scholarly journals Lessons Learned From the First 10 Consecutive Cases of Intravenous Bacteriophage Therapy to Treat Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections at a Single Center in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saima Aslam ◽  
Elizabeth Lampley ◽  
Darcy Wooten ◽  
Maile Karris ◽  
Constance Benson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Mycobacterium Abscessus ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Bacteriophage Therapy ◽  
Successful Case

Abstract Background Due to increasing multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections, there is an interest in assessing the use of bacteriophage therapy (BT) as an antibiotic alternative. After the first successful case of intravenous BT to treat a systemic MDR infection at our institution in 2017, the Center for Innovative Phage Applications and Therapeutics (IPATH) was created at the University of California, San Diego, in June 2018. Methods We reviewed IPATH consult requests from June 1, 2018, to April 30, 2020, and reviewed the regulatory process of initiating BT on a compassionate basis in the United States. We also reviewed outcomes of the first 10 cases at our center treated with intravenous BT (from April 1, 2017, onwards). Results Among 785 BT requests to IPATH, BT was administered to 17 of 119 patients in whom it was recommended. One-third of requests were for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycobacterium abscessus. Intravenous BT was safe with a successful outcome in 7/10 antibiotic-recalcitrant infections at our center (6 were before IPATH). BT may be safely self-administered by outpatients, used for infection suppression/prophylaxis, and combined successfully with antibiotics despite antibiotic resistance, and phage resistance may be overcome with new phage(s). Failure occurred in 2 cases despite in vitro phage susceptibility. Conclusions We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of intravenous BT for a variety of infections and discuss practical considerations that will be critical for informing future clinical trials.

scholarly journals 129. Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime–avibactam and Comparator Agents Tested against Gram-Negative Organisms Isolated from Patients with Bloodstream Infections in United States Medical Centers (2017–2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S93-S94
Author(s):  
Cecilia G Carvalhaes ◽  
Mariana Castanheira ◽  
Rodrigo E Mendes ◽  
Helio S Sader
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New York ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative Organisms ◽  
Esbl Producers

Abstract Background We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacterales (ENT) and P. aeruginosa (PSA) causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) in the United States (US) hospitals. Methods A total of 3,317 ENT and 331 PSA isolates were consecutively collected (1/patient) from patients with BSI in 68 US medical centers in 2017–2018 and tested for susceptibility (S) by reference broth microdilution methods in a central laboratory as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) Program. β-Lactamase screening was performed by whole-genome sequencing on ENT with decreased S to broad-spectrum cephalosporins (ESBL phenotype). Results The most common ENT species isolated from BSI were E. coli (EC; 41.9% of ENT), K. pneumoniae (KPN; 24.4%), and E. cloacae (ECL; 8.7%), and the most active agents against ENT were ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI; 99.9%S), amikacin (AMK; 99.6%S) and meropenem (MEM; 99.3%S). CAZ-AVI was active against all EC and KPN isolates (100.0%S). Only 2 ENT isolates (0.06%) were CAZ-AVI resistant, 2 NDM-1-producing ECL isolated in the New York City area. Ceftolozane–tazobactam (C-T) and piperacillin–tazobactam (PIP-TAZ) showed good activity against EC and KPN (92.2–98.9%S; Table), with limited activity against ECL (81.9–83.7%S). The most common ESBLs were CTX-M-type, which was observed in 93% of ESBL producers (mainly CTX-M-15 [64% of ESBL producers] and CTX-M-27 [13%]), and OXA-1/OXA-30 (42%); 42% of ESBL producers (n = 333, excluding carbapenemase producers) displayed ≥2 ESBL genes, mainly CTX-M-15 and OXA-1/OXA-30 (40% of ESBL producers). The most active agents against ESBL producers were CAZ-AVI (100.0%S), imipenem (99.4%S), and colistin (COL; 99.1%S). Only CAZ-AVI (99.4%S), AMK (96.2%S) and MEM (92.8%S) were active against >90% of multidrug-resistant (MDR) ENT. Among 19 carbapenem-resistant ENT (CRE; 0.6% of ENT), 9 produced a KPC-like, 2 an NDM-1, and 2 an NMC-A; carbapenemase genes were not found in 6 CRE isolates. COL (100.0%S), CAZ-AVI (98.5%S), AMK (98.5%S), C-T (98.1%S), and tobramycin (97.0%S) were very active against PSA. Conclusion CAZ-AVI exhibited potent in vitro activity and great spectrum against ENT (99.9%S) and PSA (98.5%) isolated from patients with BSI from US hospitals. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Evaluation of In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from United States Hospitals: Results from 7 Years of the AWARE Surveillance Program (2010–2016)

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S378-S378
Author(s):  
Michael A Pfaller ◽  
Rodrigo E Mendes ◽  
Leonard R Duncan ◽  
Robert K Flamm ◽  
Helio S Sader
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate ◽  
Infection Types ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Ceftaroline (CPT) is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against S. pneumoniae (SPN), including multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. CPT fosamil is approved for clinical use in the United States (US) to treat community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The AWARE Program monitors the in vitro activity of CPT against clinical bacteria from various infection types. We evaluated the activity of CPT against isolated SPN clinical isolates from US hospitals collected in 2010 through 2016. Methods A total of 8,768 isolates were consecutively collected (1 per patient) from 47 medical centers in 2010–2016 and tested for susceptibility (S) to CPT and comparator agents using CLSI broth microdilution methods. Resistant subgroups included isolates that were nonsusceptible (NS) to penicillin (PCN), ceftriaxone (CRO), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), erythromycin (ERY), clindamycin (CM), and levofloxacin (LEV) as well as MDR (NS to ≥3 classes of agents) and extensively drug resistant (XDR; NS to ≥5 classes). Results CPT inhibited 99.99% of SPN isolates at ≤0.5 mg/L (only 1 isolate had a CPT MIC of 1 mg/L) and remained active against all SPN-resistant (R) subgroups, including PCN-NS (8.7% at ≥4 mg/L), CRO-NS (6.9% at ≥2 mg/L), MDR (21.7%), and XDR (8.4%) strains. CPT activity remained stable against all R subgroups each year. MDR and XDR frequency decreased from 25.0% and 14.1% in 2011 to 17.8% and 3.2% in 2015, respectively; and S to PCN, CRO, AMC, CM, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMX), and tetracycline (TET) increased in the same period (Table). The CPT-NS isolate had multiple substitutions in the penicillin binding proteins (PBP), mainly PBP2x, when compared with reference sequences, and showed 31 amino acid alterations in MurM. For MDR isolates, CPT (99.9%S), tigecycline (99.9%S), linezolid (100.0%S), and vancomycin (100.0%S) were the most active agents. Conclusion CPT demonstrated potent and consistent (2010–2016) activity against SPN, including several R phenotypes and the less S serotypes. SPN S to many antibiotics increased from 2011 to 2015, but remained stable in 2015–2016. Increases in S rates could be related to the anti-pneumococcal vaccine PVC-13 introduced in 2010. Disclosures M. A. Pfaller, Allergan: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. E. Mendes, Allergan: Research Contractor, Research grant; L. R. Duncan, Allergan: Research Contractor, Research grant; R. K. Flamm, Allergan: Research Contractor, Research grant; H. S. Sader, Allergan: Research Contractor, Research grant

scholarly journals Tasked with a Challenging Objective: Why Do Neutrophils Fail to Battle Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms

Pathogens ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Geddes-McAlister ◽  
Abirami Kugadas ◽  
Mihaela Gadjeva
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Bacterial Biofilms ◽  
Spectroscopy Analysis ◽  
Mass Spectroscopy Analysis ◽  
Novel Therapeutic

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections are a leading cause of mortality, affecting approximately 250,000 people in Canada and over 2 million people in the United States, annually. The lack of efficacy of antibiotic-based treatments is often caused by inability of the drug to penetrate bacterial biofilms in sufficient concentrations, posing a major therapeutic challenge. Here, we review the most recent information about the architecture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in vivo and describe how advances in imaging and mass spectroscopy analysis bring about novel therapeutic options and challenge existing dogmas.

scholarly journals Baseline Study To Determine In Vitro Activities of Daptomycin against Gram-Positive Pathogens Isolated in the United States in 2000-2001

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1689-1693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian A. Critchley ◽  
Renée S. Blosser-Middleton ◽  
Mark E. Jones ◽  
Clyde Thornsberry ◽  
Daniel F. Sahm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Outpatient Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Oxacillin Resistance ◽  
Positive Spectrum

ABSTRACT The activity of daptomycin was assessed by using 6,973 gram-positive bacteria isolated at 50 United States hospitals in 2000 and 2001. Among the isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 1,163) collected, the rate of penicillin resistance was 16.1%; rates of oxacillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates (n = 1,018) and vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecium isolates (n = 368) were 30.0 and 59.5%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes (isolates resistant to three or more different chemical classes of antimicrobial agents) accounted for 14.2% of S. pneumoniae isolates, 27.1% of S. aureus isolates, and 58.4% of E. faecium isolates. For all gram-positive species tested, MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited (MIC90s) and MIC ranges for directed-spectrum agents (daptomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and linezolid) were identical or highly similar for isolates susceptible or resistant to other agents or MDR. Daptomycin had a MIC90 of 0.12 μg/ml for both penicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates of S. pneumoniae. Against oxacillin-resistant S. aureus daptomycin had a MIC90 of 0.5 μg/ml, and it had a MIC90 of 4 μg/ml against both vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant E. faecium. The MIC90s for daptomycin and other directed-spectrum agents were unaffected by the regional or anatomical origin of isolates or patient demographic parameters (patient age, gender, and inpatient or outpatient care). Our results confirm the gram-positive spectrum of activity of daptomycin and that its activity is independent of susceptibility or resistance to commonly prescribed and tested antimicrobial agents. This study may serve as a baseline to monitor future changes in the susceptibility of gram-positive species to daptomycin following its introduction into clinical use.

scholarly journals LEADER Program Results for 2009: an Activity and Spectrum Analysis of Linezolid Using 6,414 Clinical Isolates from 56 Medical Centers in the United States

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 3684-3690 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Rodrigo E. Mendes ◽  
James E. Ross ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Ronald N. Jones
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Geographic Area ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
23S Rrna ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Laboratory Design ◽  
Linezolid Resistance ◽  
Medical Centers

ABSTRACTThe LEADER Program monitors thein vitroactivity of linezolid in sampled U.S. medical centers using reference broth microdilution methods with supporting molecular investigations in a central laboratory design. This report summarizes data obtained in 2009, the 6th consecutive year of this longitudinal study. A total of 6,414 isolates from 56 medical centers in all nine Census regions across the United States participated in 2009. For the six leading species/groups, the following linezolid MIC90values were observed:Staphylococcus aureus, 2 μg/ml; coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 1 μg/ml;Enterococcusspp., 2 μg/ml;Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1 μg/ml; viridans group streptococci, 1 μg/ml; and beta-hemolytic streptococci, 1 μg/ml. Linezolid resistance was only 0.34% overall, with no evidence of significant increase in the LEADER Program since 2006. The predominant linezolid resistant mechanism found was a G2576T mutation in the 23S rRNA. L3/L4 riboprotein mutations were also found. The mobile multidrug-resistantcfrgene was found in four strains (twoS. aureusstrains and one strain each ofS. epidermidisandS. capitis) from four different states, suggesting persistence but a lack of dissemination. Linezolid continues to exhibit excellent activity and spectrum, and this study documents the need for continued monitoring of emerging mechanisms of resistance over a wide geographic area.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Susceptibility of NDM-Producing Enterobacterales Collected in the United States in 2017 and 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Lutgring ◽  
Rocío Balbuena ◽  
Natashia Reese ◽  
Sarah E. Gilbert ◽  
Uzma Ansari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Extensively Drug Resistant

ABSTRACT The treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, especially New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing bacteria, is challenging. Although less common in the United States than some other carbapenemase producers, NDM-producing bacteria are a public health threat due to the limited treatment options available. Here, we report on the antibiotic susceptibility of 275 contemporary NDM-producing Enterobacterales collected from 30 U.S. states through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network. The aims of the study were to determine the susceptibility of these isolates to 32 currently available antibiotics using reference broth microdilution and to explore the in vitro activity of 3 combination agents that are not yet available. Categorical interpretations were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive criteria. For agents without CLSI criteria, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) interpretive criteria were used. The percentage of susceptible isolates did not exceed 90% for any of the FDA-approved antibiotics tested. The antibiotics with breakpoints that had the highest in vitro activity were tigecycline (86.5% susceptible), eravacycline (66.2% susceptible), and omadacycline (59.6% susceptible); 18.2% of isolates were susceptible to aztreonam. All NDM-producing isolates tested were multidrug resistant, and 116 isolates were extensively drug resistant (42.2%); 207 (75.3%) isolates displayed difficult-to-treat resistance. The difficulty in treating infections caused by NDM-producing Enterobacterales highlights the need for containment and prevention efforts to keep these infections from becoming more common.

scholarly journals WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) Antimicrobial Activity against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria Collected Worldwide in 2015

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Mariana Castanheira ◽  
Michael Huband ◽  
Ronald N. Jones ◽  
Robert K. Flamm
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

ABSTRACT WCK 5222 consists of cefepime combined with zidebactam, a bicyclo-acyl hydrazide β-lactam enhancer antibiotic with a dual action involving binding to Gram-negative bacterial PBP2 and β-lactamase inhibition. We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-zidebactam against 7,876 contemporary (2015) clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 5,946), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,291), and Acinetobacter spp. (n = 639) from the United States (n = 2,919), Europe (n = 3,004), the Asia-Pacific (n = 1,370), and Latin America (n = 583). The isolates were tested by a reference broth microdilution method for susceptibility against cefepime-zidebactam (1:1 and 2:1 ratios) and comparator agents. Cefepime-zidebactam was the most active compound tested against Enterobacteriaceae (MIC50/90, ≤0.03/0.12 μg/ml [1:1] and 0.06/0.25 μg/ml [2:1]; 99.9% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 [1:1] and ≤8 μg/ml [2:1]). Cefepime-zidebactam was active against individual Enterobacteriaceae species (MIC50/90, ≤0.03 to 0.06/≤0.03 to 0.5 μg/ml [1:1]) and retained potent activity against carbapenem-resistant isolates (MIC50/90, 1/4 μg/ml; 99.3% of isolates were inhibited at ≤8 μg/ml [1:1]). Cefepime-zidebactam activity was consistent among geographic regions, and only one isolate showed MIC values of >8 μg/ml (1:1). Cefepime-zidebactam was also very active against P. aeruginosa with MIC50/90 values of 1/4 μg/ml, and 99.5% of isolates were inhibited at ≤8 μg/ml (1:1). The MIC values for cefepime-zidebactam at the 1:1 ratio were generally 2-fold lower than those for cefepime-zidebactam at the 2:1 ratio (MIC50/90, 2/8 μg/ml) and zidebactam alone (MIC50/90, 4/8 μg/ml). Against Acinetobacter spp., cefepime-zidebactam at 1:1 and 2:1 ratios (MIC50/90, 16/32 μg/ml for both) was 4-fold more active than cefepime or ceftazidime. Zidebactam exhibited potent in vitro antimicrobial activity against some organisms. These results support the clinical development of WCK 5222 for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant isolates.

The new Papers Past: an international collaboration between New Zealand, India, Germany, and the United States

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lanz ◽  
Frederick Zarndt ◽  
Stefan Boddie ◽  
Tracy Powell ◽  
Vishal Salgotra
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Collaboration ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Collaborative Project ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clear Communication ◽  
Insight Into

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss international collaboration on the Papers Past historic newspaper digitisation project, with particular focus on how to work together across four countries for a successful outcome.Design/methodology/approachThe paper outlines the stages of the project and provides project perspectives from all the partners. Concludes with lessons learned.FindingsThe article confirms that clear communication and requirements are essential to any collaborative project.Originality/valueThis study provides insight into how to overcome the difficulties of working collaboratively on projects across different countries and cultures.

scholarly journals In Vitro Profiling of Ceftaroline against a Collection of Recent Bacterial Clinical Isolates from across the United States

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 3398-3407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yigong Ge ◽  
Donald Biek ◽  
George H. Talbot ◽  
Daniel F. Sahm
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infections ◽  
Spectrum Activity ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Broad Spectrum Activity

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftaroline, a novel cephalosporin with broad-spectrum activity against gram-negative and -positive pathogens, against 4,151 recent clinical isolates collected in the United States. Ceftaroline was very potent against bacteria found in community- and hospital-acquired infections, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and common Enterobacteriaceae spp.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document