6. Pentavalent Meningococcal (MenABCWY) Vaccine is Safe and Well Tolerated With Immunogenicity Noninferior to Coadministered MenB-FHbp and MenACWY-CRM in a Phase 2 Study of Healthy Adolescents and Young Adults

Abstract Background Meningococcal serogroups A, B, C, W and Y cause nearly all meningococcal disease globally. Vaccination is complicated by different dosing recommendations for serogroup B (MenB) and quadrivalent (MenACWY) vaccines, which could be solved with a single pentavalent vaccine. This study in adolescents and young adults evaluated a new pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine that combines 2 licensed vaccines, MenB-FHbp (Trumenba®; bivalent rLP2086) and MenACWY-TT (Nimenrix®), into a single vaccine. Methods In this ongoing, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, multicenter study (NCT03135834), MenB vaccine-naive and MenACWY-naive or -experienced healthy 10–25-year-olds were randomized 1:2 to MenABCWY (Month 0,6) or MenB-FHbp (Month 0,6) and MenACWY-CRM (Month 0). Immune responses were measured by serum bactericidal activity assays with human complement (hSBA) against serogroup A, C, W and Y strains and 4 diverse, vaccine-heterologous MenB strains. Endpoints included percentages of subjects achieving ≥ 4-fold rises in titers from baseline. Noninferiority of immune responses was assessed at the 10% margin (95% CI lower limit > −10%). Safety was assessed. Results Following dose 2, high percentages of MenABCWY (n=543) and MenB-FHbp (n=1057) recipients achieved ≥ 4-fold rises against each of the 4 MenB strains (75.8−94.7% vs 67.4−95.0%) and titers reaching at least the lower limit of quantification against all 4 strains combined (79.9% vs 74.3%; Figure 1A). MenABCWY was noninferior to MenB-FHbp for all 5 endpoints. MenABCWY was also noninferior to a single MenACWY-CRM dose with 75.5−96.9% and 93.0−97.4% of MenABCWY recipients after dose 1 or 2, respectively, achieving ≥ 4-fold rises against serogroup A, C, W and Y depending on prior MenACWY experience (Figure 1B). Local reactions and systemic events after MenABCWY or MenB-FHbp were similarly frequent, mostly mild/moderate in severity (Figure 2), and unaffected by MenACWY experience. Figure 1. Immune Responses as Measured in hSBA to (A) MenB Test Strains at 1 Month After Dose 2 and (B) MenA, MenC, MenW, and MenY Test Strains at 1 Month After Doses 1 and 2 Figure 2. (A) Local Reactions and (B) Systemic Events Reported Within 7 Days After Any Dose Conclusion MenABCWY 4-fold immune responses from baseline were robust and noninferior to MenB-FHbp and MenACWY-CRM administered separately. Vaccination was safe and well tolerated. The favorable benefit-risk profile supports further MenABCWY development as a simplified alternative to current meningococcal vaccination practices. Funded by Pfizer. Disclosures James Peterson, MD, Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Daniel Drazan, MD, Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Hanna Czajka, MD, PhD, Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Jason Maguire, MD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Jean-Louis Pregaldien, MS, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Ilkka Seppa, MD, Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Roger Maansson, MS, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Robert O’Neill, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Annaliesa S. Anderson, PhD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) Paul Balmer, PhD, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Johannes Beeslaar, MD, Pfizer (Employee, Shareholder) John L. Perez, MD, MA, Pfizer Inc (Employee, Shareholder)

Download Full-text

28. Immunogenicity of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP Ebola Vaccine (ERVEBO™) in Participants by Age, Sex, and Baseline GP-ELISA Titer: A Post Hoc Analysis of Three Phase 2/3 Trials

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.073 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S38-S38

Author(s):

Jakub Simon ◽

Stephen Kennedy ◽

Barbara Mahon ◽

Sheri Dubey ◽

Rebecca Grant-Klein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Responses ◽

Antibody Response ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Post Hoc Analysis ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Elisa Titer ◽

Three Phase ◽

Post Hoc

Abstract Background The recent Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo highlights the sustained threat of EVD morbidity and mortality where healthcare and vaccine delivery are challenging. ERVEBO®, a live recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) vaccine containing the Zaire ebolavirus glycoprotein (GP) in place of the VSV GP (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP), was developed by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA in collaboration with multiple partners to prevent EVD and has been approved for human use in several countries. Methods We pooled data from three Phase 2/3 clinical trials conducted in Guinea (FLW), Sierra Leone (STRIVE), and Liberia (PREVAIL) during the 2013–2016 West African outbreak to assess immune responses using a validated assay in each of the three studies and performed a post hoc analysis by sex, age (18–50 yrs & >50 yrs) and baseline (BL) GP-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) titer (< 200 & ≥200 EU/ml). The full analysis set (FAS) population included the primary immunogenicity populations (all vaccinated participants with serology data collected within an acceptable day range) from all three trials. The endpoints were total IgG antibody response (EU/mL) measured by the GP-ELISA and neutralizing antibody response measured by the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP at Days 14, 28, 180, and 365 postvaccination. Results In the overall population and in all subgroups, GP-ELISA and PRNT geometric mean titers increased from BL, with most peaking at Day 28 and persisting through Day 365. There were differences between males and females and between participants with BL GP-ELISA < 200 & ≥200 EU/ml. There did not appear to be a difference between age groups. Conclusion These data demonstrate that rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP elicits a robust and durable immune response up to 12 months in participants regardless of age, sex, or BL GP-ELISA titer. The higher immune responses observed in females and participants with preexisting immunity are consistent with those described in published literature for other vaccines. Disclosures Jakub Simon, MD, MS, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Stephen Kennedy, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Barbara Mahon, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Sheri Dubey, MS, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Rebecca Grant-Klein, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Ken Liu, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Jonathan Hartzel, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Beth-Ann Coller, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Carolee Welebob, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Mary Hanson, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Rebecca Grais, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

584. Phase 1 Placebo-Controlled Trial of COVI-VAC™, an Intranasal, Live Attenuated COVID-19 Vaccine

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.782 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S394-S394

Author(s):

Sybil Tasker ◽

Daryl Bendel ◽

Melissa Bevan ◽

Steffen Mueller ◽

Anna Kushnir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Young Adults ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Member ◽

Research Study ◽

Serum Antibody ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Viral Shedding ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Furin Cleavage Site ◽

Viral Vaccine

Abstract Background COVI-VACTM is an intra-nasal live-attenuated SARS-COV-2 synthetic viral vaccine being developed for the prevention of COVID-19. COVI-VAC is attenuated through deletion of the furin cleavage site and introduction of 283 silent deoptimizing mutations that maintain viral amino acid sequence but result in significant attenuation due to slow translation in the human host cell. Notably, COVI-VAC includes all viral antigens and is not limited to spike. COVI-VAC has demonstrated attenuation, immunogenicity and single dose protection in both Syrian golden hamster and non-human primate models. Methods 48 healthy young adults were enrolled in an inpatient quarantine setting to one of 3 dose escalating cohorts and randomized to COVI-VAC or saline placebo given as nose drops, as a single 0.5mL dose or 2 doses 28 days apart. Endpoints included solicited and unsolicited adverse events, serum cytokines, viral shedding and sequence stability, mucosal and serum antibody responses and IFN ELISpot. Subjects will be followed for 1 year for late safety events and durability of immune response. Results Dosing is complete. There has been no trend in solicited reactogenicity events, and all unsolicited adverse events reported to date have been mild. There have been no SAEs or Grade 3 or 4 events. Vaccine virus from anonymized subjects was shed at levels lower than that likely to result in onward transmission, and the deoptimized sequence of the shed virus remained unchanged compared to the original vaccine sequence. Unblinded data including immunogenicity will be available prior to the IDWeek meeting. Conclusion COVI-VAC appears safe and well tolerated in healthy young adults. Vaccination resulted in minimal viral shedding without sequence instability. Safety and shedding data supports continued development in a wider Phase 2/3 population. Disclosures Sybil Tasker, MD, MPH, FIDSA, Codagenix Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Daryl Bendel, MD, Codagenix Inc (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Melissa Bevan, MD, Codagenix Inc (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Steffen Mueller, PhD, Codagenix Inc (Board Member, Employee, Shareholder) Anna Kushnir, PHD, Codagenix Inc (Employee) Brandon Londt, PhD, Codagenix Inc (Other Financial or Material Support, contracted lab services) J. Robert Coleman, PhD, Codagenix Inc. (Board Member, Employee, Shareholder)

Download Full-text

1157. Clinical Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Fosmanogepix, a Novel First-in-class Antifungal, in Patients with Renal Insufficiency: Subset Analysis from a Phase 2 Candidemia Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1343 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S605-S605

Author(s):

Pierre Bulpa ◽

Galia Rahav ◽

Ilana Oren ◽

Mickaël Aoun ◽

George R Thompson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Renal Insufficiency ◽

Antifungal Agents ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Antifungal Treatment ◽

Successful Outcome ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background Fosmanogepix (FMGX) is a first-in-class antifungal agent, with a unique MOA targeting the fungal enzyme Gwt1, and broad-spectrum activity against yeasts and molds, including fungi resistant to other antifungal agents. Patients with candidemia often have underlying renal insufficiency or are receiving medications that affect renal function. This analysis evaluated outcomes in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. Methods This global, multicenter, open-label, non-comparative study evaluated the safety and efficacy of FMGX for first-line treatment of candidemia. Patients with a recent diagnosis of candidemia defined as positive blood culture for Candida spp within 96 hrs prior to study entry with ≤ 2 days of prior antifungal treatment were eligible, including those with renal insufficiency. Patients with neutropenia, C. krusei infection, deep-seated Candida infections or receiving hemodialysis were excluded. Subjects were treated with FMGX for up to 14 days: 1000 mg IV BID for 1 day, then 600 mg IV QD for at least 2 days, followed by either 600 mg IV QD or 700 mg PO QD. Patients requiring antifungal treatment beyond 14 days received fluconazole. The primary efficacy endpoint was outcome at end of study treatment (EOST) as determined by an independent data review committee. Successful outcome was defined as survival with clearance of Candida from blood cultures with no additional antifungal treatment. Results 14/21 (66%) subjects had some degree of renal insufficiency: 7 had mild renal insufficiency (GFR:60-89), 5 had moderate renal insufficiency (GFR:30-59), and 2 had severe renal insufficiency (GFR:15-29). 12/14 (86%) completed study treatment, and treatment was successful at EOST in 12/14 (86%) subjects. Decline in renal function was not observed at EOST. 4 had worsening of renal function during the follow-up period; none required dialysis. Renal impairment did not increase exposure of FMGX. There were no treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion FMGX demonstrated high level treatment success with no evidence of drug-related nephrotoxicity, with no dose adjustments required. These preliminary data support the continued evaluation of FMGX in patients with candidemia and renal dysfunction as an alternative to potentially nephrotoxic antifungal agents. Disclosures Pierre Bulpa, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Galia Rahav, MD, AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Mickaël Aoun, MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Peter Pappas, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support) Bart Jan Kullberg, MD, FRCP, FIDSA, Amplyx (Advisor or Review Panel member) Sara Barbat, BSN, RN, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Pamela Wedel, BSc, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Haran T. Schlamm, MD, Amplyx (Consultant) Michael Hodges, BSc. MD, Amplyx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Employee)

Download Full-text

1608. Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Multiple Urban Hospitals

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1788 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S798-S799

Author(s):

Nicolo Cabrera ◽

Truc T Tran ◽

Travis J Carlson ◽

Faris Alnezary ◽

William R Miller ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Clinical Success ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Multidrug Resistant ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Research Support ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination developed for use against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). C/T is approved for complicated urinary tract and intraabdominal infections as well as hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonias. However, comprehensive clinical characterization of patients treated with C/T in non-FDA-approved indications is limited. Methods Patients ≥18 years who received C/T for ≥48 hours while hospitalized in 9 acute care centers in Houston, TX from January 2016 through September 2018 were included. Demographic, microbiologic, treatment and clinical outcome data were retrospectively collected by chart review. In patients who received multiple inpatient courses of C/T, only the first course with C/T was assessed. Results 210 patients met inclusion criteria: 58% were non-white, 35% were female and 13% were immunocompromised. Median age was 61 years (IQR, 48 to 69). Median Charlson comorbidity index was 5 (IQR, 2 to 6). At the onset of the index episode, a significant proportion of patients required intensive care unit admission (44%), mechanical ventilation (37%) and pressor support (22%). Respiratory sources were the most common (50%) followed by urine (15%). Positive cultures were documented in 93% of the cases and PA was found in 86%. Majority (95%) of PA which were MDR. C/T use was guided by susceptibility testing of the index isolate in ca. 52%. In 5.7% of cases, C/T was used to escalate therapy without any documented C/T-susceptible organism. Half (51%) of the cohort received initial dosing appropriate for renal function while 36% receiving a lower than recommended dose. Clinical success (i.e., recovery from infection-related signs and symptoms) occured in 77%. The in-hospital mortality rate in our cohort was 15% with 26 of 31 deaths deemed infection-related. Conclusion We report a large multicenter observational cohort that received C/T. A 77% clinical success with the use of C/T was documented. These data support the use of C/T in critically ill patients infected with MDR PA. Disclosures William R. Miller, MD, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Shionogi (Advisor or Review Panel member) Laura A. Puzniak, PhD, Merck (Employee) Cesar A. Arias, MD, MSc, PhD, FIDSA, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)MeMed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support)

Download Full-text

1393. Factors Associated with Co-administration of Pentavalent DTaP-IPV/Hib and Monovalent Hepatitis B Vaccine in the United States (US)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1575 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S706-S706

Author(s):

Tanaz Petigara ◽

Ya-Ting Chen ◽

Zhiwen Liu ◽

Michelle Goveia ◽

David Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

The United States ◽

Vaccination Schedule ◽

Provider Type ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Region Of Residence ◽

Birth Dose ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background The US vaccination schedule includes DTaP, IPV, Hib and HepB doses in the first 6 months of life. A previous analysis found variability in the timing of HepB doses in infants receiving DTaP-IPV/Hib. We explored factors associated with co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB on the same day. Methods This was a retrospective study using the MarketScan® commercial claims and encounters database. Infants born from 1 July 2010 - 30 June 2016, continuously enrolled in an insurance plan for ≥ 13 months and receiving ≥ 3 DTaP-IPV/Hib doses were included. Infants were assessed for HepB claims relative to the first and third DTaP-IPV/Hib doses. Because a HepB birth dose was assumed, the first HepB claim from 29 - 169 days following birth was counted as Dose 2, and the second claim from 170 days - 12 months as Dose 3. Associations between demographic, provider, and insurance characteristics, receipt of other pediatric vaccines, and co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results Among 165,553 infants who received a first DTaP-IPV/Hib dose, 60.7% received HepB Dose 2 on the same day. Among 162,217 infants who received a third DTaP-IPV/Hib dose, 45.1% received HepB Dose 3 on the same day. Infants in the Northeast were less likely (OR=0.38, 95%CI=0.36-0.39), while those in the West were more likely (OR=1.41, 95%CI=1.36-1.46) than infants in the South to receive the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 2 on the same day. Infants vaccinated by pediatricians (OR=0.54, 95%CI=0.53-0.55) were less likely to receive the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 2 on the same day compared to infants vaccinated by family physicians. Infants who received PCV on the same day as the first dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib were more likely to receive HepB Dose 2 (OR=6.96, 95%CI=6.30-7.70) that day. These factors were also associated with co-administration of the third dose of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB Dose 3. Conclusion Differences in co-administration of DTaP-IPV/Hib and HepB were associated with region of residence, provider type and co-administration of PCV. The reasons underlying these differences merit exploration. A hexavalent vaccine containing DTaP, IPV, Hib, and HepB could improve timeliness of HepB vaccination, while reducing the number of injections during infancy. Disclosures Tanaz Petigara, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Ya-Ting Chen, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Zhiwen Liu, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc., (Employee) Michelle Goveia, MD, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder) David Johnson, MD, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

673. Updated CLSI Ciprofloxacin Breakpoints from a Multicenter Assessment for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.866 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S391-S391

Author(s):

Maria M Traczewski ◽

Denise Beasley ◽

Amanda Harrington ◽

Sharon DesJarlais ◽

Omai Garner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Reference Panel ◽

Broth Microdilution ◽

Salmonella Spp ◽

Research Personnel ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Material Support ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Support Research

Abstract Background Updated US FDA/CLSI ciprofloxacin breakpoints were evaluated against data from a multicenter clinical study with Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa on a MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel. MIC results were compared to results obtained with frozen broth microdilution panels prepared according to CLSI methodology. Methods MSDGN panels were evaluated at three clinical sites by comparing MIC values obtained using the MSDGN panels to MICs utilizing a CLSI broth microdilution reference panel. Data from the combined phases of efficacy and challenge included 803 Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa clinical isolates tested using the turbidity and Prompt® methods of inoculation. To demonstrate reproducibility, a subset of 12 organisms were tested on MSDGN panels at each site during reproducibility. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1ºC and read on the WalkAway System, the autoSCAN-4 instrument, and visually. Read times for the MSDGN panels were at 16-20 hours. Frozen reference panels were prepared and read according to CLSI methodology. FDA and CLSI breakpoints (µg/mL) used for interpretation of MIC results were: Enterobacterales ≤ 0.25 S, 0.5 I, ≥ 1 R; Salmonella spp. ≤ 0.06 S, 0.12-0.5 I, ≥ 1 R; P. aeruginosa ≤ 0.5 S, 1 I, ≥ 2 R. Results Essential and categorical agreement was calculated compared to frozen reference panel results. Results for isolates tested during efficacy and challenge with Prompt inoculation and manual read are as follows: Conclusion Ciprofloxacin MIC results for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp., and P. aeruginosa obtained with the MSDGN panel correlate well with MICs obtained using frozen reference panels using updated FDA/CLSI interpretive criteria in this multicenter study. * PROMPT® is a registered trademark of 3M Company, St. Paul, MN USA. BEC, the stylized logo and the BEC product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the US and other countries. Disclosures Maria M. Traczewski, BS MT (ASCP), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Denise Beasley, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Amanda Harrington, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Sharon DesJarlais, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Omai Garner, PhD, D(ABMM), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Christine Hastey, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Regina Brookman, BS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Zabrina Lockett, MS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Jennifer Chau, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee)

Download Full-text

1400. Physician Attitudes towards Combination Vaccine Use in Infants up to 24 months of age in the United States (US)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1582 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S708-S709

Author(s):

Ya-Ting Chen ◽

Xinyi Ng ◽

Tanaz Petigara ◽

Jyoti Aggarwal ◽

Jenna Bhaloo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Physician Attitudes ◽

Combination Vaccine ◽

Hexavalent Vaccine ◽

Family Practitioners ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Vaccine Schedule ◽

Combination Vaccines ◽

Number Of Injections

Abstract Background Combination vaccines reduce the number of injections and improve the timeliness of vaccination coverage. US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations state that combination vaccines are generally preferred over equivalent individual component vaccines. Healthcare providers strongly influence parental decisions about vaccination. We sought a contemporary understanding of physician’s attitudes towards combination vaccine use in infants. Methods We conducted an online survey of US physicians (70 pediatricians and 30 family practitioners) who administer vaccines to infants aged 0-24 months and spend at least 2 days a week providing patient care. Information was collected on attitudes towards combination vaccines and factors that influence the choice of combination vaccine used in clinical practice. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results Physicians (mean age=50.2 years, range 30.0-70.0; 66% white; 37% women) reported a median of 4 injections (range 2-9) as the maximum that parents would accept at a single visit, and 71% routinely explained what combination vaccines are to parents. When deciding which pentavalent vaccine to use, physicians considered how the brand fits into the current vaccine schedule (71%); upfront purchase costs (64%); and availability as a prefilled syringe (61%). The main reasons for using combination vaccines were to reduce the number of injections (96%); ensure the infant is up-to-date with vaccinations (86%); and reduce the pain that the infant experiences with multiple injections (68%). More than half reported that their institution or practice has a program to incentivize infant vaccination according to schedule. If a hexavalent vaccine-based schedule was available, 76% of physicians said they would choose it over their current schedule comprising pentavalent or equivalent component vaccines. Conclusion Choice of pentavalent combination vaccine among pediatricians and family practitioners was largely dependent on convenience and cost-related factors. Over three-quarters would be inclined to use a hexavalent vaccine schedule if available. Disclosures Ya-Ting Chen, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Xinyi Ng, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Tanaz Petigara, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jyoti Aggarwal, MHS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Jenna Bhaloo, MPH, Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant) Michelle Goveia, MD, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder) David Johnson, MD, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder) Gary S. Marshall, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Honorarium for conference lecture)Seqirus (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

1510. Infant Pneumonia and Subsequent Risk of Chronic Respiratory Disorders

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S758-S759

Author(s):

Stephen I Pelton ◽

Rotem Lapidot ◽

Matthew Wasserman ◽

Melody Shaff ◽

Ahuva Hanau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Airway Disease ◽

Research Support ◽

Recurrent Wheezing ◽

Recurrent Pneumonia ◽

Respiratory Disorders ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Study Population ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in infancy (i.e., among children aged < 2 years) may have long-term consequences for the rapidly developing lung. We examined the impact of pneumonia in infancy on subsequent respiratory health. Methods A retrospective matched-cohort design and data from Optum’s de-identified Integrated Claims-Clinical dataset (2009-2018) were employed. Study population comprised children who were hospitalized for CAP before age 2 years (“CAP patients”) as well as matched comparators without evidence of pneumonia before age 2 years (“comparison patients”). CAP patients and comparison patients were matched (fixed 1:5 ratio, without replacement) using estimated propensity scores and a nearest-neighbor approach; those with evidence of selected medical conditions (e.g., extreme prematurity, congenital diseases, respiratory diseases) before age 2 years were excluded. Study outcomes included recurrent pneumonia and a composite of asthma, recurrent wheezing, and hyperactive airway disease. Rates of study outcomes from age 2 to 5 years were estimated for all CAP and comparison patients as well as subgroups of CAP patients (and corresponding comparison patients) stratified by etiology (bacterial, viral, unspecified). Results Study population totaled 1,343 CAP patients and 6,715 comparison patients. CAP patients and comparison patients were well-balanced on their baseline characteristics and mean duration of follow-up was 757 and 729 days, respectively. Rates of chronic respiratory disorders from age 2 to 5 years were significantly higher among CAP patients versus comparison patients. Analyses of subgroups stratified by etiology demonstrated higher rates of study outcomes among CAP patients across all strata. Rates of recurrent pneumonia and a composite of asthma, recurrent wheezing, and hyperactive airway disease from age 2 to 5 years among CAP patients and matched comparison patients Conclusion Infant CAP foreshadows an increase in subsequent risk of chronic respiratory disorders. Further studies are needed to determine whether this elevated risk is due to infant pneumonia or whether infant pneumonia is a marker of at-risk children. Disclosures Stephen I. Pelton, MD, Merck vaccine (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, DSMB)Seqirus Vaccine Ltd. (Consultant) Rotem Lapidot, MD, MSCI, Pfizer (Consultant) Matthew Wasserman, MSc., Pfizer Inc. (Employee) Melody Shaff, BA, Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Ahuva Hanau, BS, Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Alexander Lonshteyn, PhD, Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Derek Weycker, PhD, Pfizer Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)

Download Full-text

617. Physician Perspective: Utilization of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) in the ID Workforce

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.811 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S369-S370

Author(s):

Alison M Beieler ◽

Leah H Yoke ◽

Catherine Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Online Community ◽

Research Study ◽

Clinical Skills ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Limiting Factor ◽

Advanced Practice ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Resource Limited ◽

Adult Inpatient ◽

Community Forum

Abstract Background Applicants entering Infectious Disease (ID) fellowships are declining and shortages of ID physicians is a challenge recognized by the clinical workforce and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). There is increased awareness of more Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) being used within ID to expand and extend existing practices. However, little is known about APP utilization, APP clinical scope of practice, specific roles, and opportunities for education. Methods To evaluate physician perspectives on APP utilization in ID, we created an anonymous and voluntary survey using the REDCap data tool that was distributed by social media, key stakeholder emails, and IDSA online community forum between 12/1/2019-1/31/2020. In addition to collecting geographic information and the type of ID practice, participants were also surveyed about the use of APPs and any perceived barriers that may limit their use. Results 218 practicing ID physicians responded to the survey (Figure 1). 155 (71%) physicians work with APPs in their current practice (Figure 2); specifically, 56 (27%) with 1 APP, 62 (30%) with 2-4 APPs, 28 (13%) with 5-9 APPs, and 11 (5%) with > 10 APPs. Of respondents, 104 (48%) practiced at University/Medical schools, 80 (37%) in hospitals/clinics, and 28 (13%) in private practice (Table 1); most work in adult inpatient/outpatient ID. The main reasons selected by respondents for not using APPs in their practice included concerns around a lack of formal ID training 22 (15%), lack of time/lack of ability to assist with APP training 29 (20%), practice is already sufficiently staffed 19 (13%), and concern for physician revenue loss 16 (11%) (Table 1). Figure 1. Physician Responses by Region, n = 218 Figure 2. Physicians Utilizing APPs in Practice, n = 210 (*no response, 8) Table 1. Physician ID Practice Type, Setting, and Concerns Conclusion Results suggest that while collaboration between ID physicians and APPs exists to meet current needs, a lack of ID training is a limiting factor. Our findings demonstrate there is an opportunity for formal ID education and resource development both to enhance APPs clinical skills and address perceived knowledge gaps. Inclusion of APPs in the ID workforce may allow physicians to expand ID care into more resource limited areas to continue to provide high quality patient care. Disclosures Steven A. Pergam, MD, MPH, Chimerix, Inc (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Global Life Technologies, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi-Aventis (Other Financial or Material Support, Participate in clinical trial sponsored by NIAID (U01-AI132004); vaccines for this trial are provided by Sanofi-Aventis)

Download Full-text

273. Comparative Effectiveness of Ampicillin in the Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream Infections in Patients With Cancer

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.317 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S137-S138

Author(s):

J P Sanchez ◽

German Contreras ◽

Truc T Tran ◽

Shelby Simar ◽

Blake Hanson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Kidney Injury ◽

Bloodstream Infections ◽

Definitive Treatment ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Future Research ◽

Research Support ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background E. faecalis (Efc) isolates are usually susceptible to ampicillin (AMP). AMP-based regimens are the standard of care for enterococcal infections, although other antibiotics are often used as definitive treatment. We thus compared outcomes of patients with cancer and Efc bacteremia treated with AMP-containing (ACR) and non-AMP-containing antibiotic regimens (NACR). Methods A multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Henry Ford Hospital, and Memorial Hermann Health System. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, diagnosed with cancer, and had at least one Efc bloodstream isolate collected from 12/2015 to 12/2018. Patients with polymicrobial infections were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: i) ACR and ii) NACR. ACR included patients who received AMP at any time during treatment; other antimicrobials were permitted. NACR patients did not receive AMP at any time. The primary outcome compared desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) between ACR and NACR at day 14. The DOOR consisted of six hierarchical levels: 1 - death; 2 - inpatient without microbiological cure (MC) and with acute kidney injury (AKI); 3 - inpatient without MC and without AKI; 4 - inpatient admitted with MC and with AKI; 5 - inpatient with MC and without AKI; 6 - alive and discharged. Comparison of DOORs between ACR and NACR was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) ordered logistic regression. Results Seventy-one patients were included (ACR, n = 35; NACR, n = 36). No difference was seen in DOORs at day 14 between ACR and NACR (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.45 – 2.92, p=0.78). No difference was observed for all-cause mortality at day 14 (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.09 – 3.77, p=0.58) or day 30 (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.09 – 1.94, p=0.27). Patients treated with ACR received a lower median duration of other antibiotics at any point during treatment compared to NACR: daptomycin (2 v 4 days) vancomycin (2 v 4 days), and linezolid (1 v 2 days). Conclusion Patients with cancer and Efc bloodstream infections had similar outcomes when treated with ACR and NACR. ACR were associated with less use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Future research should focus on the ecologic impact of use of NACR. Disclosures Marcus Zervos, MD, Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support) Cesar A. Arias, MD, MSc, PhD, FIDSA, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)MeMed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support)

Download Full-text