scholarly journals Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Intravenous (IV) Brincidofovir (BCV) in Healthy Adult Subjects

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S311-S311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Wire ◽  
Marion Morrison ◽  
Maggie Anderson ◽  
Thangam Arumugham ◽  
John Dunn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Compartmental Analysis ◽  
Repeat Dose ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Dose Administration ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Male Subjects ◽  
Support Evaluation

Abstract Background BCV is a lipid conjugate nucleotide that has shown rapid viral clearance in patients with adenovirus infection and improved survival in animal models of smallpox. In preclinical studies in rats, IV BCV dosed twice weekly for up to 29 days was not associated with gastrointestinal (GI), hematopoietic, hepatic, or renal toxicity. This study evaluated the safety and PK of IV BCV in healthy subjects. Methods In this double-blind study, subjects were randomized 3:1 to receive IV BCV or placebo in sequential single ascending dose cohorts (Table 1). Plasma PK samples were collected over 7 days and assayed by HPLC-MS. Plasma BCV PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis and dose proportionality was assessed. Safety assessments were collected over 14 days. Results Forty healthy male subjects (18–46 years, 83% White) were enrolled and completed the study. Plasma BCV Cmax and AUC∞ increased in proportion to dose (Table 1). AEs and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were dose- and infusion duration-related (Table 1). GI AEs were mild. All AEs and ALT elevations were transient and no serious AEs occurred. Conclusion Single doses of BCV 10–50 mg administered as a 2h IV infusion were well tolerated and not associated with significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. BCV IV 10 mg and BCV IV 50 mg achieved geometric mean plasma BCV AUC∞ similar to and 4.5-fold, respectively, values achieved with BCV oral 100 mg tablets (Cmax = 251 ng/mL and AUC∞ = 1394 ng hours/mL). These data support evaluation of repeat dose administration in healthy subjects and virally-infected patients. Disclosures M. B. Wire, Chimerix: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. M. Morrison, Chimerix: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.M. Anderson, Chimerix: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. T. Arumugham, Chimerix: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. J. Dunn, Chimerix: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. O. Naderer, Chimerix: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.

scholarly journals Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics and Safety following Administration of Escalating Doses Once Daily to Healthy Subjects

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1318-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry H. Dvorchik ◽  
David Brazier ◽  
Michael F. DeBruin ◽  
Robert D. Arbeit
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Lipopeptide Antibiotic ◽  
To Receive

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to establish the pharmacokinetics and safety of escalating, once-daily doses of daptomycin, a novel lipopeptide antibiotic active against gram-positive pathogens, including those resistant to methicillin and vancomycin. This phase 1, multiple-dose, double-blind study involved 24 healthy subjects in three dose cohorts (4, 6, and 8 mg/kg of body weight) who were randomized to receive daptomycin or the control at a 3:1 ratio and administered the study medication by a 30-min intravenous infusion every 24 h for 7 to 14 days. Daptomycin pharmacokinetics was assessed by blood and urine sampling. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters. Daptomycin pharmacokinetics was linear through 6 mg/kg, with a slight (∼20%) nonlinearity in the area under the curve and trough concentration at the highest dose studied (8 mg/kg). The pharmacokinetic parameters measured on the median day of the study period, (day 7) were half-life (∼9 h), volume of distribution (∼0.1 liters/kg), systemic clearance (∼8.2 ml/h/kg), and percentage of the drug excreted intact in urine from 0 to 24 h (∼54%). Daptomycin protein binding (mean amount bound, 91.7%) was independent of the drug concentration. No gender effect was observed. All subjects who received daptomycin completed the study. The frequencies and distributions of treatment-emergent AEs were similar for the subjects who received daptomycin and the control subjects. There were no serious AEs and no pattern of dose-related events. The pharmacokinetics of once-daily administration of daptomycin was linear through 6 mg/kg. For all three doses, plasma daptomycin concentrations were consistent and predictable throughout the dosing interval. Daptomycin was well tolerated when it was administered once daily at a dose as high as 8 mg/kg for 14 days.

Synthetic Food Colors and Hyperactivity in Children: A Double-Blind Challenge Experiment

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 975-983
Author(s):  
J. Preston Harley ◽  
Charles G. Matthews ◽  
Peter Eichman
Keyword(s):  
Classroom Behavior ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Neuropsychological Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Comparable Data ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Multiple Trials ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Male Subjects ◽  
Comparison Measures

Nine hyperactive male subjects, selected on the basis of showing a favorable "response" to the Feingold diet in an earlier study, were maintained on a strict elimination (Feingold) diet for 11 weeks, and were given multiple trials of placebo and challenge food materials. Parental and teacher ratings, classroom behavior observations, and neuropsychological test scores obtained during baseline, placebo, and challenge conditions, in general, were not found to be adversely affected by the artificial color challenge materials. As expected, comparable data gathered on a matched control group showed them to receive substantially better ratings than the hyperactive subjects on the majority of the comparison measures employed. Possible explanations for the discrepancy between the dramatic clinical-anecdotal reports that have been given and the much more equivocal findings from format experimental projects are presented.

Abstract 455: Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Drug-drug Interaction between LCZ696 and Hydrochlorothiazide

Hypertension ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiu-Ling Hsiao ◽  
Michael Greeley ◽  
Parasar Pal ◽  
Thomas Langenickel ◽  
Gangadhar Sunkara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Compartmental Analysis ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Objective: LCZ696 is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) being developed for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and heart failure. Ingestion of LCZ696 results in systemic exposure to AHU377 (inactive prodrug of LBQ657, a neprilysin inhibitor) and valsartan (angiotensin receptor blocker). Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is indicated as first line treatment of hypertension. Since LCZ696 and HCTZ may be co-administered for optimal blood pressure control, this study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction potential between LCZ696 and HCTZ. Methods: An open-label, three-period, single sequence study in 27 healthy subjects was conducted. In Period 1, subjects received oral HCTZ 25 mg qd x 4 days and were discharged for a 4-10 day washout. In Period 2, subjects received LCZ696 400 mg qd x 5 days, and in Period 3, HCTZ 25 mg qd + LCZ696 400 mg qd x 4 days. Serial PK samples were collected and analyzed by a validated LC-MS/MS method. PK parameters (AUCtau,ss,Cmax,ss) of LCZ696 analytes (LBQ657, valsartan) and HCTZ in plasma were determined using non-compartmental analysis, and the results were statisticallyevaluated. Results: The 90% CIs confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratio for AUCtau,ss of HCTZ fell within the ( 0.8 - 1.25) range, while those of Cmax,ss (0.74, 0.70-0.78) fell outside the range, indicating Cmax,ss of HCTZ decreased by 26% when co-administered with LCZ696. Those for AUCtau,ss of LBQ657 fell within the range but the upper bound for Cmax,ss (1.19, 1.10-1.28) was outside the range, indicating Cmax of LBQ657 increased by 19%; the upper bound for valsartan exposures(AUCtau,ss: 1.14, 1.00-1.29; Cmax,ss: 1.16, 0.98-1.37) were above the range, indicating AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of valsartan increased by 14%and 16%, respectively. Conclusion: When LCZ696 400mg qd and HCTZ 25mg qd were co- administered, AUCtau,ss of HCTZ was unchanged but Cmax,ss decreased by 26%; AUCtau,ss of LBQ657 was unchanged but Cmax,ss increased by 19%; and lastly, AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of valsartan increased by 14%and 16%, respectively. LCZ696 400 mg qd was safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects when administered alone and in combination with HCTZ 25 mg qd.

Duloxetine augmentation in resistant obsessive compulsive disorder: Surveying a new medication for challenges in treatment of OCD

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S415-S415
Author(s):  
A. Mowla
Keyword(s):  
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
To Receive

IntroductionUp to 50% of patients with OCD have failed to respond in SSRI trials, so looking for pharmacological alternatives in treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) seems necessary.ObjectivesSurveying duloxetine augmentation in treatment of resistant OCD.AimsStudy the effects of serotonin-norepinephrine enhancers for treatment of OCD.MethodsThis augmentation trial was designed as an 8-week randomized controlled, double blind study. Forty-six patients suffering from OCD who had failed to respond to at least 12 weeks of treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (fluoxetine, citalopram or fluvoxamine) were randomly allocated to receive duloxetine or sertraline plus their current anti OCD treatment. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) was the primary outcome measure.ResultsForty-six patients (24 of 30 in duloxetine group and 22 of 27 in sertraline group) completed the trial. Both groups showed improvement over the 8-week study period (mean Y-BOCS total score at week 8 as compared with baseline: P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) without significant difference (P = 0.861). Those receiving duloxetine plus their initial medications experienced a mean decrease of 33.0% in Y-BOCS score and the patients with sertraline added to their initial medication experienced a mean decrease of 34.5% in Y-BOCS.ConclusionsOur double blind controlled clinical trial showed duloxetine to be as effective as sertraline in reducing obsessive and compulsive symptoms in resistant OCD patients. However, it needs to be noted that our study is preliminary and larger double blind placebo controlled studies are necessary to confirm the results.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Intravenous chlorpromazine in the acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache: a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study

2002 ◽  
Vol 60 (3A) ◽  
pp. 537-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Eduardo Bigal ◽  
Carlos Alberto Bordini ◽  
José Geraldo Speciali
Keyword(s):  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Emergency Rooms ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Therapeutic Gain ◽  
Type Headache ◽  
To Receive

Acute headache is a very frequent symptom, responsible for a significant percentage of caseload at primary care units and emergency rooms. Chlorpromazine is easily available in such settings. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy of chlorpromazine on the acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache. We randomized 30 patients to receive placebo (10 ml of saline intravenous injections) and 30 patients to receive 0.1 mg/Kg chlorpromazine intravenously. We used 7 parameters of analgesic evaluation. Patients receiving chlorpromazine showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) of pain compared to placebo, far up to 30 minutes after the drug administration. The therapeutic gain was 36.7% in 30 minutes and 56.6 % in 60 minutes. The number needed to treat (NNT, the reciprocal or the therapeutic gain) was 2.7 in 30 minutes and 1.8 in 60 minutes. There were reductions in the recurrence and in the use of rescue medication in the chlorpromazine group. We can conclude that intravenous chlorpromazine is an effective drug to relief the pain in tension-type headache.

Bombesin Reduces Food Intake after a Preload in Man by a Cholecystokinin-Independent Mechanism

1993 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Lieverse ◽  
J. B. M. J. Jansen ◽  
A. A. M. Masclee ◽  
C. B. H. W. Lamers
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Saline Infusion ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cholecystokinin Receptor ◽  
Independent Mechanism

1. A double-blind study was undertaken to determine whether the infusion of bombesin inhibits the intake of a carbohydrate-rich meal, consumed 15 min after a 300 ml banana shake, in nine lean healthy subjects and whether the possible inhibition of food intake by bombesin is mediated by cholecystokinin. 2. The amount of food eaten during infusion of bombesin (267 ±60 g) and bombesin combined with the cholecystokinin-receptor antagonist loxiglumide (269±39g) was slightly (P = 0.09) less than during saline infusion (384 ± 40 g). In addition, preprandial feelings of hunger were significantly less during infusion of both bombesin and bombesin combined with loxiglumide. 3. In conclusion, infusion of bombesin tends to inhibit the intake of a carbohydrate-rich meal after a preload by a cholecystokinin-independent mechanism.

A double-blind study of MPV-2213ad, a novel aromatase inhibitor, in healthy male subjects

1999 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Ahokoski ◽  
K. Irjala ◽  
S. Huhtala ◽  
E. Salminen ◽  
H. Scheinin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aromatase Inhibitor ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Healthy Male ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Male Subjects

A Parallel-Group Comparison of Astemizole and Loratadine for the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Al-Muhaimeed
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Runny Nose ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
The Mean ◽  
To Receive

The efficacy and safety of the two antihistamines, astemizole and loratadine, were compared in a double-blind study of 84 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Patients were randomized to receive orally either astemizole 10 mg once daily ( n = 40) or loratadine 10 mg once daily ( n = 44) for 1 week. No other antirhinitis medication was allowed during the study. By day 7 the mean daily symptom scores, recorded on diary cards, were lower in patients receiving astemizole than in those receiving loratadine for runny nose, itchy nose and sneezing, although not for blocked nose, and treatment differences only reached statistical significance for runny nose. After 7 days, 53.75% of patients on astemizole and 38.6% on loratadine were free of symptoms, and 87% of patients on astemizole described the treatment as good or excellent compared with 62% on loratadine. The present results suggest that astemizole may be more effective than loratadine in controlling symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis.

A Multiple-Dose, Double-Blind Comparison of Intramuscularly and Orally Administered Ketorolac Tromethamine and Ketogan® in Patients with Pain following Orthopaedic Surgery

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
P H Gebuhr ◽  
M Soelberg ◽  
W Strauss
Keyword(s):  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Multiple Dose ◽  
Fixed Time ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intramuscular Dose ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Oral Doses ◽  
To Receive

In this multiple-dose, double-blind study 100 patients with moderate, severe or very severe pain following orthopaedic surgery were randomly assigned to receive ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with potent analgesic properties (10 mg), or the standard regimen of Ketogan® (a combination product containing the narcotic analgesic, ketobemidone, plus a spasmolytic agent) by intramuscular injection every 1 – 6 h as needed for pain. When patients were able to tolerate an oral diet and were expected to respond to oral analgesic medication, based on overall pain sensitivity, they were switched to oral doses of the same medication every 4 – 6 h as needed. A maximum of four daily doses of medication was allowed for up to 10 days. The severity of pain was scored on a five-point scale and was recorded before the first intramuscular dose, at fixed time points therafter for up to 6 h and at the end of each day. Both treatments were effective immediately after the first dose and during the subsequent multiple-dose phase. There were no statistically significant differences between ketorolac and Ketogan®. The results show that 10-mg doses of ketorolac in intramuscular injections followed by 10-mg doses of oral ketorolac are as effective as Ketogan® for the treatment of pain following orthopaedic surgery. Ketorolac appears to be better tolerated than Ketogan® since significantly fewer patients reported adverse events ( P = 0.004) when taking ketorolac.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document