scholarly journals Patient Perceptions and Acceptance of Routine Emergency Department HIV Testing

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Brown ◽  
Irene Kuo ◽  
Jennifer Bellows ◽  
Ryan Barry ◽  
Peter Bui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
African American ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
High Prevalence

Objectives. We report on the rates of patient acceptance and their perceptions of routine emergency department (ED) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in a high-prevalence area. Methods. We analyzed the race/ethnicity of patients who either accepted or declined a routine HIV test that was offered to all patients in the ED of a large academic center. We also distributed a patient perception survey about ED HIV testing. Results. During the study period, an HIV screening test was offered to 9,826 patients. Of these, 5,232 patients (53%) accepted the test. The acceptance rate of HIV testing was highest among African American patients (55%), followed by 52% for white, 50% for Hispanic, and 42% for Asian patients. A total of 1,519 completed surveys were returned for analysis. The most common reasons for declining a test were that patients did not perceive themselves to be at risk for HIV (49%) or they had recently been tested for HIV (18%). Overall, 84% of patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test in the ED. When analyzed by ethnicity, 89% of African American patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test if the friend went to the ED, but only 74% of white patients would do so. Conclusions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2006 recommendations on HIV screening are well accepted by the target populations. Further work at explaining the risk of HIV infection to ED patients should be undertaken and may boost the acceptance rate of ED HIV screening.

scholarly journals 1120. Impact of Training Residents to Improve HIV Screening in a Teaching Hospital in Mexico City

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S590-S590
Author(s):  
Lorena Guerrero-Torres ◽  
Isaac Núñez-Saavedra ◽  
Yanink Caro-Vega ◽  
Brenda Crabtree-Ramírez
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Time Series ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Hiv Diagnosis ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Test

Abstract Background Among 230,000 people living with HIV in Mexico, 24% are unaware of their diagnosis, and half of newly diagnosed individuals are diagnosed with advanced disease. Early diagnosis is the goal to mitigate HIV epidemic. Missed opportunities may reflect a lack of clinicians’ consideration of HIV screening as part of routine medical care. We assessed whether an educational intervention on residents was effective to 1) improve the knowledge on HIV screening; 2) increase the rate of HIV tests requested in the hospitalization floor (HF) and the emergency department (ED); and 3) increase HIV diagnosis in HF and ED. Methods Internal Medicine and Surgery residents at a teaching hospital were invited to participate. The intervention occurred in August 2018 and consisted in 2 sessions on HIV screening with an expert. A questionnaire was applied before (BQ) and after (AQ) the intervention, which included HIV screening indications and clinical cases. The Institutional Review Board approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. BQ and AQ scores were compared with a paired t-test. To evaluate the effect on HIV test rate in the HF and ED, an interrupted time series analysis was performed. Daily rates of tests were obtained from September 2016 to August 2019 and plotted along time. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to model temporal trends. HIV diagnosis in HF and ED pre- and post-intervention were compared with a Fisher’s exact test. A p< 0.05 was considered significant. Results Among 104 residents, 57 participated and completed both questionnaires. BQ score was 79/100 (SD±12) and AQ was 85/100 (SD±8), p< .004. Time series of HIV testing had apparent temporal trends (Fig 1). HIV test rate in the HF increased (7.3 vs 11.1 per 100 episodes) and decreased in the ED (2.6 vs 2.3 per 100 episodes). HIV diagnosis increased in the HF, from 0/1079 (0%) pre-intervention to 5/894 (0.6%) post-intervention (p< .018) (Table 1). Fig 1. HIV test rates. Gray area represents post-intervention period. Table 1. Description of episodes, HIV tests and rates pre- and post-intervention in the Emergency Department and Hospitalization Floor. Conclusion A feasible educational intervention improved residents’ knowledge on HIV screening, achieved maintenance of a constant rate of HIV testing in the HF and increased the number of HIV diagnosis in the HF. However, these results were not observed in the ED, where administrative barriers and work overload could hinder HIV screening. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1294. Long-Term Impact of an HIV Testing Program on High-Risk HIV Screening in the Emergency Department

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S466-S466
Author(s):  
Jillian T Baron ◽  
Alexis Schwartz ◽  
Ebony Davis ◽  
Julie E Uspal ◽  
Brendan Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Testing Program ◽  
Sti Testing ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background Emergency Departments (EDs) are important sites for HIV testing. However, there is little guidance on how best to implement HIV testing in the ED. The purpose of this study was to evaluate HIV screening practices of high-risk individuals presenting to an ED in the absence (ED1) and in the presence (ED2) of an established HIV testing program within the same academic hospital. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all individuals 18 years or older presenting to either ED between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. High-risk of HIV infection was determined by receipt of bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis. The primary outcome was receipt of any HIV test in the ED. Overall proportions of patients tested for HIV at the same time of STI testing were compared between sites by chi-square test. Predictors of HIV testing were analyzed by logistic regression. Results During the study period, 7,956 individuals received STI testing at ED1 and 10,815 received STI testing at ED2. The majority of individuals receiving STI testing at both sites were female, 81.2% at ED1 and 66.4% at ED2 (P <0.001). Only 4.0% of individuals received HIV testing at ED1 compared with 47.4% at ED2 (P <0.001). Individuals were significantly more likely to receive HIV testing at the time of STI testing in the ED with an HIV testing program (aOR 19.66, 95% CI 17.28–22.37). In the ED without an HIV testing program, individuals were more likely to receive HIV testing if they were male (aOR 3.57, 95% CI 2.78–4.55) and less likely if they were black (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50–0.97). In the ED with an HIV testing program, individuals were more likely to receive HIV testing if they were male (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.92–2.44) and more likely if they were black (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.37–2.20). Conclusion Overall, the presence of an HIV testing program in the ED significantly increased the probability that individuals would receive an HIV test at the time of bacterial STI testing and mitigated disparities in care. The results of this study will help guide ongoing interventions to improve HIV screening among high-risk individuals in the emergency department. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals An Electronic Alert for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department Increases Screening but not the Diagnosis of HIV

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 299-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Liu ◽  
J. Sperling ◽  
R. Green ◽  
S. Clark ◽  
D. Vawdrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
New York ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

SummaryObjective: Based on US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, New York State enacted legislation in 2010 requiring healthcare providers to offer non-targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to all patients aged 13–64. Three New York City adult emergency departments implemented an electronic alert that required clinicians to document whether an HIV test was offered before discharging a patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the electronic alert on HIV testing rates and diagnosis of HIV positive individuals.Methods: During the pre-intervention period (2.5–4 months), an electronic “HIV Testing” order set was available for clinicians to order a test or document a reason for not offering the test (e.g., patient is not conscious). An electronic alert was then added to enforce completion of the order set, effectively preventing ED discharge until an HIV test was offered to the patient. We analyzed data from 79,786 visits, measuring HIV testing and detection rates during the pre-intervention period and during the six months following the implementation of the alert.Results: The percentage of visits where an HIV test was performed increased from 5.4% in the pre-intervention period to 8.7% (p<0.001) after the electronic alert. After the implementation of the electronic alert, there was a 61% increase in HIV tests performed per visit. However, the percentage of patients testing positive per total patients-tested was slightly lower in the post-intervention group than the pre-intervention group (0.48% vs. 0.55%), but this was not significant. The number of patients-testing positive per total-patient visit was higher in the post-intervention group (0.04% vs. 0.03%).Conclusions: An electronic alert which enforced non-targeted screening was effective at increasing HIV testing rates but did not significantly increase the detection of persons living with HIV. The impact of this electronic alert on healthcare costs and quality of care merits further examination.Citation: Schnall R, Liu N, Sperling J, Green R, Clark S, Vawdrey D. An electronic alert for HIV screening in the emergency department increases screening but not the diagnosis of HIV. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 299–312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-09-RA-0075

scholarly journals 1299. Cluster of False-Positive “Fifth-Generation” HIV Test Results During Implementation of a Routine HIV Screening Program in an Emergency Department

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S468-S468
Author(s):  
Andrew B Trotter ◽  
Anjana Maheswaran ◽  
Mary Kate Mannion ◽  
Sara Baghikar ◽  
Janet Lin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
False Positives ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
Hiv Antigen ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Background In November 2014, the University of Illinois Hospital (UI Health) introduced an electronic medical record (EMR)-driven HIV screening program in the emergency department (ED). In October 2016, our hospital laboratory introduced “Fifth-generation” HIV testing using the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 HIV Antigen/Antibody diagnostic assay. Fifth-generation HIV testing has the advantage of separately detecting and reporting HIV antibody and HIV-1 p24 antigen. Although the literature and manufacturer report high sensitivity and specificity of this test, we encountered higher than expected rates of false-positive tests during the introduction of this test. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the results of our ED HIV screening program from October 2016 to March 2019 to describe the outcomes of HIV testing, determine the rates of false-positive HIV tests and determine if false-positive rates were temporally clustered. We also investigated various potential causes of higher than expected false positives including pre-analytical and analytical error. We defined a false-positive test as a repeatedly reactive initial HIV antigen and/or HIV-1 antibody result with a subsequent negative or indeterminate HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay and negative HIV-1 nucleic amplification test. Results During the review period, out of a total of 17,385 HIV tests which were performed, 85 tests were confirmed positive and 27 were false positives. This represents an HIV prevalence of 0.5%. Eighteen of the 27 false positives occurred during an 8 month period between October 2016 and April 2017 (see Figure 1). During our investigation of potential causes of the false-positive tests, we discovered that a reagent lot for the test was changed in June 2017 which resulted in a significant decrease in the false-positive rate (0.33% to 0.07%). Conclusion We provide data which suggests that a reagent lot may have been the cause of higher than expected false-positive tests for HIV testing. Monitoring of testing outcomes during implementation of a routine HIV testing program can help identify potential root causes of false-positive tests. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Emergency Department Patient Acceptance of Opt-in, Universal, Rapid HIV Screening

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 27-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland C. Merchant ◽  
George R. Seage ◽  
Kenneth H. Mayer ◽  
Melissa A. Clark ◽  
Victor G. DeGruttola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
Demographic Characteristics ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Hiv Screening

Objectives. We assessed emergency department (ED) patient acceptance of opt-in, rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening and identified demographic characteristics and HIV testing-history factors associated with acceptance of screening. Methods. A random sample of 18- to 55-year-old ED patients was offered rapid HIV screening. Patient acceptance or decline of screening and the reasons for acceptance or decline were analyzed with multivariable regression models. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the logistic regression models. Results. Of the 2,099 participants, 39.3% accepted HIV screening. In a multinomial regression model, participants who were never married/not partnered, did not have private health insurance, and had 12 or fewer years of education were more likely to be screened due to concern about a possible HIV exposure. In a multivariable logistic regression model, the odds of accepting screening were greater among those who were younger than 40 years old (OR=1.61, 95% CI 1.32, 2.00), nonwhite (OR=1.28, 95% CI 1.04, 1.58), not married (OR=1.82, 95% CI 1.44, 2.28), lacking private health insurance (OR=1.40, 95% CI 1.13, 1.74), and who had 12 or fewer years of education (OR=1.43, 95% CI 1.16, 1.75). Despite use of a standardized protocol, patient acceptance of screening varied by which research assistant asked them to be screened. Patients not previously tested for HIV who were white, married, and 45 years or older and who had private health insurance were more likely to decline HIV screening. Conclusions. In an opt-in, universal, ED HIV screening program, patient acceptance of screening varied by demography, which indicates that the impact of such screening programs will not be universal. Future research will need to determine methods of increasing uptake of ED HIV screening that transcend patient demographic characteristics, HIV testing history, and motivation for testing.

Routine HIV Screening in Cancer Patients in the Emergency Department

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Terry W Rice ◽  
◽  
Patricia A. Brock ◽  
Carmen Gonzalez ◽  
Kelly W Merriman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Linkage To Care ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Routine Hiv Screening ◽  
Incident Cases

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) in cancer patients improves outcomes and reduces transmission of this oncogenic virus. HIV testing rates of cancer patients are similar to the general population (15-40%), despite the association with cancer. Our aim was to increase HIV screening in the Emergency Department(ED) of a comprehensive cancer center through a quality initiative. Testing increased significantly during the intervention (p<0.001; 0.15/day to 2.69/day). Seropositive HIV rate was 1.4% (12/852), with incidence of 0.3%. All patients were linked to care. Incident cases were between 36 and 55 years of age. Barriers encountered included confusion regarding the need for written consent for HIV testing, failure to consider ordering the test, and concerns regarding linkage to care.

scholarly journals Demographic Variations in HIV Testing History among Emergency Department Patients: Implications for Hiv Screening in US Emergency Departments

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland C Merchant ◽  
Bethany M Catanzaro ◽  
George R Seage ◽  
Kenneth H Mayer ◽  
Melissa A Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Emergency Department Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document