scholarly journals 1275. Will an App-Optimized HIV Self-testing Strategy Work for South Africans? Results From a Large Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S388-S388
Author(s):  
Nitika Pant Pai ◽  
Ali Esmail ◽  
Gayatri Marathe ◽  
Suzette Oelofse ◽  
Marietjie Pretorius ◽  
...  

Abstract Background HIV self-testing (HIVST) offers a potential for expanded test access; challenges remain in operationalizing rapid personalized linkages and referrals to care. We investigated if an app-optimized personalized HIVST strategy improved referrals, detected new infections and expedited linkages to care and treatment. Methods In an ongoing cohort study (n = 2,000) based in South Africa, from November 2016 to January 2018, to participants presenting to self-test at community township based clinics, we offered a choice of the following strategies: (a) unsupervised HIVST; (b) supervised HIVST. We also observed participants opting for conventional HIV testing (ConvHT) in geographically separated clinics. We observed outcomes (i.e., linkage initiation, referrals, disease detection) and compared it between the two (HIVST vs. ConvHT) for the same duration. Results Of 2,000 participants, 1,000 participants were on HIVST, 599 (59.9%) chose unsupervised HIVST, 401 (40.1%) on supervised HIVST; compared with 1,000 participants on ConvHT. Participants in HIVST vs. ConvHT were comparable young (mean age 27.7 [SD = 9.0] vs. 29.5 [SD = 8.4]); female (64.0% vs. 74.7%); poor monthly income <3,000 RAND ($253 USD) (79.9% vs. 76.4%). With HIV ST (vs. ConvHT), many more referrals (17.4% [15.1–19.9] vs. 2.6% [1.7–3.8]; RR 6.69 [95% CI: 4.47–10.01]), and many new infections (86 (8.6% (6.9–10.5)) vs. 57 (5.7% (4.3–7.3)); Odds Ratio 1.55 [95% CI 1.1–2.2]) were noted. Break up: 45 infections in supervised HIVST 45 (52.3%); 41 infections in unsupervised HIVST (47.6%)]. Preference for HIVST was at 91.6%. With an app-optimized HIVST strategy, linkages to care were operationalized within a day in all participants (99.7% (HIVST) vs. 99.2% (ConvHT); RR 1.005 [95% CI: 0.99–1.01]); 99.8% supervised HIVST, 99.7% unsupervised HIVST. Conclusion Our app-optimized HIVST strategy successfully increased test referrals, detected new infections, and operationalized linkages within a day. This innovative, patient preferred strategy holds promise for a global scale up in digitally literate populations worldwide. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky Janssen ◽  
Nora Engel ◽  
Aliasgar Esmail ◽  
Suzette Oelofse ◽  
Megan Smallwood ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine E Oldenburg ◽  
Katie B Biello ◽  
Amaya G Perez-Brumer ◽  
Joshua Rosenberger ◽  
David S Novak ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to characterize HIV testing practices among men who have sex with men in Mexico and intention to use HIV self-testing. In 2012, members of one of the largest social/sexual networking websites for men who have sex with men in Latin America completed an anonymous online survey. This analysis was restricted to HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men residing in Mexico. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to assess factors associated with HIV testing and intention to use a HIV self-test. Of 4537 respondents, 70.9% reported ever having a HIV test, of whom 75.5% reported testing at least yearly. The majority (94.3%) indicated that they would use a HIV home self-test if it were available. Participants identifying as bisexual less often reported ever HIV testing compared to those identifying as gay/homosexual (adjusted odds ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.44–0.62). Having a physical exam in the past year was associated with increased ever HIV testing (adjusted odds ratio = 4.35, 95% confidence interval: 3.73–5.07), but associated with decreased interest in HIV self-testing (adjusted odds ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.48–0.89). The high intention to use HIV home self-testing supports the use of this method as an acceptable alternative to clinic- or hospital-based HIV testing.


Author(s):  
Patrick O’Byrne ◽  
Alexandra Musten ◽  
Lauren Orser ◽  
Gauri Inamdar ◽  
Marie-Odile Grayson ◽  
...  

Abstract Setting In March 2020, COVID-19 shuttered access to many healthcare settings offering HIV testing and there is no licensed HIV self-test in Canada. Intervention A team of nurses at the University of Ottawa and Ottawa Public Health and staff from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN) obtained Health Canada’s Special Access approval on April 23, 2020 to distribute bioLytical’s INSTI HIV self-test in Ottawa; we received REB approval on May 15, 2020. As of July 20, 2020, eligible participants (≥18 years old, HIV-negative, not on PrEP, not in an HIV vaccine trial, living in Ottawa, no bleeding disorders) could register via www.GetaKit.ca to order kits. Outcomes In the first 6 weeks, 637 persons completed our eligibility screener; 43.3% (n = 276) were eligible. Of eligible participants, 203 completed a baseline survey and 182 ordered a test. These 203 participants were an average of 31 years old, 72.3% were white, 60.4% were cis-male, and 55% self-identified as gay. Seventy-one percent (n = 144) belonged to a priority group for HIV testing. We have results for 70.9% (n = 129/182) of participants who ordered a kit: none were positive, 104 were negative, 22 were invalid, and 2 “preferred not to say”; 1 participant reported an unreadiness to test. Implications Our results show that HIV self-testing is a pandemic-friendly strategy to help ensure access to sexual health services among persons who are good candidates for HIV testing. It is unsurprising that no one tested positive for HIV thus far, given the 0.08% positivity rate for HIV testing in Ottawa. As such, we advocate for scale-up of HIV self-testing in Canada.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitika Pant Pai ◽  
Megan Smallwood ◽  
Laurence Desjardins ◽  
Alexandre Goyette ◽  
Krisztian G Birkas ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Although HIV self-testing strategies have been recommended by the World Health Organization, HIV self-tests are not yet approved in Canada. Currently approved HIV self-tests offer toll-free lines that are insufficient for initiating expedited linkages to counseling and care, accurate interpretation, and support during HIV self-testing. We developed an innovative, multilingual software app called HIVSmart! to plug these gaps. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to test our app-optimized oral HIV self-testing strategy for feasibility in men who have sex with men (MSM) who presented to test at a large sexual health clinic (Clinique Médicale L’Actuel) in Montreal. METHODS Between July 2016 and February 2017, we offered a strategy consisting of the OraQuick In-Home HIV Test (an investigational device) and a tablet installed with the HIVSmart! app to study participants, who presented at a private office in the clinic, mimicking an unsupervised home environment. We evaluated the strategy for its feasibility, acceptability, and preference. Using the HIVSmart! app, participants were guided through the self-testing process. We determined feasibility with a metric defined as the completion rate, which consisted of the following 3 steps: (1) self-test conduct; (2) self-test interpretation; and (3) linkages to care. Participants independently performed, interpreted, recorded their self-test and result, engaged in pre- and posttest counseling, and sought linkages to care. Laboratory tests (p24, Western Blot, and RNA), as per country algorithms, were expedited, and linkages based on the rapid test status were arranged. RESULTS Mean age of the 451 participants enrolled was 34 (range, 18-73) years. Of all participants, 97.1% (438/451) completed and submitted the survey through the HIVSmart! app. In total, 84.7% (371/438) of the participants were well educated (beyond high school) and 52.5% (230/438) had been tested within the past 6 months. Of the 451, 11.5% (52/451) were on pre-exposure prophylaxis. Feasibility (completion rate), an average proportion of the 3 steps, was computed to be 96.6% (419/451). The acceptability of the strategy was high at 98.5% (451/458). A majority of the participants (448/451, 99.3%) were found to be self-tested and lab-confirmed negative and were counseled after self- and rapid tests. In total, 0.7% (3/451) of the participants who self-tested positive and were lab-confirmed positive were linked to a physician within the same day. Furthermore, 98.8% (417/422) of the participants found the app to be useful and 94.0% (424/451) were willing to recommend it to a friend or partner. CONCLUSIONS The HIVSmart! app-optimized strategy was feasible, accepted, and preferred by an educated, urban MSM population of Montreal. With the app, participants were able to perform, interpret, store results, and get rapidly linked to care. The HIVSmart!-optimized, self-testing strategy could be adapted and contextualized to many at-risk populations within Canada and worldwide, thereby maximizing its public health impact.


Author(s):  
Hyo Geun Choi ◽  
Jung Ho Park ◽  
Yeon Ju Choi ◽  
Yong Joon Suh

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) is a large cohort study that is available to the public. Using this large cohort study, we aimed to unravel the relationship between breast cancer development and a family history of breast cancer in Korea. Methods: This cohort study relied on data from the KoGES from 2001 through 2013. A total of 211,725 participants were screened. Of these, 129,374 women were evaluated. They were divided into two groups, including participants with and without breast cancer. A logistic regression model was used to retrospectively analyze the odds ratio of breast cancer history in families of women with and without breast cancer. Results: Of 129,374 women, 981 had breast cancer. The breast cancer group had more mothers and siblings with histories of breast cancer (p < 0.001). A history of breast cancer in the participant’s mother resulted in an odds ratio of 3.12 (1.75–5.59), and a history of breast cancer in the participant’s sibling resulted in an odds ratio of 2.63 (1.85–3.74). There was no interaction between the history of maternal breast cancer and the history of sibling breast cancer. Based on the subgroup analysis, family history was a stronger factor in premenopausal women than in menopausal and postmenopausal women. Conclusions: A family history of breast cancer is a significant risk factor for breast cancer in Korea. Premenopausal women with a maternal history of breast cancer are of particular concern. Intensive screening and risk-reducing strategies should be considered for this vulnerable subpopulation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Iruzubieta ◽  
Tatiana Fernández-Lanas ◽  
Laura Rasines ◽  
Lorena Cayon ◽  
Ana Álvarez-Cancelo ◽  
...  

AbstractThe simplicity and low cost of rapid point-of-care tests greatly facilitate large-scale population testing, which can contribute to controlling the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We evaluated the applicability of a self-testing strategy for SARS-CoV2 in a population-based, cross-sectional study in Cantabria, Spain, between April and May 2020. For the self-testing strategy, participants received the necessary material for the self-collection of blood and performance of a rapid antibody test using lateral flow immunoassay at home without the supervision of healthcare personnel. A total of 1,022 participants were enrolled. Most participants correctly performed the COVID-19 self-test the first time (91.3% [95% CI 89.4–92.9]). Only a minority of the participants (0.7%) needed the help of healthcare personnel, while 6.9% required a second kit delivery, for a total valid test result in 96.9% of the participants. Incorrect use of the self-test was not associated with the educational level, age over 65, or housing area. Prevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV2 for subjects with a valid rapid test result was 3.1% (95% CI 2.2–4.4), similar to the seroprevalence result obtained using a conventional approach carried out by healthcare professionals. In conclusion, COVID-19 self-testing should be considered as a screening tool.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S426-S426
Author(s):  
Nitika Pant Pai ◽  
Megan Smallwood ◽  
Laurence Desjardins ◽  
Alexandre Goyette ◽  
Anne-Fanny Vassal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although HIV self-tests are recommended by the WHO, they are not yet approved in Canada. Service delivery gaps such as linkages to counseling and care remain unachieved by offering self-tests without adequate support. In this first Canadian study, we evaluated the feasibility of operationalizing an innovative HIVSmart! app-optimized oral HIV self-testing strategy in men who have sex with men (MSM), presenting at a large sexual health clinic in Montreal. Methods Between July 2016 to February 2017, participants were offered the OraQuick In-Home HIV Test, and a tablet installed with the HIVSmart! app, at a private office in the clinic to simulate an unsupervised home environment. With the HIVSmart! app, participants independently performed and interpreted self-tests, and were linked to in-person post-test counseling and care. Self-test results were confirmed by laboratory tests (p24, Western Blot, RNA as needed). Results The mean age of the 451 participants was 34 years (18–73); 85% were well educated (beyond high school, n = 371/438); 53% (230/438) were frequent testers (past 6 months), and 13% were on PrEP (52/451). 99% (417/422) of participants found the HIVSmart! app helpful in guiding them through the self-testing procedure; 93% (418/451) of participants interpreted their tests accurately; and 94% (395/419) stated they would recommend the app-optimized self-testing strategy to their partners. Feasibility (completion rate of self-testing) was 93% (419/451), and acceptability of the strategy was high at 99% (451/458). All HIV self-test negative participants (448/451, 100%) were counseled following the self-test. Three participants self-tested positive, were confirmed HIV positive (0.7% prevalence), and were rapidly linked to care with a physician. Conclusion The HIVSmart! app-optimized strategy was feasible, and highly accepted by an educated, frequently testing, urban MSM population of Montréal. With the app, participants were able to interpret their test results accurately and were rapidly linked to care. Innovations like HIVSmart! which engage, aid, and facilitate linkages to care, can be adapted to suit the needs of many populations in Canada and internationally, maximizing global impact through reverse innovation. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitika Pant Pai ◽  
Madhavi Bhargava ◽  
Lawrence Joseph ◽  
Jigyasa Sharma ◽  
Sabrina Pillay ◽  
...  

Background.A convenient, private, and accessible HIV self-testing strategy stands to complement facility-based conventional testing. Over-the-counter oral HIV self-tests are approved and available in the United States, but not yet in Canada. Canadian data on self-testing is nonexistent. We investigated the feasibility of offering an unsupervised self-testing strategy to Canadian students.Methods.Between September 2011 and May 2012, we recruited 145 students from a student health clinic of a large Canadian university. Feasibility of operationalization (i.e., self-test conduct, acceptability, convenience, and willingness to pay) was evaluated. Self-test conduct was computed with agreement between the self-test performed by the student and the test repeated by a healthcare professional. Other metrics were measured on a survey.Results.Participants were young (median age: 22 years), unmarried (97%), and 47% were out of province or international students. Approximately 52% self-reported a history of unprotected casual sex and sex with multiple partners. Self-test conduct agreement was high (100%), so were acceptability (81%), convenience (99%), and willingness to pay (74%) for self-tests. Concerns included accuracy of self-tests and availability of expedited linkages.Conclusion.An unsupervised self-testing strategy was found to be feasible in Canadian students. Findings call for studies in at-risk populations to inform Canadian policy.


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tafadzwa Dzinamarira ◽  
Collins Kamanzi ◽  
Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson

Introduction: The World Health Organisation recommends HIV self-testing as an alternative testing method to help reach underserved populations, such as men in sub-Saharan Africa. Successful implementation and scale-up of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in Rwanda relies heavily on relevant stakeholders’ involvement. We sought to explore HIVST key stakeholders’ perceptions of the implementation and scale-up of HIVST in Rwanda. Method: We conducted in-depth interviews with personnel involved in HIV response projects in Rwanda between September and November 2019. We purposively sampled and interviewed 13 national-level key stakeholders from the Ministry of Health, Rwanda Biomedical Center, non-governmental organizations and HIV clinics at tertiary health facilities in Kigali. We used a thematic approach to analysis with a coding framework guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (intervention characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, characteristics of individuals involved in the implementation and the implementation process). Results: Key stakeholders perceived HIVST as a potentially effective initiative, which can be used in order to ensure that there is an improvement in uptake of testing services, especially for underserved populations in Rwanda. The following challenges for implementation and scale-up of HIVST were revealed: lack of awareness of the kits, high cost of the self-test kits, and concerns on results interpretation. Key stakeholders identified the following as prerequisites to the successful implementation and scale-up of HIVST in Rwanda; creation of awareness, training those involved in the implementation process, regulation of the selling of the self-test kits, reduction of the costs of acquiring the self-test kits through the provision of subsidies, and ensuring consistent availability of the self-test kits. Conclusions: Key stakeholders expressed confidence in HIVST’s ability to improve the uptake of HIV testing services. However, they reported challenges, which need to be addressed to ensure successful implementation and scale-up of the HIVST. There is a need for further research incorporating lower level stakeholders to fully understand HIVST implementation and scale-up challenges and strategies to inform policy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document