91. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Antibiotic Prescribing among Nurse Practitioners

Abstract Background Antibiotic overuse (AO) in ambulatory care is an important public health problem. Nurse practitioners (NPs) account for a growing proportion of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions: 14.6% in 2016. Our objective was to assess NPs’ attitudes about antibiotic prescribing practices and knowledge and use of antibiotic prescribing guidelines (APG) in their practice. Methods We distributed a survey via email to NPs listed as licensed by the North Carolina Board of Nursing. Surveys were distributed three times; duplicate responses were not permitted. Respondents who reported not prescribing antibiotics in the outpatient setting were ineligible. Three randomly selected respondents received gift cards. Questions assessed degree type, practice type, years in practice, and attitudes about antibiotic prescribing practices antibiotic stewardship. Respondents answered four questions assessing knowledge of APG. Analyses were descriptive; scores on knowledge questions were compared using T-tests. Results Survey requests were sent to 10,094 listed NPs; there were 846 completed responses (8.4%), of which 672 respondents (79.4%) reported prescribing antibiotics in outpatient care. Of those, 595 (88.5%) treat adult patients. Most respondents agreed that AO is a problem in their state (84.5%); 41.3% agreed that it was a problem in their practice. Patient/family satisfaction was the most frequently reported driver of AO (90.1%). Most respondents agreed that national APG are appropriate (95.4%) and that quality improvement (QI) is warranted (93.4%). Respondents reported following APG always (18.5%) or more than half the time (61.0%). Respondents answered a mean of 1.89 out of 4 knowledge questions correctly, with higher scores among those reporting following APG more than half the time (1.97 vs 1.58, p< 0.0001). Overall attitudes about antibiotic prescribing, antibiotic prescribing guidelines, and acceptance of Quality Improvement. N=595. Respondents’ reported drivers of antibiotic overuse. Respondents were permitted to select more than one driver. Content question performance by self-reported guideline compliance; scores represent the number correct out of four questions. Conclusion Respondents agree that AO is a problem but place responsibility externally. Confidence in APG was high; most respondents endorsed following APG most of the time. Performance on knowledge questions suggests a need for education. Most respondents would welcome QI focused on AO, including education and personalized feedback. Similar work is needed in other regions and among other prescriber groups. The results will inform outpatient antibiotic stewardship. Disclosures Elizabeth Walters, DNP, CPNP-PC, RN, Merck (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, I am a trainer for the Nexplanon product.) Ravi Jhaveri, MD, AstraZeneca (Consultant)Dynavax (Consultant)Elsevier (Other Financial or Material Support, Editorial Stipend as Co-editor in Chief, Clinical Therapeutics)Seqirus (Consultant)

Download Full-text

Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Optimize Treatment of Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Applied Gerontology ◽

10.1177/07334648211018299 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 073346482110182

Author(s):

Sainfer Aliyu ◽

Jasmine L. Travers ◽

S. Layla Heimlich ◽

Joanne Ifill ◽

Arlene Smaldone

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Nursing Home ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Nursing Home Residents ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Meta Analyses

Effects of antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) interventions to optimize antibiotic use for infections in nursing home (NH) residents remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess ASPs in NHs and their effects on antibiotic use, multi-drug-resistant organisms, antibiotic prescribing practices, and resident mortality. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using five databases (1988–2020). Nineteen articles were included, 10 met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased following ASP intervention in eight studies with a pooled decrease of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [4.7, 23.0]; Cochran’s Q = 166,837.8, p < .001, I2 = 99.9%) across studies. Decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use was highest in studies that examined antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI). Education and antibiotic stewardship algorithms for UTI were the most effective interventions. Evidence surrounding ASPs in NH is weak, with recommendations suited for UTIs.

Download Full-text

2051. Frequency of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Nursing Homes

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1731 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S691-S691

Author(s):

Chitra Kanchagar ◽

Brie N Noble ◽

Christopher Crnich ◽

Jessina C McGregor ◽

David T Bearden ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Nursing Homes ◽

Tract Infection ◽

Multidrug Resistant ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Term Care ◽

Antibiotic Overuse ◽

For Profit ◽

Memory Care ◽

Minimum Criteria

Abstract Background Antibiotics are among the most prescribed medications in nursing homes (NHs). The increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant and C. Difficile infections due to antibiotic overuse has driven the requirement for NHs to establish antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). However, estimates of the frequency of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in NHs have varied considerably between studies. We evaluated the frequency of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in a multi-state sample of NHs. Methods We utilized a retrospective, (20%) random sample of residents of 17 for-profit NHs in Oregon, California, and Nevada who received antibiotics between January 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018. Study NHs ranged in size from 50 to 188 beds and offered services including subacute care, long-term care, ventilator care, and Alzheimer’s/memory care. Data were collected from residents’ electronic medical records. Antibiotic appropriateness was defined using Loeb Minimum Criteria for initiation of antibiotics for residents with indications for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), urinary tract infection (UTI) and skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI). Residents with other types of infections were excluded from the study. Results Among 232 antibiotic prescriptions reviewed, 61% (141/232) were initiated in the NH. Of these, 65% were for female residents and 81% were for residents above the age of 65. Nearly 70% (98/141) of antibiotic prescriptions were for an indication of an LRTI, UTI, or SSTI of which 51% (57% of LRTIs, 52% of UTIs, and 35% of SSTIs) did not meet the Loeb Minimum Criteria and were determined to be inappropriate. Among antibiotics that did not meet the Loeb Minimum Criteria, more than half were cephalosporins (40%) or fluoroquinolones (14%) and the median (interquartile range) duration of therapy was 7 (5–10) days. Conclusion These data from a multi-state sample of NHs suggest the continued need for improvement in antibiotic prescribing practices and the importance of ASPs in NHs. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

Development of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Using a Model of Actionable Feedback

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1155/2012/150367 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 2012 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Sameer J. Patel ◽

Lisa Saiman ◽

Jennifer M. Duchon ◽

David Evans ◽

Yu-hui Ferng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Nurse Practitioners ◽

Neonatal Intensive Care ◽

Laboratory Data ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Shared Responsibility ◽

Individual Responsibility ◽

Audit And Feedback ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Data Elements

We describe the development of an audit and feedback intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using a theoretical framework. Participants included attending physicians, neonatal fellows, pediatric residents, and nurse practitioners. The intervention was based on the “model of actionable feedback” which emphasizes that feedback should be timely, individualized, nonpunitive, and customized to be effective. We found that real-time feedback could not be provided for the parameters established in this study, as we had to collect and analyze numerous data elements to assess appropriate initiation and continuation of antibiotics and required longer intervals to examine trends in antibiotic use. We learned during focus groups that NICU clinicians strongly resisted assigning individual responsibility for antibiotic prescribing as they viewed this as a shared responsibility informed by each patient's laboratory data and clinical course. We were able to create a non-punitive atmosphere thanks to written informed consent from NICU attendings and assurance from leadership that prescribing practices would not be used to assess job performance. We provided customized, meaningful feedback integrating input from the participants. Adapting the principles of the “model of actionable feedback” to provide feedback for antimicrobial prescribing practices proved challenging in the NICU setting.

Download Full-text

Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in New York City: A model for collaboration

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2018.227 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 39 (11) ◽

pp. 1360-1366 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Joan Guzik ◽

Gopi Patel ◽

Pooja Kothari ◽

Misha Sharp ◽

Belinda Ostrowsky ◽

...

Keyword(s):

New York ◽

New York City ◽

Collaborative Learning ◽

York City ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Respiratory Infections ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Acute Respiratory Infections ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

The Status

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the status of antibiotic prescribing in the ambulatory setting for adult patients with acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and to identify opportunities and barriers for outpatient antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs).DesignMixed methods including point prevalence using chart reviews, surveys, and collaborative learning.SettingHospital-owned clinics in the New York City area.Participants/PatientsIn total, 31 hospital-owned clinics from 9 hospitals and health systems participated in the study to assess ARI prescribing practices for patients >18 years old.InterventionsEach clinic performed a survey of current stewardship practices, retrospective chart reviews of prescribing in 30 randomly selected ARI patients from October 2015 to March 2016, and surveys of provider characteristics and knowledge. Clinics participated in collaborative learning with peers and experts in antibiotic stewardship and collected data from June 2016 to August 2016. Sites received data reports by individual clinic, aggregated by hospital, and were compared among participating clinics.ResultsFew sites had outpatient stewardship activities. The retrospective review of 1,004 ARI patients revealed that 37.3% of ARI patients received antibiotics, with significant variation in prescribing practices among sites (17.4%–71.0%; P<.001). Macrolides were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. Most of the 302 respondents recognized the need for tools to assist in prescribing.ConclusionsThis collaborative study establishes a baseline assessment of the status of outpatient ASPs in New York City. It provides hospitals, health systems, and individual clinics with specific data to inform their development of stewardship interventions targeting ARIs.

Download Full-text

Adaptation of the WHO Essential Medicines List for national antibiotic stewardship policy in England: being AWaRe

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy ◽

10.1093/jac/dkz321 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 74 (11) ◽

pp. 3384-3389 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Emma Budd ◽

Emma Cramp ◽

Mike Sharland ◽

Kieran Hand ◽

Philip Howard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Expert Elicitation ◽

Essential Medicines ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Appropriate Use ◽

Specific Index ◽

High Level ◽

Global Strategies ◽

Improve Access

Abstract Objectives Appropriate use of and access to antimicrobials are key priorities of global strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The WHO recently classified key antibiotics into three categories (AWaRe) to improve access (Access), monitor important antibiotics (Watch) and preserve effectiveness of ‘last resort’ antibiotics (Reserve). This classification was assessed for antibiotic stewardship and quality improvement in English hospitals. Methods Using an expert elicitation exercise, antibiotics used in England but not included in the WHO AWaRe index were added to an appropriate category following a workshop consensus exercise with national experts. The methodology was tested using national antibiotic prescribing data and presented by primary and secondary care. Results In 2016, 46/108 antibiotics included within the WHO AWaRe index were routinely used in England and an additional 25 antibiotics also commonly used in England were not included in the WHO AWaRe index. WHO AWaRe-excluded and -included antibiotics were reviewed and reclassified according to the England-adapted AWaRE index with the justification by experts for each addition or alteration. Applying the England-adapted AWaRe index, Access antibiotics accounted for the majority (60.9%) of prescribing, followed by Watch (37.9%) and Reserve (0.8%); 0.4% of antibiotics remained unclassified. There was unexplained 2-fold variation in prescribing between hospitals within each AWaRe category, highlighting the potential for quality improvement. Conclusions We have adapted the WHO AWaRe index to create a specific index for England. The AWaRe index provides high-level understanding of antibiotic prescribing. Subsequent to this process the England AWaRe index is now embedded into national antibiotic stewardship policy and incentivized quality improvement schemes.

Download Full-text

Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Among United States Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofw168 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 3 (3) ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Guillermo V. Sanchez ◽

Adam L. Hersh ◽

Daniel J. Shapiro ◽

James F. Cawley ◽

Lauri A. Hicks

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Respiratory Infection ◽

Nurse Practitioners ◽

Nurse Practitioner ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Acute Respiratory Infection ◽

Physician Assistant ◽

Physician Assistants ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing

Abstract We examined US nurse practitioner (NP) and physician assistant (PA) outpatient antibiotic prescribing. Antibiotics were more frequently prescribed during visits involving NP/PA visits compared with physician-only visits, including overall visits (17% vs 12%, P < .0001) and acute respiratory infection visits (61% vs 54%, P < .001). Antibiotic stewardship interventions should target NPs and PAs.

Download Full-text

Outpatient antifungal prescribing patterns in the United States, 2018

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ash.2021.201 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Kaitlin Benedict ◽

Sharon V. Tsay ◽

Monina G. Bartoces ◽

Snigdha Vallabhaneni ◽

Brendan R. Jackson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Nurse Practitioners ◽

The United States ◽

Antifungal Drugs ◽

Prescribing Patterns ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

The South ◽

Antifungal Stewardship ◽

Prescription Rates

Abstract Background: Widespread inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is a major driver of resistance. Little is known about antifungal prescribing practices in the United States, which is concerning given emerging resistance in fungi, particularly to azole antifungal agents. Objective: We analyzed outpatient antifungal prescribing data in the United States to inform stewardship efforts. Design: Descriptive analysis of outpatient antifungal prescriptions dispensed during 2018 in the IQVIA Xponent database. Methods: Prescriptions were summarized by drug, sex, age, geography, and healthcare provider specialty. Census denominators were used to calculate prescribing rates among demographic groups. Results: Healthcare providers prescribed 22.4 million antifungal courses in 2018 (68 prescriptions per 1,000 persons). Fluconazole was the most commonly prescribed drug (75%), followed by terbinafine (11%) and nystatin (10%). Prescription rates were higher among females versus males (110 vs 25 per 1,000 population) and adults versus children (82 vs 27 per 1,000 population). Prescription rates were highest in the South (81 per 1,000 population) and lowest in the West (48 per 1,000 population). Nurse practitioners and family practitioners prescribed the most antifungals (43% of all prescriptions), but the highest prescribing rates were among obstetrician-gynecologists (84 per provider). Conclusions: Prescribing antifungal drugs in the outpatient setting is common, with enough courses dispensed for 1 in every 15 US residents in 2018. Fluconazole use patterns suggest vulvovaginal candidiasis as a common indication. Regional prescribing differences could reflect inappropriate use or variations in disease burden. Further study of higher antifungal use in the South could help target antifungal stewardship practices.

Download Full-text

To Study the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Large Tertiary Care Teaching Center

International Journal of Research Foundation of Hospital and Health Care Administration ◽

10.5005/jp-journals-10035-1031 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 13-24

Author(s):

YK Gupta ◽

Shakti Kumar Gupta ◽

Madhav Madhusudan Singh ◽

DK Sharma ◽

Aarti Kapil

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Resistance ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Care Teaching ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Large Tertiary Care

ABSTRACT Introduction As antimicrobial resistance continues to increase and new antimicrobial development stagnates, antimicrobial stewardship programs are being implemented worldwide. The goal of antimicrobial stewardship is to optimize antimicrobial therapy with maximal impact on subsequent development of resistance. Thirty to fifty percent of hospitalized patients receive antimicrobial therapy. Previous data suggest that inappropriate use results in higher mortality rates, longer lengths of stay, and increased medical costs. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) reduce the improper use of antimicrobials and improve patient safety. Despite increased awareness about the benefits of these programs, few medical and surgical ASPs exist and fewer comprehensive studies evaluate their effects. Aim To study the antimicrobial stewardship program in a large tertiary care teaching center. Objectives • To study the antibiotic prescribing practices in a tertiary care government hospital • To compare the antibiotic prescribing practices with the standard guidelines available with the hospital • To make recommendation if any for rational use of antibiotics. Materials and methods • Review of literature • Prospective study of 15 days in selected general medicine and general surgery ward in which 5 to 6 reading will be taken in to know the antibiotic prescribed to patients. • Retrospective study of 15 days for study of patient records to know the antibiotic prescribed to patients. • Interaction with faculty and senior residents of general medicine and surgery to know about the pattern of infection and antibiotic prescription. • Interaction with microbiology department and their faculty to know the microbial resistance pattern and possible suggestion which need to be incorporated in antibiotic Stewardship program. Results The present study on antibiotic prescribing practices was undertaken in a super specialty hospital at New Delhi. A sample size of 100 case records was considered. There is no such stewardship program in tertiary care hospital, although it was demanded in various forum and meetings. There are no recommendations available either for patients of renal failure or other such compromised metabolic or immune states in the form of written antibiotic stewardship program of the hospital. The appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed in the case records was examined in light of the antibiotic stewardship program of the hospital. It was found that the overall adherence to antibiotic stewardship program was nil as no existing antibiotic stewardship program is exiting in this hospital. Gautum Dey in a study conducted at this hospital in New Delhi found that in 40.7% preoperative cases and 60.3% postoperative cases two or more than two antibiotics were given. The author has also commented that there was no evidence of adhering to antibiotic stewardship program or utilising culture and sensitivity reports to guide the therapy. The data obtained from the present study on further analysis has shown that in seven cases, the antibiotics prescribed were inadequate in terms of dose and duration. Thus resulting in an apparently lower cost of treatment than what was recommended by the antibiotic stewardship program of the hospital. Although such inappropriate prescription results in increased chances of antibiotic resistance, the immediate or short-term effects are not very conclusive. It is observed that there were 26 (26%) cases in medical and 12 (12%) cases in surgery disciplines in which the initial and final diagnosis was different. Uncertainty about the final diagnosis promotes empirical prescribing practices. Conclusion Antimicrobial stewards are a prominent part of local and national efforts to contain and reverse antimicrobial resistance. A range of intervention options is available with varying levels of resources and can yield substantial improvements in morbidity, mortality, quality of care, and cost. The cost of delivering such programs is dwarfed by the benefits and provides an opportunity for hospital epidemiologists to garner support. This suggests that antimicrobial management programs belong to the rarefied group of truly cost saving quality improvement initiatives. Considering the enormous implications of antibiotic resistance, it is necessary that we act in haste, lest our wonder drugs and magic bullets become ineffectual. Future systems promise greater integration and analysis of data, facilitated delivery of information to the clinician, and rapid and expert decision support that will optimize patient outcomes while minimizing antimicrobial resistance. They may also offer our best hope for avoiding an ‘Antibiotic armageddon’. In addition, the ASP plays an integral role in providing guidance to clinicians and ensures that the appropriate antimicrobial agents are used. How to cite this article Singh MM, Gupta SK, Gupta YK, Sharma DK, Kapil A. To Study the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Large Tertiary Care Teaching Center. Int J Res Foundation Hosp Healthc Adm 2015;3(1):13-24.

Download Full-text

Interrupted Time-Series Analysis to Evaluate the Impact of a Behavioral Change Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ash.2021.28 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

pp. s15-s16

Author(s):

Brittany Morgan ◽

Larissa May ◽

Haylee Bettencourt

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Respiratory Infections ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

The United States ◽

Quality Improvement Intervention ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

The Impact ◽

Improvement Intervention ◽

Inappropriate Prescriptions

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that outpatient settings account for 85%–90% of antibiotic prescriptions in the United States, and ~30% of those prescriptions are unnecessary. One of the most common examples of inappropriate prescribing is for viral upper respiratory infections (URIs). Up to 50% of prescriptions written for URIs are deemed inappropriate, making it an important focus for Antibiotic Stewardship programs. In this study, we evaluated the effect of a behaviorally enhanced quality improvement intervention in reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral URIs. Methods: A quasi-experimental study assessed the effects of an Antibiotic Stewardship intervention on antibiotic prescribing for viral URIs. The outcome of interest was a change in the number of antibiotics prescribed at each participating clinic over a 1-year preimplementation period and a 2-year postimplementation period. Time trends were analyzed using segmented regression analysis, and a stepped wedge design was used to account for intervention roll-out across clinics. Results: From 2017 to 2020, there were 63,028 patient visits in 21 clinic locations. Antibiotics were prescribed an average of 11.5% and 5.8% of visits during the pre- and postimplementation periods, respectively. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic over the study period was azithromycin (n = 3,551), followed by amoxicillin (n = 924). Overall, the intervention was associated with a 46% reduction in antibiotic prescriptions or 0.54 times (P = .001) as many inappropriate antibiotics prescribed as before the intervention. There was no significant change in the month-to-month trend in inappropriate prescriptions after the intervention was implemented (P = .87). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that a behaviorally enhanced quality improvement intervention to reduce inappropriate prescribing for URI in ambulatory care encounters was successful in reducing potentially inappropriate prescriptions for presumed viral respiratory infections.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Download Full-text

Managing antibiotics wisely: a quality improvement programme in a tertiary neonatal unit in the UK

BMJ Open Quality ◽

10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000285 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. e000285 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Vasiliki Makri ◽

Gemma Davies ◽

Stephanie Cannell ◽

Katherine Willson ◽

Lucy Winterson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patient Safety ◽

Quality Improvement ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Neonatal Unit ◽

Antibiotic Overuse ◽

Quality Improvement Programme ◽

Sustained Reduction ◽

Improvement Programme ◽

The Uk

Microbial resistance to antibiotics is a serious global health problem compounded by antibiotic overuse and limited investment in new antibiotic research. Inappropriate perinatal antibiotic exposure is increasingly linked to lifelong adverse outcomes through its impact on the developing microbiome. Antibiotic stewardship may be the only effective preventative strategy currently available. As the first tertiary neonatal unit in the UK to collaborate in an international quality improvement programme (QIP) with Vermont Oxford Network (VON), we present the results of our antibiotic stewardship initiative.The QIP was officially launched in January 2016 and aimed to reduce antibiotic usage rate (AUR) by 20% of baseline by 31st December 2016 without compromising patient safety. A multidisciplinary team of professionals and parent representatives shared good practices and improvement strategies through international webinars and local meetings, devised uniform data collection methodology and implemented a number of carefully selected ‘Plan–Do–Study–Act’ cycles. Run charts were used to present data and, where appropriate, statistical analysis undertaken to compare outcomes.The QIP resulted in a sustained reduction in AUR from a baseline median of 347 to 198 per 1000 patient-days (a reduction of 43%). The proportion of culture-negative sepsis screens where antibiotics were stopped within 36–48 hours increased consistently from a baseline of 32.5% to 91%. The antibiotic days per patient at discharge reduced from a median of 3 to 2 days, and there was a reduction in practice variation. Our annual mortality and necrotising enterocolitis rates for the VON cohort (<30 weeks or <1500 g) were the best ever recorded, 5.5% and 1.4%, respectively. Audits confirmed a high level of staff and family awareness of the QIP.The QIP achieved a sustained reduction in antibiotic use without compromising patient safety. Our challenge is to sustain this improvement safely.

Download Full-text