban regimen for VTE prophylaxis in abdominal body contouring surgery. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent abdominoplasty, circumferential body lift, fleur-de-lis panniculectomy, or circumferential fleur-de-lis panniculectomy at our surgical center from August 2014 to November 2019. A 7-day postoperative course of once-daily 10 mg rivaroxaban, starting on postoperative day 1, was administered to every patient unless there was a contraindication. The 2 primary endpoints were the incidence of VTE and bleeding events. Results A total of 600 patients were included in the study. There were no deaths. There were 4 (0.7%) incidents of VTE events: 2 (0.3%) patients suffered pulmonary embolus and 2 (0.3%) patients suffered a lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis. A total of 13 (2.2%) patients suffered complications related to bleeding. Of these, operative intervention for control and evacuation was required in 7 (1.2%) patients. Conclusions A 7-day postoperative course of once-daily rivaroxaban for VTE risk reduction in abdominal body contouring surgery is associated with a low incidence of VTE events and a low risk of bleeding complications. Level of Evidence: 4

Head and Neck Microsurgeon Practice Patterns and Perceptions Regarding Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (08) ◽  
pp. 549-555
Author(s):  
Kaushik P. Venkatesh ◽  
Shoshana W. Ambani ◽  
Aris R.L. Arakelians ◽  
Jonas T. Johnson ◽  
Mario G. Solari
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Prophylactic Anticoagulation

Abstract Background Patients undergoing head and neck (H&N) microvascular reconstruction comprise a population at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Free flap and VTE thromboprophylaxis may coincide but tend to vary from surgeon to surgeon. This study identifies VTE prophylaxis patterns and perceptions among H&N microsurgeons in the United States. Methods An online survey on VTE prophylaxis practice patterns and perceptions was emailed to 172 H&N microsurgeons in the United States using an anonymous link. Results There were 74 respondents (43% response rate). These surgeons completed residencies in otolaryngology (59%), plastic surgery (31%), and oral maxillofacial surgery (7%). Most underwent fellowship training (95%) and have practiced at an academic center (97%) for at least 6 years (58%), performing an average of 42 ± 31 H&N free flap cases per year (range = 1–190). Most adhered to general VTE prophylaxis guidelines (69%) while 11% did not and 20% were unsure. Nearly all surgeons (99%) would provide prophylactic anticoagulation, mostly in the form of subcutaneous heparin (51%) or enoxaparin (44%); 64% additionally used aspirin, while 4% used aspirin alone. The majority of surgeons (68%) reported having postoperative VTE complications, with six surgeons (8%) reporting patient deaths due to pulmonary embolism. A third of the surgeons have encountered VTE prophylaxis-related adverse bleeding events, but most still believe that chemoprophylaxis is important for VTE prevention (92%). While 35% of surgeons were satisfied with their current practice, most would find it helpful to have official prophylactic anticoagulation guidelines specific to H&N free flap cases. Conclusion The majority of microsurgeons experienced postoperative VTE complications after H&N free flap reconstruction despite the routine use of prophylactic anticoagulation. Though bleeding events are a concern, most surgeons believe chemoprophylaxis is important for VTE prevention and would welcome official guidelines specific to this high-risk population.

Primary Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients with Solid Tumors Receiving Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1157-1157
Author(s):  
Minh Phan ◽  
Sonia John ◽  
Ana Isabel Casanegra ◽  
Alfonso Tafur
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Major Bleeding Events ◽  
Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis

Abstract Abstract 1157 Background: Venous thromboembolism [VTE] is the second highest cause of mortality among patients with cancer. However, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for patients with solid tumor is only recommended during hospitalization. Primary outpatient thromboprophylaxis is not a widely accepted practice. Objective: Determine safety and efficacy of outpatient primary VTE prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors. Data sources: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE up to June 2012. Key search words included venous thromboembolism, malignancy, anticoagulants, and chemotherapy. Studies were considered for our meta-analysis if they included outpatient primary pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with active solid cancer. All the information was independently reviewed by 2 of the authors [MP, SJ] and a third reviewer resolved discrepancies. The measure of association was calculated with R (R: A Language and Environment for Statistical, R Development Core Team, www.R-project.org), R META package (Version 0.8–2, Author: Guido Schwarzer). The Q statistic was calculated and a formal test of homogeneity was conducted. Random-effects model was preferred in case of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 1371 abstracts were reviewed and 29 manuscripts were fully abstracted. Eight randomized controlled trials including 6706 patients were analyzed. There were less VTE events with outpatient prophylaxis: odds ratio [OR] of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.40–0.70). Six studies used low or ultra-low molecular weight heparin and two studies used warfarin. In the subgroup analysis of heparin based primary prophylaxis, there was a significant reduction in VTE events [OR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.34–0.64], no significant heterogeneity [FIG 1]. In addition, there was no difference in major bleeding events between groups [OR 1.48, 95% CI, 0.89–2.46]. Five studies reported mortality data; there was significant heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions: Heparin based outpatient VTE prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors reduced by half the risk of VTE with no significant differences in major bleeding events. The current publications do not allow a meaningful grouped analysis of survival data, improved patient selection is necessary in order to adequately target VTE prevention strategies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Rationale and Design of a Phase IIb/III Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Dabigatran Etexilate for Venous Thromboembolism in Children: The Diversity Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5025-5025
Author(s):  
Manuela Albisetti ◽  
Ivan Manastirski ◽  
Martina Brueckmann ◽  
Savion Gropper ◽  
Bushi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Dabigatran Etexilate ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Parenteral Treatment ◽  
Expert Working Group

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasing in children. The current standard of care comprises unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for at least 5 days followed by UFH, LMWH or Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for approximately 3 months in general. All of the current options have limitations: UFH and LMWH require parenteral administration; VKA requires frequent international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring and is associated with multiple food and drug interactions. The direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, which is orally administered as the prodrug, dabigatran etexilate (DE) is effective for the treatment of VTE in adults and may overcome some of the limitations associated with standard of care. Objective To describe the design of a study evaluating the appropriateness of a proposed DE dosing algorithm and assessing the safety and efficacy of DE versus standard of care in pediatric patients with VTE. Methods This open-label, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, multi-center, non-inferiority study (NCT01895777) will be conducted in approximately 100 sites in approximately 30 countries. Patients aged 0 to < 18 years with an imaging-confirmed diagnosis of VTE initially receiving parenteral treatment with UFH or LMWH for 5-7 days (but no more than 21 days) who are expected to require anticoagulation therapy for at least 3 months will be eligible for inclusion. Main exclusion criteria include conditions associated with an increased risk of bleeding, renal dysfunction, active infective endocarditis, mechanical or biological heart valve prosthesis, hepatic disease and anemia or thrombocytopenia. Patients will be stratified into three age groups: stratum 1 (12 to < 18 years), stratum 2 (2 to < 12 years) and stratum 3 (birth to < 2 years). Recruitment will begin in stratum 1, being subsequently escalated to strata 2 and 3, respectively based on recommendations from the Data Monitoring Committee. Patients will be randomized (2:1) to receive DE versus standard of care (LMWH or VKA). DE will be administered twice daily as capsules, pellets or an oral liquid formulation depending on patient age and the patient's ability to swallow pellets or capsules. Upon completion of a 3-month treatment period (including the initial parenteral treatment phase) patients will be followed off-study drug for any adverse events. DE will be dosed to achieve steady-state measured trough circulating plasma concentrations (≥50 and < 250 ng/mL); the initial dose required will be calculated using a nomogram, which adjusts dosing according to the age and weight of the child. Dabigatran plasma concentrations will be evaluated at all study visits (7 scheduled during treatment period); DE will be up- or down-titrated as required. Results In terms of efficacy, the study will evaluate the proportion of patients with complete thrombus resolution, freedom from recurrent VTE (including symptomatic and asymptomatic, contiguous progression or non-contiguous new thrombus, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary and paradoxical embolism, and thrombus progression) and freedom from VTE-related mortality. With regards to safety, the key endpoint will be freedom from major bleeding events, as per International Society on thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) pediatric-specific criteria. All components of the primary efficacy and key safety endpoints will be adjudicated by an independent blinded committee. Conclusion This study, one of the largest controlled pediatric studies for VTE, will provide data on the safety and efficacy of DE compared with standard of care for the treatment of VTE in children aged 0 to < 18 years. Disclosures Albisetti: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Pediatric Expert Working Group. Manastirski:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Brueckmann:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Gropper:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Wang:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Tartakovsky:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Biss:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Huang:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Mitchell:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Halton:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Pediatric Expert Working Group for Boehringer Ingelheim.

scholarly journals Enoxaparin Dosing for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Low Body Weight Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1179545X1986381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dybdahl ◽  
Grant Walliser ◽  
Michelle Pershing ◽  
Christy Collins ◽  
David Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
The Impact

Background: The appropriate dose of enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in low body weight patients is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of enoxaparin dosing on major and minor bleeding events in low body weight patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients weighing less than 45 kg receiving subcutaneous (SC) enoxaparin for VTE prevention. The primary objective was to determine whether enoxaparin dose was associated with major and minor bleeding. The secondary objective was to determine the incidence of VTE by enoxaparin dose. Results: There were 173 patients included in the study, of which 37 patients received 2 different courses of enoxaparin during hospitalization, resulting in 210 enoxaparin courses. Among all enoxaparin courses, 16.2% were associated with major bleeding and 5.2% with minor bleeding. There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding by dose (enoxaparin 30 mg SC daily, 30 mg SC twice daily, or 40 mg SC daily; P = .409). Patients who experienced major bleeding were older (54.9 ± 16.1 years) than patients who did not (48.4 ± 18.4 years) ( P = .043). There was no difference in the incidence of minor bleeding by dosing schedule ( P = .14). No patients experienced a VTE. Conclusion and Relevance: The risk of bleeding was similar by enoxaparin dose but increased with age in low body weight patients. Given the low incidence of VTE in this study, it is reasonable to consider decreasing the prophylactic enoxaparin dose in low body weight patients, especially in the elderly population.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients initiating chemotherapy: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7074-7074
Author(s):  
Emma Ryan ◽  
Julia Salinaro ◽  
Laura J Havrilesky ◽  
Brittany Anne Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Prophylaxis Strategy

7074 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among cancer patients. The Apixaban for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in High-Risk Ambulatory Cancer Patients (AVERT) randomized controlled trial concluded that apixaban is a safe and effective option for VTE prophylaxis in high-risk ambulatory cancer patients initiating a new chemotherapy regimen. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from a health system perspective to determine if apixaban is a feasible prophylactic strategy for this population. Methods: A decision model was created from a third party payer perspective with a time horizon of 6 months, based on the treatment arms of the AVERT trial: (1) apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for 6 months during active chemotherapy versus (2) placebo. Rates of VTE (4.2% apixaban vs 10.2% placebo), major bleeding (3.5% vs 1.8%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (7.3% vs 5.5%) were modeled from the results of the AVERT trial. Cost estimates for treatments and events were obtained from wholesale drug costs, previously published studies and Medicare reimbursement data, and adjusted for inflation to 2018 dollars. Quality adjusted life years were calculated based on previously published utility values for the health states of advanced cancer, DVT, PE, and major bleeding events. An exploratory analysis was performed comparing prophylactic aspirin to no prophylaxis assuming a VTE rate of 7.2%, major bleeding rate of 3.5%, and CRNMB rate of 7.3%, based on the conservative assumptions that while aspirin may not be as effective at preventing VTE, the rate of clinically significant bleeding events would be similar or greater than that of apixaban. Results: In the base case model, apixaban is more costly and more effective than placebo (ICER = $5,013,190/QALY), and the cost per VTE prevented in the apixaban arm is $33,000. In one-way sensitivity analysis, if the cost of apixaban were reduced by 40% from $3,197 to $1,250 for a 6 month course, this could potentially be a cost-effective prophylaxis strategy with an ICER less than $100,000/QALY. In the alternative analysis, aspirin dominates placebo as it is both more effective and less expensive, and remains cost-effective even when the rate of clinically recognized bleeding with aspirin exceeds 15%. Conclusions: Further investigation into less costly prophylactic options such as generic direct oral anticoagulants (once available) and aspirin is warranted prior to broader implementation of a VTE prophylaxis strategy in this population.

Prospective, Open-label clinical Trial of Bivalirudin in Children with Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1165-1165
Author(s):  
Sarah H. O'Brien ◽  
Donald Yee ◽  
Jessica Lira ◽  
Neil A Goldenberg ◽  
Guy Young
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Recurrent Events ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Partial Resolution

Abstract Abstract 1165 Background: Bivalirudin (BIV) is a direct thrombin inhibitor with a favorable pharmacologic profile in comparison to heparin. In a previous study in children <6 months of age with venous thromboembolism (VTE), bivalirudin was demonstrated to be a safe and potentially more effective anticoagulant. The present study's aims were to assess the safety, dosing, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of BIV in children >6 months of age. Methods: This prospective, open-label study evaluated the use of BIV for initial treatment of a new VTE in children between 6 months and 18 years of age. Eligible subjects received a BIV bolus of 0.125mg/kg followed by an initial continuous infusion of 0.125mg/kg/hour which was adjusted as needed to achieve a PTT of 1.5–2.5x their baseline PTT. BIV levels by high performance liquid chromatography and PTTs were tested simultaneously 5 times in the first 24 hours, daily thereafter and following all dose adjustments. Subjects remained on BIV until they were transitioned to long-term anticoagulant treatments. Imaging was required to confirm the presence of a VTE and follow-up imaging was obtained at 2–3 days and 30 days following initiation of anticoagulation. Subjects were closely monitored for bleeding and adverse events. Results: 18 subjects (11M:7F) ranging in age from 9 months-17 years completed the study. There were no major bleeding events and one minor bleeding event. Outcome of VTE: at 2–3 days, 2 subjects had complete resolution and 7 subjects had partial resolution while at 30 days, 7 subjects had complete resolution and 9 subjects had partial resolution. There were no symptomatic recurrent events or any asymptomatic local progressions by surveillance imaging. Seven subjects required no dose adjustments during their course of treatment ranging between 2–5 days. See figure for correlation of PTT with BIV levels [each circle represents one subject with their mean PTT and BIV level with the standard deviations (r2=0.64)]. Conclusions: BIV offers a potentially safer, more effective and pharmacologically more predictable alternative to heparin for initial anticoagulation of children with VTE. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation was excellent suggesting PTT as an acceptable monitoring strategy for BIV in this population. Further studies comparing BIV to heparin should be conducted. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Bivalirudin is not approved for use in children. Goldenberg:Eisai Inc: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CPC Clinical Research: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document