scholarly journals 96. Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis Selection and Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Reported Penicillin Allergy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S178-S179
Author(s):  
Ryan K Dare
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Infection Prophylaxis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hip And Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background Administration of preoperative antibiotics are known decrease risk of postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) and deviation from first line prophylaxis increases this risk. Patients who report penicillin (PCN) allergy are less likely to receive cefazolin preoperatively despite being the preferred antibiotic for SSI prevention in the majority of surgical procedures. Methods A single center retrospective descriptive study was performed during the 2018–2019 academic year. Perioperative antimicrobial administration practice was evaluated for all types of surgical procedures. Patient demographics, PCN allergy history, development of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) within 90 days of procedure, and total hip and knee arthroplasty SSIs were assessed. Results During the study period, 16,376 procedures were performed with perioperative antibiotic administration. Cefazolin (12,756; 77.9%) was most frequently administered followed by clindamycin (1,396; 8.5%), and vancomycin (735, 4.5%). PCN allergy was reported in 2,051 (12.5%) patients, of which 1,180 (57.5%) had record of previously receiving a cephalosporin. Interestingly, 694 (33.8%) and 11,799 (82%) patients with and without a reported PCN allergy respectively received cefazolin perioperatively (P< 0.001). The incidence of joint replacement SSI was higher in patients with a reported PCN allergy (6 of 97; 6.2%) compared to those without (12 of 671; 1.8%) (P=0.018). CDI occurred in 44 (1.1%) of 3,883 and 70 (0.5%) of 12,493 patients who received a non-cefazolin or cefazolin respectively for prophylaxis (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5–2.9). In multivariate analysis controlling for surgery type, age, weight, and renal function, receipt of a non-cefazolin antibiotic was independently associated with developing CDI (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1–2.4). Conclusion Patients with a reported PCN allergy were more likely to receive a non-cefazolin antibiotic perioperatively and were more likely to develop a SSI following hip or knee replacement. Administration of a non-cefazolin antibiotic was independently associated with increased risk of CDI. Efforts should be made to minimize inappropriate avoidance of first line perioperative prophylaxis due to reported PCN allergies. Disclosures Ryan K. Dare, MD, MS, Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc (Research Grant or Support)

scholarly journals The interplay of Clostridioides difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110202
Author(s):  
Kanika Sehgal ◽  
Devvrat Yadav ◽  
Sahil Khanna
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Molecular Tests ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
High Index Of Suspicion

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease of the intestinal tract that commonly presents with diarrhea. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common complications associated with IBD that lead to flare-ups of underlying IBD. The pathophysiology of CDI includes perturbations of the gut microbiota, which makes IBD a risk factor due to the gut microbial alterations that occur in IBD, predisposing patients CDI even in the absence of antibiotics. Superimposed CDI not only worsens IBD symptoms but also leads to adverse outcomes, including treatment failure and an increased risk of hospitalization, surgery, and mortality. Due to the overlapping symptoms and concerns with false-positive molecular tests for CDI, diagnosing CDI in patients with IBD remains a clinical challenge. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion for CDI in patients who seem to be experiencing an exacerbation of IBD symptoms. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are the first-line treatments for the management of CDI in IBD. Microbiota restoration therapies effectively prevent recurrent CDI in IBD patients. Immunosuppression for IBD in IBD patients with CDI should be managed individually, based on a thorough clinical assessment and after weighing the pros and cons of escalation of therapy. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, the diagnosis of CDI in IBD, and outlines the principles of management of both CDI and IBD in IBD patients with CDI.

scholarly journals 785. Association between Prevalence of Laboratory-Identified Clostridioides difficile Infections (CDIs) and CDI Antibiotic Treatment in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals, 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S437-S437
Author(s):  
Kerui Xu ◽  
Andrea L Benin ◽  
Hsiu Wu ◽  
Jonathan R Edwards ◽  
Qunna Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prevalence Rates ◽  
Hospital Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Patient Admissions ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are an urgent public health threat, accounting for 223,900 infections and 12,800 deaths in hospitalized patients annually. In early 2018, the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommended oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin as the first-line antibiotics for CDIs. To track the uptake of IDSA’s recommendations, we evaluated the association between CDI prevalence and use of first-line antibiotics in hospitals reporting to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Methods We matched 2018 hospital-level, NHSN data on laboratory-identified CDIs with NHSN antimicrobial use (AU) data for the same time period. Hospitals that submitted < 6 months of either data type in 2018 were excluded. The association between quarterly hospital-level CDI prevalence rates per 100 patient-admissions and use of CDI antibiotics (oral vancomycin plus fidaxomicin) per 1,000 days-present was evaluated using Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient and using Goodman and Kruskal’s gamma (G) on ordinal quartiles to assess rates of discordant pairs. Results Among the 2735 hospital-level quarters based on 714 hospitals included in the study, CDI prevalence (median: 0.46 per 100 patient-admissions) and CDI antibiotic use (median: 8.85 antibiotic-days per 1,000 days-present) demonstrated only a moderately positive correlation (r = 0.48). Among hospitals in the highest quartile for CDI prevalence, 5.1% were in the lowest quartile for antibiotic use. Among hospitals in the highest quartile for antibiotic use, 5.3% were in the lowest quartile for CDI prevalence, and 54.2% were in the highest quartile for CDI prevalence (G = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.57–0.63). Correlation of hospital-level Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevalence rates and oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin use in U.S. acute care hospitals, 2018 Distribution of hospital-level Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevalence rates and oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin use in ordinal quartiles (Q1–Q4) to access rates of discordant pairs Conclusion The moderate correlation and discordant rates suggest that vancomycin and fidaxomicin are less frequently used as primary antibiotics in some hospitals; whereas in others, CDI antibiotic use is occurring in the absence of positive laboratory tests for CDI. To further investigate this discordance, there is a need to assess hospitals’ prescribing and testing practices in an ongoing manner. These findings may be useful to serve as baseline for measuring progress of appropriateness of treatment and testing for CDIs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

THAs Performed Within 6 Months of Clostridioides difficile Infection Are Associated with Increased Risk of 90-Day Complications

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J. Douglas ◽  
Ethan A. Remily ◽  
Oliver C. Sax ◽  
Sahir S. Pervaiz ◽  
Evan B. Polsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

scholarly journals Analysis of the impact of secondary prophylaxis on Clostridioides difficile recurrence in critically ill adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205031212093089
Author(s):  
Kathryn A Connor ◽  
Kelly M Conn
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Infection Prophylaxis ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Critically Ill Adults ◽  
Ill Adults ◽  
Infection Recurrence

Introduction: Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection recurrence in patients re-exposed to antibiotics for treatment of a non- Clostridioides difficile infection is high at approximately 33%. Low-dose per os vancomycin (e.g. 125 mg q12 h) or metronidazole (e.g. 500 mg intravenous/per osq8 h) may help prevent recurrences, but study of secondary prophylaxis in critically ill patients is needed. Objectives: To determine whether critically ill adults receiving low-dose per os vancomycin for secondary Clostridioides difficile infection prophylaxis have fewer recurrences of Clostridioides difficile infection in 90 days compared with patients receiving metronidazole for secondary Clostridioides difficile infection prophylaxis or control (no secondary prophylaxis). Methods: This was a retrospective, two-center, observational study in a large academic medical center and affiliated community hospital. Included patients had a history of Clostridioides difficile infection within 1 year of receiving antibiotics for clinical care. We compared patients receiving secondary prophylaxis with vancomycin or metronidazole and control patients; in addition, an unplanned fourth group (vancomycin/metronidazole combination) was identified and analyzed. The primary outcome was Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence within 90 days of a course of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Fisher’s exact, analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence with prophylaxis group and additional contributing factors. Results: Eighty-two patients were included: 38 control (46.3%), 20 metronidazole (24.4%), 17 vancomycin (20.7%), and 7 combination (8.5%). Ten of 82 patients (12.2%) had at least one Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence; 8/38 patients in the control group (21.1%), 1/7 patients in the combination group (14.3%), 1/17 patients in the per os vancomycin group (5.9%), and 0/20 in the metronidazole group (0%; p = 0.073). As a post hoc secondary analysis, the three prophylaxis groups were coalesced into one group and compared with control (4.5% vs 21%; p = 0.039). Additional factors (e.g. age, obesity, immunosuppression, acid suppression) were not significantly associated with Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence or with prophylaxis group. Conclusion: There was no difference in Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence between prophylaxis groups, however, given the low recurrence rate, prospective evaluation with a larger sample of critically ill patients is necessary.

Anti-TNF containing regimens may be associated with increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahimeh Sadat Gholam-Mostafaei ◽  
Abbas Yadegar ◽  
Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei ◽  
Masoumeh Azimirad ◽  
Nasser Ebrahimi Daryani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals Correlation of prevention practices with rates of health care-associated Clostridioides difficile infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Jackson S. Musuuza ◽  
Linda McKinley ◽  
Julie A. Keating ◽  
Chidi Obasi ◽  
Mary Jo Knobloch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
Acute Care Facilities

AbstractObjective:We examined Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevention practices and their relationship with hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI rates (CDI rates) in Veterans Affairs (VA) acute-care facilities.Design:Cross-sectional study.Methods:From January 2017 to February 2017, we conducted an electronic survey of CDI prevention practices and hospital characteristics in the VA. We linked survey data with CDI rate data for the period January 2015 to December 2016. We stratified facilities according to whether their overall CDI rate per 10,000 bed days of care was above or below the national VA mean CDI rate. We examined whether specific CDI prevention practices were associated with an increased risk of a CDI rate above the national VA mean CDI rate.Results:All 126 facilities responded (100% response rate). Since implementing CDI prevention practices in July 2012, 60 of 123 facilities (49%) reported a decrease in CDI rates; 22 of 123 facilities (18%) reported an increase, and 41 of 123 (33%) reported no change. Facilities reporting an increase in the CDI rate (vs those reporting a decrease) after implementing prevention practices were 2.54 times more likely to have CDI rates that were above the national mean CDI rate. Whether a facility’s CDI rates were above or below the national mean CDI rate was not associated with self-reported cleaning practices, duration of contact precautions, availability of private rooms, or certification of infection preventionists in infection prevention.Conclusions:We found considerable variation in CDI rates. We were unable to identify which particular CDI prevention practices (i.e., bundle components) were associated with lower CDI rates.

scholarly journals GRADING prognostic factors for severe and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: expected and unexpected findings. A systematic review.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessel Meike van Rossen ◽  
Rogier E. Ooijevaar ◽  
Christina M.J.E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls ◽  
Olaf M. Dekkers ◽  
Ed J. Kuijper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), its subsequent recurrences (rCDI), and severe CDI (sCDI) provide a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Treatment consists of oral antibiotics. Fidaxomicin, bezlotoxumab and fecal microbiota transplantion (FMT) reduce the number of recurrences compared to vancomycin, but are more costly. Identifying patients diagnosed with initial CDI who are at increased risk of developing sCDI/rCDI could lead to more cost-effective therapeutic choices. Objectives In this systematic review we aimed to identify clinical prognostic factors associated with an increased risk of developing sCDI or rCDI. Methods PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science and COCHRANE Library databases were searched from database inception through March, 2021. Study selection was performed by two independent reviewers on the basis of predefined selection criteria; conflicts were resolved by consensus. Cohort and case-control studies providing an analysis of clinical or laboratory data to predict sCDI/rCDI in patients ≥18 years diagnosed with CDI, were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Research (QUIPS) tool and the quality of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool, modified for prognostic studies. Overview tables of prognostic factors were constructed to assess the number of studies and the respective direction of an association (positive, negative, or no association). Results and conclusions 136 studies were included for final analysis. Higher age and the presence of multiple comorbidities were prognostic factors for sCDI. Identified risk factors for rCDI were higher age, healthcare-associated CDI, prior hospitalization, PPIs started during/after CDI diagnosis and previous rCDI. Some variables that were found as risk factors for sCDI/rCDI in previous reviews were not confirmed in the current review, which can be attributed to differences in methodology. Risk stratification for sCDI/rCDI may contribute to a more personalized and optimal treatment for patients with CDI.

scholarly journals 2389. Assessing the Time Course of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Clostridioides difficile Infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S825-S825
Author(s):  
Katherine Panagos ◽  
Natalia Blanco ◽  
Surbhi Leekha ◽  
Erik von Rosenvinge ◽  
Emily Heil
Keyword(s):  
Proton Pump ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a known risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and recurrence, even in the absence of antibiotic use. No studies have specifically assessed the increased risk for CDI based on PPI duration, given that PPIs are frequently newly prescribed during hospitalizations and infrequently discontinued, even when CDI has occurred. The aim of this project was to assess the time course of PPI utilization and risk of CDI. Methods We conducted a retrospective matched case–control study comparing patients who developed CDI (cases) with patients who did not develop CDI (controls, matched on age, gender, date of admission and hospital location) from a cohort of patients with a C.difficile PCR test order from an academic medical center. Patient charts were reviewed for PPI use prior to the date of the positive test and whether the PPI was started in the hospital or as a home medication (>30d, 30–90d, 90–180d, >180d). The primary comparison was odds of PPI use between cases and controls using conditional logistic regression adjusted for antibiotic exposure (SAS 9.4, Cary, NC). Results A total of 348 patients were included in the study, 174 cases and 174 matched controls. 65% of patients in the study received a PPI, 85% a PPI or H2 blocker and 95% of patients received antibiotics during their admission. Patients on PPIs as home medications were not at an increased risk of CDI (OR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.60–1.93)) compared with those not on PPIs. Patients whose PPIs were initiated in the hospital were at increased risk of CDI compared with those not on PPIs (OR = 1.4 (95% CI 0.81–2.41)). No significant difference was observed across time periods of PPI use prior to admission and development of CDI. Conclusion Patients who started PPIs during inpatient stays were at a higher risk of developing CDI than patients not exposed to PPIs. However, PPI use was not found to be significantly associated with CDI in this analysis, regardless of the time or duration of PPI prescription. The results may be confounded by the high frequency of PPI use and concomitant antibiotic use in both cases and controls. Further study is needed to evaluate the impact of short-course PPI prescriptions in inpatient settings on CDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document