Flint and Fauna
The manifestly fraudulent elements in the man-ape combination called Eoanthropus dawsoni are the filed down molars and canine, the Vandyke brown staining of the latter and the iron-coloration of the jaw. Taken with the massive evidence of the complete incompatibility of jaw and cranium, those fabrications assure us of the enormity of the larger deception, the foisting of a spurious fossil human ancestor on to the world of palaeontology. The plot achieved its great success because it provided in the spurious fossil a self-consistent array of evidence and this fitted well with the presumed antiquity of the gravels of the Sussex Ouse; for that antiquity there was supporting testimony in the presence of palaeolithic tools and remains of animals of the earliest phase of the Ice Age. But now with the centre-piece proved spurious, what of its appurtenances? Since the jaw is no fossil, but a recent intrusion and a deliberate one, can we help but suspect these other objects in the gravel, impressive and persuasive as the fossil animals and implements appear on first sight? The club-like bone implement discovered in 1914 ranks next to the skull as the most remarkable of the discoveries at Piltdown. Implements of bone are well-known to have been used in the late Ice Age, for example, by men of the cave-art period. Not only is the Piltdown specimen entirely unique in its shape, but as a primitive tool, which Dawson and Woodward were confident it was, it would rank as by far the earliest ever used; in the words of the discoverers, ‘their opinion was that the working and cutting of the bone were done when it was in a comparatively fresh state’. Moreover, Woodward had identified the bone as one which in all likelihood had been obtained from the femur of a very early species of elephant. Judging from the other elephant and mastodon remains, such an animal would certainly have been in existence in the times of Piltdown man.