scholarly journals Osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma with asymptomatic brain metastases: an open-label, three-arm, phase II pilot study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nir Peled ◽  
Waleed Kian ◽  
Edna Inbar ◽  
Iris M Goldstein ◽  
Melanie Zemel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tki

Abstract Background Osimertinib is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and Thr790Met mutations. While intracranial activity of osimertinib is documented in larger trials, a prospective study focusing exclusively on patients with asymptomatic brain metastases has not been reported. Methods In this nonrandomized, phase II, open label, 3-arm prospective proof-of-concept pilot study, 48 patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) received osimertinib 80 mg daily. Patients were either treatment naïve (arm A=20) or previously treated with an EGFR-TKI and Thr790Met-positive (arm B=18) or negative (arm C=10). In cases of isolated intracranial progression, osimertinib dose was escalated (160 mg). The primary endpoints were intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR). The secondary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (iPFS). This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02736513. Results The iORR’s were 84.2%, 66.7% and 50% and the iDCR’s were 94.7%, 94.4% and 80% in arms A, B and C, respectively. The median iPFS was 11.8 months (95% CI 7.7-NA), 7.6 (95% CI 5.3-NA) and 6.3 months (95% CI 3.9-NA) in arms A, B and C, respectively. Following dose escalation, pooled iORR was 54% (arm A=5, arm B=4, arm C=2). Adverse events were similar to those in previously published literature. Conclusion Osimertinib demonstrated high efficacy on brain metastases. All trial arms displayed a significant decrease in the number and diameter of target lesions. These findings indicate that osimertinib is effective for Thr790Met-positive and negative LUAD patients with asymptomatic brain metastases. Therefore, osimertinib should be considered a viable option for EGFR-mutant patients with brain involvement regardless of their Thr790Met mutation status.

Regomune: A phase II study of regorafenib + avelumab in solid tumors—Results of the biliary tract cancer (BTC) cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4096-4096
Author(s):  
Sophie Cousin ◽  
Carine A. Bellera ◽  
Jean Philippe Guégan ◽  
Thibault Mazard ◽  
Carlos A. Gomez-Roca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label

4096 Background: Regorafenib (R) has shown promising efficacy in patients (pts) with BTC refractory to standard chemotherapy. Anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies have only limited clinical activity. Synergy between R and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies has been shown in pre-clinical solid tumor models. Methods: This is a single-arm open-label multicentric phase II trial (Bayesian adaptive design) assessing the efficacy and safety of R (160 mg QD 3weeks/4) + avelumab (A) (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) combination in BTC pts. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate under treatment, based on central review according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included: 1-year progression free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival (OS), and Safety using NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Correlative studies were planned from pts tumor samples obtained at baseline. Results: Between Nov. 2018 and Nov. 2019, 34 BTC pts were enrolled in 4 centers. Median age was 63 (range 36 – 80). Median follow-up was 9.8 months. Median number of previous treatment lines for metastatic or locally advanced disease was: 2 (range 1 – 4). Twenty-nine (85.3%) pts experienced at least 1 dose modification or treatment interruption of R or A due to an adverse event (AE) related to the treatment. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were : Hypertension (17.6%), Fatigue (14.7%), and maculo-papular rash (11.8%). No death was related to the treatment. Among the 29 pts with at least one imaging tumor assessment, 4 (13.8%) achieved a partial response, and 11 (37.9%) demonstrated stable disease including 10 (34.5%) pts with tumor shrinkage. Fourteen pts (48.3%) had progressive disease. The median PFS and OS were 2.5 months (95%CI 1.9 – 5.5) and 11.9 months (95%CI 6.2 – NA) respectively. Baseline tumor samples were available for 27 pts. High IDO and PD-L1 expression at baseline was associated with better outcome. Conclusions: The R+A combination is associated with significant anti-tumor activity with promising survival rates in this heavily pre-treated population. Full Biomarkers analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03475953.

PULSE: A randomized phase II open label study of panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy after progression on anti-EGFR therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS143-TPS143
Author(s):  
John H. Strickler ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab ◽  
Christine Megerdichian Parseghian ◽  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Genomic Alterations ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

TPS143 Background: Patients with KRAS and NRAS ( RAS) wild-type mCRC benefit from the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (Abs) panitumumab and cetuximab, but nearly all patients experience resistance. Blood-based profiling of cell free DNA (cfDNA) can identify genomic alterations that drive acquired EGFR Ab resistance. After discontinuation of anti-EGFR Abs, acquired genomic alterations decay over time to undetectable levels. Some studies have suggested clinical benefit from EGFR Ab rechallenge, but there is limited evidence that EGFR Ab rechallenge improves survival compared to standard of care (SOC) therapies. We hypothesize that cfDNA profiling will identify patients appropriate for panitumumab rechallenge, and that these molecularly selected patients will have improved survival compared to current SOC therapies. Methods: This is a randomized phase II, open label study designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of panitumumab rechallenge versus SOC (investigator choice TAS-102 or regorafenib). Secondary objectives include comparisons of progression free survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and quality of life as measured by the linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) questionnaire. Eligible patients have radiographically measurable KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF codon 600 wild-type mCRC based on tumor tissue testing, and must have experienced progression or intolerance to treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, an anti-VEGF Ab, and an anti-PD-1 Ab if the tumor has mismatch repair deficiency or is MSI-H. Progression after at least 4 months treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab is required. All patients must be enrolled in the COLOMATE cfDNA screening protocol (NCT03765736) and meet molecular eligibility based on Guardant360 cfDNA profiling (absence of amplification of ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET; absence of mutations of BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET [mutant allele frequency > 0.5%]). Greater than 90 days must have elapsed between the most recent treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab and cfDNA profiling. Dosing for all study drugs is according to clinical SOC. 120 patients will be randomized 1:1 to panitumumab rechallenge or SOC. With 83 OS events, this study will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 6.5 to 10 months (HR=0.65; 1-sided α= 0.15). This study began enrollment in 6/2020. Recruitment is ongoing at 16 sites in the Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network (ACCRU-GI-1623). Clinical trial information: NCT03992456.

scholarly journals Whole Brain Radiotherapy With and Without Concurrent Erlotinib in NSCLC with Brain Metastases: a multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenzhou Yang ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Rongqing Li ◽  
Abulimiti Yisikandaer ◽  
Biyong Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Whole Brain ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background Erlotinib combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) demonstrated a favorable objective response rate in a phase 2 single-arm trial of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. We assessed whether concurrent erlotinib with WBRT is safe and benefits patients in a phase 3, randomized trial. Methods NSCLC patients with two or more brain metastases were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to WBRT (n=115) or WBRT combined with erlotinib arms (n=109). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and cognitive function (CF) was assessed by Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results A total of 224 patients from 10 centers across China were randomized to treatments. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. Median iPFS for WBRT concurrent erlotinib was 11.2 months versus 9.2 months for WBRT-alone (p=0.601). Median PFS and overall survival (OS) of combination group were 5.3 versus 4.0 months (p=0.825) and 12.9 versus 10.0 months (p=0.545), respectively, compared with WBRT-alone. In EGFR-mutant patients, iPFS (14.6 versus 12.8 months; p=0.164), PFS (8.8 versus 6.4 months; p=0.702) and OS (17.5 versus 16.9 months; p=0.221) were not significantly improved in combination group over WBRT-alone. Moreover, there were no significant differences in patients experiencing MMSE score change between the treatments. Conclusion Concurrent erlotinib with WBRT didn’t improve iPFS and excessive CF detriment either in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population or in EGFR-mutant patients compared with WBRT-alone, suggesting that while safe for patients already taking the drug, there is no justification for adding concurrent EGFR-TKI with WBRT for the treatment of brain metastases.

scholarly journals Pyrotinib in HER2-Mutant Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (24) ◽  
pp. 2753-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Xingya Li ◽  
Qiming Wang ◽  
Guanghui Gao ◽  
Yiping Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Targeted therapies against non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring HER2 mutations remain an unmet need. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-mutant advanced NSCLC in a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled to receive pyrotinib at a dose of 400 mg/d for 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate per independent review committee (IRC). RESULTS Between October 20, 2016, and December 10, 2018, 60 patients received pyrotinib monotherapy. At baseline, 58 (96.7%) were stage IV, and 25 (41.7%) received at least 2 lines of prior chemotherapy. As of data cutoff on June 20, 2019, IRC-assessed objective response rate was 30.0% (95% CI, 18.8% to 43.2%). All subgroups of patients with different HER2 mutation types showed a favorable objective response rate. The objective response rates were similar between patients with and without brain metastases (25.0% v 31.3%). The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.1 months). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) per IRC. The median overall survival was 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 21.3 months). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28.3% of patients, with the most common being diarrhea (20.0%; all grade 3). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION Pyrotinib showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in chemotherapy-treated patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC.

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

RAMSETE: A single-arm, multicenter, single-stage phase II trial of RAD001 (everolimus) in advanced and metastatic silent neuro-endocrine tumours in Europe.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4122-4122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne E. Pavel ◽  
Bertram Wiedenmann ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Nicholas Reed ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Best Response

4122 Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Everolimus (RAD001), an oral mTOR inhibitor, has antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced NET. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II study (RAMSETE), the safety and efficacy of everolimus monotherapy was evaluated in pts with advanced nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET. Methods: Pts with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), progressive, nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET received everolimus (10 mg/day) as monotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (proportion of pts with best overall complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] per RECIST v1.0) by central radiologic review. A secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS). Results: By database soft lock (December 1, 2011), 73 pts from 16 European clinics received everolimus (median duration of treatment: 193 days). Fifty-five (75%) pts discontinued; reasons included disease progression (n=23), adverse events (AEs [n=23]), withdrawal of consent (n=4), death (n=3), and protocol deviation (n=2). In the per protocol population (N=60), 32 (53%) pts received prior antineoplastic therapy. The best response by central review was stable disease in 55%. By local review, 3 (5%) pts had a PR, with SD in 39 (65%) pts. Median PFS by central review was 185 days (95% CI: 158-255). Median PFS by local investigator review was 285 days (95% CI: 231-not estimable). 69 (95%) pts reported treatment-related AEs of any grade, including rash (n=28; 38%), diarrhea (n=20; 27%), mucosal inflammation (n=18; 25%), and decreased appetite (n=17; 23%). Treatment-related grades 3 and 4 AEs and serious AEs were reported by 27 (37%) and 18 (25%) pts, respectively. Conclusions: In this open-label trial of everolimus in pts with advanced, nonsyndromic, extrapancreatic NET, a high rate of disease stabilization was achieved after prior tumor progression with favorable median PFS. This study further supports efficacy of everolimus in types of NET other than those studied in RADIANT-3 (pancreatic NET) and RADIANT-2 (NET associated with carcinoid syndrome).

Final report of an open-label phase II trial of bevacizumab plus docetaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic, previously untreated nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18046-e18046
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Pennell ◽  
Sujith R. Kalmadi ◽  
Marc A. Shapiro ◽  
Hamed Daw ◽  
Cristina P. Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

e18046 Background: Platinum and non-platinum doublet chemotherapy has similar efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients (pts). Bevacizumab (B) improves outcomes when added to platinum doublets, but its safety and efficacy in combination with non-platinum doublets is unknown. This study was designed to test the combination of B, docetaxel (D), and gemcitabine (G) in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Methods: Pts with metastatic, non-squamous NSCLC, PS 0-1, and measurable disease by RECIST were enrolled in this open-label, single arm phase II trial. Pts received D (75 mg/m2) on d1, G (900 mg/m2) on d1 & 8, and B (15 mg/kg) on d1 every 21d for up to 6 cycles, followed by B maintenance until progression or 12 mos total. Pts received growth factor d9. CT scans were performed every 6 wks. The primary endpoint was 1-yr progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints of safety, objective response rate (ORR), overall PFS, and overall survival (OS). Pts with tumor cavitation, untreated brain metastases, and hemoptysis were excluded. Planned enrollment was 46. Results: 13 pts were enrolled from 12/2009 to 4/2011. Pt characteristics: Median age 63 (35-69), 85% male, PS 0 (38%), PS 1 (62%). The median # of cycles of chemotherapy was 6 (1-6), median # cycles of B was 4 (1-15), with 2 pts coming off study prior to the first evaluation (1 grade 5 encephalopathy, 1 grade 4 febrile neutropenia). 5 pts (38%) had chemo dose reduction and 4 (31%) discontinued treatment for toxicity. 3 pts (23%) discontinued B prior to progression, 2 for tumor cavitation and 1 for grade 1 hemoptysis. The grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity rate was 69%, with 6 pts (46%) hospitalized with pneumonitis/pneumonia felt possibly related to study drugs. At this point enrollment was halted for safety concerns. The 1-yr PFS was 8%, and the median PFS was 6.9 mos (95% CI 2.0-NYR). 11 pts were evaluable for response, and 6 pts had partial responses for an ORR of 55%. The median OS was NYR with median follow up of 10.9 mos. Conclusions: The combination of B, D, and G was not tolerable at the doses and schedule used in this study. A formal phase I trial is needed if this combination is to be investigated further.

A single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat (pan) and carfilzomib (cfz) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RR MM).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8115-TPS8115
Author(s):  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Joseph Mace ◽  
Ruth E. Lamar ◽  
Victor Gian ◽  
Patrick Brian Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Starting Dose

TPS8115 Background: Despite novel therapies, MM remains an incurable disease. Changes in histone modification are commonly found in human cancers including MM. Preclinical studies demonstrate synergistic anti-MM activity with histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) and proteasome inhibitors (PI) through the dual inhibition of the proteasome and aggresome pathways. Pan is an oral pan-HDACi which has shown synergy with bortezomib in clinical studies. Cfz is a 2nd generation PI which has shown marked anti-MM activity with an improved safety profile. In this trial we evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of pan and cfz in pts with RR MM. Methods: This multi-center US study plans to enroll up to 52 adults with RR MM. The phase I study will determine the MTD of the combination of cfz and pan and follow a standard dose escalation design. Pan will be administered orally three times weekly during weeks 1 and 3 of each 28-day cycle (Days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 19) at a starting dose of 20 mg. Cfz will be administered intravenously on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of each 28-day cycle. Cfz starting dose will be 20mg on days 1,2 of cycle 1 with escalation to the corresponding dose level beginning at 27 mg , if well tolerated. Dose modifications will not be permitted during cycle 1 unless a pt experiences a DLT. A maximum of four dose levels will be evaluated. Approximately 24 pts will be enrolled during the phase I portion to establish the MTD. In the phase II portion of this study, pts with RR MM will receive treatment with the optimal dose of pan and cfz established during phase I. Pts will be assessed for response to treatment after each cycle (4 weeks). Pts with objective response or stable disease will continue treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. The primary endpoint is to establish the optimal doses of cfz and pan that can be administered to pts with RR MM (phase I) and to evaluate the overall response rate (phase II). Secondary endpoints include time-to-progression, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Approximately 25 pts are planned for the phase II portion. Current status: As of 1/27/12 3 patients have been enrolled.

EGFR-TKI benefit for NSCLC patients with EML4-ALK rearrangement.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18035-e18035
Author(s):  
Zhijie Wang ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Yi Long Wu ◽  
Hua Bai ◽  
Xu-Chao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Alk Rearrangement ◽  
Mutant Type ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tki

e18035 Background: EML4-ALK rearrangement defines a new molecular subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To identify the biological profiles of these patients, we examined the clinico-pathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes of NSCLC patients based on EML4-ALK and EGFR mutations. Methods: Patients with stage IV NSCLC were screened for EML4-ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutations at Peking University Cancer Hospital. EML4-ALK was identified using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and EGFR mutations were determined using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). Results: Of the 151 patients screened, 113 had complete follow-up data as an analysis set. The incidence of EML4-ALK was 9.7% (11/113) using FISH, in which 10 cases had sufficient specimens for IHC confirmation and all were positive. Overall, EML4-ALK and EGFR mutations were largely mutually exclusive (p = 0.033), although two patients harbored concurrent mutations. EML4-ALK rearrangement was associated with resistance to EGFR-TKIs compared with the EGFR mutant type and WT/Nonrearrangement type (p = 0.001 for objective response rate; p = 0.004 for disease control rate; p = 0.021 for progression-free survival [PFS]). In terms of patients who received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the EML4-ALK type, EGFR mutant type, and WT/Nonrearrangement type. Moreover, two patients with concurrent EML4-ALK and EGFR mutations had superior PFS after EGFR-TKI compared with single EML4-ALK-rearranged patients. Conclusions: This study presents several biological features of EML4-ALK NSCLC. It is largely mutually exclusive to EGFR mutations, resistant to EGFR-TKI. Coexistence of ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutation in patients with advanced NSCLC might represent a separate genotype with unique biological characteristics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document